Future Prospects of University Students Studying Psychological Counselling and Guidance: A Case Study

Öz

Dramatic increases in the unemployment rates worldwide have been observed for the last two decades. The number of unemployed individuals, which was 800 million in 1995, has exceeded one billion at the beginning of the 21st century and while the rates of unemployment have long been one of the primary agendas of the governments, they are continuing to rise irrevocably. Presenting the expectations and worries of prospective teachers studying at the Department of Guidance and Psychological Counselling (GPC) to raise the visibility of an important problem in the field of raising teachers and employment policies is the main objective of this research. In this research based on a case study, which is a qualitative research pattern, the data were collected using semi-structured interview questions to the participants composed of eight female and eight male students from different stages. The findings obtained in this study showed that the majority of the students, especially the students from low-income families, based their future expectations on governmental teacher appointments and they attached considerable importance to KPSS (PPSE, Public Personnel Selection Examination). Moreover, a majority of students felt obliged to start working as early as possible and as a result, they delayed their plans, such as pursuing a Master’s degree. Also, a secure employment condition was their biggest expectation for the future and they did not have any hopes for higher standards of living conditions. Making the content of the GPC teachers’ written examination for an appointment more fitting to their field of expertise, a more objective interviewing process, and annulling the appointments of teachers out of the GPC field are among the proposals of this research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Education
• PCG
• university students
• youth
• future expectation
• employment

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy, H. H. (2001). Issizlik- egitim iliskisine genel bir bakis ve gelecekte izlenecek politikalara iliskin gorusler [An overview of the unemployment-education relationship & views on future policies], Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 32(1-2), 129-138.
2. Aktuel PDR (2011). Felsefe mezunlari rehber ogretmen olarak ataniyor [Philosophy graduates are appointed as counselors], Retrieved from https://www.aktuelpdr.net/felsefe-mezunlari-rehber-ogretmen-olarak-ataniyor-pdr-alanina-ataniyor.html
3. Aktuel PDR (2012). Felsefe sosyoloji mezunlari rehber ogretmen olarak atanmayacak [Philosophy and sociology graduates will not be appointed as counselor], Retrieved from https://www.aktuelpdr.net/felsefe-sosyoloji-mezunlari-rehber-ogretmen-olarak-atanmayacak.html
4. Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5. Bora, T., & Erdogan, N. (2011). Cuppenin, kilicin ve kalemin mahcup yoksullari: Yeni kapitalizm, yeni işsizlik ve beyaz yakalilar [The embarrassed poor of the robe, sword, and the pen: new capitalism, new unemployment, and the white collars], Bosuna mi okuduk: Turkiye’de beyaz yakali issizligi. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
6. Bora, A. (2011). Aile: En guclu issizlik sigortasi [Family: The strongest unemployment insurance], Bosuna mi okuduk: Turkiye’de beyaz yakali issizligi. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
7. Borg, C., & Mayo, P. (2005). The EU memorandum on lifelong learning. Old wine in new bottles?, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 3(2), 203-225.
8. Castel, R. (2003). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. Translate: R. Boyd, New Brunswick (USA)/London (UK): Transaction Publishers.

9. De Gaulejac, V. (2013). Isletme hastaligina tutulmus toplum [Le société malade de la gestion]. Cev. Ozge Erbek. Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
10. Egilmez, M. (2017). Issizlik artıyor [Unemployment is increasing], Retrieved from http://www.mahfiegilmez.com/2017/02/issizlik-artyor.html
11. Erdayi, A. U. (2012). Beyaz yakalilarin tanimlanmasi uzerine [On the definition of workers who white collar]. Is Guc Endustri Ilsşkileri ve Insan Kaynaklari Dergisi, 14(3), 65- 80.
12. Gecgin, E. (2014). Esneklesme rejiminde gencligin halleri [The states of youth in flexibility regime]. Yurt ve Dunya Dergisi, 7.
13. Gorz, A. (2001). Yasadigimiz sefalet: Kurtulus careleri [Misères du présent, richesse du possible]. Cev. N. Tutal, Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
14. Gundogdu, K., Cimen, N., & Turan, S. (2008). Ogretmen adaylarinin kamu personeli secme sinavina (KPSS) iliskin görüsleri [Teacher candidates' views on the public personnel selection examination (KPSS)], Ahi Evran Universitesi Kırsehir Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 9(2), 35-43.
15. Habervitrini (2002). DMS ile KMS sinavlari birlestirildi [DMS and KMS exams are combined]. Retrieved from http://www.habervitrini.com/egitim/dms-ile-kms-sinavlari- birlestirildi-12783
16. Jeffrey, C. (2011). Geleceksiz kusak: Issiz gencler isiginda gecçligi yeniden dusunmek [The generation without future: Rethinking youth in the light of unemployed youth]. Gercek, yikici ve yaratici. Cev. D. Oz, Ed. D. Oz, F. Donmez Atbasi ve Y. Burkev, Ankara: Nota Bene Yayinlari.
17. Makal, A. (2003). Cumhuriyetin 80. yilinda Turkiye’de calisma iliskileri [Labour relations of the republic of Turkey in 80 years], A.U. SBF-GETA Tartisma Metinleri, No.62/Aralik.
18. Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. (Second Edition.). USA: Pearson Education Inc.
19. OECD (2017). Bir bakista egitim 2017: OECD gostergeleri [Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators] Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond- school/EAG2017CN-Turkey-Turkish.pdf
20. Paker, T. (2015). Durum calismasi [Case study], Nitel arastirma yontem, teknik, analiz ve yaklasimlar. F. N. Seggie & Y. Bayyurt (Eds). Ankara: Ani Yayinlari.
21. Punch, K. F. (2011). Sosyal araştirmalara giris: Nitel ve nicel yaklasimlar [Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches]. D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan & Z. Akyüz (Cev.)., Ankara: Siyasal Yayinevi.
22. Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
23. Sennett, R. (1998). the corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company.
24. Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1977). The Hidden Injures of Class.UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Solmon, L. C., &. Fagnano, C. L (1995). Benefits of education In International encyclopedia of wconomics of wducation. Edited by M. Carnoy, (2’nd Edition), Oxford, OX, UK ; Tarrytown, N.Y., USA : Pergamon.
26. Standing, G. (2011). Precariat: The new dangerous class. London/UK: Bloomsburry Academic.
27. TUIK (2016). Isgucu istatistikleri 2016 [Labour statistics 2016], Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24635
28. TUIK (2018). Isgucu istatistikleri 2018 [Labour statistics 2018], Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/HbGetirHTML.do?id=30677
29. TUIK (2019). Ne egitimde ne istihdamda olan 15-24 yas grubu genc nufusun bitirdigi egitim düzeyi [The level of education completed by the young population in the 15-24 age group, neither in education nor in employment] Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1007
30. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences], Guncellestirilmis gelistirilmis 5. Baski, Seskin Yayincilik, Ankara.
31. Yuksel, S. (2004). Ogretmen atamalarinda merkezi sinav uygulamasinin degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of central examination application in teacher appointments], XIII. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kurultayi. Inönü Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi, Malatya, 6-9 Temmuz 2004.