Araştırma Makalesi

Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct

Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct

Öz

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, the global education system has been compelled to adopt Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) in response to the threat of the virus. This abrupt shift in teaching methods has yielded anticipated and unanticipated consequences across all levels of education. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of ERT on academic integrity at a higher education institution situated in the western region of Türkiye. 12 hypothetical academic misconduct scenarios questionnaire was completed by a total of 234 participants. The responses relating to student observations suggest that collusion is perceived to be the most commonly witnessed form of academic misconduct, with many students specifically noting the prevalence of exam outsourcing. However, contract cheating was found to be the least preferred method of academic transgression in this study. Another significant finding suggests based on students observations that in-class activities facilitated by teachers can inadvertently facilitate either collaboration or dishonest practices among students during ERT. It is worth emphasizing that the implementation of well-designed assignments for effective assessments can serve as an initial step towards preserving academic integrity within an academic institution. Consequently, this study underscores the persisting and widespread issue of academic integrity transgressions within higher education, reaffirming its status as an epidemic concern.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Aiken, L. R. (1991). Detecting, understanding, and controlling for cheating on tests. Research in Higher Education, 32, 725-736. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00974740.pdf
  2. Anekwe, T. D. (2010). Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting. Bioethics, 24(6), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00705.x
  3. Ashworth, P., & Bannister, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381034
  4. Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in Schools, 17, 515-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198010)17:4<515::AID-PITS2310170417>3.0.CO;2-3
  5. Barrett, R., & Cox, A. L. (2005). ‘At least they’re learning something’: The hazy line between collaboration and collusion. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264226
  6. Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐ 19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  7. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Students’ dishonesty and its control in college. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
  8. Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2016). A conceptual framework for implementing exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education. Handbook of academic integrity, 463-480.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Değerler Eğitimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

24 Aralık 2023

Kabul Tarihi

1 Nisan 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erçin Kamburoğlu, N., & Razı, S. (2024). Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 20(1), 65-106. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1409200
AMA
1.Erçin Kamburoğlu N, Razı S. Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct. EKU. 2024;20(1):65-106. doi:10.17244/eku.1409200
Chicago
Erçin Kamburoğlu, Nalan, ve Salim Razı. 2024. “Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct”. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 20 (1): 65-106. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1409200.
EndNote
Erçin Kamburoğlu N, Razı S (01 Haziran 2024) Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 20 1 65–106.
IEEE
[1]N. Erçin Kamburoğlu ve S. Razı, “Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct”, EKU, c. 20, sy 1, ss. 65–106, Haz. 2024, doi: 10.17244/eku.1409200.
ISNAD
Erçin Kamburoğlu, Nalan - Razı, Salim. “Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct”. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 20/1 (01 Haziran 2024): 65-106. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1409200.
JAMA
1.Erçin Kamburoğlu N, Razı S. Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct. EKU. 2024;20:65–106.
MLA
Erçin Kamburoğlu, Nalan, ve Salim Razı. “Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct”. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, c. 20, sy 1, Haziran 2024, ss. 65-106, doi:10.17244/eku.1409200.
Vancouver
1.Nalan Erçin Kamburoğlu, Salim Razı. Policy Matters: Tendencies towards Academic Misconduct. EKU. 01 Haziran 2024;20(1):65-106. doi:10.17244/eku.1409200

Cited By