Bağda bitki gelişim düzenleyicisi, yaprak gübresi ve yayıcı-yapıştırıcılarla karıştırılarak uygulanan bazı pestisitlerin parçalanma sürecindeki değişimlerin belirlenmesi

Öz

2015-2016 yıllarında yürütülen bu çalışmada, asma yapraklarını toplama ve üzüm hasadı öncesi dönemlerde kullanılan bazı pestisitler ile bitki gelişim düzenleyicisi (BGD), yaprak gübresi (YG) ve yayıcı-yapıştırıcıların (YY) pestisitlerin parçalanma sürecine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bağda karışım halinde kullanılan pestisitlerin, ilaçlama alet deposunda parçalanma olup olmadığının belirlenmesi amacıyla laboratuvarda gerçekleştirilen önce fiziksel sonra da kromatografik analizlerde gerek pestisitlerin birbirleriyle gerekse diğer preparatlar ile karışımlarında herhangi bir önemli etkileşim görülmemiştir. Karışım halinde kullanılan pestisitlerin arazi koşullarında parçalanma sürecinde değişim olup olmadığını belirlemek üzere 2016 yılında İzmir’in Kemalpaşa ilçesindeki bir bağda iki farklı dönemde iki deneme kurulmuştur. Asmanın yaprak toplama döneminde azoxystrobin, imidacloprid ve metalaxyl içeren preparatların üçlü karışımı BGD, YG ve YY ile tekli, ikili ve üçlü olarak karıştırılarak 8 karakterli bir deneme üç tekerrürlü olarak uygulanmış, amaca uygun aralıklarla alınan yaprak örneklerinde aktif maddelerin degredasyon süreci belirlenmiştir. Genel olarak çoğu karışımlarda degredasyonunun yavaşladığı, bekleme süresi sonunda bile kalıntı miktarının MRL’nin altına düşürmediği görülmüştür. Üzüm döneminde ise boscalid, chlorpyrifos ethyl ve hexythiazox içeren preparatların üçlü karışımı, aynı asma yaprak döneminde olduğu gibi uygulanmıştır. Bu dönemde kullanılan tüm karışımlar, boscalidin degredasyon sürecini uzatmış, chlorpyrifos ethyl ve hexythiazoxun degredasyon sürecinde ise önemli bir etki görülmemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yaprak gübresi,pestisit,bitki gelişim düzenleyicisi,bekleme süresi,yayıcı-yapıştırıcı,tank karışımı

Determination of the changes in the process of degradation of some pesticides applied in mixtures with plant growth regulators, foliar fertilizers and spreader-stricker in a vineyard

Abstract

The study conducted in 2015-2016 examined effects of plant growth regulators (PGR), foliar fertilizers (FF) and spreader-sticker (SS) on the process of degradation of pesticides. First physical then chromatographic analyses were conducted in laboratory to determine whether degradation occurred even in spray tanks. In order to determine if changes occurred during the process of decomposition of pesticides in mixtures under field conditions, two experiments were set up in Izmir during the shooting and fruiting of grapevines in 2016. In shooting period, a mixture of azoxystrobin, imidacloprid and metalaxyl was blended with PGR, FF and SS in double and triple combinations to create eight treatments applied to three replicates to determine the process of degradation of active ingredients on leaf samples collected at given intervals. In general, it was observed that degradation of azoxystrobin, imidacloprid and metalaxyl on leaves applied with PGR, FF and SS was slower and the residues did not drop below maximum residue limits even after the preharvest interval. During the fruiting period, a mixture of boscalid, chlorpyrifos ethyl and hexythiazox was applied in the same way as for the shooting period. All mixtures with PGR, FF and SStended to increase degradation of boscalid, but had no effect on the degradation on chlorpyrifos ethyl and hexythiazox.

Keywords

• Foliar fertilizer,pesticide,plant growth regulator,preharvest interval,spreader-sticker,tank mix

Kaynakça

1. Ağar, S., M. Durgun, B. Evyapan & S. Öztürk, 1991. Investigations on the character of the waters, for preparing pesticide mixture, in the regions that plant protection chemicals are used intensively in Turkey. Plant Protection Bulletin, 31 (1-4): 99-108.
2. Anonymous, 2011. T.C. General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies. Standard testing methods for the preparation of storage terminals of plant protection products in plant or vegetable products. (Web page: https://www.tarim.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/yayin/22.pdf) (Date accessed: June 2015).
3. Anonymous, 2014. Federation of Food & Drink Industry Associations of Turkey (Web page: http://www.tgdf.org.tr/ turkce/tgdfraporlari/11uzum.pdf) (Date accessed: November 2014).
4. CIPAC, 2006. Collaborative International Pesticide Analytical Council, Content Handbook. 45 pp.
5. Copçu, M., N. Öngen, V. Çetin & K. Atalay, 2002. Correct deployment in the vinification program and pesticide burden reduction studies. Turkey V. Viticulture and Oenology Symposium. Nevşehir, 572 pp.
6. Durmuşoğlu, E., O. Tiryaki & R. Canhilal, 2010. Pesticide use in Turkey, residual and resistance problems. (Web page: http://www.zmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/52cf38361a20908_ek.pdf) (Date accessed: May 2016).
7. EPA, 1996. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Product Properties Test Guidelines, OPPTS 830.6317.
8. FAO, 1985. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Guidelines for the Packaging and Storage of Pesticides. (Web page: http://www.fao.org/home/en/) (Date Accessed: November 2014).

9. Fishel, F., 2002. Effects of water pH on the stability of pesticides. (Web page: https://extension2.missouri.edu/ ipm1017) (Date Accessed: May 2016).
10. JMP, 2007. Version 7.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
11. Kucharski, M., 2007. Impact of adjuvants on: Phenmedipham, desmedipham and ethofumesate residues in soil and plant. Pestycydy, (3-4): 53-59.
12. Kucharski, M. & J. Sadowski, 2009a. Influence of adjuvants on behavior of phenmedipham in plant and soil. Polish Journal of Agronomy, 1: 32-36.
13. Kucharski, M. & J. Sadowski, 2009b. Degradation of ethofumesate in soil under laboratory conditions. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 18 (2): 243-247.
14. Kucharski, M., J. Sadowski & K. Domaradzki, 2012. Degradation rate of chloridazon in soil as influenced by adjuvants. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 52 (1): 114-118.
15. Kucharski, M., J. Sadowski, B. Wujek & J. Trajdos, 2011. Influence of adjuvants addition on lenacil residues in plant and soil. Polish Journal of Agronomy, 5: 39-42.
16. Lehotay, S. J., 2007. Determination of pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 90 (2): 485-520.
17. Lehotay, S. J., K. Mastovska & A. R. Lightfield, 2005. Use of buffering and other means to improve results of problematic pesticides in a fast and easy method for residue analysis of fruits and vegetables. Journal of AOAC International, 88 (2): 615.
18. Lo, C. & T. Lee, 2010. Effects of adjuvants on pesticide combinations: water quality on physical compatibility. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals, 32 (11): 111-119.
19. Miller, J. N. & A. Ambrus, 2005. “Statistics in calibration analyses: Manual on Basic Statistics Chapter: 9: 45-49”. In: Lectures Database FAO/IAEA Workshop on Introduction to QC/QA Measures in Pesticide Residue Analytical Laboratories. (12 September-7 October 2005, Seibersdorf, Vienna, Austria), 171 pp.
20. Okdemir, Ş., S. Öztürk & N. Şimşir, 1965. The studies on effect of hardness of the emulsion stability Turkey waters of drugs. Plant Protection Bulletin, 5 (1): 180-190.
21. Park, D. & J. C. Chong, 2010. Carrier water quality influences pesticide stability university index. Produced by PSA CAFLS Web Team Clemson University, Clemson, S.C. 29634 (864): 656-3311.
22. Ryckaert, B., P. Spanoghe, G. Haesaert, B. Heremans, S. Isebaert & W. Steurbaut, 2007. Quantitative determination of the influence of adjuvants on foliar fungicide residues. Crop Protection, 26: 1589-1594.
23. SANTE, 2015, Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed, SANTE/11945/2015.
24. Swarcewicz, M., A. Gregorczy & J. Sobczak, 2013. Comparison of linuron degradation in the presence of pesticide mixtures in soil under laboratory conditions. Environ Monit Assess, 185: 8109-8114.
25. Swarcewicz, M. K. & A. Gregorczyk, 2012. The effects of pesticide mixtures on degradation of pendimethalin in soils. Environ Monit Assess, 184: 3077-3084.
26. TUIK, 2015. Turkish Statistical Institute. (Web page: http://www.tuik.gov.tr.) (Date accessed: August 2016).
27. Whitford, F., 2009. The impact of water quality on pesticide performance. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service. (Web page: hhttps://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/PPP/PPP-86.pdf) (Date accessed: May 2016).
28. WHO, 1984. World Health Organization. Technical Report Series 699: Chemistry and Specifications of Pesticides.
29. Yılmaz, C. & E. Durmuşoğlu, 2012. Changes on biological effect and degration duration of some insecticides mixed with humic matter used against Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westw.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)] on tomato. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 36 (4): 559-571.