TÜM YÖNLERİYLE TEK KULLANIMLIK MEDİKAL MASKELER

Öz

Covid 19 pandemi süreciyle hayatımıza giren ve önemli bir yer tutan medikal maskeler, özellikle viral enfeksiyonlarda bulaşma riskini azaltarak, hijyenik, ucuz, ulaşılabilir, etkin bir koruma sağlarlar. Filtrasyon özelliği yüksek tek kullanımlık bu ürünler, olefin grubu içeren polimerlerden üretilmiş çok katlı nonwoven kumaşlardır. Bu çalışma medikal maskelerin, tanımı, üretiminde kullanılan maddeler, üretim metotları, kumaş özellikleri, çeşitleri, kullanım yerleri, Türkiye de ve Dünya da Pazar payları, filtrasyon test ve standartları, kullanım performansları, gibi farklı yönleriyle incelendiği kapsamlı bir derleme olup, en optimal ürün seçimi için öneriler sunmaktadır. Ayrıca yeni ve gelecekteki kullanım özelliklerine göre medikal maske üretimine perspektif sunması amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tek kullanımlık medikal maske
• üretim
• test metotları
• performans
• pazar

Kaynakça

1. (https://www.laboratuar.com/sektorel/medikal/en-149-en-14683-maske-testleri/ 11.2022)
2. 3M Personal Safety Division, 2020. Respirators and Surgical Masks: A Comparison, pp. 1–4.
3. Anfinrud, P., Stadnytskyi, V., Bax, C.E., Bax, A., 2020. Visualizing speech-generated oral fluid droplets with laser light scattering. New Engl. J. Med. 382 (21), 2061–2063. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2007800.
4. ASTM F1862/F1862M - 17 Standard Test Method for Resistance of Medical Face Masks to Penetration by Synthetic Blood (Horizontal Projection of Fixed Volume at a Known Velocity). https://www.astm.org/Standards/F1862.htm.
5. ASTM F2101 - 01 Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) of Medical Face Mask Materials, Using a Biological Aerosol of Staphylococcus aureus. https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/F2101-01.htm.
6. ASTM International, 2010. ASTM F2299/F2299M - 03(2010)-Standard Test Method for Determining the Initial Efficiency of Materials Used in Medical Face Masks to Penetration by Particulates Using Latex Spheres. https://doi.org/10.1520/F2299_ F2299M-03R10.
7. Bałazy, A., Toivola, M., Adhikari, A., Sivasubramani, S.K., Reponen, T., Grinshpun, S.A., 2006. Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks? Am. J. Infect. Control 34 (2), 51–57. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.018. Borkow, G., Zhou, S.S., Page, T., Gabbay, J., 2010. A novel anti-influenza copper oxide containing respiratory face mask. PLoS One 5 (6), e11295. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0011295.
8. C. for D. and R. Health, 2004. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Surgical Masks - Premarket Notification [510 (k)] Submissions, p. 14.

9. Chua, M.H., Cheng, W., Goh, S., Kong, J,. Li, B., Lim J. Y. C., Mao, L., Wang, S., Xue,K., Yang, L. et al. (2020). Face Masks in the New COVID-19 Normal: Materials, Testing, and Perspectives. DOI: 10.34133/2020/7286735
10. Face Masks and Coverıng Supers Crıpt For The General Public The Royal Society/ 26 JUNE 2020. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/set-c/set-c-facemasks.pdf?la=en-GB&hash=A22A87CB28F7D6AD9BD93BBCBFC2BB24
11. Farooq Azam, Faheem Ahmad, Zia Uddin, Abher Rasheed, Yasir Nawab, Ali Afzal, Sheraz Ahmad, Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Munir Ashraf, "A Review of the Fabrication Methods, Testing, and Performance of Face Masks", International Journal of Polymer Science, cilt 2022, Makale Kimliği 2161869, 20 sayfa, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2161869)
12. Han, Z.Y., Weng, W.G., Huang, Q.Y., 2013. Characterizations of particle size distribution of the droplets exhaled by sneeze. J. R. Soc. Interface 10 (88), 20130560. https:// doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0560. https://corona.cbddo.gov.tr/Home/DeathConfirmedRatio (2022)
13. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Yillik-Sanayi-Urun-(PRODCOM)-Istatistikleri-2021-45835. (Erişim Tarihi: 01.09.2022)
14. https://www.tmo.org.tr/images/editorimages/yüz%20maskeleri%20genel%20bilgilendirme.pdf (09.2022)
15. Jerry T.J. Ju, Leah N. Boisvert, Yi Y. Zuo, Face masks against COVID-19: Standards, efficacy, testing and decontamination methods,Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Volume 292, 2021,102435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102435.
16. Kellie G, Developments in composite nonwovens and related materials. Advances in Technical Nonwovens UK, Woodhead Puplishing, 2016:213-26)
17. Keskin, Y., Özyaral, O., Kuş Gribi Maskeleri/ TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 2006 /sf(2) https://docplayer.biz.tr/4048078-Kus-gribi-maskeleri-yasar-keskin-oguz-ozyaral.html 11.2022
18. Kırman, C., 2020. “Yüz Maskeleri”, TMMOB Tekstil Mühendisleri Odası Nisan 2020 (sf26)
19. Konda, A., Prakash, A., Moss, G.A., Schmoldt, M., Grant, G.D., Guha, S., 2020. Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03252.
20. Lentner, C. (Ed.), 1984. Geigy Scientific Tables, Volume 1 — Units of Measurement, Body Fluids, Composition of Blood, Hematology, Somatometric Data. Medical Education Division, Ciba-Geigy Corporation, West Caldwell, NJ, p. 413.
21. Li, M., Furlong, J.L., Yorio, P.L., Portnoff, L., 2019. A new approach to measure the resistance of fabric to liquid and viral penetration. PLoS One 14 (2), e0211827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211827.
22. Matuschek, C., Moll, F., Fangerau, H. et al. The history and value of face masks. Eur J Med Res 25, 23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00423-4
23. Midha,V., Arjun, Dr. (2017). Spun bonding Technology and Fabric Properties: a Review. Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology. 1. 10.15406/jteft.2017.01.00023.)
24. Promislow, D.E.L., A Geroscience Perspective On COVID-19 Mortality, The Journals Of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences And Medical Sciences (2020).
25. Rengasamy, S., et al., 2018. A comparison of total inward leakage measured using sodium chloride (NaCl) and corn oil aerosol methods for air-purifying respirators, 9624(May), https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2018.1479064.
26. Rengasamy, S., Shaffer, R., Williams, B., Smit, S., 2017. A comparison of facemask and respirator filtration test methods. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14 (2), 92–103. https:// doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2016.1225157.
27. Steve Zhou, S., Lukula, S., Chiossone, C., Nims, R.W., Suchmann, D.B., Ijaz, M.K., 2018. Assessment of a respiratory face mask for capturing air pollutants and pathogens including human influenza and rhinoviruses. J. Thorac. Dis. 10 (3), 2059–2069. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.03.103.
28. Strasser, B.J. and Schlich, T. “A history of the medical mask and the rise of throwaway culture”, 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):19-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31207-1.
29. Red Cross workers fold reusable masks during the influenza pandemic, Boston, MA, USA, March, 1919
30. Spooner, J.L., “History of Surgical Face Masks: The myths, the masks, and the men and women behind them”, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(08)71359-0
31. U.S. CPSC, 2011. “United States Consumer Product Safety Commission,” no. October [Online]. Available: http://www.cpsc.gov/PageFiles/125782/diop.pdf.
32. Velavan, T.P., Meyer, C.G., 2020. The COVID-19 epidemic. Trop. Med. Int. Health 25 (3), 278–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13383.
33. Yang, S., Lee, G.W.M., Chen, C.M., Wu, C.C., Yu, K.P., 2007. The size and concentration of droplets generated by coughing in human subjects. J. Aerosol Med. Depos. Clear. Eff. Lung 20 (4), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2007.0610.
34. Yeşil,Y.,Bhat,G.S. (2016), "Structure and mechanical properties of polyethylene melt blown nonwovens", International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 780-793. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-09-2015-0099