The Relationship between the Sectoral Structure of Female Employment and Economic Growth and Income Distribution in Türkiye: Empirical Evidence from Fourier-Based Cointegration and Causality Analyses

Öz

This study aims to evaluate the contribution of female labour force to the economy in a more comprehensive framework by analysing the relationship between the sectoral structure of female employment in Türkiye and economic growth and income distribution. Using data from the Turkish economy (1991–2023), the study employs FADL and RALS-FADL cointegration tests to analyze long-term relationships and the Fourier Toda-Yamamoto test to assess causality. The findings indicate significant long-run relationships between women's employment in total, services, industry, and agriculture with economic growth and income distribution. While increased female employment in all sectors improves income distribution, agricultural employment negatively impacts economic growth, and the effect of total female employment on growth remains limited. The causality analysis findings reveal that income distribution is a determining factor for female employment in the service sector and total female employment, while industrial female employment is effective on income distribution. There is also evidence that economic growth affects women's employment in the agricultural sector. These findings indicate that policies targeting female employment have sectorally differentiated impacts on economic growth and income distribution, thus underscoring the necessity for sector-specific targeted strategies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Female Employment
• Sectoral Structure
• Economic Growth
• Income Distribution

Türkiye’deki Kadın İstihdamının Sektörel Yapısı ile Ekonomik Büyüme ve Gelir Dağılımı Arasındaki İlişki: Fourier Tabanlı Eşbütünleşme ve Nedensellik Analizlerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'deki kadın istihdamının sektörel yapısı ile ekonomik büyüme ve gelir dağılımı arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz ederek, kadın işgücünün ekonomiye olan katkısının daha kapsamlı bir çerçevede değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Türkiye ekonomisine ait 1991-2023 veriler kullanılarak yapılan çalışmada, değişkenler arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkiler FADL ve RALS-FADL eşbütünleşme testleriyle, nedensellik ilişkisi ise Fourier Toda-Yamamoto testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular toplam, hizmet, sanayi ve tarım sektörlerindeki kadın istihdamı ile ekonomik büyüme ve gelir dağılımı değişkenleri arasında uzun dönemli ilişkiler bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, tüm sektörlerdeki ve toplam kadın istihdamındaki artış gelir dağılımını iyileştirirken, tarım sektöründeki kadın istihdamı ekonomik büyümeyi olumsuz etkilemekte ve toplam kadın istihdamının büyüme üzerindeki etkisi sınırlı kalmaktadır. Nedensellik analizi bulguları, gelir dağılımının hizmet sektöründe ve toplam kadın istihdamı üzerinde belirleyici bir faktör olduğunu, sanayi sektöründeki kadın istihdamının ise gelir dağılımı üzerinde etkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, ekonomik büyümenin tarım sektöründeki kadın istihdamını etkilediğine dair ampirik kanıtlar elde edilmiştir. Bu bulgular, kadın istihdamına yönelik politikaların ekonomik büyüme ve gelir dağılımı üzerindeki etkilerinin sektörel düzeyde farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymakta olup, politika yapıcılar için sektörel bazda hedeflenmiş stratejiler geliştirilmesi gerekliliğine vurgu yapmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kadın İstihdamı
• Sektörel Yapı
• Ekonomik Büyüme
• Gelir Dağılımı

Kaynakça

1. Akcan, M.B. and Azazi, H. (2022). İstihdam oluşturmayan büyümenin sektörel analizi: Türkiye örneği. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20(1), 227–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/yead.1037008
2. Akıncı, M. and Yılmaz, Ö. (2013). Türkiye’de sektörel istihdam ve bölgesel kalkınma ilişkisi: Shift–Share (Değişim Payı) analizi. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 63(2), 25–51. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iuifm/
3. Aksoy, E. (2013). Relationships between employment and growth from industrial perspective by considering employment incentives: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 74–86. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijefi/
4. Aktaş, E.E. (2021). Gelir dağılımı adaletsizliği ve istihdam ilişkisi: Seçili ülkeler için panel Tobit analizi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.928947
5. Akyol Özcan, K. (2023). Kadın istihdamı ve kişi başına gsyh’nin gelir eşitsizliği üzerindeki etkisi: Avrupa Birliği üye ülkeleri ve Türkiye'de panel moderatör etki analizi. Journal of Academic Value Studies, 9(3), 162-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/javs.72069
6. Akyol, H., Karakuş, K., Can, H. and Ağırkaya, M.B. (2019). Türkiye’de endüstriyel gelişim, işsizlik ve gelir eşitsizliği ilişkisi. G. Gürçay (Ed.), UBAK uluslararası bilimler akademisi sosyal bilimler kongresi bildiri kitabı içinde (s. 126). UBAK Publications.
7. Altuğ, F. and Almammadlı, G. (2025). Türkiye’de kadın istihdamının sektörel ve bölgesel düzeyde yoğunlaşma durumu. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 54, 164–193. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.1488162
8. Altun, Y. and İşleyen, Ş. (2019). Türkiye’de iktisadi büyüme ile sanayi sektöründe istihdam arasındaki ilişkinin ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı ile ekonometrik analizi: 1991–2017. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17, 657–676. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/igdirsosbilder/

9. Ankara Development Agency. (2024). Kadın kooperatifleri çalıştayı raporu. Retrieved from https://ankaraka.org.tr/sites/default/files/article- documents/KADIN%20KOOPERAT%C4%B0FLER%C4%B0%20%C3%87ALI%C5%9ETAYI%20RAPORU.pdf
10. Arısoy, İ. (2013). Kaldor yasası çerçevesinde Türkiye’de sanayi sektörü ve iktisadi büyüme ilişkisinin sınanması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(1), 143–162. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/oguiibf/
11. Aydın, A. (2025). Türkiye ekonomisinde sanayisizleşme ve gelir dağılımı. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 26(1), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1469277
12. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J.J. and Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00091
13. Banerjee, P., Arčabić, V. and Lee, H. (2017). Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from Crude Oil Market. Economic Modeling, 67, 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.004
14. Becker, G.S. (1991). A treatise on the family: Enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15. Becker, R., Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x
16. Blau, F.D. and Kahn, L.M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789-865. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160995
17. Bussmann, M. (2009). The effect of trade openness on women's welfare and work life. World Development, 37(6), 1027-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.10.007
18. Checchi, D. and García-Peñalosa, C. (2008). Labour market institutions and income inequality. Economic Policy, 23(56), 601-649. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40071852
19. Christopoulos, D.K. and Leon-Ledesma, M.A. (2010). Smooth breaks and non-linear mean reversion: Post-Bretton Woods real exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(6), 1076–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.02.003
20. Conesa, J. C. and Wang, Y. (2023). Workers’ income risk and the evolution of income inequality in China (SSRN Paper No. 4622204). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4622204 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4622204
21. Cysne, R.P. (2009). On the positive correlation between income inequality and unemployment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.218
22. Deffo, R.N., Tchoumdop, M.E.N. and Kamga, B.F. (2024). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on income inequalities in Cameroon: The influence of employment status. Journal of African Economies, 33(Supplement_1), i73-i93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejae022
23. Demirtaş, G. and Yayla, N. (2017). The effect of global ıntegration on women’s employment: An empirical ınvestigation. Journal of Yasar University, 12(48), 339-349. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jyasar/
24. Dinç, Ö.G. (2022). Türkiye’de tarım, sanayi ve hizmet sektörleri ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: bootstrap toda-yamamoto nedensellik testi. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.33416/baybem.1125113
25. Duman, A. (2019). Türkiye’de emeğin değişen payı ve gelir dağılımı. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1(60), 349-370. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ct/
26. Durceylan Kaygusuz, E., Filiztekin, A. and Göker, Z.G. (2023). Türkiye'de kadınların işgücüne katılımı: genel eğilimler, bölgesel ve demografik farklar, tutumlar. Retrieved from https://kadingirisimci.gov.tr/media/ffvjlczc/8-t%C3%BCrkiye-de-kad%C4%B1nlar%C4%B1n-i%C5%9Fg%C3%BCc%C3%BCne-kat%C4%B1l%C4%B1m%C4%B1.pdf
27. Dursun, G. and Damadoğlu, J. (2020). Female labour force participation and economic growth in the South Mediterranean countries: Structural shifts in causal linkages. Journal of Current Researches on Business and Economics, 10(1), 69-82. Retrieved from https://www.jocrebe.com/
28. Enders, W. (2014). Applied econometric time series. New York: Wiley
29. Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2012a). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 574-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00662.x
30. Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2012b). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
31. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
32. Er, S. (2012). Women indicators of economic growth: A panel data approach. Economic Research Guardian, 2(1), 27-42. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/
33. Folbre, N. (2009). Greed, lust and gender: A history of economic ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199238422.001.0001
34. Gaddis, I. and Klasen, S. (2014). Economic development, structural change, and women's labor force participation: A reexamination of the feminization U hypothesis. Journal of Population Economics, 27(3), 639-681. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44289679
35. Giupponi, G., Joyce, R., Lindner, A., Waters, T., Wernham, T. and Xu, X. (2024). The employment and distributional impacts of nationwide minimum wage changes. Journal of Labor Economics, 42(S1), 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1086/728471
36. Goldin, C. (1994). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history (NBER Working Paper No. 4707). https://doi.org/10.3386/w4707
37. Goldin, C. (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1091-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1091
38. Greene, W.H. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th Edition). New York: Pearson Education.
39. Gregory, A.W. and Hansen, B.E. (1996a). Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7
40. Gregory, A.W. and Hansen, B.E. (1996b). Tests for cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(3), 555-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1996.mp58003008.x
41. Gujarati, D.N. and Porter, D.C. (2009). Basic econometrics (Fifth Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
42. Günay, G. and Bener, Ö. (2011). Perception of family life in frame of gender roles of women. Turkish Journal Of Social Research, 153(153), 157-171. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tsadergisi/
43. Hatemi-J, A. (2008). Tests for cointegration with two unknown regime shifts with an application to financial market integration. Empirical Economics, 35, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0175-9
44. Helpman, E., Itskhoki, O. and Redding, S. (2010). Inequality and unemployment in a global economy. Econometrica, 78(4), 1239-1283. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8640
45. ILO. (2025). ILO modelled estimates database. Retrieved from https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/
46. Im, K.S. and Schmidt, P. (2008). More efficient estimation under non-normality when higher moments do not depend on the regressors, using residual augmented least squares. Journal of Econometrics, 144(1), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.01.003
47. İnce Yenilmez, M. (2023). The position of women in working life during the Republican era. In Y. Pustu, A. Şenel and H.Y. Karacabey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Turkey Economics Congress 2023 (pp. 1159–1170). Ankara, Turkey: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
48. İzgi Balcı, B. ve Akdeniz, S. (2011). Kadın istihdamı sorunsalı nereden doğuyor? Paper presented at the EconAnadolu 2011: Anadolu International Conference in Economic II. Eskişehir, Türkiye.
49. Kabeer, N. (2016). Gender equality, economic growth, and women's agency: The "endless variety" and "monotonous similarity" of patriarchal constraints. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 295-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1090009
50. Kalaycı, S. and Öztürk, A. (2017). Inequality of income distribution based on education, unemployment and inflation in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 12(31), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12674
51. Kopuk, E. and Meçik, O. (2020). Türkiye’de imalat sanayi ve tarım sektörlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: 1998–2020 dönemi analizi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 27(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.693387
52. Kutluay Şahin, D. (2022). Kadın istihdamının ekonomik büyümeye etkisi: Ampirik bir analiz. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 8(2), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1135131
53. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/i304619
54. Lee, H., Lee, J. and Im, K. (2015). More powerful cointegration tests with non-normal errors. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19(4), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2013-0060
55. Lorgelly, P.K. and Owen, P.D. (1999). The effect of female and male schooling on economic growth in the Barro-Lee model. Empirical Economics, 24, 537-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810050071
56. Makal, A. (2002). Türkiye’de çok partili dönemde çalışma ilişkileri: 1946–1963 (1st ed.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
57. Makal, A. (2010). Türkiye’de erken Cumhuriyet döneminde kadın emeği. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2(25), 13-40. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ct/
58. Maki, D. (2012). Tests for cointegration allowing for an unknown number of breaks. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2011-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2012.04.022
59. Mastercard. (2022). The Mastercard index of women entrepreneurs. Retrieved from https://www.mastercard.com/news/insights/2022/mastercard-index-of-women-entrepreneurs-2021/
60. Mercan, M. and Kızılkaya, O. (2014). Türkiye’de sanayi sektörü, ekonomik büyüme ve verimlilik ilişkisinin Kaldor yasaları çerçevesinde sınanması: Ekonometrik bir analiz. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 36(1), 137–160. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/muiibd/
61. Mocan, H.N. (1999). Structural unemployment, cyclical unemployment, and income inequality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(1), 122-134. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2646791
62. Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, N.A. and Soytas, U. (2016). Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Economics, 60, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009
63. Nolan, B. (1986). Unemployment and the size distribution of income. Economica, 53(212), 421-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/2554095
64. OECD. (2013). Recommendation of the council on gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264279391-en
65. OECD. (2017). The pursuit of gender equality: An uphill battle. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281318-en
66. Oh, D.Y., Lee, H. and Boulware, K.D. (2020). A comment on interest rate pass-through: a non-normal approach. Empirical Economics, 59, 2017-2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01696-3
67. Oktay, D.S. (2019). Asymmetric impact of inflation and unemployment on income inequality: The case of Turkey. In S. Sarı, M. Balcılar and A.H. Gencer (Eds.), Proceedings of international conference of Eurasian economies 2019 (pp. 11-20). North Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
68. Olivetti, C. (2013). The female labor force and long-run development: The American experience in comparative perspective (NBER Working Paper No. 19131). https://doi.org/10.3386/w19131
69. Ökçün, G. (1970). Osmanlı sanayii: 1913–1915 yılları sanayi (Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences Publication No. 299). Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences.
70. Özgün, F. (2023). Türkiye’de hizmetler sektörü istihdamı ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 9(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1198463
71. Özoçaklı, D. and Palandökenlier, B. (2024). Farklı boyutlarıyla istihdam ve büyüme arasındaki nedensellik: Türkiye için sektörel bir analiz. Finans Politik and Ekonomik Yorumlar, 668, 37–54. Retrieved from https://www.ekonomikyorumlar.com.tr/sayi/668
72. Pata, U.K. (2018). Türkiye’de kadın istihdamı ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Simetrik ve asimetrik nedensellik testleri ile sektörel bir analiz. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 21, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.391777
73. Phillips, P.C. and Hansen, B.E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545
74. Prime Ministry Directorate General of Statistics. (1945). Labour statistics, 1937–1943: Worker statistics (1937; 1938; 1943) and workplace accident statistics, 1937–1943 [Government report]. Ankara, Turkey: Prime Ministry Directorate General of Statistics.
75. Quataert, D. (1999). Sanayi devrimi çağında osmanlı imalat sektörü (Çev. Tansel Güney). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
76. Roberts, A. and Tran, T.B. (2022). The globalization of production, national labour regulations and income inequality in the global North and South, 1980-2013. Global Networks, 23(4), 687-714. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12392
77. Rodrigues, P.M.M.and Taylor, A.M.R. (2009). The flexible Fourier form and local GLS De-trended UR tests. Banco de Portugal (Banco De Portugal Working Paper No. 19). Retrieved from https://www.bportugal.pt/sites/default/files/anexos/papers/wp200919.pdf
78. Seguino, S. (2000). Gender Inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28(7), 1211-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00018-8 SOFA Team, and Doss, C. (2011). The role of women in agriculture (ESA Working Paper No. 11-02). Retrieved from https://gender.cgiar.org/publications/role-women-agriculture
79. Solt, F. (2019). The standardized World income inequality database. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LM4OWF
80. Standing, G. (1999). Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development, 27(3), 583-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00151-X
81. Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2015). Introduction to econometrics. London: Pearson Education
82. Sussnitzki, A.J. (1966). Ethnic division of labor. In C. Issawi (Ed.), The economic history of the Middle East, 1800–1914 (pp. 114–125). Chiago: The University of Chicago Press.
83. Şenol, D. and Mazman, İ. (2013). Tarihi bir bakışla çalışma hayatında kadın. In G. Çamur Duyan, D. Şenol and S. Yıldız (Eds.), Kırıkkale University center for practice and research on women’s issues (pp. 151–162). Kırıkkale, Turkey: Kırıkkale University Center for Practice and Research on Women’s Issues.
84. Tam, H. (2011). U-shaped female labor participation with economic development: Some panel data evidence. Economics Letters, 110(2), 140-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.003
85. Telli Üçler, Y. (2022). Türkiye’de sektörler itibarı ile istihdam büyüme ilişkisi. Pearson Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(21), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.46872/pj.590
86. Toda, H.Y. and Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
87. Tökin, İ.H. (1946). İktisadi ve İçtimaî Türkiye: Cilt III: Türkiye’de Sanayi. Ankara, Turkey: Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını.
88. Tsani, S., Paroussos, L., Fragiadakis, C., Charalambidis, I. and Capros, P. (2013). Female labour force participation and economic growth in the South Mediterranean countries. Economics Letters, 120(2), 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.043
89. Tsong, C.C., Lee, C.F., Tsai, L.J. and Hu, T.C. (2016). The Fourier approximation and testing for the null of cointegration. Empirical Economics, 51, 1085-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-1028-6
90. Turgut, A.Ş. (2019). Türkiye’deki gelir eşitsizliğinin toplumsal cinsiyet, kadının istihdamı ve kadın yoksulluğu açısından değerlendirilmesi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(38), 315-329. https://doi.org/10.35343/kosbed.581637
91. Turhan, Ş. and Erdal, B. (2022). Ekonomik büyüme ve tarımsal istihdam. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.972239
92. TurkStat. (2012). İstatistik göstergeler 1923–2011 (No. 3890). Ankara, Turkiye: Publications of the Turkish Statistical Institute.
93. TurkStat. (2024). Employed by sector- Employment, unemployment and wage statistics. Retrieved from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Istihdam,-Issizlik-ve-Ucret-
94. Uyanık, Y. and Yeşilkaya, F. (2021). The effect of women employment by educational attainment level on ıncome ınequality: A panel data analysis. Journal of Academic Research and Studies, 13(24), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.794907
95. Verme, P. (2015). Economic development and female labor participation in the Middle East and North Africa: A test of the U-shape hypothesis. IZA Journal of Labor & Development, 4(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40175-014-0025-z
96. Wooldridge, J.M. (2013) Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th Edition). USA: South-Western Pub, Mason.
97. World Bank. (2020). Women, business and the law 2020. Retrieved from https://wbl.worldbank.org/content/dam/sites/wbl/documents/2021/02/WBL2020_ENG_v2.pdf
98. World Bank. (2025a). World development indicators: Employment to population ratio, total (% of total population ages 15+). Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=SL.EMP.TOTL.SP.NE.ZS&country=
99. World Bank. (2025b). World development indicators: GDP per capita growth (annual %). Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG&country=
100. Yılancı, V. (2019). A residual-based cointegration test with a Fourier approximation (MPRA Paper No. 95395). Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/95395/1/MPRA_paper_95395.pdf
101. Yılancı, V., Ulucak, R., Zhang, Y. and Andreoni, V. (2023). The role of affluence, urbanization, and human capital for sustainable forest management in China: Robust findings from a new method of Fourier cointegration. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 812-824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2421
102. Yıldırım, U. and Engeloğlu, Ö. (2023). Türkiye’de sektörel istihdam ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Saklı eşbütünleşme ve asimetrik nedensellik testi. Fiscaoeconomia, 7(2), 1445–1473. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1255703