TR
EN
Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis
Öz
This study aims to investigate the socioeconomic variables and their order of importance that have a significant effect on the dropout and graduation of higher education students. Relational survey model was used in the study. In the study, the "Students Dropout and Academic Success Dataset," was utilized. The dataset, created by the Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, consists of 4424 records. CHAID decision tree algorithm was used to analyze the data. With this method, the independent variables that demonstrate the maximum variation in the dependent variable have been identified hierarchically. It is found that, 49.93% of the students are “graduate”, 32.12% are “dropout”, and 17.948% are “enrolled”. Obtained findings show that the graduation rates of the students are not at the desired level. “Tuition fees up to date” was found as the best variable that explains the students’ school completion. 86.55% of students with not up to date tuition fees were found as dropout and 55.95% of students with up-to-date tuition fees were found as graduate. “Scholarship holder” was found as the variable that best explains the clusters formed by variable “tuition fees up to date”. 89.00% of the students that don’t have their tuition fees up to date and don’t hold a scholarship dropout the school, while 78.44% of students that have their tuition fees up to date and holding a scholarship are graduate. Building on the results obtained from the study, several suggestions were proposed for coping with dropout problem and further guiding research on dropout.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Aina, C. (2013). Parental background and university dropout in Italy. Higher Education, 65(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9554-z
- Allen, J., Robbins, S. B., Casillas, A., & Oh, I. S. (2008). Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9098-3
- Araque, F., Roldán, C., & Salguero, A. (2009). Factors influencing university drop out rates. Computers and Education, 53(3), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.013
- Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 155–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976194
- Bean, J. P. (1983). The Application of a Model of Turnover in Work Organizations to the Student Attrition Process. The Review of Higher Education, 6(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1983.0026
- Behr, A., Giese, M., Teguim Kamdjou, H. D., & Theune, K. (2021). Motives for dropping out from higher education—An analysis of bachelor’s degree students in Germany. European Journal of Education, 56(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12433
- Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2007). The Price We Pay: Economic and Social Consequences of Inadequate Education. Brookings Institution Press.
- Belloc, F., Maruotti, A., & Petrella, L. (2010). University drop-out: An Italian experience. Higher Education, 60(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9290-1
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Haziran 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi
25 Nisan 2023
Kabul Tarihi
11 Şubat 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2024 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1
APA
Hark Söylemez, N. (2024). Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 20(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1287393
AMA
1.Hark Söylemez N. Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis. EKU. 2024;20(1):107-121. doi:10.17244/eku.1287393
Chicago
Hark Söylemez, Nesrin. 2024. “Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis”. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 20 (1): 107-21. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1287393.
EndNote
Hark Söylemez N (01 Haziran 2024) Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 20 1 107–121.
IEEE
[1]N. Hark Söylemez, “Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis”, EKU, c. 20, sy 1, ss. 107–121, Haz. 2024, doi: 10.17244/eku.1287393.
ISNAD
Hark Söylemez, Nesrin. “Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis”. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 20/1 (01 Haziran 2024): 107-121. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1287393.
JAMA
1.Hark Söylemez N. Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis. EKU. 2024;20:107–121.
MLA
Hark Söylemez, Nesrin. “Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis”. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, c. 20, sy 1, Haziran 2024, ss. 107-21, doi:10.17244/eku.1287393.
Vancouver
1.Nesrin Hark Söylemez. Dropout and Graduation in Higher Education: CHAID Analysis. EKU. 01 Haziran 2024;20(1):107-21. doi:10.17244/eku.1287393