ANALYSIS OF THE HEAT PUMP PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT REFRIGERANTS IN A BUILDING WITH DETERMINED HEATING LOAD ACCORDING TO TS 825

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 402 - 414, 30.12.2020

Ahmet Erhan Akan

https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.745263

Öz

In this study, the performance of a geothermal heat pump used in heating mode with different refrigerants was theoretically analyzed. The geothermal heat pump used in the evaluations has a evaporator capacity of 12.1 kW. In addition, the performance of the geothermal heat pump was investigated by using different refrigerants at variable evaporator temperatures in the system. Thermodynamic analysis was applied to the system using the HFC refrigerant types R 134a, R 143a, R 404A, R 407A, R 407C, R 410A, R 507 and SES36 refrigerants for the determined operating conditions of the geothermal heat pump. Solway Solkane 8.0 calculation program was used in the analyses. As a result of the analyses, the lowest working loads and the highest heating effect coefficient values for the same operating conditions were obtained from the system used R 134a, R 407a, R 407C and SES36 coolant fluids, respectively. Besides, it was determined that the refrigerant giving the highest pressure ratio value is SES36.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Refrigerant, Heat pump, Performance analysis, Heatting effect

Kaynakça

• [1] Söğüt, M. Z., Bulgurcu, H., Yalçın, E. (2012). Emission Inventory Depending on Refrigerants in the Refrigeration Industry, 1st National Air Conditioning Refrigeration Education Symposium.
• [2] Yılmaz, F., Selbaş, R., Özgür, A., E., Balta, M., T. (2016 ). SOLKATERM@SES36 Performance Analysis of Refrigerant in Refrigeration Applications, SDU International Journal of Technological Science, 8(1), 10-19.
• [3] Camdali, U., Bulut, M., Sozbir, N. (2015). Numerical modeling of a ground source heat pump: The Bolu case, Renewable Energy, 83, 352-361.
• [4] D’Accadia M. D., Vanoli L. (2004). Thermoeconomic optimisation of the condenser in a vapour compression heat pump, International Journal of Refrigeration, 27(4), 433–441.
• [5] Boran, K., Menlik, T., Alpsoy, H. (2015). Experimental Investigation of Performance of R134a/R152a Refrigerant Mixture in Heat Pump, Journal of Polytechnic, 18 (4), 251-256.
• [6] Xu, X., Hwang, Y., Radermacher, R. (2013). Performance comparison of R410A and R32 in vapor injection cycles, International Journal of Refrigeration, 36(3), 892–903.
• [7] Alkan, R., Kabul, A., Kızılkan, Ö. (2014). Thermodynamıc Analysıs Of A Ground Source Heat Pump For Dıfferent Refrıgerants, Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 34(1), 27-34.
• [8] Çomaklı, K., Çomaklı, Ö., Yılmaz, M., Özyurt, Ö., Erdoğan, S., Şahin, B., Bakırcı, K. (2007). Investigation of Energy and Exergy Efficiencies in Heat Pumps Using Zeotropic Gas Mixtures, TUBITAK Research Project Final Report, Project No: 105M030, pp.161, Erzurum.
• [9] Yang, M.H., Yeh, R.H. (2015). Performance and exergy destruction analyses of optimal subcooling for vapor compression refrigeration systems, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 87, 1-10.
• [10] Ozgener, O., Hepbasli, A. (2005). Exergoeconomic analysis of a solar assisted ground source heat pump greenhouse heating system, Applied Thermal Engineering, 25, 1459–1471.
• [11] www.solway.com, accessed: 15.04.2020.
• [12] www.solkane.com, accessed: 15.04.2020.