An Overview of the Creative Drama Experience in The Information Technologies And Software Course From The Students’ Perspective

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the opinions of 6th-grade Information Technologies and Software Course (ITSC) students on the creative drama method. In the first stage of the study, which was designed with the basic qualitative research method, a drama study prepared for the 6th-grade ITSC was applied to a group of 35 students. Focus group interviews were conducted with 24 students at the end of the drama study. Content analysis was used in the analysis of the qualitative data obtained in the study. Research findings showed that creative drama is effective in realizing the achievements of ITSC, in better for expressing students for themselves, in using information technologies, the internet, and social media in their real-life consciously. The results of the research revealed that the drama method and techniques used are effective for students to better understand the subjects covered, focus on the lesson, participate in the lesson more eagerly, feel better during the lesson, and the method in question positively affects their emotions. In this process, the students stated that the games, role-playing and improvisation exercises, and physical activities adapted according to the learning outcomes of the lesson made them more interested and enthusiastic about the lesson. According to the results of the research, it can be suggested that the use of drama methods and techniques in different ways in ITSC should be widespread and the teachers of the ITSC should be educated about drama and should use drama method and techniques in student's learning processes.

Keywords

• Information and communication technology (ICT
• Creative drama
• Drama and technology
• Focus group interview
• Creative drama, Drama and technology, Focus group interview

Kaynakça

1. Adiguzel, O. (2019). Egitimde yaratici drama [Creative drama in education] (6. Baski). Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayinlari.
2. Atalay, O., & Sahin, S. (2012). Ilkogretim 5. sinif bilisim teknolojileri dersinin oğretiminde drama ogretim yonteminin oğrenci basarisina etkisi [The effect of drama teaching method on student achievement in the teaching of primary school 5th-grade information technologies course]. Egitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(2), 1-9.
3. Aykac, N. (2014). Ogretim ilke ve yontemleri [Teaching principles and methods]. Ankara: Pegem Yayimcilik.
4. Buyukozturk, S., Akgun, E., Karadeniz, S., Demirel, F. & Kilic, E. (2014). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayincilik.
5. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. California: SAGE.
7. Cebi, A. (2008). Ilkogretim ikinci asamada yaratici drama destekli bilgisayar okuryazarligi [Computer literacy supported by creative drama in the second stage of primary education]. Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Universitesi Akademik Bilisim, 569-573.
8. Celebi Uzgur, B., & Aykac, N. (2016). Bilisim Teknolojileri ve Yazilim Dersi Ogretim Programinin Ogretmen Goruslerine Gore Degerlendirilmesi (Ege Bolgesi ornegi) [Evaluation of information technologies and software course curriculum according to teachers' views (Aegean Region example)]. Mustafa Kemal Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 13 (34), 273-297.

9. Celik, H., Baser Baykal, N. & Kilic Memur, H. N. (2020). Nitel veri analizi ve temel ilkeleri [Qualitative data analysis and its basic principles]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 379-406.
10. Celikkaya, T. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde drama yonteminin onemi ve uygulama ornekleri [The importance of drama method in social studies course and its application examples]. Journal of Turkish Studies, 9 (2), 447-470.
11. Cokluk, O., Yilmaz, K. & Oguz, E. (2011). Nitel bir gorusme yöntemi: Odak grup gorusmesi [A qualitative interview method: Focus group interview]. Kuramsal Egitimbilim Dergisi, 4 (1), 95-107.
12. Dursun, O. O. & Cuhadar, C. (2009). Bilgisayar ogretmeni adaylarinin ogretmenlik meslegine iliskin dusunceleri [The thoughts of pre-service computer teachers on the teaching profession]. In Proceedings of 9th International Educational Technology Conference.
13. Flintoff, K. (2010). Connections between drama education and the digital education revolution. Drama West State Conference, Australia.
14. Karaosmanoglu, G. & Adiguzel, O. (2017). Yaratici drama yönteminin 6. sinif bilisim teknolojileri ve yazilim dersi alan ogrencilerin akademik basarilarina etkisi [Effects of creative drama method on students academic achievements in ict lessons of sixth grades]. Elementary Education Online, 16(2), 693-712.
15. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing Focus Groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299-302. Retrieved February 15, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/29728251
16. MoNE. (2012). Bilisim teknolojileri ve yazilim dersi ogretim programi [Information technologies and software course curriculum]. Retrieved June 10, 2018, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx?islem=1&kno=196
17. MoNE (2018). Bilisim teknolojileri ve yazilim dersi ogretim programi [Information technologies and software course curriculum]. Retrieved February 10, 2018, from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/2018124103559587.pdf.
18. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam & Associates (Eds.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for interview and analysis (pp. 3- 17). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: Revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Franscisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Metinnam, I. (2019). Sinif ogretmenligi adaylarinin yaratici drama oturumu planlama surecinde yasadiklari sorunlarin incelenmesi [Investigation of the problems experienced by pre-service primary school teachers in planning a creative drama session]. Yaratici Drama Dergisi, 14(2), 219-242.
21. Oruc, S., & Cagir, S. (2018). 5. sinif ogrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler dersinde drama yontemini kullaniminin incelenmesi [Investigation of 5th grade students' use of drama method in social sciences lesson]. International Journal of Social Science Research, 7 (1), 154-174.
22. Ozek, B. M. (2014). Bilisim teknolojileri dersinde yaratici drama yonteminin kullanılmasinin ogrenci basarisina etkisi [The effect of using creative drama method on student success in information technologies lesson]. Birinci Avrasya Egitim Arastirmalari Kongresi [First Eurasian Educational Research Congress], İstanbul.
23. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Butun & S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.) Ankara: Pegem Academy.
24. San, I. (1990). Egitimde yaratici drama [Creative drama in education]. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 2(23), 573-582.
25. San, I. (2002). Egitim ogretimde yasayarak ogrenme yontemi ve estetik surec olarak yaratici drama [Creative drama as a learning method by experience and aesthetic process in education]. Yaratici Drama 1985-1995 yazilar (edt. H. Omer Adiguzel). Inci San'a Armagan. [Creative Drama, 1985-1995 articles (edt. H. Omer Adiguzel). Gift to Inci San]. Ankara: Naturel Yayincilik.
26. Sarioglu, T., & Kartal, G. (2017). Bir yontem olarak drama bilisim teknolojileri ogretiminde iyi bir secenek olabilir mi? [Could drama be a good option as a method in information technology teaching?]. Elementary Education Online, 16(1), 366–376.
27. Seferoglu, S. S. (2007). Ilkogretim bilgisayar dersi ögretim programi: elestirel bir bakis ve uygulamada yasanan sorunlar [Elementary education computer lesson curriculum: a critical perspective and problems encountered in practice]. Egitim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 29, 99-111.
28. Sahan, H. H. (2002). Yapilandirmaci ogrenme [Constructivist learning]. Yasadikca Egitim Dergisi, 74-75; 49-52.
29. Ustundag, T. (2009). Yaratici drama ogretmeninin gunlugu [Creative drama teacher's diary] (9.basim). Ankara: Pegem A Yayinlari.
30. Yildirim, A. ve Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.
31. ISTE (2016). ISTE Standards for students. International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved 1 April, 2019 from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students.
32. TQF (2016). Turkiye yeterlilikler cercevesine dair teblig: Mesleki yeterlilik kurumu Turkiye yeterlilikler cercevesi [Communiqué on Turkey qualifications framework: Turkey qualifications framework for vocational qualifications authority]. Retrieved 1 April, 2019 from https://myk.gov.tr/images/articles/editor/130116/TYC_teblig_2.pdf.
33. Yilmaz, S. (2012). Sosyal bilgiler derslerinde drama yontemi ile ogretimin ogrencilerin sosyal beceri, empatik beceri ve akademik basari duzeylerine etkisi [the effect of education with drama method on students' social skills, empathic skills and academic achievement levels in social sciences lessons]. Yayimlanmamis doktora tezi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ataturk Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Erzurum.