Rethinking Euroscepticism in Turkey: Government, Opposition and Public Opinion

Öz

This article aims to scrutinise the state of euroscepticism in Turkey with a particular focus on the shifting preferences of government, opposition and public opinion in the last decade. Building upon Yılmaz’s (2011) analysis, the article will try to make sense of the eurosceptic transformations in Turkish politics from 2008 onwards. Accordingly, first, shifting governmental discourses towards the EU will be discussed with a particular focus on how the AKP government adopted the ‘Sévres Syndrome’ as a key political tool to denigrate Europe. Second, euroscepticism in opposition parties will be scrutinised comparing the strategic eurosceptic rhetoric of the CHP with the ideologically-driven euroscepticism of the MHP. Final section will examine how Turkish public responds to the eurosceptic/pro-EU shifts in the discourses of major political parties. Overall, the article argues that euroscepticism in Turkish politics in the last decade often fluctuates between government and opposition in response to certain domestic political turning points appearing to be more strategic than ideologically-driven, more volatile than stable, and hence less and less credible. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Euroscepticism,AKP,CHP,MHP,Public Opinion,Turkey

Türkiye’deki Avrupa Şüpheciliğini Yeniden Düşünmek: Hükümet, Muhalefet ve Kamuoyu

Öz

Bu çalışma, hükümet, muhalefet ve kamuoyunun değişen tercihlerine odaklanarak, son on yılda Türkiye’deki Avrupa şüpheciliğinin durumunu mercek altına almayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, Yılmaz’ın (2011) analizinin üstüne koyarak, özellikle 2008 sonrası dönemde Türk siyasetindeki Avrupa şüpheci dönüşümü anlamlandırmaya çalışacaktır. Buna göre, öncelikle, hükümetin Avrupa’ya yönelik değişen söylemleri tartışılacak ve hükümetin Avrupayı kötüleme amacıyla “Sevr Sendromu”’nu nasıl önemli bir siyasi araç olarak kullandığı vurgulanacaktır. İkinci olarak, muhalefet partilerinde gözlenen Avrupa şüpheciliği ele alınacak ve CHP’nin stratejik şüpheci söylemiyle MHP’nin ideolojik şüpheci söylemi karşılaştırılacaktır. Son bölümde ana siyasi partilerin söylemlerindeki Avrupa şüpheci/Avrupa yanlısı değişime Türk kamuoyunun nasıl yanıt verdiği tartışılacaktır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, Türk siyasetinin son on yılında gözlemlenen Avrupa şüphecisi tutumun önemli siyasi dönüm noktalarının etkisiyle kimi zaman hükümet, kimi zaman da muhalefet tarafından sahiplenildiğini vurgulamakta; bundan dolayı Türkiye’deki Avrupa şüpheciliğinin ideoloijk olmaktan ziyade stratejik, oldukça değişken ve bu yüzden de giderek daha az inandırıcı olduğunu savunmaktadır.           

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Şüpheciliği,AKP,CHP,MHP,Kamuoyu,Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Al Jazeera. (2017). Bahçeli: Avrupa'ya ağır bir faturası olur [Bahçeli: It costs Europe gravely]. Retrieved from http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/haber/bahceli-avrupaya-agir-bir-faturasi-olur
2. Alpan, B. (2014). “Europe-as-hegemony” and discourses in Turkey after 1999: What has “Europeanisation” got to do with it?. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 16(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2013.864184
3. Alpan, B. (2016). From AKP’s “Conservative democracy” to “advanced democracy”: Shifts and challenges in the debate on “Europe”. South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1155283
4. Avcı, G. (2011). The Nationalist Movement Party's euroscepticism: Party ideology meets strategy. South European Society and Politics, 16(3), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.598359
5. Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2016). De-Europeanisation through discourse: A critical discourse analysis of AKP’s election speeches. South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1147717
6. Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2018). Foreign policy and identity change: Analysing perceptions of Europe among the Turkish public. Politics, 38(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717729932
7. Balkır, C. and Eylemer, S. (2016). Shifting logics: The discourses of Turkish political elites on EU accession. South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1147523
8. Başkan Canyaş, F. and Gümrükçü, S. B. (2015). Europeanization and political parties in Turkey. In A. Tekin and A. Güney (Eds.), The Europeanization of Turkey: Polity and politics (pp.145-161). London: Routledge.

9. Baudner, J. (2012). The Politics of ‘norm diffusion’ in Turkish European Union accession negotiations: Why it was rational for an islamist party to be ‘pro-European’ and a secularist party to be “anti-European”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(6), 922-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02291.x
10. Baykal, D. (2003, 3 June). Baykal’s speech in the CHP Parliamentary Group reunion. Turkish Parliament, Ankara.
11. BBC. (2017). Turkey-Netherlands row: Dutch warn citizens after Erdogan threat. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39254556.
12. BBC. (2018). Turkey-Netherlands row: Dutch ambassador withdrawn. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42943825.
13. Birgün. (2017). Erdoğan: Terör örgütleri ve ana muhalefet “hayır” diyor [Erdoğan: Terrorists and main opposition say “No”]. Retrieved from https://www.birgun.net/haber-detay/erdogan-teror-orgutleri-ve-ana-muhalefet-hayir-diyor-151415.html.
14. Benvenuti, B. (2017). The Migration paradox and EU-Turkey relations (Istituto Affari Internazionali Working Papers No. 17). Retrieved from http://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/migration-paradox-and-eu-turkey-relations.
15. Boşnak, B. (2016). Europeanisation and De-Europeanisation dynamics in Turkey: The case of environmental organisations. South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1151476
16. Buhari-Gülmez, D. (2016, 5 October). Turkey’s relations with Europe are in flux following Ahmet Davutoğlu’s resignation [LSE Blog]. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/05 /10/turkeys-relations-with-europe-are-in-flux-following-ahmet-davutoglus-resignation/.
17. Buhari-Gülmez, D. (2018, 26 September). Why Turkey’s currency crisis is deepening the rift between Ankara and the West [LSE Blog]. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2018/ 09/26/why-turkeys-currency-crisis-is-deepening-the-rift-between-ankara-and-the-west/.
18. Business Insider UK. (2016). Erdogan: The West supports 'terror' and stands behind 'coup plotters'. Retrieved from http://uk.businessinsider.com/afp-turkeys-erdogan-accuses-west-of-supporting-terror-coup-plotters-2016-8.
19. Canefe, N. and Bora, T. (2003). The Intellectual roots of anti-European sentiments in Turkish politics: The case of radical Turkish nationalism. Turkish Studies, 4(1), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005725
20. Celep, Ö. (2011). The Republican People's Party and Turkey's EU membership. South European Society and Politics, 16(3), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.598358
21. CNN Türk. (2017). Erdoğan'dan Hollanda'ya sert tepki: Bunlar Nazi kalıntısı [Erdoğan’s strong reaction to Holland: They are remnants of Nazis], [Video]. Retrieved from https://www.cnnturk.com/video/turkiye/erdogandan-hollandaya-sert-tepki-bunlar-nazi-kalintisi.
22. Cumhuriyet. (2013). Kılıçdaroğlu'dan Hollanda Başbakanı Rutte'ye mektup [Letter from Kılıçdaroğlu to Dutch Prime Minister Rutte]. Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/diger/ 429158/Kilicdaroglu_dan_Hollanda_Basbakani_Rutte_ye_mektup.html.
23. Cumhuriyet. (2016). Kılıçdaroğlu'ndan AB'ye Erdoğan çağrısı [Kılıçdaroğlu’s Erdoğan call to the EU]. Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/siyaset/636341/ Kilicdaroglu_ ndan_AB_ye_Erdogan_cagrisi.html.
24. Cumhuriyet. (2018). Bahçeli'den AB'nin Türkiye'yi kınayan kararına tepki: Türkiye korsan bir devlet değildir [Bahçeli’s reaction to the EU’s comdemnation of Turkey: Turkey is not a rogue state]. Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/siyaset/949137/ Bahceli_den_AB_nin_Turkiye_yi_kinayan_kararina_tepki__Turkiye_korsan_ bir_devlet_degildir.html.
25. Çınar, M. (2008). The Justice and Development Party and the Kemalist establishment. In Ü. Cizre (Ed.), Secular and Islamic politics in Turkey: The making of the Justice and Development Party (pp. 109-131). London and New York: Routledge.
26. Dikici Bilgin, H. (2017). Westernist sceptics and anti-western reformers in the Turkish party system. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 19(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2016.1155904
27. Erdoğan, R. T. (2011). Erdoğan’dan Ahmet Altan’a yanıt [Erdoğan’s response to Ahmet Altan]. Vatan Gazetesi, Retrieved from http://haber.gazetevatan.com/Erdogandanahmet-altana-yanit/ 382348/9/Siyaset.
28. European Parliament. (2013, 11 June). Resolution on the situation in Turkey (No. B7-0309/2013). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?reference=B7-2013-0309&type=MOTION&language=EN&redirect
29. Eylemer, S. and Taş, İ. (2007). Pro-EU and eurosceptic circles in Turkey. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23(4), 561-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270701674657
30. Göçek, M. (2011). The Transformation of Turkey: Redefining state and society from the Ottoman Empire to the modern era. London: I. B. Tauris.
31. Guida, M. (2008). The Sèvres syndrome and “komplo” theories in the islamist and secular press. Turkish Studies, 9(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840701813994
32. Gülmez, S. B. (2008). The EU policy of the Republican People’s Party: An inquiry on the opposition party and euro-skepticism in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 9(3), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840802267389
33. Gülmez, S. B. (2013a). The EU policy of the Republican People’s Party (CHP) under Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu: A new wine in an old wine cellar. Turkish Studies, 14(2), 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.802924
34. Gülmez, S. B. (2013b). Rising euroscepticism in Turkish politics: The cases of the AKP and the CHP. Acta Politica, 48(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2013.2
35. Gülmez, S. B. (2014). Understanding the euroscepticism in Turkish politics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.
36. Gülmez, S. B. (2018). Cosmopolitan diplomacy. In G. Delanty (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of cosmopolitanism studies (2nd ed.), (pp. 430-439). London: Routledge.
37. Gümrükçü, T. (2018). Turkey's Erdogan tells ministers to stop using U.S. firm McKinsey. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-economy-erdogan/turkeys-erdogan-tells-ministers-to-stop-using-u-s-firm-mckinsey-idUSKCN1MG074?feedType= RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=twitter.
38. Günay, C. and Dzihic, V. (2016). Decoding the authoritarian code: Exercising “legitimate” power politics through the ruling parties in Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 529-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1242872
39. Güneş-Ayata, A. (2003). From euro-scepticism to Turkey-scepticism: Changing political attitudes on the European Union in Turkey. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 5(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461319032000097941
40. Habertürk. (2007). Genel seçim 2007 [General Elections 2007]. Retrieved from https://www.haberturk.com/secim2007.
41. Heper, M. and İnce, B. (2006). Devlet Bahçeli and “far right” politics in Turkey, 1999-2002. Middle Eastern Studies, 42(6), 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200600922981
42. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009), A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
43. Hürriyet. (2013). Kılıçdaroğlu'ndan Almanya Başbakanı Merkel'e mektup [Letter from Kılıçdaroğlu to German Chancellor Merkel]. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ gundem/kilicdaroglundan-almanya-basbakani-merkele-mektup-23551250.
44. Hürriyet. (2017). Bahçeli'den hükümete ilk eleştiri’ [Bahçeli’s first criticism of the government]. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/bahceli-15-temmuz-sonrasinda-avrupa-ayakta-alkislamaliydi-40396424.
45. Hürriyet. (2018). 24 Haziran 2018 Cumhurbaşkanlığı seçim sonuçları [24 June 2018 Presidential Elections Results]. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/secim/24-haziran-2018-secimleri/.
46. Hürriyet Daily News. (2013). Turkey may face ‘tough’ EU report. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-may-face-tough-eu-report.aspx?PageID=238&NID= 55649&NewsCatID=338.
47. Hürriyet Daily News. (2018). Turkey and Netherlands agree to 'normalize diplomatic ties' after sour period. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-and-netherlands-agree-to-normalize-diplomatic-ties-after-sour-period-134799.
48. İçener, E. (2016). Turkey – EU relations after the failed July 15 coup attempt. Bilig, 79, 69-87. Retrieved from www.jstor.com
49. İçener, E. and Çağlıyan-İçener, Z. (2011). The Justice and Development Party's identity and its role in the EU's decision to open accession negotiations with Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2011.556426
50. Kaya, A. (2017). Europeanization of civil society in Turkey: Legacy of the #Occupygezi movement. Turkish Studies, 18(1), 125-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2016.1258552
51. Kaya, A. (2020). Right-wing populism and islamophobism in Europe and their impact on Turkey–EU relations. Turkish Studies, 21(1), 1-28. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2018.1499431
52. Keyman, E. F. and Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2013). Transforming Turkey-EU relations: Ground for hope?. In S. Aydın-Düzgit, A. Duncker, D. Huber, E. F. Keyman, and N. Tocci (Eds.), Global Turkey in Europe: Political, economic and foreign policy dimensions of Turkey’s evolving relationship with the EU (pp. 275–282). Retrieved from ww.jstor.org
53. Kirişci, K. (2006). Turkey's foreign policy in turbulent times (European Union Institute for Security Studies Chaillot Papers No 92). Retrieved from https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/turkeys-foreign-policy-turbulent-times
54. Langan, M. (2017). Virtuous power Turkey in Sub-Saharan Africa: The ‘Neo-Ottoman’ challenge to the European Union. Third World Quarterly, 38(6), 1399-1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1229569
55. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M. and Edwards, E. (2006). Party competition and European Integration in the East and West different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies, 39(29), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414005281932
56. Nefes, T. S. (2013). Political parties’ perceptions and uses of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in Turkey. The Sociological Review, 61(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12016
57. NTV. (2018). Bahçeli: Avrupa Birliği kapısı ardına kadar kapandı [Bahçeli: the European Union’s door has shut down completely]. Retrieved from https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/bahceli-avrupa-birligi-kapisi-ardina-kadar-kapandi,WQGYYRcGYE6nX5XMNhlWZg.
58. Onursal-Beşgül, Ö. (2016). Policy transfer and discursive de-Europeanisation: Higher education from Bologna to Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1152019
59. Öniş, Z. (2003). Globalization, democratization and the far right: Turkey's Nationalist Action Party in critical perspective. Democratization, 10(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13510340312331 294017
60. Öniş, Z. (2007). Conservative globalists versus defensive nationalists: Political parties and paradoxes of Europeanization in Turkey. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 9(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701689902
61. Öniş, Z. (2010). Contesting for Turkey's political ‘centre’: Domestic politics, identity conflicts and the controversy over EU membership. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 18(3), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2010.507919
62. Saatçioğlu, B. (2010). Unpacking the compliance puzzle: The case of Turkey‘s AKP under EU conditionality (Kolleg-Forschergruppe Working paper No.14). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/kfgxxx/p0014.html
63. Saatçioğlu, B. (2016). De-Europeanisation in Turkey: The case of the rule of law. South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1147994
64. Saatçioğlu, B. and El Basani, A. (2013). The AKP’s shifting support for EU accession: Secular constraints, organizational capacities and religious ideas. In C. Fırat and L. Hoffmann (Eds.), Turkey and the European Union: Facing new challenges and opportunities (pp. 138-155). Abingdon: Routledge.
65. Sabah. (2017). MHP lideri Bahçeli: 16 Nisan'dan sonra Avrupa sallanacak [MHP leader Bahçeli: Europe will tremble after 16 April]. Retrieved from https://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem /2017/03/18/MHP-lideri-bahceli-ilk-anayasa-mitinginde-konusuyor-canli.
66. Semo, M., Jégo, M. and Ayad, C. (2016, 8 August). Recep Tayyip Erdogan: Les occidentaux ont laissé les Turcs seuls. Le Monde. Retrieved from https://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2016/08/08/recep-tayyip-erdogan-les-occidentaux-ont-laisse-les-turcs-seuls_4979765_3214.html.
67. Sitter, N. (2001). The politics of opposition and European integration in Scandinavia: Is Euro‐scepticism a government‐opposition dynamic?. West European Politics, 24(4), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425463
68. Soyaltın-Colella, D. and Akdeniz-Göker, E. (2019). De-Europeanisation and equal citizenship in Turkey: The case of circassians. The International Spectator, 54(4), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2019.1666233
69. Sözcü. (2015). Türkiye’nin, AB’nin toplama kampı olmasına vize vermem [I won’t endorse Turkey to become the EU’s concentration camp]. Retrieved from https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2015/ gundem/turkiyenin-abnin-toplama-kampi-olmasina-vize-vermem-969191/.
70. Spiering, M. (2007). Euro-sceptic concerns about national identity in the European Union and Turkey. In E. Lagro and K. E. Jorgensen (Eds.), Turkey and the Euroean Union: Prospects for a ifficult encounter (pp. 169-184). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
71. Taggart, P. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 33(3), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00387
72. Taggart, P. and Szczerbiak, A. (2004). Contemporary Euroscepticism in the party systems of the European Union candidate states of Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00143.x
73. Takvim. (2017). Avrupa’nın şer ittifakı [The unholly alliance of Europe]. Retrieved from https://www.takvim.com.tr/guncel/2017/04/11/avrupanin-ser-ittifaki.
74. Tasch, B. (2016, 8 August). The West 'contradicts the values it is defending': Erdogan blasts the international response to the Turkey coup. Business Insider UK. Retrieved from http://uk.businessinsider.com/erdogan-blasts-international-response-to-turkey-coup-refugee-crisis-2016-8.
75. TBMM. (2008a). TBMM tutanak dergisi [Turkish Parliament’s Parliamentary Minutes Journal], [Term 23, Legislative Year 2, Volume 15, Session 67, 20 February].
76. TBMM. (2008b). TBMM tutanak dergisi [Turkish Parliament’s Parliamentary Minutes Journal], [Term 23, Legislative Year 2, Volume 22, Session 117, 12 June].
77. Tezcan, E. and Aras, İ. (2015). Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi’nde Euroseptisizm: Avrupa Birliği desteğinin eleştiriye dönüşümü. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 11(41), 1-35. Retrieved from www.jstor.com
78. Timur, Ş. and Nordland, R. (2016, 25 November). Erdogan threatens to let migrant flood into Europe resume. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/25/ world/europe/turkey-recep-tayyip-erdogan-migrants-european-union.html.
79. Toksabay, E. and Karadeniz, T. (2017, 6 July). EU parliament calls for Turkey accession talks to be suspended. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-parliament/eu-parliament-calls-for-turkey-accession-talks-to-be-suspended-idUSKBN19R194.
80. Vachudova, M. A. (2014). EU leverage and national interests in the Balkans: The puzzles of enlargement ten years on. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12081
81. Yaka, Ö. (2016). Why not EU? Dynamics of the changing Turkish attitudes towards EU membership. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 24(1), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2015.1056726
82. Yavuz, H. M. (2009). Secularism and Muslim democracy in Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Yılmaz, H. (2006). Two pillars of nationalist Euroskepticism in Turkey: The Tanzimat and Sevres syndromes. In I. Karlsson and A. Strom Melin (Ed.), Turkey, Sweden and the European Union: Experiences and expectations (pp. 29-40). Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
84. Yılmaz, H. (2009). The International context. In C. W. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, R. F. Inglehart and C. Welzel (Eds.), Democratization (pp. 92-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Yılmaz, H. (2011). Euroscepticism in Turkey: Parties, elites, and public opinion. South European Society and Politics, 16(1), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608741003594353
86. Yılmaz, G. (2016a). From Europeanization to de-Europeanization: The Europeanization process of Turkey in 1999–2014. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 24(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2015.1038226
87. Yılmaz, G. (2016b). Europeanisation or de-Europeanisation? Media freedom in Turkey (1999–2015). South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1148102
88. Wódka, J. (2016). Transnational cooperation of Turkish political parties as an ineffective tool of Europeanization. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(2), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1168640