FED Faiz Oranları ve Türkiye Ekonomisi: Zamanla Değişen Nedensellik Analizi (1975-2024)

Öz

Bu çalışma, 1975-2024 döneminde ABD Merkez Bankası’nın (FED) politika faizindeki değişimlerin Türkiye’de seçilmiş makroekonomik göstergelerle olan Granger nedenselliği (öngörü gücü) ilişkilerinin zaman içinde nasıl değiştiğini incelemektedir. Yıllık veriler kullanılarak FED faizi ile (i) USD/TRY kuru, (ii) TÜFE (log düzey), (iii) reel GSYİH büyümesi, (iv) kısa vadeli iç faiz oranı ve (v) net portföy akımları arasındaki ilişkiler her bir değişken için ayrı ikili VAR çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir. Zamanla değişen ilişkileri yakalamak üzere Yinelenen Genişleyen Pencere (REW) Wald testi uygulanmış ve kritik değerler bootstrap ile (B=1000) elde edilmiştir. Bulgular, FED şoklarının Türkiye’deki makro değişkenlerle olan öngörü ilişkisinin tüm örneklem boyunca sabit olmadığını; küresel finansal koşulların sıkılaştığı ve Türkiye’nin politika/kur rejimi açısından dönüşümler yaşadığı alt dönemlerde güçlenebildiğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca bulgular, politika aktarım kanallarının dönemsel olarak farklılaştığını da göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, dış finansman koşullarına duyarlı ekonomilerde zamanla değişen nedensellik yaklaşımının önemine işaret etmekte ve politika yapıcılar için dış şoklara karşı tampon mekanizmalarının güçlendirilmesine yönelik çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Zamanla Değişen Nedensellik
• FED Para Politikası
• Gelişen Piyasa Ekonomileri
• Türkiye Ekonomisi

Federal Reserve Interest Rates and the Turkish Economy: A Time-Varying Causality Analysis (1975-2024)

Öz

This study examines how the Granger-causality (predictive) link between the U.S. Federal Reserve’s (FED) policy rate and key Turkish macroeconomic indicators evolves over time during 1975–2024. Using annual data, we estimate separate bivariate VAR models between the FED rate and (i) the USD/TRY exchange rate, (ii) the CPI log level, (iii) real GDP growth, (iv) the domestic short-term interest rate, and (v) net portfolio flows. To capture time variation and potential structural change, we apply the Recursive Expanding Window (REW) Wald test and obtain critical values via bootstrap (B=1000). The results indicate that causality is not stable over the sample: predictive relationships strengthen in subperiods associated with tighter global financial conditions and domestic regime shifts, while remaining weaker or intermittent in other periods. Additionally, the findings indicate that monetary policy transmission channels vary across periods. The findings highlight the value of time‑varying causality tools for emerging markets and provide policy implications on building buffers against external monetary shocks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Time-Varying Causality
• FED Monetary Policy
• Emerging Market Economies
• Turkish Economy

Kaynakça

1. Akar, N.Ç. and Varlık, C. (2025). The role of capital flows in the ınternational transmission of US monetary policy: The case of Turkey. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 502–528. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1579707
2. Alesina, A. and Summers, L.H. (1993). Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: some comparative evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077833
3. Andrews, D.W.K. (1993). Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica, 61(4), 821-856. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951764
4. Bai, J. (1997). Estimating multiple breaks one at a time. Econometric Theory, 13(3), 315-352. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/
5. Blanchard, O. and Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review, 103(3), 117-120. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.117
6. Bruno, V. and Shin, H.S. (2015). Capital flows and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 71, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.11.011
7. Calvo, G.A. and Reinhart, C.M. (2002). Fear of floating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 379-408. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753650274
8. Denaux, Z., Topcu, M. and Emirmahmutoglu, F. (2023). Revisiting the financial development and economic growth nexus: Evidence from South Korea. Economics Bulletin, 43(3), 1328-1337. Retrieved from http://www.accessecon.com/

9. Eichengreen, B. and Gupta, P. (2015). Tapering talk: The impact of expectations of reduced Federal Reserve security purchases on emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 25, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2015.07.002
10. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J. and Stock, J.H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root (NBER Working Paper No. 0130). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/t0130
11. Erer, D. (2023). Enflasyon ve enflasyon belirsizliği arasındaki zamanla değişen ilişkinin analizi: Türkiye örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 24(1), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1179508
12. Forbes, K.J. and Warnock, F.E. (2012). Capital flow waves: Surges, stops, flight, and retrenchment. Journal of International Economics, 88(2), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.03.006
13. Goldberg, P.K. and Knetter, M.M. (1997). Goods prices and exchange rates: What have we learned? (NBER Working Paper No. 5862). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w5862
14. Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
15. Hansen, B.E. (1992). Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410381
16. Hou, Y., Li, W., Wu, D., Zang, Y. and Quach, L. (2025). The spillover effect of US monetary policy on the international financial market: Evidence from network analysis. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 10(1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2024.12.001
17. Kangal, M. (2021). FED'in para politikalarının gelişmekte olan ülkeler üzerindeki etkisi. Haliç Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 243-266. https://izlik.org/JA65LG44NK
18. Lastauskas, P. and Nguyen, A.D.M. (2023). Global impacts of US monetary policy uncertainty shocks. Journal of International Economics, 145, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2023.103830
19. Mishra, A.K., Ghate, K., Renganathan, J., Kennet, J.J. and Rajderkar, N.P. (2022). Rolling, recursive evolving and asymmetric causality between crude oil and gold prices: Evidence from an emerging market. Resources Policy, 75, 102474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102474
20. Münyas, T., Yıldırım, R.K. and Aydın, G.K. (2025). FED faiz kararlarının ülke risk primleri ve hisse senedi piyasası üzerindeki etkisi. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, 12(2), 847-874. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1510364
21. Obstfeld, M., Shambaugh, J.C. and Taylor, A.M. (2005). The trilemma in history: Tradeoffs among exchange rates, monetary policies, and capital mobility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653054638307
22. Perron, P. and Qu, Z. (2007). A simple modification to improve the finite sample properties of Ng and Perron’s unit root tests. Economics Letters, 94(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.06.009
23. Rey, H. (2015). Dilemma not trilemma: The global financial cycle and monetary policy independence (NBER Working Paper No. 21162). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w21162/w21162.pdf
24. Sarsıcı, E. (2025). The inflation-interest rate relationship in the Turkish economy: Evidence of cointegration and Granger causality. Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi (Journal of Bucak Business Administration Faculty), 8(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.38057/bifd.1658630
25. Shi, S., Hurn, S. and Phillips, P.C.B. (2020). Causal change detection in possibly integrated systems: Revisiting the money–income relationship. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 18(1), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbz004
26. Shi, S., Phillips, P.C.B. and Hurn, S. (2018). Change detection and the causal impact of the yield curve. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 39(6), 966–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12427
27. Şahin, D. and Durmuş, S. (2021). Döviz kuru oynaklığı ile BİST sektör endeksleri arasındaki ilişkinin zamanla değişen nedensellik analizi. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 701-723. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.984532
28. Topcu, M., Yagli, I. and Emirmahmutoglu, F. (2021). COVID-19 and stock market volatility: A time-varying perspective. Economics Bulletin, 41(3), 1681-1689. Retrieved from http://www.accessecon.com/
29. Uluğ, M., Işık, S. and Mert, M. (2023). The effectiveness of ultra-loose monetary policy in a high inflation economy: A time-varying causality analysis for Turkey. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(4), 2855–2887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09535-3
30. Yıldırım, M. and Yıldırım, D. (2025). The effects of macroeconomic news surprises on Borsa Istanbul sectoral indices: A study with volatility models. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 1495-1515. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1725746