Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education

Tanju Deveci

Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education

Öz

Language is often the determining factor in authors’ success in publishing their papers. Among various language features authors utilize is adjectives. There is a lack of consensus about their use in academic writing. This study investigated qualitative adjective use in research articles in one sub-discipline of educational sciences. The corpus was comprised of 30 journal articles. Online software was used to describe the adjective profile. A scheme was borrowed from the literature to classify adjectives according to their semantic use. Results showed that adjectives accounted for 7.9% of the corpus. A significant number of adjectives belonged to the Academic Words List and the Off-list Words (50.9%). Results also showed that the Abstract included the biggest percentage of adjectives (10.4%), which was followed by the Conclusion and Recommendations (8.9%) and the Introduction and Literature Review (8.8%). Adjectives occurred in Methods and Results less frequently. The most common semantic use of adjectives was related to the sub-domain of descriptors. Evaluative adjectives were also used frequently. The second sub-domain of classifiers included topical (8.3%) and relational adjectives (2.4%). Results are discussed and recommendations are made future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Bailey, S. (2003). Academic writing: A practical guide for students. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic changes in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Johanson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.
Brooks, A. K. (2019). Agential realism in a community-based organization in Mexico: An ethico-onto-epistemology of emancipatory learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 69(1), 42-59.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coxhead, A., & Byrd, P. (2007). Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 129-147.

Deveci, T., & Nunn, R. (2018). Use of relative clauses in humanities and social sciences research articles: A case study. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(1), 17-26. doi: 10.13189/lls.2018.060103
ERIC (n.d.). Guidance on writing abstracts. Retrieved February 2020, https://eric.ed.gov/?abstract
Florez, M. A. (1999). Improving adult English language learners’ speaking skills. National Center for ESL Literacy Education. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED: 435204)
Fox, R., & Fox, J. (2004). Organizational discourse: A language-ideology-power perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Hood, S. (2005). Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: A focus on the introductions to research reports. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (Eds.). Analysing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks (pp. 24-44). London: Continuum.
Kartal, G. (2017). A corpus-based analysis of the most frequent adjectives in academic texts. Teaching English with Technology, 17(3), 3-18.
Keeling, J., Chapman, H. M., & Williams, J. (2013). How to write well: A guide for health and social care students. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Khoo, D. (2005). Adjectives and adverbs in academic writing. Retrieved December 2019, https://www.utsc. utoronto.ca/twc/sites/utsc.utoronto.ca.twc/files/resource-files/xAdjsandAdvs.pdf
Labaree, R. V. (2009). Organizing your research paper. Retrieved November 2019, http://libguides.usc.edu/ writingguide/conclusion
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322.
Mason, C. P. (1858). English grammar: Including the principles of grammatical analysis. London: Walton & Maberly. Miller, A. A., & Blessing, J. D. (2016). The results section. In J. G. Forister & J. D. Blessing (Eds.). Introduction to research and medical literature for health professionals (pp.169-176). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Murray, K. (2014). Adjectives and adverbs. New York: PowerKiDS Press. Nunn, R., Brandt, C., & Deveci, T. (2018). Transparency, subjectivity and objectivity in academic texts. English Scholarship Beyond Borders, 4(1), 71-102.
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2013). Cluttered writing: Adjective and adverbs in academia. Scientometrics, 96. 679-681. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0937-9
Omori, K. (2017). Writing a discussion section. In M. Allen (Ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1883-1885). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
Osmond, A. (2013). Academic writing and grammar for students. Los Angeles: SAGE Ruday, S. (2014). The common core grammar toolkit: Using mentor texts to teach the language standards in grades 6-8. New York and London: Routledge.
Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., & Malmström, H. (2019). Developing a new academic vocabulary test. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 59-71.
Rosado, N., & Caro, K. G. (2018). The relationship between lexis and reading comprehension: A review. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 136-147.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). Technical writing in a second language: The role of grammatical metaphor. In Analysing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks (pp. 172-190). London: Continuum.
Starfield, S. (2005). Word power: Negotiating success in a first-year sociology essay. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (Eds.). Analysing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks (pp. 66-83). London: Continuum.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential skills and tasks (3rd Edition). Michigan: Michigan ELT.
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tutin, A. (2010). Evaluative adjectives in academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. In R. L. Sanz, P. M. Duenas & E. L. Millan (Eds.). Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic genres (pp. 219-242). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars. Tyrkkö, J. (2014). “Strong churlish purging pills”: Multi-adjectival premodification in early modern medical writing in English. In I. Taavitsainen, A. H. Juker, & J. Tuominen (Eds.). Diachronic corpus pragmatics (pp. 157-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wallwork, A. (2016). English for academic research: Grammar, usage and style. New York, NY: Springer.
Wang, J, Liang, S. I., & Ge, G. C. (2008). Establishment of a medical academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 442-458.
Williams, J. (2013). Academic encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vo, S. (2019). Use of lexical features in non-native academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 1-12.
Zinsser, W. (2006). On writing well: The classic guide to writing nonfiction. New York: Harper Paperbacks.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Tanju Deveci ^* Bu kişi benim
0000-0001-5905-9793
United Arab Emirates

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Eylül 2020

Kabul Tarihi

24 Şubat 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Deveci, T. (2021). Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 7(1), 132-146. https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH

AMA

1.Deveci T. Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education. EKUAD. 2021;7(1):132-146. https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH

Chicago

Deveci, Tanju. 2021. “Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education”. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research 7 (1): 132-46. https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH.

EndNote

Deveci T (01 Nisan 2021) Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research 7 1 132–146.

IEEE

[1]T. Deveci, “Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education”, EKUAD, c. 7, sy 1, ss. 132–146, Nis. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH

ISNAD

Deveci, Tanju. “Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education”. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research 7/1 (01 Nisan 2021): 132-146. https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH.

JAMA

1.Deveci T. Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education. EKUAD. 2021;7:132–146.

MLA

Deveci, Tanju. “Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education”. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, c. 7, sy 1, Nisan 2021, ss. 132-46, https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH.

Vancouver

1.Tanju Deveci. Qualitative Adjectives in Education Research Articles: The Case of Lifelong Learning and Adult Education. EKUAD [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2021;7(1):132-46. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA87HT29WH