A Metaphor Analysis of Elementary Student Teachers’ Conceptions of Teachers in Student- and Teacher-Centered Contexts

Yıl 2015, , 281 - 300, 30.10.2015

Sibel Duru

https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.16

Öz

Problem Statement: Student teachers’ beliefs and conceptions affect not only what and how they learn in teacher education programs, but also their future professional development in their teaching careers. Examining and understanding student teachers’ beliefs and conceptions is therefore crucial to improving their professional preparation and development, as well as the effectiveness of teacher education.

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to explore elementary student teachers’ beliefs and conceptions about teaching in the contexts of student- and teacher-centered educational perspectives.

Method: This study employed qualitative research methodologies by asking 267 prospective teachers to provide a metaphor characterizing teachers. Both quantitative and qualitative data analyses were used for the study.

Findings and results: The results of analysis represented 113 metaphors made by student teachers about teachers—for example, they are gardeners. Results of descriptive analysis show that of the 267 student teachers, 227 (85.7%) had teacher-centered beliefs, 11 (4.1%) had student-centered beliefs, and 29 (10.1%) had mixed beliefs. The student teachers had no misconceptions about teacher-centeredness, meaning that all misconceptions and poorly structured beliefs were related to student-centeredness.

 Conclusions and recommendations: The study showed that the teacher-centered approach is quite common among student teachers in Turkey. As a result, teacher educators should provide various opportunities for and model student-centered approaches so that student teachers can critically examine their beliefs and realize other educational possibilities. Furthermore, most participants lacked a consistent cognitive structure about teaching, largely due to misconceptions related to guidance and active learning, which require more in-depth research. Student teachers also described teachers’ and students’ roles with stereotypical metaphors, including teachers as knowledge givers who know everything and teachers as social controllers who disseminate dominant cultural values. Acknowledging these misconceptions can allow teacher educators to better design courses, classroom discussions, and assignments to help student teachers develop new pedagogical knowledge and beliefs.

Keywords: Teacher education, student teachers’ beliefs, teaching metaphors, educational approach

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teacher education, student teachers’ beliefs, teaching metaphors, educational approach

İlkokul Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretmen Kavramına Yönelik Öğrenci Merkezli Ve Öğretmen Merkezli Eğitim Anlayışına Göre (Yanlış) Kavramsallaştırmaları

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğretmen eğitimi, öğretmen adaylarının inançları, öğretim metaforları, eğitim yaklaşımı

Kaynakça

• Akkuş, H. (2013). Pre-service secondary science teachers’ images about themselves as science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(2), 249–260.
• Britzman, D. P. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 442–456.
• Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search for understanding: The case for constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Chan, J. K. S. (1999). Student teachers’ beliefs: What have they brought to the initial
• teacher training? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED435607).
• de Leon–Carillo, C. (2007). Filipino pre-service education students’ preconceptions of teacher roles viewed through a metaphorical lens. Asia–Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 197–217.
• Draaisma, D. (2007). Bellek Metaforları [ Memory Metaphors] İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık.
• Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Duru, S. (2006). Pre-service elementary education teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning in Turkey (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
• Eisenhart, M. A., Shrum, J. L., Harding, J. R., & Cuthbert, A. M. (1988). Teacher beliefs: Definitions, findings, and directions. Educational Policy, 2(1), 51–69.
• Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.
• Fasko, D. J., & Grubb, D. J. (1997). Implications of the learner-centered psychological principles and self-assessment tools for teacher education reform. Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 160–189.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison–Wesley.
• Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 9–31), New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
• Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York, NY: McGraw–Hill.
• Greene, M. W., & Zimmerman, S. O. (2000). The effects of fifth dimension on preservice teachers beliefs. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, San Diego, CA.
• Hein, G. E. (2002). The challenge of constructivist teaching. In E. Mirochnik, & D. C. Sherman (Eds.), Passion and pedagogy: Relation, creation, and transformation in teaching (pp. 197–214). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
• Joram, E., & Gabrielle, A. (1997). Preservice teachers’ prior beliefs: Transforming obstacles into opportunities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
• Leavy, A. M., McSorley, F. & Boté, L. A. (2007). An examination of what metaphor construction reveals about the evolution of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1217–1233.
• Löfström, E., & Poom–Valickis, K. (2013). Beliefs about teaching: persistent or
• malleable? A longitudinal study of prospective teachers’ beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 104–113.
• Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., & James, T. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(2), 116–127.
• Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2008). A language teacher is like…: Examining Malaysian students’ perceptions of language teachers through metaphor analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 192–205.
• Noble, A., & Smith M. L. (1994). Old and new beliefs about measurement-driven reform: “The more things change, the more they stay the same”(ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED 378 228).
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Simon & Shuster MacMillan.
• Rokeach, M. (1968).Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
• Saban, A., Koçbekir, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). An investigation of the concept of teacher among prospective teachers through metaphor analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 509–522.
• Seung, E., Park, S., & Narayan, R. (2011). Exploring elementary preservice teachers’ beliefs about science teaching and learning as revealed in their metaphor writing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 703–714.
• Shaw, D. M., & Mahlıos, M. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ metaphors of teaching and literacy. Reading Psychology, 29, 31–60.
• Sinatra, G. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2004). Teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs, dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 483–498
• Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 762–769.
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1998). Why constructivism must be radical. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 23–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). “That’s funny, you don’t look like a teacher”: Interrogating images and identity in popular culture. London: Falmer Press.
• Zeichner, K. M., &Tabachnick, B. R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education “washed out” by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7–11