Değişen Gürültü Koşullarında Kalman Filtreleri ile Güç Sistemlerinde Harmonik Tahmini: Performans Analizi ve Değerlendirmesi

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1, - , 10.03.2026

Serdar Koçkanat

https://doi.org/10.65520/erciyesfen.1836331

https://izlik.org/JA33SD66LZ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, güç sistemlerinde harmoniklerin genlik ve faz tahmini için literatürde önerilen bir test sinyali kullanılmıştır. Test sinyali, 10 dB, 20 dB ve 40 dB gürültü koşulları altında önerilen Kalman tabanlı yaklaşıma uygulanmıştır. Performans, elde edilen tahmin sonuçları ile literatürde bildirilen sonuçlar karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiştir. 10 dB Gauss gürültüsü için, ortalama karesel hata (OKH) 0.006649 ve normalleştirilmiş ortalama karesel hata (NOKH) 0.014542 idi; 20 dB Gauss gürültüsü için OKH 0.000613 ve NOKH 0.001340; 40 dB Gauss gürültüsü için OKH 0.000004 ve NOKH 0.000009 olmuştur. Her üç gürültü durumu için de ortalama hesaplama süresi 0.06 saniyedir. Her gürültü seviyesi için, orijinal, gürültülü ve tahmini sinyaller hem zaman hem de frekans alanlarında analiz edilmiş ve görsel değerlendirmeler sayısal sonuçlarla tutarlıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kestirim , Harmonik , Kalman , Gürültü , Güç

Destekleyen Kurum

Hiçbir fon yok.

Harmonic Estimation in Power Systems with Kalman Filters under Varying Noise Conditions: Performance Analysis and Evaluation

https://izlik.org/JA33SD66LZ

Öz

In this study, a test signal proposed in the literature for amplitude and phase estimation of harmonics in power systems is utilized. The test signal is applied to the proposed Kalman-based approach under noise conditions of 10 dB, 20 dB, and 40 dB. Performance is evaluated by comparing the obtained estimation results with those reported in the literature. For 10 dB Gaussian noise, the mean squared error (MSE) was 0.006649, and the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) was 0.014542; for 20 dB Gaussian noise, the MSE was 0.000613, and the NMSE was 0.001340; and for 40 dB Gaussian noise, the MSE was 0.000004, and the NMSE was 0.000009. The average computational time across all three cases is 0.06 seconds. For each noise level, the original, noisy, and estimated signals are analyzed in both the time and frequency domains, with visual assessments consistent with the numerical results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Estimation , Harmonic , Kalman , Noise , Power

Etik Beyan

No ethical declaration is required for the study.

Destekleyen Kurum

No funding.

Teşekkür

The author would like to thank the referees for their constructive comments that contributed to the improvement of the article, as well as the editorial board for their dedicated support throughout the publication process.

Kaynakça

• Chen, C. I., & Chen, Y. C. 2014. Comparative study of harmonic and interharmonic estimation methods for stationary and time-varying signals. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(1), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2013.2242419.
• Ortmeyer, T. H., Chakravarthi, K. R., & Mahmoud, A. A. (1985). The effects of power system harmonics on power system equipment and loads. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 104(9), 2555–2563. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1985.319019.
• Arranz-Gimon, A., Zorita-Lamadrid, A., Morinigo-Sotelo, D., & Duque-Perez, O. 2021. A review of total harmonic distortion factors for the measurement of harmonic and interharmonic pollution in modern power systems. Energies, 14(20), 6467. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206467.
• Kumar, D., & Zare, F. 2016. Harmonic analysis of grid connected power electronic systems in low voltage distribution networks. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 4(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2015.2454537.
• Singh, G. K. 2009. Power system harmonics research: A survey. European Transactions on Electrical Power, 19, 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.201.
• IEEE. 2014. IEEE recommended practice and requirements for harmonic control in electric power system (IEEE Std 519-2014) (Revision of IEEE Std 519-1992). IEEE, 1-29.
• Singh, S. K., Sinha, N., Goswami, A. K., & Sinha, N. 2016. Several variants of Kalman filter algorithm for power system harmonic estimation. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 78, 793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.028.
• Kabalci, Y., Kockanat, S., & Kabalci, E. 2018. A modified ABC algorithm approach for power system harmonic estimation problems. Electric Power Systems Research, 154, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.08.019.
• Martínez-Navarro, G., & Orts-Grau, S. 2025. Selective SAPF for harmonic and interharmonic compensation using an adaptive Kalman filter-based identification method. Applied Sciences, 15(22), 12249. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212249.
• Yu, P., & Sun, J. 2025. Improved Sage–Husa unscented Kalman filter for harmonic state estimation in distribution grid. Electronics, 14(2), 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14020376.
• Qi, J., Sun, K., Wang, J., & Liu, H. 2018. Dynamic state estimation for multi-machine power system by unscented Kalman filter with enhanced numerical stability. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9, 1184–1196. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2580584.
• Lu, Z., Ji, T. Y., Tang, W. H., & Wu, Q. H. 2008. Optimal harmonic estimation using a particle swarm optimizer. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 23(2), 1166–1174. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2008.917656.
• Oğuzalp, Ş. N., Akkaya, S., & Eminoğlu, U. 2025. Comparison of advanced metaheuristic algorithms for harmonic detection in power systems. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(2), 620–638. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1618127.