A Qualitative Research on Competency-Based Learning Management System and Its Effectiveness

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 27, 257 - 278, 31.07.2021

Gul Ozudogru Huseyin Sımsek

Öz

This research aimed to reveal the effectiveness of the Akhi Competency-Based Training Project (ACBTP, called AYDEP), a distinctive learning management system based on user views. The research was designed as a case study, one of the qualitative research methods. The study group of the study consisted of the first-year pre-service teachers and instructors in the Classroom Education Department of a state university in the fall semester during the 2018-2019 academic year. A semi-structured interview form was used as a data collection tool. The data were analyzed with the content analysis method. The results showed that, in general, the system was used for course planning, assessment-evaluation and communication purposes. While the system facilitated planning, supported communication and was easily accessible, it had some limitations as well. Providing user support throughout the process in such systems can increase effectiveness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Learning management system, teacher training, competency-based training

Kaynakça

• 2015-2019 Stratejik Plan. (2014). Ahi Evran Universitesi, 2015-2019 Stratejik Plan. Retrieved from http://sgdb.ahievran.edu.tr/dosyalar/stratejik_plan_070115/ on 27.05.2019
• Akbas, H. E., Bozkurt, S., & Yazıcı, K. (2018). Comparision with the management thought and The Guild Organization Structure at The Ottoman Government. Accounting and Financial History Research Journal, Special Issue, 165-202.
• Albir, A. H. (2007). Competence-based curriculum design for training translators. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 1(2), 163-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2007.10798757
• Altiparmak, M., Kurt, İ. D., & Kapıdere, M. (201). E-Learning and open source code management systems in education. XIII. Akademik Bilisim Conference, 319-327.
• Ates, V., & Guyer, T. (2016). Evaluation of a learning management system by faculty members: Example of Gazi University. Journal of Information Technologies, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17671/btd.01463
• Bates, A. W. (T). (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Routledge.
• Bozkurt, A., & Ucar, H. (2018). E-Learning and e-exams: examination of learners’ perspectives concerning the authentication methods in online assessment processes. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(2), 745-755. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.357339
• Bursalioglu, Z. (1994). Okul yonetiminde yeni yapı ve davranıs. Pegem Publishing.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & Research desing: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
• Elcicek, M., & Bahceci, F. (2017). The investigation of the effects of mobile learning management system on academic success and attitudes of learners. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(5), 1695-1714.
• Elmas, M. (2013). Sakarya University Online Academic Systems. The Online Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 145-171.
• Emiroglu, B. G. (2019). Investigating faculty members’ perceived usability of Edmodo learning management system. Adiyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1), 158-175. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.533131
• Erdogdu, F., & Sahin, S. (2018). Student opinions regarding usability of the ubiquitous learning system. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 15-24.
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
• Gloria, A. ve Oluwadara, A. (2016). Influence of mobile learning training on pre-service Social studies teachers' technology and mobile phone self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 74-79.
• Hodge, S. (2007). The Origins of Competency-Based Training. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 47(2), 179-209.
• Holmes, K. A. ve Prieto-Rodriguez, E. (2018). Student and staff perceptions of a learning management system for blended learning in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 21-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.2
• Kimmons, R., Miller, B. G., Amador, J., Desjardins, C. D. ve Hall, C. (2015). Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre- service teachers’ reflective practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 809-829.
• Koc. T., & Turan, A. H. (2014). Mobile SABIS acceptance and use: An ampirical assessment at Sakarya University. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, 9(2), 163-175.
• Kose, A. (2016). Assessment of the candidate teachers training process according to the opinions of school administrators. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(3), 924-944.
• Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: towards context-aware ubiquiotus learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), E1-E9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00976.x
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
• Olpak, Y. Z., & Ozcakır, B. (2018). Ahi yeterlige dayalı egitim projesi: Pilot uygulamaya iliskin ogrenci gorusleri. 6th International Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education Symposium, Turkey.
• Ozonur, M., Kamıslı, H., Yelken, T. Y., & Tokmak, H. S. (2019). Investigation of distance education students’ opinions about the Enocta learning management system. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 50, 283-302. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.407470
• Reigeluth, C. M., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. S. L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N. D. (2008). Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education: Learning management systems. Educational Technology, 48(6), 32-39.
• Sendag, S., & Gedik, N. (2015). Teacher training problems of Turkey on the threshold of higher education transformation and a support model. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 5(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.35232
• Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. M. (2008). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Information Age Publications.
• TYCC [Turkiye Yuksekogretim Yeterlilikler Cercevesi] Yonetmeligi. (2011). Turkiye yuksekogretim yeterlilikler cercevesi yonetmeligi. Retrieved from http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr/dosyalar/21122011-TYYC%20Yonetmeligi-Taslak.doc on 04.07.2019.
• Yenipazar, E., & Turan, A. H. (2017). End user information technology satisfaction at Sakarya University SABIS assesment. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 22(2), 241-252.
• Yildirim, A., & Simsek, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastırma yontemleri. Seckin Publishing.
• Yıldız, E. (2020). Investigation of factors affecting the sense of community of distance education learners in online learning environments. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 180-205. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.9m
• Yıldız, M. (2015). The relationships among distance education instructors’ knowledge, belief and practices towards distance education. Master Thesis. Hacettepe University, Department of Computer and Instructional Technology Education, Ankara.
• YODEK [Yuksekogretim Akademik Degerlendirme ve Kalite Gelistirme Komisyonu]. (2007). Retrieved from Yuksekogretim kurumlarında akademik degerlendirme ve kalite gelistirme rehberi. http://www.yodek.org.tr/yodek/files/7aa12f8d2582deb44d4249c7aa4a2020.pdf on 04.07.2019.