Ihlara vadisinin (aksaray) kuşları

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3, 162 - 173, 01.06.2014

Mehmet Ali Tabur

Öz

Ihlara Vadisi’nde (Aksaray) 2010 - 2011 döneminde yapılan bu araştırmada; 60 yerli, 77 yaz göçmeni ve 34 kış göçmeni olmak üzere toplam 171 kuş türü tespit edilmiştir. Uluslararası koruma kriterlerine göre tesp it edilen türlerden; üçü hassas, dördü tehdit altında ve yedisi tehdide yakın statüdedir. Avrupa kuş koruma kriterlerine göre ise türlerin; 10’u SPEC I kategorisinde, 18’i II, 55’i III, 82’si IV ve 6’sı V statüsündedir. Ayrıca yerel koruma kriterlerine gö re; 15’i A.1.2, 41’i A.2, 20’si A.3.1, 52’si A.3, 14’ü A.4, 19’u A.5, 2’si B.1.2, 2’si B.2, 1’i B.3, 3’ü B.4 ve 1’i B.5 kategorisinde yer almaktadır. Alanda türleri direkt olumsuz etkileyen bariz bir etken gözlenmemiştir. Ancak kimyasal madde kullanımı, do ğal yaşam alanlarının tahribatı ve sulak alan rejimindeki değişimler gibi etkenler türleri dolaylı olarak etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ihlara Vadisi, Kuşlar, Avifuana, Aksaray

Birds of Ihlara Valley (Aksaray)

Öz

In this study on the avifauna of Ihlara Valley performed between 2010 - 2011, I observed a total of 171 bird species including 60 residentials, 77 summer migrants and 34 winter migrants. According to International Union for Conservation of Nature, three spec ies are listed as vulnerable, four as endangered, and eight as near threatened. Also according to European bird conservation categories, 10 of them are in SPEC I, 18 in II, 55 in III, 82 in IV, 6 in V. In addition, 15 species are listed in A.1.2, 41 in A.2 , 20 in A.3.1, 52 in A.3, 14 in A.4, 19 in A.5, 2 in B.1.2, 2 in B.2, 1 in B.3, 3 in B.4, and 1 species in B.5 according to local protection categories. There were no direct negative effects on bird species in the area, but some factors such as chemical m aterial use, habitat degradation, and water regime changes indirectly affect the species.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ihlara Valley, Birds, Avifuana, Aksaray

Kaynakça

• Bregman, T.P., Sekercioglu C.H., Tobias, J.A., Global patterns and predictions bird species responses to forest fregmantation: Implications for ecosystem function and conservation. Biological Conservation 169, 372-383, 2014.
• del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A., Sargatal, J. (eds.), Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1. Lynx Edicions, 696 pp., Barcelona, 1992.
• Fryer, G., Notes on the Breeding Biology of the Buzzard. Brit. Birds 79, 18–28, 1986.
• Gregory, R.D., Noble, D.G., Custance, J., The state of play of farmland birds: population trends and conservation status of lowland farmland birds in the United Kingdom. Ibis, 146 (Suppl. 2), 1–13, 2004.
• Hickman, C.P., Roberts, L.S, Larson, A., Integrated Prenciples of Zoology. 899 p., New York, 2001.
• Kati, V.I., Sekercioglu, Ç.H., Diversity, ecological structure, and conservation of the landbird community of Dadia reserve, Greece. Diversity and Distributions 12, 620-629, 2006.
• Kiziroğlu, İ., Canlıların Yok Olma Süreci ve Anadolu’da Soyu Tükenme Tehlikesi Altındaki Kuş Türleri. Tabiat ve İnsan, Sayı 3, 2-4, 1994.
• Kiziroğlu, İ., Ekolojik Potpuri. Takav Matbaacılık Yayıncılık A.Ş., 391s, Ankara, 2001.
• Mikusiński, G., Angelstam, P., Occurrence of mammals and birds with different ecological characteristics in relation to forest cover in Europe – do macroecological data make sense? Ecol. Bull. 51, 265–275, 2004.
• Norris, K., Pain, D.J., Conserving Bird Biodiversity. General Principles and their Application. Cambridge University Press, 337p., England, 2002.
• Owens, I. P. F., Bennett, P. M., Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: Habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.200223397, 2000. predators.
• Ross, S., Wall, G., Ecotourism: towards congruence between theory and practice. Tourism Management 20, 123-132, 1999. 13.Trakuş http://www.trakus.org/kods_bird/uye/?fsx=2fsdl17@d&tur=D ereku%FEu, 2014.