Fen Okuryazarı Vatandaş Olmanın 21. Yüzyılda Günlük Yaşama Etkisi: Elektrik Devreleri Örneği

Öz

Alan yazında birçok çalışma fen okuryazarlığını sadece fen içerik bilgisini dikkate alarak değerlendirmektedir. Ancak, fen okuryazarlığının temel amacı bireyleri bilinçli kararlar alma ve giderek daha karmaşık ve teknoloji odaklı bir hale gelen dünyada anlamlı bir şekilde yaşama konusunda güçlendirmektir. 21. yy. becerileri ile fenin günlük yaşamdaki uygulamalarını anlamak daha da önemli hale gelmiştir. Öğrencilerin probleme dayalı eleştirel düşünme becerilerini uygulamak için fen disiplininin temel fikirlerini günlük yaşam durumlarıyla ilişkilendirmeleri gerekmektedir. Dünya genelinde fen müfredatı, fen okuryazarı öğrencileri geleceğin toplum üyeleri olarak yetiştirmeyi göz önünde bulundurmaktadır. Burada soru, fen okuryazarlığının uygulanmasının vatandaşların günlük yaşamını nasıl şekillendirdiğidir. Bu çalışma, farklı bakış açılarını açıklığa kavuşturarak bu soruyu cevaplamayı amaçlamaktadır. Fen okuryazarlığının bireylerin günlük yaşamını nasıl yönlendirdiğini anlamak için elektrik devreleri fen konusu incelenmiştir. Konuyla ilgili olarak üç ana bölüm tartışılmıştır. Bunlar; günlük yaşam uygulamaları, kişisel güvenlik ve ekonomik boyut başlıkları altında toplanmıştır. Bu görüş çalışması fen okuryazarlığının bireyleri bilinçli ve etkili vatandaşlara dönüştürmede önemli bir rol oynadığının altını çizmektedir. Elektrik devreleri olgusu bakımından fen okuryazarı olan bireylerin rahatlık v güven sağlaması sebebiyle daha iyi bir yaşam kalitesine sahip oldukları sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fen eğitimi
• Fen okuryazarlığı (FO)
• Elektrik devreleri
• Günlük yaşam
• Görüş yazısı

The Effect of Being Scientifically Literate Citizen on Everyday Life in 21st Century: Sample of Electrical Circuits

Öz

Many studies in the literature evaluate scientific literacy (SL) only by considering science content knowledge. However, the main purpose of scientific literacy is to empower individuals to make informed decisions and to live meaningfully in an increasingly complex and technology-driven world. Understanding daily life applications of science has become even more important with the 21st century skills. It is required the learners link science disciplinary core ideas with everyday life situations in order to practice problem-based critical thinking skills. The science curricula around the world considers to raise scientifically literate students as future members of the society. The question here is how implementing SL shapes everyday life of citizens. This study aims to answer this question with clarifying an interpretable perspective. The science phenomenon of electrical circuits was examined to comprehend how SL leads everyday life of the people. Three main sections are discussed regarding to the issue. These were entitled daily life applications, personal safety, and economic dimension. This position paper underlies SL plays an important role turning individuals into conscious and effective citizens. It is concluded that scientifically literate people in terms of electrical circuits phenomenon have better quality of life due to their having scientific knowledge provides comfort and confidence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Electrical circuits
• Everyday life
• Position paper
• Science education
• Scientific literacy (SL)

Kaynakça

1. Adriyawati, A., Utomo, E., Rahmawati, Y., & Mardiah, A. (2020). STEAM-Project-Based Learning integration to improve elementary school students' scientific literacy on alternative energy learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1863-1873.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). The Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Published by Oxford University Press in 1993. New York: NY.
3. Boulding, K. E., & Senesh, L. (1983). The optimal utilization of knowledge: Making knowledge serve human betterment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4. Brennan, R. P. (1992). Dictionary of scientific literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Bybee, R. (2016). Scientific literacy. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 944-946). Springer.
6. Çepni, S., Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Bacanak, A. (2006). Fen eğitimine yeni bir bakış: Fen-teknoloji-toplum. Trabzon: PegemA Yayıncılık.
7. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice. Teachers College Press: New York, NY.
8. DeBoer, G. E. (2006). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. B. Flick and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science (pp. 17-35). Springer: The Netherlands.

9. Derman, A. (2014). Bilimsel okuryazarlığın tesisinde fen öğretim programlarının rolü. International Journal of Social Science (JASSS), 26, 143-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2270
10. Dewey, J. (1904). The Education situation. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
11. Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121-127.
12. Divya, V., Sathya, A., Murali, Y., & Sudhakaran, M. (2017). Intelligent energy saving system based on standby power reduction for home environment. International Journal of Global Engineering (IJGE), 1(3), 30-37.
13. Durant, J. R. (1993). What is scientific literacy? In J. R. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe (pp. 129– 137). London: Science Museum
14. Durant, J. (1994). What is scientific literacy? European Review, 2, 83-89.
15. Energy.Gov (n.d.). How does solar work. Retrieved July 29, 2022, from https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/how-does-solar-work#:~:text=When%20the%20sun%20shines%20onto,cell%2C%20causing%20electricity%20to%20flow
16. Fensham, Peter J. (2002). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(1), 9-24.
17. Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022) The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535-555. Go Concepts (n.d.). Why I no longer charge my mobile phone overnight and why you shouldn’t either. Retrieved June 12, 2022, from https://www.go-concepts.com/blog/why-i-no-longer-charge-my-mobile-phone-overnight-and-why-you-shouldnt-either/#:~:text=This%20is%20called%20a%20%E2%80%9Ctrickle,ambient%20temperature%20than%20it%20should
18. Good Energy (n.d.). How do solar panels work? Retrieved July 29, 2022, from https://www.goodenergy.co.uk/how-do-solar-panels-work/
19. Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M. (2003). Message from the “Island Group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 607-615.
20. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Education Leadership, 16, 13-16.
21. Hurd, P. D. (1975). Science, technology, and society: New goals for interdisciplinary science teaching. The Science Teacher, 42(2), 27-30.
22. Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing World. In S. Norris (Ed.), Issues and Trends (pp. 407-416). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23. Keskin, H., Tezel, Ö., & Acat, M. B. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersine ilişkin bilimsel okuryazarlık seviyeleri. International Journal of Social Science (JASSS), 47, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS3513
24. Klein, P. D. (2006). The Challenges of Scientific Literacy: From the viewpoint of second‐generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, (28)2-3, 143-178, DOI: 10.1080/09500690500336627
25. Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. In S. Norris (Ed.), Issues and Trends (pp. 291-310) John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
26. Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2007). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 101-115.
27. Layton, D. (1973). Science for the people. New York: Science History Publications.
28. Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Sequences: An Approach Drawing upon the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist Perspective on Learning. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560189
29. Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: science and the public. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.
30. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge: New York, NY.
31. Meier, A. K. (2002, January 22-23). A Worlwide Review of Standby Power Use in Homes. In Proceedings of Symposium on Highly Efficient Use of Energy and Reduction of Its Environmental Impact, Osaka, Japan.
32. Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521. National Resource Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
33. National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
34. Next Generation Science Standards (2013). The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Retrieved May 18, 2022, from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
35. Norris, S. & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
36. Oktay, E. H. (2022). Hane halkı elektrik tüketiminin azaltılmasında topluluk tabanlı sosyal pazarlama yaklaşımının kullanılması (Tez No. 762315) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Kafkas Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı, Tez Merkezi.
37. Oktay, Z., Atalayın, Y., & Coşkun, C. (2022, December 20-23). Konutlarda Kullanılan Cihazların Pasif Durumdaki Enerji Kayıpları ve Örnek Bir Hesaplama. 1st International Conference on Engineering, Natural and Social Sciences, Konya, Turkey.
38. Pella, M. (1967). Science literacy and the h.s. curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 67, 346-356.
39. Prewett, K. (1983). Scientific literacy and democratic theory. Daedalta, 12, 49-64.
40. Reaves, D. (2014). Identifying Perceived Barriers and Benefit to Reducing Energy Consumption In An Affordable Housing Complex Usıng The Community- Based Social Marketing Model. Colorado State University.
41. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy / science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Sharon, A.J., & Baram‐Tsabari, A. (2020). Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education,104, 873-894. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21581
43. Sulsilah, H., Utari, S., & Saepuzaman, D. (2019). The application of scientific approach to improve scientific literacy on domain competency at secondary school on dynamic electricity topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,1157(3), 1-6.
44. Susdarwati, S., Dimas, A., & Hannum, F. (2021). The development of scientific literacy-based physics learning module on direct current circuit material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869, 1-6.
45. Thomas, G., & Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In M. Shortland (Ed.), Scientific literacy papers (pp. 1–14). Oxford, UK: Department for External Studies, University of Oxford.
46. Vasiliu, A., Nedelcu, O., Magdun, O., & Sălișteanu, I. C. (2021). A study on the energy consumption of the electrical and electronic household and office equipment in standby and off-mode. Scientific Bulletin of the Electrical Engineering Faculty, 1(44), 26-30.