THE MODERATİNG ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGİCAL WELL-BEING IN THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED SUPERVİSOR SUPPORT ON GREEN ORGANİZATİONAL BEHAVİOR

Yıl 2024, , 228 - 247, 29.03.2024

Kerim Güvendi , Necla Öykü İyigün

https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1400720

Öz

Researchers in the field of organizational behavior and sustainable development are increasingly focusing on the determinants and influencing factors of “green organizational behavior,” defined as pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace. For this reason, in the study, perceived manager support and psychological well-being of employees, which affect the quality and quantity of the workforce, were considered as factors that have a guiding effect on green organizational behavior. In this context, the originality of the research examines the role of psychological well-being in the effect of perceived supervisor support on employees' orientation towards green organizational behavior. The sample of the study consists of employees working in an organization providing public service. The data was collected from the employees through the questionnaire. The collected data was analyzed through the SPSS and PROCESS programs. This research emphasizes the importance of perceived supervisor support in terms of green organizational behavior and psychological well-being. It also offers important perspectives and recommendations, especially for the public sector. The findings of the research revealed that perceived supervisor support and psychological well-being had a positive and significant effect on green organizational behavior. In addition, it was determined that psychological well-being did not have a moderating role in the relationship between perceived supervisor support and green organizational behavior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perceived supervisor support, Green organizational behavior, Psychological well-being, Public sector

ALGILANAN YÖNETİCİ DESTEĞİNİN YEŞİL ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ ÜZERİNDE ETKİSİNDE PSİKOLOJİK İYİ OLUŞUN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Öz

Örgütsel davranış ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma alanındaki araştırmacılar, giderek iş yerinde çevre yanlısı davranışlar olarak tanımlanan “yeşil örgütsel davranışın” belirleyicilerini ve etkileyen faktörlere odaklanmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışmada çalışanların iş gücünü nitelik ve niceliği yönünden etkileyen algılanan yönetici desteğini ve psikolojik iyi oluşu, yeşil örgütsel davranış üzerinde yönlendirici etkisi olan faktörler olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu kapsamda araştırmanın özgünlüğü, algılanan yönetici desteğinin çalışanların yeşil örgütsel davranışa yönelmesi üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik iyi oluş rolünü incelenmektedir. Araştırmanın örneklemini kamu hizmeti sağlayan bir kurumda çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak anket kullanılmış, veri analizleri SPSS ve PROCESS programları ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu araştırma, algılanan yönetici desteğinin yeşil örgütsel davranış ve psikolojik iyi oluş açısından önemine vurgu yaparak, özellikle kamu sektörü için önemli bakış açıları ve öneriler sunmaktadır. Araştırma elde edilen regresyon bulguları, algılanan yönetici desteği ve psikolojik iyi oluşun yeşil örgütsel davranış üzerinde pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca algılanan yönetici desteği ile yeşil örgütsel davranış arasında ilişkide psikolojik iyi oluşun düzenleyici rolü incelendiğinde psikolojik iyi oluşun etkisinin olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algılanan yönetici desteği, Yeşil örgütsel davranış, Psikolojik iyi oluş, Kamu sektörü

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için etik kurul izni İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu’nun 27/02/2023 tarih ve 02-3 numaralı kararı ile alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

• Aboramadan, M., Crawford, J., Turkmenoglu, M. A., & Farao, C. (2022). Green inclusive leadership an employee green behaviors in the hotel industry: Does perceived green organizational support matter? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, 103330. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.ijhm.2022.103330
• Afsar, B., Maqsoom, A., Shahjehan, A., Afridi, S. A., Nawaz, A., & Fazliani, H. (2019). Responsible leadership and employee's proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1806
• Andersson, L., Jackson, S. E., & Russell, S. V. (2013). Greening organizational behavior: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1854
• Bauer, T.N., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1996) Green career choices: The influence of ecological stance on recruiting. Journal of business and psychology, 10, 445–458 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251780
• Bağdoğan, S. Y. (2018). Algılanan örgütsel destek, psikolojik iyi oluş ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkilerin değerlendirilmesi. İş, Güç: Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 20(3), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.4026/isguc.466669
• Bissing-Olson, M. J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K. S., & Zacher, H. (2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro- environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1788
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.
• Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Adline Publishing.
• Byrne, B. M. (1989). A Primer of LISREL, Basic Assumptions and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. New York: Springer.
• Cantor, D. E., Morrow, P. C., & Blackhurst, J. (2015). An examination of how supervisors ınfluence their subordinates to engage in environmental behaviors. Decision Sciences, 46(4), 697-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12149
• Chaudhary, R. (2020). Green human resource management and employee green behavior: an empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1827
• Cica, H. R. (2023). Çalışanların örgütsel bağlılık ile örgütsel özdeşleşme davranışının yeşil örgütsel davranış üzerindeki etkisinde çevre tutkusunun aracı rolü (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Costa, A., Mouro, C., & Duarte, A. P. (2022). Waste separation-Who cares? Organizational climate and supervisor support's role in promoting pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082155
• Çakar, N. D., & Yıldız, S. (2009). Örgütsel adaletin iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisi: “algılanan örgütsel destek” bir ara değişken mi?. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(28), 68-90. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr /pub/esosder/issue/6142/82426
• Çankaya, M. (2020). Sağlık çalışanlarında algılanan örgütsel destek ve psikolojik iyi oluşun işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisi. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(8), 79-98. https://dergipark.org.tr /tr/pub/asead/issue/56449/768948
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
• Değirmenci, B. (2019). Kamu çalışanlarının psikolojik dayanıklılık psikolojik iyi olma ilişkisinde iyimserliğin aracılık rolü. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 47-63. http://tursbad.hku.edu.tr/ tr/pub/issue/44945/532954
• Deschênes, A. A. (2023). Professional isolation and pandemic teleworkers’ satisfaction and commitment: The role of perceived organizational and supervisor support. European Review of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2022.100823
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.95.3.542
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-w., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well- being. In E. Diener (Ed.) Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener, 247-266. Springer Science + Business Media https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-90-481-2354-4_12
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-w., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social indicators research, 97, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
• Edwards, S. (2006). Physical exercise and psychological well-being. South African journal of psychology, 36(2), 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630603600209
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
• Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. American Psychological Association, 87(3), 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
• Erbaşı, A. (2019). Yeşil örgütsel davranış ölçeği: bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Istanbul Management Journal, (86), 1-23. https://doi :10.26650/imj.2019.86.0001
• Ertürk, A., Kara, S. B. K., & Güneş, D. Z. (2016). Duygusal emek ve psikolojik iyi oluş: bir yordayıcı olarak yönetsel destek algısı. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1723-1744. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aibuefd/issue/28550/304594
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
• Giray, M. D., & Şahin, D. N. (2012). Algılanan örgütsel, yönetici ve çalışma arkadaşları desteği ölçekleri: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 15(30), 1. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2022.363
• Greller, M. M., & Herold, D. M. (1975). Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigation. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(2), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90048-3
• Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications.
• Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901. https://doi:10.1177/ 1461355720907620
• Hutchison, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 159-174.
• İyigun, O., Resat Cica, H., Güvendi, K., & Sensoy Büyükaslan, B. (2020). Çalışanların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının yeşil örgütsel davranış üzerindeki etkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin rolü: bir kamu kurumunda araştırma. Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi 28. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 784- 799.
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1984). Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Sqsuares Methods. Mooresville, In: Scientific Software.
• Kara, E., & Çetinel, M. H. (2023). Yönetici desteği ile çalışan performansı arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik iyi oluş ve personel güçlendirmenin aracı etkisinin belirlemesi. Sosyoekonomi, 31(56), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.17233/ sosyoekonomi.2023.02.05
• Khan, A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2021). The nexuses between transformational leadership and employee green organisational citizenship behaviour: Role of environmental attitude and green dedication. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 921-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2926
• Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E., & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management 43-5. https://doi: 10.1177/0149206314547386.
• Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
• Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(4), 1075-1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0013164488484024
• Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575773
• Norton, T. A., Zacher, H., Parker, S. L., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2017). Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 996-1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2178
• Madani, J., & Najjari, R. (2022) Green Organizational Support: A New Approach in Reinforcement and Promoting Green Organizational Behavior of Employees. Academy of Organizational Behavior Management, 44, 1. https://obs.sinaweb.net/article_701384.html?lang=en
• Mishra, P. (2017). Green human resource management: A framework for sustainable organizational development in an emerging economy. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5), 762-788
• https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2016-1079
• Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Employee green behaviors’, In S. E. Jackson, D. S. Ones, & S. Dilchert (Eds.), Managing human resources for environmental sustainability (ss. 85–116). Jossey-Bass/Wiley. http://ebookcentral. proquest.com/lib/istanbul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=837584
• Ones, D. S., Wiernik, B. M., Dilchert, S., & Klein, R. M. (2018). Multiple domains and categories of employee green behaviours: More than conservation. Chapters, in; V. K. Wells, D. Gregory-Smith & D. Manika (Eds.), Research handbook on employee pro-environmental behaviour, chapter 2, (ss. 13-38). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432834.00007
• Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003). Algılanan örgütsel adaletin bireylerarası saldırgan davranışlar üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (21), 77-96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291339169
• Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Chen, Y. (2013). Linking environmental management practices and organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: a social exchange perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(18), 3552-3575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.777934
• Pehlivanlı, E. A. (2023). Çalışanın yeşil davranışı. Efe Akademi Yayınları.
• Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
• Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0021- 9010.86.5.825
• Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro- environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176-194. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/job.1820
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
• Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
• Sen, H. T., & Yildirim, A. (2023). The relationship between nurses' perceived organisational, supervisor and co- worker support, psychological well-being and job performance. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 73(3), 552-557. https://doi.org/10.47391/jpma.6594
• Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689
• Shi, M.-H., Liu, B.-C., Chen, W., Zhou, G.-Y.-T., & Lin, W.-S. (2014). The relationship between supervisor error bearance and employee creativity: perceived supervisor support as a mediator and proactive personality as a moderator. 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Information System (ICETIS 2014), (ss. 566-569). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetis-14.2014.126
• Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
• Setyaningrum, R. P. (2023). Achieving employee environmental performance through perceived organizational support towards the environment: a mediated-moderation analysis. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 17-30 https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol27.iss1.art2
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
• Tanaka, J. S., ve Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 197-201.
• Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28-3), 374-384. https://doi.org/10.13140/ RG.2.1.2414.4480
• Tenteriz, Y., & Tozkoparan, G. (2022). Algılanan yönetici desteği ve algılanan çalışma arkadaşları desteğinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerine etkisi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(1), 89-107. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/klujfeas/issue/40803/434633?publisher=klu
• Türkkan, G., & Ülbeği, İ. D. (2022). Algılanan yönetici desteği ve yöneticiye güvenin örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 29(4), 661-682. https://doi.org/10.18657/ yonveek.1063360
• Warr, P. (1978). A study of psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 69(1), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.2044-8295.1978.tb01638.x
• Weiss, L. A., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2016). Can we increase psychological well-being? The effects of interventions on psychological well-being: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS one, 11(6), e0158092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158092
• Yüksel, A., Uçkun, S., & Uçkun, C. G. (2022). Çalışanların yeşil örgütsel davranışlarına ilişkin bir araştırma. International Academic Social Resources Journal, 7(43), 1380-1387. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.29228
• Zacher, H., Rudolph, C. W., & Katz, I. M. (2023). Employee green behavior as the core of environmentally sustainable organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 465-494. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-050421
• Zhang, B., Yang, L., Cheng, X., & Chen, F. (2021). How does employee green behavior ımpact employee well- being? An empirical analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041669
• Zizek, S., Treven, S., & Cancer, V. (2015). Differences in personal holism of slovenian employees. Proceedings of the 6th Global Conference on Managing in Recovering Markets (GCMRM 2015) (ss. 651-672). University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Economics and Business May 18–19.