ENDOJEN BÖLGESEL KALKINMAYA FARKLI BİR BAKIŞ

Yıl 2005, Sayı: 24, 1 - 14, 01.01.2005

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Murat Çetin

Öz

1970’lere kadar exojen kalkınma yaklaşımı, bölgesel kalkınmada hakim model konumundaydı. Bu anlayış çerçevesinde kalkınmanın, “kalkınma kutupları” olgusunda olduğu gibi, gelişmiş bölgelerden az gelişmiş yada geri kalmış bölgelere doğru yayılma göstereceği kabul görmüştür. 1970’li yılların sonlarına doğru bu tür modeller, bölgelerin sürdürülebilir kalkınmasını desteklemediği için terk edilmeye başlanmış, büyük ölçüde yerel kaynaklara dayalı, yerel aktör ve dinamikler tarafından gerçekleştirilen ve sürdürülen bir kalkınma anlayışı olarak tanımlanabilen endojen kalkınma yaklaşımı ön plana çıkmıştır. Bu yaklaşımın temel dinamikleri arasında yerel üretim sistemleri, şehir sistemleri ve yenilikçi çevre önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Bu çalışmada söz konusu dinamikler ayrıntılı ele alındığı gibi, aralarındaki etkileşimler üzerinde de durulmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Endojen kalkınma, bölgesel dinamikler

Kaynakça

• AYDALOT, P. (1986), Innovative Milieu, European Research Group on İnnovative Milieux, Paris.
• BECATTINI, G. (1990), The Marshalian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion, Geneva.
• BRAMANTI, A. and R. RATTI (1997), The Multi-faceted Dimensions of Local Development, Aldershot:Ashgate, pp.3-44.
• CAMAGNI, R. (1995a), The Concept of Innovative Milieu and its Relevance for Public Policies in European Lagging Regions, Papers of the Regional Science Association, pp.317-340.
• CAMAGNI, R. (1995b), Global Network and Local Milieu: Towards a Theory of Economic Space, Aldershot: Avebury, pp.195-214.
• CAMAGNI, R. (1998), The City as a Milieu: Applying the GREMI Approach to Urban Evolution, Paper Presented at the GREMI Conference, June 29-30, Paris.
• CARBONARA, N., I. GIANNOCCARO and P. PONTRANDOLFO (2002), “Supply Chains within Industrial Districts: A Theoretical Framework”, International Journal of Production Economics, 76, pp.159-176.
• COFFEY, W. and M. POLESE (1985), “Local Development: Conceptual Bases and Policy Implications”, Regional Studies, 19(2), pp.85-93.
• CONSOLI, D. and P.P. PATRUCCO (2003), The Knowledge Trade-off: Circulation, Growth and the Role of Knowledge-intensive Business Services in Urban Innovation Systems, EAEPE Conference ‘The Information Society-Understanding its Institutions Interdisciplinary’, November 7-10, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
• ÇETİN, M. (2004), “Bölgesel Kalkınmaya Farklı Bir Bakış: Çevre/Yenilikçi Çevre Yaklaşımı”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 18(3-4), ss.35-49.
• DURANTON, G. (2002), “The Economics of Production Systems: Segmentation and Skill-Biased Change”, European Economic Review, Article in Paper, July, pp.1-30.
• ETTLINGER, N. (1991), “The Roots of Competitive Advantage in California and Japan”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 8(13), pp.391-407.
• FUJITA, M., P. KRUGMAN and T. MORI (1995), “On the Evolution of Hiearchical Urban Systems”, Discussion Papers, No:419, Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japonya.
• FUJITA, K. and R.C. HILL (1995), “Global Toyotaism and Local Development”, IJURR, pp.7-21.
• GAROFOLI, G. and B.A. VAZQUEZ (1994), Organization of Production and Territory: Local Models of Development, Pavia.
• GERTOSIO, C., N. MEBARKI and A. DUSSAUCHOY (2000), “Modelling and Simulation of the Control Framework on Flexible Manufacuring Systems”, International Journal of Production Economics, 64, pp.285-293.
• GILLY, J.P. (1990), “Social Services and Production Technologies in Urban Development”, 30 th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, İstanbul.
• GROSJEAN, N. and O. CREVOISIER (1998), “Territorial Production Systems: Towards a Systematic Diagnostic Method”, Working Papers, No:9802, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp.1-25.
• HAMPSON, I., P. EWER and M. SMITH (1994), “Post-Fordism and Workplace Change: Towards a Criticial Research Agenda”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, (June), pp.30-38.
• HANSEN, N. (1995), The Region as a Factor of Production: From Marshall’s Industrial District to Innovative Regional Milieux, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the WRS, San Diego.
• HENDERSON, J.V. (1987), Systems of Cities and Inter-City Trade, Harword Academic Publishers, Switzerland.
• JANSSENS, R. (1999), “A Boolean Approach to the Measurement of Group Processes and Attitudes: The Concept of Integration as an Example”, Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, pp.275-293.
• KEEBLE, D. (1993), Small Firm Creation, Innovation and Growth and the Urban-Rural Shift, London: Routledge, pp.55-78.
• MAILLAT, D., O. CREVOISIER. and B. LECOQ (1994), Innovation, Networks and Territorial Dynamics, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
• MAILLAT, D. (1995), “Territorial Dynamic, Innovative Milieu and Ragional Policy”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 7, pp.157-165.
• MAILLAT, D. and B. LECOQ (1992), “New Technologies and Transformation of Regional Structures in Europe: the Role of the Milieu”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4, pp:1-20
• MAILLAT, D., G. LECHOT, B. LECOQ and M. PFISTER (1996), “Comparative Analysis of the Structural Development of Milieux: The Example of the Watch Industry in the Swiss and French Jura Arc”, Working Papers, No:9607a, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp:1-16 .
• MAILLAT, D. (1996), “From the Industrial District to the Innovative Milieu: Contribution to an Analysis of Territorialized Productive Organizations”, Working Papers, No: 9606b, University of Neuchatel, IRER, Switzerland, pp:1-28
• MARSHALL, J. U. (1989), The Structure of Urban Systems, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
• MUEHLINGHAUS, S., S. WAELTY and H. ELSASSER (2001), Endogenous Development and Local Initiatives in Mountainous Communities in Switzerland, University of Zürich.
• PIORE, M.J. and C. SABEL (1984), The Second Industrial Divide, New York:Basic Books.
• PYKE, F., G. BECATTINI and W. SENGENGBERGER (1990), Industrial Districts and Interfirm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Laber Studies.
• RAFFAELE, P. and U. STEFANO (2000), “Externalities, Khnowledge Spillovers and The Spatial Distribution of Innovation”, Geo Journal, 4, pp:1-31.
• REMMERS, G.A. (1995), Hitting A Moving Target: Endogenous Development in Marginal European Areas, Gatekeeper Series No:63, International Institute for Environment and Development, pp:1-18.
• RUCCIO, D. F. (1993), “Fordism on a World Scale: International Dimensions of Regulation”, Review of Political Economics, 21, pp:33-53.
• STORPER, M., (1991), Technology Districts and International Trade: the Limits to Globalisation in an Age of Flexible Production, Los Angeles, Lewis Centre for Regional Policy Studies.
• TERLUIN, I.J. (2001), Rural Region in the EU: Exploring Differences in Economic Development, Nowember, Groningen.
• TODLİNG, F. (1994), “Regional Networks of High-Technology Firms: The Case of the Greater Boston Region”, Technovation, 14 (5), pp:323-343.
• VAN DER PLOEG, J.D. (1999), Endogenous Development: Practices and Perspectives in Europe, Compass Newsletter, (February), Netherlands.
• WALSH, J. (2002), Regional Development, National University of Ireland, Maynoot, Ireland.