Student Clubs at Universities: A Content Analysis on Diversity

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 27, 52 - 73, 31.07.2021

Omur Hakan Kuzu

Öz

Student clubs at universities are quite significant in acquiring many skills and competencies, especially personal, cognitive, and social development, to support students’ professional and academic achievements. That being the case, this paper, a descriptive case study, aims to unveil how student clubs in Turkish state universities are diversified according to their fields of operation and university types. As of January-February 2020, 207 state and foundation universities exist in Turkey, and 11.106 student clubs information on 175 websites of these universities was attained for this research. Student clubs in the study were analysed in terms of the access information of the clubs and the number of university students. In contrast, club names were coded using the content analysis method. As a result of the analyses, it was observed that these clubs are classified under three themes, eight categories, and nineteen codes. At the end of the study, it was concluded that access to information of student clubs at Turkish universities and their visibility levels on universities’ websites and other social media are rather insufficient, and some suggestions were therefore made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

University, student clubs, content analysis

Kaynakça

• Akyuz, H., & Turkmen, M. (2015). Investigation of university students’ attitudes towards leisure time activities: Bartin University sample. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 4(Special Issue 1), 340-357.
• Altbach, P. G. (2011). The academic profession: The realities of developing countries. In Philip G. Altbach (Ed), Leadership for world-class universities: Challenges for developing countries (pp. 205-223). Routledge.
• Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
• Avci, O., Ring, E., & Mitchelli, L. (2015). Stakeholders in U.S. higher education: An analysis through two theories of stakeholders. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, X(II), 45-54.
• Bergan, S. (2004). Student participation in higher education governance. Semantic Scholar. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/845a/ba2e03d09a9857682335d068d90cdda5dc06.pdf?_ga=2.141904753.210436895.1579999026- 485561085.1565937251
• Bjorkquist, C. (2008). Continuity and change in stakeholder influence: Reflections on elaboration of stakeholder regimes. Reflecting Education, 4(2), 24-38.
• Burrows, J. (1999). Going beyond labels: A framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 5-10.
• Chi, B. S. (2000). Service-learning as ‘citizenship’ education: The promise and puzzles, Washington DC: Corporation for National Service. Unomaha. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=slcecurriculum
• Coffey, A., Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
• Cooper, D. L., Healy, M. A., & Simpson, J. (1994). Student development through involvement: Specific changes over time. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 98-102.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Cortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2017). Mission and vision statements of universities worldwide-a content analysis. Bogotá: Documento de investigación No. 152, Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
• Dey, E. L., Antonaros, M., Ott, M. C., Barnhardt, C. L., & Holsapple, M. A. (2010). Developing a moral compass: What is the campus climate for ethics and academic integrity? Core commitments: educating personal and social responsibility. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/core_commitments/moralcompassreport.pdf
• Dugan, J. P. (2013). Patterns in group involvement experiences during college: Identifying a taxonomy. Journal of College Student Development, 54, 229-246.
• Dugan, J. P., & Komives, S. R. (2007). Developing leadership capacity in college students: Findings from a national study. A report from the multi-institutional study of leadership. National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs.
• Dunkel, N. W., & Schuh, J. H. (1998). Advising student groups and organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Elkins, D. J., Forrester, S. A., & Noel-Elkins, A. V. (2011). Students’ perceived sense of campus community: The influence of out-of-class experiences. College Student Journal, 45, 105-122.
• Emil, S. (2020). What do universities’ virtual faces tell at a glance? A visual and textual analysis of Turkish universities’ official homepages. Journal of Higher Education, 10(1),1-10. https//. doi.org/10.2399/yod.19.009
• Eskici, M., & Aktas, R. (2014). Universite ogrencilerinin ogrenci kuluplerine yonelik gorusleri. Asian Journal of Instruction, 2(1), 31-40.
• Etzkowitz H., & Leydesdorff L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university- industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
• Ewing, J. C., Bruce, J. A., & Ricketts, K. G. (2009). Effective leadership development for undergraduates: How important is active participation in collegiate organizations? Journal of Leadership Education, 7(3), 118-131.
• Foreman, E. A., & Retallick, M. S. (2013). Using involvement theory to examine the relationship between undergraduate participation in extracurricular activities and leadership development. Journal of Leadership Education, 12(2), 56-73.
• Foubert, J. D., & Grainger, L. U. (2006). Effects of involvement in clubs and organizations on the psychosocial development of first-year and senior college students. NASPA Journal, 43(1), 166-182.
• Froumin, I. (2011). Establishing a new research university: The higher school of economics, the Russian Federation. In P. G. Altbach, and J. Salmi (Eds.), The road to academic excellence the making of world-class research universities (pp. 293-322). The World Bank.
• Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19-32.
• Gallagher, M. (2011). The role of elite universities in national higher education and research systems, and the challenges of prosecuting the case for concentrating public investment in their development in Australia, In N. C. Liu, Q. Wang, and Y. Cheng (Eds.), Paths to a world- class university (pp. 29-66). Sense Publishers.
• Gellin, A. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature 1991-2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 746-762.
• Gerdes, H., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1994). Emotional, social, and academic adjustment of college students: A longitudinal study of retention. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(3), 281-288.
• Guardia, J. R., & Evans, N. J. (2008). Factors influencing the ethnic identity development of Latino fraternity members at a Hispanic Serving Institution. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 163-181.
• Hostut, S. (2018). Turk universitelerin paydas analizi. Erciyes İletisim Dergisi, 5(3), 187-200.
• Huang, Y., & Chang, S. (2004). Academic and cocurricular involvement: Their relationship and the best combinations for student growth. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 391-406.
• Johnson, J. H. (1991). Student voice motivating students through empowerment. Oregon School Study Council.
• Jones, S. R., & Abes, E. S. (2004). Enduring influences of service-learning on college students’ identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 45(2), 149-166.
• Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303-324.
• Lapa, T. Y., & Ardahan, F. (2009). The reasons students at Akdeniz University participate in leisure activities and the ways they spend their time. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 20(4), 132-144.
• Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2009). Student participation in university governance: The role conceptions and sense of efficacy of student representatives on departmental comite´s. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 69-84.
• Logue, C. T., Hutchens, T. A., & Hector, M. A. (2005). Student leadership: A phenomenological exploration of postsecondary experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 46(4), 393-408.
• Lukovics, M. and Zuti, B. (2015). New functions of universities in the XXI. century: fourth generation” universities. Transition Studies Review, 22(2), 33-48.
• Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2013). Successful universities towards the improvement of regional competitiveness: fourth generation’ universities. Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy Conference, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Conference Paper, Palermo, Olaszország.
• Martin, L. M. (2000). The relationship of college experiences to psychosocial outcomes in students. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 294-303.
• McMillan, J. H. (1996). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. HarperCollins College Publishers.
• Menon, M. E. (2003). Student involment in university governance: A need for negotiated educational aims? Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 233-246.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed). Sage.
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
• Mohan Bursali, Y., & Aksel, I. (2016). Sosyal girisimciligin genc aktorleri: Universite ogrenci topluluklari ornegi. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Researches, 17(37), 85-101.
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: Vol. 2 A decade of research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Phillips, J. A., McLaughlin, M. M., Gettig, J. P., Fajiculay, J. R., & Advincula, M. R. (2015). An analysis of motivation factors for students’ pursuit of leadership positions. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(1), 1-5.
• Richter, F. D., & Tjosvold, D. (1980). Effects of student participation in classroom decision making on attitudes, peer interaction, motivation, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 74-80.
• Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence: lessons of experience. In P. G. Altbach, and J. Salmi (Eds.), The road to academic excellence the making of world-class research universities (pp. 323-342). The World Bank.
• Schlossberg, N. K. (1989). Marginality and mattering: Key issues in building community. New Directions for Student Services, 48, 5-15.
• Sears, J. T., & Hall, J. D. (2000). Generational influences on contemporary curriculum thought. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 199- 214.
• Sehoole, C., & Lee, J. J. (2020). South Africa as a geopolitical hub for migration and international student mobility. Higher Education Governance & Policy, 1(2), 99-108.
• Seres, L., Pavlicevic, V, & Tumbas, P. (2018). Digital transformation of higher education: competing on analytics. Proceedings of INTED2018 Conference 5th-7th March 2018, Valencia, Spain, pp. 9491-9497.
• Smith, M. W. (1994). Community service learning: Striking the chord of citizenship. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1(1), 37-43.
• Star, C., & Hammer, S. (2008). Teaching generic skills: Eroding the higher purpose of universities or an opportunity for renewal? Oxford Review of Education, 34(2), 237-251.
• Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 149-162.
• Turan, D., Duysak, A., & Kuguoglu, I. H. (2017). Universite ogrenci topluluklarinin toplumsallasmada yeri ve onemi. Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Journal of Social Sciences, 3(6), 203-217.
• Usdiken, B., Divarci Cakmakli A., & Topaler, B. (2017). “Strategy” in public and private universities, 1982-2014. Journal of Management Research, 13(1-2), 8-40.
• Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591-611.
• Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third-generation university: Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Yaldir, A., Koyuncuoglu, M. U., & Demir, B. (2016). Universiteler icin ogrenci topluluk yonetim bilgi sistemi uygulamasi. XVIII. Akademik Bilisim Konferansi, Aydin, 936-944. https://ab.org.tr/ab16/bildiri/315.pdf
• Yildirim, A., Simsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seckin Publication.
• Yuksekogretim Kurulu (YOK). 2020. Universitelerimiz. https://www.yok.gov.tr/universiteler/universitelerimiz
• Zuo, B., & Ratsoy, E. W. (1999). Student participation in university governance. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 29(1), 1-26.