TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİNDE YEŞİL KRİTERİN ÖNEMİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI: TÜRK GIDA SEKTÖRÜ ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2022, , 500 - 513, 31.12.2022

Mustafa Dalay , Kazım Sarı

https://doi.org/10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.1152540

Cited By: 3

Öz

Tedarikçi seçimi, birden fazla farklı kriterin dikkate alındığı ve tedarik zinciri başarısı için hayati öneme sahip bir karadır. Günümüzde, toplumsal çevre bilinci ve işletmelerin çevreye olan hassasiyetleri medya, sivil toplum kuruluşları ve ilgili mevzuatın etkisi ile önemli ölçüde artmıştır. Bu durum farklı ülke ve sektörlerdeki işletmeler için fiyat, kalite, güvenirlik gibi geleneksel kriterlerin yanında çevreyle ilgili yeşil kriterin de tedarikçi seçim sürecinde yerini almasını sağlamıştır. Ancak, yeşil kritere, tedarikçi seçim sürecinde ne ölçüde ağırlık verildiği, özellikle Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülke işletmeleri için tartışma konusudur. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada, Türk gıda sektöründeki işletmelerin hangi kriterlere göre tedarikçi seçimi yaptığı ve seçim sürecinde yeşil kritere ne düzeyde ağırlık verdiği araştırılmaktadır. Bu kapsamdaki araştırmamız, bulanık DEMATEL kullanarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Türk gıda sektöründeki işletmelerin tedarikçi seçiminde, en çok fiyat, kalite, güven ve iş yapısına önem verdiğini, yeşil kritere ise az düzeyde önem verdiğini ortaya çıkarmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarikçi Seçimi, Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri, Bulanık DEMATEL

EXPLORING THE IMPORTANCE OF GREEN CRITERIA IN SUPPLIER SELECTION: THE CASE OF THE TURKISH FOOD INDUSTRY

Öz

Supplier selection is a decision that takes multiple different criteria into account and it is vital to success of a supply chain. Today, social environmental awareness and the sensitivity of companies to the environment have increased significantly with the impact of media, non-governmental organizations and relevant legislation. This situation has enabled the green criterion to take its place in the supplier selection process as well as traditional criteria such as price, quality and reliability for companies in different countries and sectors. However, the extent to which the green criterion is given high weight in the supplier selection process is a matter of debate, especially for companies in developing countries such as Turkey. For this purpose, it is investigated according to which criteria the companies in the Turkish food sector choose their suppliers and how much weight they give to the green criterion in the selection process. Our research in this context was carried out fuzzy DEMATEL. The results obtained revealed that the Turkish food industry companies give the most importance to price, quality, relability, and business structure in supplier selection, while they attach a very few importance to the green criterion.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supplier Selection, Green Supply Chain, Fuzzy DEMATEL

Kaynakça

• Aksakal, E., Dağdeviren, M. (2010). Anp ve Dematel Yöntemleri İle Personel Seçimi Problemine Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 25, No 4, 905-913.
• Ansari, A. and Batoul, M. (1988). JIT purchasing as a quality and productivity centre. The International Journal of Production Research, Vol.26, 19-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207548808947838.
• Anthony, T.F. and Buffa, F.P. (1977). Strategic Purchase Scheduling. The Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Fall 1977, 27-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1977.tb00400.x
• Banaeian N., Mobli, H., Nielsen I.E., Omid, M. (2015). A Methodology for Green Supplier Selection in Food Industries, Technology Management for Sustainable Production and Logistics, EcoProduction, 3-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33935-6_1
• Benton, W.C. and Krajewski, L. (1990). Vendor Performance and Alternative Manufacturing Environments. The Decision Sciences, Vol.21, 403-415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1990.tb01693.x
• Bernard, P. (1989), “Managing vendor performance”, The Production and Inventory Management Journal, 1-7.
• Browning, J.M., Zabriskie, N.B., Huellmantel, A.B. (1983). Strategic Purchasing Planning. The Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Spring 1983, 19-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1983.tb00071.x
• Chang, B., Chang, C.W., Wu C.H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria, Expert Systems with Applications 38, 1850–1858
• Dickson, W.G. (1966). An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems And Decisions. The Journal of Purchasing, February, 5-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x
• Dobos and Vörösmarty (2014). Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators. The Int. J. Production Economics, Elsevier 157, 273-278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.026
• Feng, G.C., Ma, R. (2020). Identification of the factors that influence service innovation in manufacturing enterprises by using the fuzzy DEMATEL method, The Journal of Cleaner Production 1-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120002
• Genovese, A., Lenny Koh, S.C., Bruno, G., (2013). Esposito, E. Greener supplier selection: State of the art and some empirical evidence. The International Journal of Production Research, 51, 2868–2886. doi:https://doi.org/101080/00207543.2012.748224
• Grisi, R.M., Guerra, L. and Naviglio, G. (2010). Supplier Performance Evaluation for Green Supply Chain Management. P. Taticchi (Ed.), Business Performance Measurement and Management, 149-162.
• Haq, A.N., Kannan, G. (2006). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 826-835. doi: 10.1007/s00170-005-2562-8
• Hwang, H., Moon, D.H., Shinn, S.W. (1990). An Eoq Model With Quantıty Discounts For Both Purchasing Price And Freight Cost, The Computers and Operations Research, 73-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(90)90029-7
• Huang, C.Y., Shyu, J.Z., Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan’s SIP Mall industry. The Technovation, 27, 744–765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.04.002
• Jiunn-I, S., Hsin-Hung, W., Kuan-Kai, H. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowl. Based Syst. 23, 277–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013
• Kamili, U.A., Nurcahyo, R. and Farizal (2020). Supply Chain Effect to Environment of Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) Industry. 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, 469-473. Doi: 10.1109/ICIEA49774.2020.9102079
• Kannan, G., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., Murugesan, P., (2013). Multi Criteria Decision Making approaches for Green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. The Journal of Cleaner Production, 1-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046
• Kaynak, R., Aytekin, M. (2005). Makine Halı Sektöründe Satınalma Davranışına Etki Eden Tedarikçi Performans Kriterleri. V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, 25-27.
• Kuo, T.C., Hsu, C.W., Li, J.Y. (2015). Developing a Green Supplier Selection Model by Using the DANP with VIKOR, The Sustainability, 1661-1689. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021661
• Lee, A.H.I., Kang, H.Y., Hsu, C.F., Hung, H.C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. The Expert Systems with Applications, 36,7917–7927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052
• Liang, H., Ren, J., Gao, Z., Gao, S., Luo, X., Dong, L., Scipioni (2016). A. Identification of critical success factors for sustainable development of biofuel industry in China based on grey decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory(DEMATEL). J. Clean. Prod. 131, 500–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.151
• Liou, J.J.H., Yen, L., Tzeng, G.H. (2008). Building an effective safety management system for airlines. The Journal of Air Transport Manage. 14, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.10.002
• Michnik, J. (2013). Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System (WINGS) –An analysis method for the systems of interrelated components. The European Journal of Operational Research, 3,536–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.007
• Monczka, R.M., Giunipero, L.C., C.P.M. and Reck, R.F. (1981). Perceived Importance of Supplier Information. The Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Spring 1981, 21-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1981.tb00629.x
• Newman, R.G. (1988). Insuring Quality: Purchasing’s Role. The Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Fall 1988, 14-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1988.tb00633.x
• Opricovic, S. ve Tzeng, G. (2003). Defuzzication Within a Multicriteria Decision Model, www.worldscientific.com, Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488503002387
• Organ A. (2013). Bulanık Dematel Yöntemiyle Makine Seçimini Etkileyen Kriterlerin Değerlendirilmesi, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 22, Sayı1, Sayfa 157-172.
• Ren, J., Manzardo, A., Toniolo, S., Scipioni, A. (2013). Sustainability of hydrogen supply chain. Part I: identification of critical criteria and cause-effect analysis for enhancing the sustainability using DEMATEL. The International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38,14159–14171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.126
• Ronen, B., Trietsch, D. (1988). A Decision support system for purchasing management of large projects. The Operations Research, 36(6), 882-890. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.36.6.882
• Sarı, K. (2017). A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Framework For Evaluating Green Supply Chain Management Practices, The Computer and Industrial Ingeneering. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.016
• Senvar, O., Tuzkaya G. ve Kahraman, C. (2014). Multi Criteria Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE Method” (Eds.) Kahraman, C. ve Oztaysi, B., Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness, The Recent Developments and Techniques, Springer, Volume 313, ISBN 978-3-642-53939-8, (eBook), 24-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53939-8 2
• Soukup, W.R. (1987). Supplier Selection Strategies. The Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Summer 1987, 7-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1987.tb00180.x
• Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. The Expert Syst. Appl. 32, 1028–1044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
• Wagner J., Ettenson R., Parrish J. (1989). Vendor Selection Among Retail Buyers: An Analysis by Merchandise Division, The Journal of Retailing, 58-79.
• Wang, C.N., Tsai, H.T., Nguyen, V.T., Nguyen, V.T. and Huang, Y.F. (2020). A Hybrid Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Supplier Evaluation and Selection in the Food Processing Industry. The Symmetry, 12,211, 1-12.
• Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, B.C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods, The European Journal of Operational Research, 2-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R
• Wei, P.L., Huang, J.H., Tzeng, G.H., Wu, S.I. (2010). Causal modeling ofweb-advertising effects by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. The International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 9, 799–829. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622010004032
• Wu, W. W., Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. The Expert systems with applications, 32(2), 499-507.