Investigation of Giftedness Awareness Level of Parents Whose Children Attend Science and Art Center (SAC) in Terms of Different Variables

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the level of giftedness awareness of parents whose children attend Science and Art Center (SAC) and to examine their giftedness awareness in terms of different variables. The participants of the current study, which was conducted using the descriptive survey, one of the quantitative research methods, are 436 parents of gifted students who attended Science and Art Center in five different provinces in the 2022-2023 school year. The Parental Awareness Scale (Parents with Gifted Children) and a Personal Demographic Characteristics Information Form the researchers developed were used as data collection tools. Due to the normal distribution of the data in the study, parametric tests and descriptive analysis methods were used to analyze the data. According to the data obtained from the study, the level of giftedness awareness of the participating parents is high. As a result of this study, the unrealistic misinformation, and prejudices of the parents of gifted children will be identified, which will contribute to the early identification of gifted children by their families and the recognition of their characteristics. Early interventions will shorten the way to reach the goals set for these children in the long term. It is thought that studies aiming to determine the factors affecting the awareness of parents with gifted children and enabling them to be examined in terms of different demographic characteristics by other researchers will contribute to the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gifted
• Parent
• Awareness
• Science and Art Center

Kaynakça

1. Acar-Arıcan, S. A. (2019). The effect of bibliotherapy technique on parents of gifted children's awareness and parenting practices about their children. (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Bahçeşehir University Institute of Educational Sciences, Istanbul.
2. Adler, D. M. (2006). The effects of participating in support groups focusing on parenting gifted children: doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Ohio.
3. Afat, N. (2013). Testing the effectiveness of the family education program developed for the self-fruits of gifted children (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
4. Afat, N. and Konik, A. K. (2018). Awareness of parents with gifted children: a scale development study. Journal of National Education. 47 (220), 79 – 104. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/40715/488436.
5. Afat, N (2024). Analysis of the gifted's parents' awareness in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 20(3), 12-25. Doi number:10.29329/ijpe.2024.664.2
6. Akar, I., and Uluman, M., (2013). Classroom teachers' ability to correctly nominate gifted students. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1(3), 199-212.
7. Akarsu, F. (2001). Gifted children, families and their problems, Ankara: Eduser Publications.
8. Altunya, N. (2006). Veteran educational institute. Gazi Institute of Secondary Teachers and Education (1926-1980), Gazi University Faculty of Communication Printing House, Ankara.

9. Alvino, J. (1995). Considerations and strategies for parenting the gifted child (RM95218). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
10. Applebaum, A.S. (1998). Learning to parent the gifted child: Developing a model parenting program to prevent underachievement and other related emotional difficulties in gifted children. Doctoral thesis, Widener University, Pennsylvania.
11. Avcı, A. (2005). Examining parents' views on the awareness of their gifted children (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
12. Balbay, C., & Özak, H. (2024). Özel yetenekli çocukları olan ebeveynlerin farkındalık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(3), 2223-2243. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1452821
13. Baysal-Metin, N., Dağlıoğlu, H.E. and Saranlı, A.G. (2018). Gifted children from a child development perspective, Ankara: Hedef Publications.
14. Bloom, B. S. & Sosniak, L. A. (1981). Talent development vs. schooling. Educational Leadership, 39(2), 86-94.
15. Bricklin, P. M. (1983). Working with parents of learning-disabled/gifted children. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning disabled/giftedchildren: Identification and Programming, 243–260. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
16. Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing children's potential at school and home, Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
17. Colangelo, N. & Dettman, D. (1983). A review of research on parents and families of gifted children. Exceptional Education, 50(1), 20-27.
18. Cutts, N. E. & Moseley, N. (2004). How to prevent the education of gifted and gifted children from wasting one of the nation's most significant resources (Translator: İsmail Ersevim), Özgür Yayınları, Istanbul.
19. Çalışkan, M. (2017). Üstün yetenekli çocuklara sahip ailelerin aile işlevselliği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gaziantep.
20. Çitil, M. (2018). Evaluation of the policies of the education of the gifted in Turkey. Journal of National Education, Education of the Gifted, 143–172. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/40518/48001.
21. Dağlıoğlu, E. & Metin, N. (2002). Determination of those gifted in mathematics among children aged five to six attending kindergarten. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 2(1). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aibuefd/issue/1508/18284
22. Dağlıoğlu, E.& Suveren, S. (2013). Determining the consistency of teachers' and parents' views and children's performances in identifying gifted children in the preschool period. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 13(1), 431- 453.
23. Dağlıoğlu, E., (1995). Identification of gifted children attending the 2nd-5th grades of primary school (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.
24. Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
25. Delisle, J. R. (2002). Barefoot Irreverence: A collection of writings on gifted child education, Prufrock Press Inc.
26. Delisle, J. R. (2006). Üstün yetenekli çocuklara ebeveynlik. Prufrock Press, Referans Çeviri Hizmetleri ve Yayıncılık Ltd.
27. Enç, M. (2005). Superior brain power, (2. Print), Ankara: Gündüz Education Publishing.
28. Enright, K. M. & Ruzicka, M.F. (1989). Relationships between perceived parental behaviours and the Self-Esteem of gifted children. Psychological Reports, 65(3), 931–937.
29. Feldhusen, J. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement, In Sternberg, R. J.& Davidson, J. E. (Eds) Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., 64-79), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Freeman, J. (1986). The psychology of gifted children. UK: John Willey and Sons.
31. Freeman, J. (2011). Psychology for the sake of the environment. In Mendonca, A., Cunha, A, & Chakrabarti, R. (Eds.) Dordrecht: Springer.
32. Gallagher, J. J. (1960). Gifted child in the elementary school. Department Of Classroom Teacher. American Educational Research Association of National Education Association.
33. Galton, F. (1879). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. New and rev. Ed. New York: D. Appleton.
34. Grubb, K. E. (2008). An examination of the experiences of gifted preschool and primary-age children. (Doctorate of Philosophy), RMIT University, Australia.
35. Hodge, K. (2006). Vulnerability of young gifted children: How do you recognise giftedness? What do children do? Paper presented at the Early Childhood Education Conference, Melbourne, June.
36. Ihlamur, Ş. (2017). Üstün yetenekli çocuklara sahip ailelerin danışmanlık ihtiyaçlarının saptanması. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, İstanbul. file:///C:/Users/Administrator/Downloads/a55dccf7-3a2b-48ff-b5f4-a0712767ad0f.pdf
37. İpek, Y. (2019, December 1-3) Okul öncesi dönemde özel yetenekli çocukların ailelerinin gözlemleri ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar [Observations of the parents of private skills in the preschool period and the problems] [Paper presentation]. International Congress on Gifted and Talented Education, Malatya, Türkiye.
38. Kalem, M. & Şentürk Ş. (2019). Developing an achievement test for gifted awareness training. Gazi Journal of Educational Sciences, Doi number: 10.30855/gjes.2019.05.02.009. 5(5), 160-175.
39. Karakuş, F. (2014). Üstün yetenekli çocukları olan anne babaların çocuklarının eğitimine yönelik algıları. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 289-304. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/omuefd/issue/20251/214909 .
40. Kennedy, K. & Farley, J. (2018). Counselling gifted students: school-based considerations and strategies. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(3), 361–367.
41. Kıldan, O., A., (2008). According to the constructivist approach, the effect of in-service training given to preschool teachers on teacher-child and teacher-parent relations. (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Gazi University, Department of Child Development Education, Ankara.
42. Kıldan, O., A., Temel, Z., F., (2008). The effect of in-service training based on a constructivist approach on some teachers' teaching views. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 16(8), 25-36.
43. Kurtulmuş, Z. (2010). Investigation of the effect of computer-based education given to the families of gifted children attending the science and art centre on family members' perceptions of family relationships and children's perfectionism levels (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
44. Leana-Taşçılar, M. Z., Özyaprak, M. and Yılmaz, Ö. (2016). An online training program for gifted children's parents in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Doi number:10.14689/ejer.2016.65.09. 65(1), 147-164.
45. Levent, F. (2011). Üstün yetenekli çocukların hakları el kitabı anne baba ve öğretmenler için. İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.
46. MAK, Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry. Report of the parliamentary research established to discover gifted children, ıdentifying the problems related to their education and ensuring their effective employment to contribute to the development of our country. Ankara: TBMM, 2012 http://hdl.handle.net/11543/129.
47. Makel, M.C., Rinn, A.N. & Plucker, J.A. (2021). Athletic talent development from theory to practice: the self-regulated talent development process (Eds.). From giftedness to gifted Education: Reflecting theory in practice, Routledge. Doi number:10.4324/9781003235262.
48. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report To The Congress Of The United States By The U. S. Commissioner Of Education. Washington. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED056243.
49. McClain, M.C. & Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identifying gifted students in the United States today: a look at government definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, Doi number: 10.1080/15377903.2012 .643757. 28(1), 59–88,
50. Ministry of Industry and Technology of the Republic of Turkey (2017). Socio-Economic development ranking surveys. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/merkez-birimi/b94224510b7b/sege.
51. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2019). Science and art centers directive.
52. Özbay, Y. (2013). Gifted children and their families. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family and Social Policies, General Directorate of Family and Community Services. Pdf book. ISBN: 978-605-4628-54-4.
53. Passow, A.H. & Rudnitski, R.A. (1993). State policies regarding the education of the gifted are reflected in legislation and regulation. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
54. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
55. Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In Reflections on gifted education: Critical works by Joseph S. Renzulli and colleagues, 55-90. Waco, TX, US: Prufrock Press Inc.
56. Rimm, S. B. (1996). Parenting for achievement. Roeper Review, 19(1), 57-59.
57. Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Sourcebooks, Inc. Doi number:10.4324/9781003233244.
58. Saranlı, A. G. (2011). Investigation of the effectiveness of family guidance programs developed for families of gifted children (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.
59. Schader, R. (2009). Parent nominations. Kerr, B. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity and talent, 2(2), 673–675. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
60. Scott, M. S., Perou, R., Urbano, R., Hogan, A., & Gold, S. (1992). The identity of giftedness: a comparison of white, Hispanic and black families. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 131–139. Doi number:1177/001698629203600303.
61. Sezginsoy, B. (2007). Bilim ve sanat merkezi uygulamasının değerlendirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir.
62. Shayir, T. (2015). Examination of the knowledge levels of classroom teachers about gifted children. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul.
63. Solow, R. E. (1995). Parents' reasoning about their intellectually gifted children's social and emotional development. Roeper Review, 18(2), 142-146.
64. Su, Ş., Sağlam, A. ve Mutlu, Y. (2017). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi öğrencilerinin “BİLSEM” ve “Okul” kavramlarına ilişkin algı düzeylerinin metaforlarla karşılaştırılması. Üstün Zekâlılar Eğitimi ve Yaratıcılık Dergisi, Aralık, 4(3), 91-108.
65. Şahin, F. T., and Kalburan, F. N. C. (2009). Family education programs and their effectiveness: What is being implemented worldwide? Pamukkale University Journal of Education Fa culty, 25(25), 1-12.
66. Şahin, F., (2012). The effectiveness of the training program is to increase classroom teachers' level of knowledge about gifted students and their characteristics (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis)—Ankara University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
67. Şimsek, F. and Şahin, M. (2023). Parental perceptions of gifted students and their education. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, Doi number: 10.17152/gefad.1187856. 43(1), 475-496.
68. Tekin, H. (1996). Measurement and evaluation in education. Ankara: Judicial Publications.
69. Tümen, D.S. (2019). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi öğrencilerinin öğrenmeye ilişkin tutumları: Bolu BİLSEM Örneği. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD) Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economics (EJRSE) ISSN: 2148-9963.
70. Van Deur, P., (2011). Views of gifted elementary students about self-directed learning. Gifted and. Gifted International, 26(12), 111-120.
71. Wasserman, J D., & Bracken, B. A. (2013). Fundamental psychometric considerations in assessment. In J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.) Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (2nd ed., Vol:10, pp. 50-81) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
72. Webb, J. T. (1998). Existential depression in gifted individuals. Communicator, 29(3) 25–26.
73. Wingert, H. (1997). Parent beliefs transmission of beliefs and impact on the child. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Canada. Worrell, F.C.& Erwin, J.O. (2011). Best practices in ıdentifying students for gifted and talented education programs. J. Appl. Sch. Psychol. 27, 319–340.