Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on the Concepts of Technostress and Work Engagement

Öz

The widespread use of technology in business processes and daily life can cause technostress, which is a negative situation in individuals. Technostress can cause different negative physical, emotional, cognitive and behavioral effects on individuals. It is expected that these negativities caused by technostress will reduce the individual's level of dedication to work. From this point of view, the study aims to examine the relationship between these two concepts in the context of literature. In this direction, the Web of Science (WoS) database was preferred in the study with the bibliometric analysis method. The sample of the research consists of 43 studies covering the expressions "technostress and dedication to work" in WoS. The obtained data were analyzed using the VOSviewer program. According to the analysis result, the first study was conducted in 2015. The highest number of studies belongs to 2023. In terms of research areas, it was seen that the most studies were conducted in the field of multidisciplinary psychology. The most frequently used keywords were determined to be technostress (20 repetitions), dedication to work (14 repetitions), Covid-19 (6 repetitions) and burnout (5 repetitions). As a result of the findings of the study investigating the relationship between technostress and work engagement, there is a negative relationship between technostress and work engagement.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Technostress
• Work Engagement
• Burnout
• Stress

Teknostres ve İşe Adanmışlık Kavramlarına İlişkin Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

İş süreçlerinde ve gündelik hayatta teknolojinin yaygın kullanımı, bireylerde olumsuz bir durum olan teknostrese neden olabilmektedir. Yaşanan teknostres ise bireylerde farklı negatif fiziksel, duygusal, bilişsel ve davranışsal etkiler doğurabilmektedir. Teknostresin neden olduğu bu olumsuzlukların ise bireyin işe adanmışlık seviyesini azaltması beklenmektedir. Bu noktadan hareketle çalışma bu iki kavram arasındaki ilişkiyi literatür bağlamında incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, bu doğrultuda bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle Web of Science (WoS) veritabanı tercih edilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini, WoS'da yer alan "teknostres ve işe adanmışlık" ifadelerini kapsayan 43 çalışma oluşturmaktadır. Elde edilen veriler VOSviewer programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucuna göre ilk çalışma 2015 yılında yapılmıştır. En fazla çalışma sayısı 2023 yılına aittir. Araştırma alanları açısından bakıldığında en fazla multidisipliner psikoloji alanında çalışıldığı görülmüştür. En sık kullanılan anahtar kelimelerin ise teknostres (20 tekrar), işe adanmışlık (14 tekrar), Covid-19 (6 tekrar) ve tükenmişlik (5 tekrar) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Teknostres ile işe adanmışlık arasındaki ilişkiyi araştıran çalışma bulguları sonucunda, teknostres ile işe adanmışlık arasında negatif bir ilişki bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teknostres
• İşe Adanmışlık
• Tükenmişlik
• Stres

Kaynakça

1. Akınoğlu, H. F. G. (1993). Teknostres. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 7(3), 159-173.
2. Ali, A., Jan, S., and Iqbal, P. M. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis on Technostress: An Emerging Discipline. Journal of Indian Library Association, 57(4), 37- 48.
3. Ali, S., Rubab, A., Jamshed, K., Sheikh, M.Z.A., Jamshaid, S. and Eman, N. (2023). Impact of Techno Stress on Work Engagement with Medıatıng Role of Workload and Moderatıng Role of Computer Self- Effıcacy. Journal of Xidian University, 17(2), 515- 540.
4. Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., and Baharun, R. (2020). Research Trends of Neuromarketing: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948–2962.
5. Altaf, A., and Masrek, M. N. (2021). Visualizing the knowledge domain of Work Engagement through Bibliometric Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice(e-journal), 1-23.
6. Andrulli, R., and Gerards, R. (2023). How new ways of working during COVID- 19 affect employee well-being via technostress, need for recovery, and work engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107560.
7. Arnetz, B.B., Wiholm, C. (1997). Technological stress: Psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(1), 35–42.
8. Arslan, B., ve Akyol, E. M. (2023). Web of Science (Wos) Veri Tabanında Yer Alan Örgütsel Sessizlik Konulu Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analiz Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi. Journal of Business in The Digital Age, 6(Özel Sayı), 46-56.

9. Aslan, H. (2021). İçsel Motivasyonun İşe Adanmışlık Üzerindeki Etkisinde İş Becerikliliğinin Aracı Rolü. Econder International Academic Journal, 5(2), 397-415.
10. Atanasoff, L. and Venable, M.A. (2017). Technostress: implications for adults in the workforce, The Career Development Quarterly, 65, 326-338.
11. Aydemir, C, Endirlik, H. (2019). İşe Adanmışlığın Bazı Demografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(3), 1093-1107.
12. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., and Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
13. Bahamondes-Rosado, M.E., Cerdá-Suárez, L.M., Dodero Ortiz de Zevallos, G.F. and Espinosa-Cristia, J.F. (2023.) Technostress at work during the COVİD-19 lockdown phase (2020–2021): a systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology,14:1173425.
14. Bail, C., Harth, V., and Mache, S. (2023). Digitalization in Urology—A Multimethod Study of the Relationships between Physicians’ Technostress, Burnout, Work Engagement and Job Satisfaction. Healthcare, 11, 1-22.
15. Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current directions in psychological science, 20(4), 265-269.
16. Bakker, A. B. and Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4-11.
17. Bakker, A. B., and Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
18. Bakker, A.B. and Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a Model of Work Engagement, Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223.
19. Bao, Y., Zhang, X. and Hua, M. (2024). Relating Technostress and Turnover Intention: A Three-Wave Study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2024.2316638.
20. Berger, R., Romeo, M., Gidion, G. and Poyato, L. (2016). Media use and technostress. 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. (390- 400), March 2016, Valencia, Spain.
21. Bernburg, M., Tell, A., Groneberg, D. A., and Mache, S. (2024). Digital stressors and resources perceived by emergency physicians and associations to their digital stress perception, mental health, job satisfaction and work engagement. BMC Emergency Medicine, 24(31), 1-13.
22. Borle, P., Reichel, K., Niebuhr, F., and Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2021). How Are Techno-Stressors Associated with Mental Health and Work Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Occupational Exposure to Information and Communication Technologies within the Technostress Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8673.
23. Bourlakis, M., Nisar, T. M., and Prabhakar, G. (2023). How technostress may affect employee performance in educational work environments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122674.
24. Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading.
25. Brooks, S., and Califf, C. (2017). Social media-induced technostress: Its impact on the job performance of it professionals and the moderating role of job characteristics. Computer networks, 114, 143-153.
26. Burkut, E. B., ve Köseoğlu, E. (2022). Mimarlık alanında çocuklarla ilgili yayınların bibliyometrik analizi ve bibliyografik haritaları. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(2), 511-527.
27. Califf, C. B. and Brooks, S. (2020). An Empirical Study Of Techno-Stressors, Literacy Facilitation, Burnout and Turnover Intention as Experienced By K-12 Teachers. Computers & Education, 157, 1-15.
28. Camacho, S. and Barrios, A. (2022). Teleworking and technostress: early consequences of a Covid-19 lockdown. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24, 441–457.
29. Chandra, S., Shirish, A., and Srivastava, S. C. (2019). Does Technostress Inhibit Employee Innovation? Examining the Linear and Curvilinear Influence of Technostress Creators. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44, 299-331.
30. Chiappetta, M. (2017). The Technostress: definition, symptoms and risk prevention. Senses Sciences, 4(1), 358-361.
31. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., and Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
32. Coetzee, M., and De Villiers, M. (2010). Sources of job stress, work engagement and career orientations of employees in a South African financial institution. Southern African Business Review, 14(1), 27-58.
33. Çınar, K., ve Furat, M. F. (2024). Teknostres Kavramı Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi, Arşiv Dünyası, 11(1), 46-64.
34. Çoban, R., ve Aydoğdu, T. (2020). Havacılık Sektöründe Zaman Baskısının Teknostrese Etkisi: Uçak Bakım Teknisyenleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(3), 2442–2460.
35. Çolakoğlu, M., ve Öncü, S. (2023). STEM Araştırma Eğilimlerini Keşfetmek: Bibliyometrik Bir İçgörü. 3. International Conference on Educational Technology and Online Learning, 204-211.
36. Dereli, A.B. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis with Vosviewer. Communicata, 28, 1-7.
37. Di Dalmazi, M., Mandolfo, M., Stringhini, C., and Bettiga, D. (2022, June). Influence of technostress on work engagement and job performance during remote working. In International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction (pp. 149-163). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
38. Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ. ve Erhan, T. (2023). Post-Truth Kavramı Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Vosviewer ile Bibliyometrik Analizi. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(2), 164-188.
39. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., and Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296.
40. Eldor, L. (2017). The Relationship Between Perceptions of Learning Climate and Employee İnnovative Behavior and Proficiency. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1454-1474.
41. Erdirençelebi, M., ve Karataş, C. G. (2019). Örgütsel Adaletin İşe Adanmışlık ile İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Etkisi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(4), 1825-1849.
42. Finlandiya Bilişim Teknolojileri Sektörü Raporu (2022). Helsinki Büyükelçiliği Ticaret Müşavirliği. Erişim adresi: https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5b8a43355c7495406a2275b0/Finlandiya%20Bi li%C5%9Fim%20Sekt%C3%B6r%C3%BC%20Notu%202022.pdf.
43. Gonlepa, M. K., Dilawar, S., and Amosun, T. S. (2023). Understanding employee creativity from the perspectives of grit, work engagement, person organization fit and feedback. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1012315.
44. Grummeck-Braamt, J. V., Nastjuk, I., Najmaei, A., and Adam, M.T.P. (2021). A bibliometric review of technostress: Historical roots, evolution and central publications of a growing research field. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6621-6630.
45. Gull, M., Ahmed, A., and Warraich, I. A. (2022). Conducting a bibliometric study through a systematic literature review regarding job characteristics and work engagement. Journal of Management and Research, 9(2), 28-65.
46. Gül, N. (2022). Teknostresin Tükenmişlik Üzerindeki Etkisinde Bilinçli Farkındalığın Aracılık Rolü: Banka Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Alanya Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 6(3), 2747-2762.
47. Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., and Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of applied psychology, 94(6), 1452-1495.
48. Hamurcu, M., ve Eren, T. (2017). Science citation index (SCI) kapsamında dergi seçimi için analitik ağ süreci yönteminin kullanılması. Harran üniversitesi mühendislik dergisi, 2(2), 54-70.
49. Hamzah, H., Nordin, N. S., Dwiyanti, R., Na'imah, T., and Mawi, N. (2021). The role of well-being, supervisor support and positive feedback on lecturers’ work engagement. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 16(1), 73-84.
50. Han, Y., Yang, Y., and Mohamed, R. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of work engagement in the hospitality and tourism industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(5), 1946-1966.
51. Hapsari, A. D., and Nurtjahjanti, H. (2022). Hubungan antara technostress dengan keterikatan kerja pada perangkat desa di kecamatan kedung, kabupaten jepara. Jurnal Empati, 11(6), 375-380.
52. Harunavamwe, M., and Kanengoni, H. (2023). Hybrid and virtual work settings; the interaction between technostress, perceived organisational support, work-family conflict and the impact on work engagement. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 14(2), 252-270.
53. Ingusci E., Signore F., Giancaspro M.L., Manuti A., Molino M., Russo V., Zito M. and Cortese C.G. (2021.) Workload, Techno Overload, and Behavioral Stress During COVİD-19-19 Emergency: The Role of Job Crafting in Remote Workers. Frontiers in Psychology,12:655148.
54. Jena, R. K. (2015a). Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academician. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1116-1123.
55. Jena, R.K. (2015b). Impact of technostress on job satisfaction: an empirical study among Indian academician. The International Technology Management Review, 5(3), 117-124.
56. Jufrizen, J., Harahap, D. S., and Khair, H. (2024). Leader-Member Exchange and Employee Performance: Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 26(3), 306-322.
57. Kanık, L. (2023). Kütüphanelerde teknostresin nedenleri, etkileri ve çözüm önerileri. Külliye Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, [Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'nin 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı], 499-526.
58. Kasemy, Z. A., Sharif, A. F., Barakat, A. M., Abdelmohsen, S. R., Hassan, N. H., Hegazy, N. N., ... and Abdelwanees, S. (2022). Technostress creators and outcomes among Egyptian medical staff and students: A multicenter cross-sectional study of remote working environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 796321.
59. Kim, S., and Christensen, A. L. (2017). The dark and bright sides of personal use of technology at work: A job demands–resources model. Human Resource Development Review, 16(4), 425-447.
60. Koyuncu, M., Burke, R. J., and Fiksenbaum, L. (2006). Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bank: Potential antecedents and consequences. Equal opportunities international, 25(4), 299-310.
61. La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., and Chiappetta, M. (2018). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 92, 13-35.
62. Laspinas, M. L. (2015). Technostress: Trends and Challenges in the 21st Century Knowledge Management. European Scientific Journal, 11(2), 205-217.
63. Lee, J. W., and Song, Y. (2020). Promoting employee job crafting at work: the roles of motivation and team context. Personnel Review, 49(3), 689-708.
64. Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., and Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257-282.
65. Lee, Y., and Eissenstat, S. J. (2018). An application of work engagement in the job demands–resources model to career development: Assessing gender differences. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29, 143-161.
66. Li, K., Rollins, J. and Yan, E. (2018). Web of science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content- based analysis. Scientometrics, 115, 1–20. Lin, Y. and Yu, Z. (2024). An integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review modelling students’ technostress in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-25.
67. Louzán, R., and Torrano, F. (2024). Bibliometric Study and Network Mapping of Teacher Technostress Between 1992-2022. Comunicar (English Edition), 32(78), 1-15.
68. Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., and Marx, J. (2022). Digital detox. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 64(2), 239-246.
69. Mohammed, G.M. (2022). The Impact of Technostress on Employees’ Well- Being: The Role of Work Engagement and Perceived Supervisor Support. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 11(1), 943-952.
70. Moral Munoz, J. A., Herrera Viedma, E., Santisteban Espejo, A. and Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An Up to Date Review. El Profesional De La Informacion, 29(1), 1-20.
71. Nang, A. F. M., Maat, S. M., and Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Teacher technostress and coping mechanisms during Covid-19-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Pegem Journal of Education and instruction, 12(2), 200-212.
72. Nurrosidah, A., and Sopiah, S. (2022). Work engagement: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. ETNIK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Teknik, 1(11), 757-767.
73. Orgambídez-Ramos, A., and de Almeida, H. (2017). Work engagement, social support, and job satisfaction in Portuguese nursing staff: A winning combination. Applied Nursing Research, 36, 37-41.
74. Özçelik, Z. (2021). Covid-19 nedeniyle evden çalışma sürecinde performans değerlemesi: Bir kamu kurumu çağrı merkezi örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (58), 221-240.
75. Perwira, L. T., Aulia, A., and Jocom, C. O. (2021). Are Love of Work, Perceived Organizational Support, and Psychological Well-Being Predictors of Work Engagement? Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 10(4), 673-685.
76. Pfaffinger, K. F., Reif, J. A. M., and Spieß, E. (2022). When and why telepressure and technostress creators impair employee well-being. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(2), 958-973.
77. Poon, J. M. L. (2013). Relationships among perceived career support, affective commitment, and work engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1148–1155.
78. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., and Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information systems research, 19(4), 417-433.
79. Rajput, S., and Kumari, U. (2024). A bibliometric analysis on computation and technostress research trends. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 3072, (1). AIP Publishing.
80. Rajput, S., Sami, L., Iffat, B., Kausar, K., Rahman, M. S., and Khan, A. (2024). Techno-Stress: An In-depth Bibliometric Analysis of Its Influence on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention from 1985 to 2023 using VOS Viewer Software. World Journal of Management and Economics, 16(4), 199-219.
81. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., and Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.
82. Riedl, R. (2013). On the Biology of Technostress: Literature Review and Research Agenda. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 44(1), 18- 55.
83. Rodríguez, B. P., Verdú-Jover, A. J., Estrada-Cruz, M., and Gomez-Gras, J. M. (2024). Does digital transformation increase firms' productivity perception? The role of technostress and work engagement. European journal of management and business economics, 33(2), 137-156.
84. Rothbard, N.P. and Patil, S.V. (2011). Being There: Work Engagement and Positive Organizational Scholarship. In G.M. Spreitzer & K.S. Cameron (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press.
85. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
86. Salazar-Concha, C., Ficapal-Cusí, P., Boada-Grau, J., and Camacho, L. J. (2021). Analyzing the evolution of technostress: A science mapping approach. Heliyon, 7.
87. Saleem, F., Malik,M.I., Qureshi, S.S., Farid, M.F. and Qamar, S. (2021). Technostress and Employee Performance Nexus During COVİD-19-19: Training and Creative Self-Efficacy as Moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:595119.
88. Sarti, D. (2014). Job Resources as Antecedents of Engagement at Work: Evidence From a Long-Term Care Setting. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 213–237.
89. Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., and Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
90. Spagnoli, P., Molino, M., Molinaro, D., Giancaspro, M.L., Manuti, A. and Ghislieri, C. (2020). Workaholism and Technostress During the COVİD- 19-19 Emergency: The Crucial Role of the Leaders on Remote Working. Frontiers in Psychology,11:620310
91. Srivastava S.C., Chandra S., Shirish A. (2015). Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Information Systems Journal, 25, 355–401.
92. Steelman, Z. R., and Soror, A. A. (2017). Why do you keep doing that? The biasing effects of mental states on IT continued usage intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 209-223.
93. Strom, D. L., Sears, K. L., and Kelly, K. M. (2014). Work engagement: The roles of organizational justice and leadership style in predicting engagement among employees. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 21(1), 71-82.
94. Suh, A., and Lee, J. (2017). Understanding teleworkers’ Technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Research, 27(1), 140-159.
95. Şahin, Y. L., ve Çoklar, A. N. (2009). Social networking users’ views on technology and the determination of technostress levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1437-1442.
96. Tagurum, Y. O., Okonoda, K. M., Miner, C. A., Bello, D. A.,and Tagurum,D. J. (2017). Effect of Technostress on Job Performance and Coping Strategies among Academic Staff of a Tertiary Institution in North-Central Nigeria. International Journal of Biomedical Research, 8(6), 312–319.
97. Tan, H., and Zou, Q. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Research of Teachers' Work Engagement from 2008 to 2018 in China. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 1(3), 24-30.
98. Tarabay, K. (2022). The Impact of Technostress on Work Engagement: A Mediation Model Assessing the Role of Grit and Voice Behavior, [Unpublıshed Master of Business Administration], Lebanese American University.
99. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B.S. and Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
100. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S. and Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the Dark Side: Examining Creators, Outcomes, and Inhibitors of Technostress. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113-120.
101. Truța, C., Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., Lixăndroiu, R. C., Dovleac, L., and Maican, M. A. (2023). Always connected@ work. Technostress and well-being with academics. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107675.
102. Tu, Q., Wang, K., and Shu, Q. (2005). Computer-related technostress in China. Communications of the ACM, 48(4), 77–81.
103. Türen, U., Erdem, H., ve Kalkın, G. (2015). İş Yerinde Tekno-Stres Ölçeği: Havacılık ve Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 6(1), 1-19.
104. Uddin, M. J., Ferdous, M., Rahaman, A., and Ahmad, S. (2023). Mapping of technostress research trends: a bibliometric analysis. In 2023 7th international conference on intelligent computing and control systems (ICICCS), 938-943.
105. Urukovičová, N., Rošková, E., Schraggeová, M., and Smoroň, J. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Technostress Creators Inventory among employed Slovak respondents. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100324.
106. Wang, K., Shu, Q., and Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress Under Different Organizational Environments: An Empirical Investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002-3013.
107. Weinert, C., Maier, C., Laumer, S., and Weitzel, T. (2020). Technostress mitigation: an experimental study of social support during a computer freeze. Journal of Business Economics, 90, 1199-1249.
108. Wollard, K. K. and Shuck, B. (2011). Antecedents to employee engagement: A structured review of the literature. Advances In Developing Human Resources, 13(4), 429-446.
109. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., and Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International journal of stress management, 14(2), 121-141.
110. Yavan, Ö. (2016). Örgütsel Davranış Düzleminde Adanmışlık. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,25, 278-296.
111. Yazıcı, A. M., ve Kınay, M. (2021). Redefining the business life and technostress during COVID-19. Studies on Social Science Insights, 1(1), 36-48.
112. Ye, D., Xu, B., Wei, B., Zheng, L., and Wu, Y. J. (2024). Employee work engagement in the digital transformation of enterprises: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-15.
113. Yongxing, G., Hongfei, D., Baoguo, X., and Lei, M. (2017). Work engagement and job performance: the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 708-713.
114. Zainab, S. S., and Ahmad, U. N. U. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Faculty Work Engagement Literature in Higher Education Domain (1997-2021), Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 14(7), 363-373.
115. Zupic, I., and Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472.