ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ

A. Tarık Gümüş

ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ

Öz

Yayım yılı sebebiyle bu makalede öz bölümü bulunmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

ARASLI, Oya, Adaylık Kavramı ve Türkiye'de Milletvekili Adaylığı, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara 1972.
ATAR, Yavuz, Çağdaş Demokrasinin Siyasal Boyutu: Türkiye'de Demokratikleşme ve Anti-Demokratikleşme Göstergeleri, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 17, 1997.
ATAR, Yavuz, Seçim Hukukunun Güncel Sorunları, Anayasa Yargısı, c. 23, Anayasa Mahkemesi Yayınları, Ankara 2006.
ATAR, Yavuz, Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Mimoza Yayınlan, Konya 2009.
AYBAY, Rona, 'Çoğunlukçu' ve 'Çoğulcu' Demokrasi Aynnu, Cumhuriyet, 19.06.2010.
BACK, Hanna, Intra-Party Politics And Coalition Fornıation Evidence from Swedish Local Govenunent, Party Politics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2008.
BAKKER Ryan, JOLLY Seth, POLK Jonathan, Pattems of Dimensionality, Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, 31 March - 3 April 2011, http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/skjolly/Dinı2.pdf, 25.11.2012.
BAKKER Ryan, JOLLY Seth, POLK Jonathan, Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts, 2010 European Consortium for Political Research's Fifth Pan-European Conference on EU Politics in Porto Portugal. http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/skjolly/Diml.pdf 25.11.2012.

BEKTAŞ, Arsev, Demokratikleşme Sürecinde Liderler Oligarşisi, CHP ve AP (1961- 1980), Bağlam Yayınlan, İstanbul 1993.
BIELEN Ingrid v., HOPKIN Jonattan, The Presidentialization of Spanish democracy: Sources of Prime Ministerial Power in Post-Franco Spain, The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modem Democracies, Eds. Thonıas Poguntke, Paul D. Webb, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005.
BİLİR, Faruk, Siyasi Partilerin Güncel Sorunları ve Demokratikleşme, Uluslararası Davraz Kongresi Küresel Diyalog, Isparta 2009.
BOUCEK, Francoise, The Stmcture and Dynanıics of Intra-Party Politics in Europe, Perspectives onEuropeanPolitics and Society, Vol. 3, Issue, 3, 2002.
CAREY, John M., POLGA-HECIMOVICH John, Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America, The Jounıal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 3, August 2006.
CHRYSSOCHOOU, Dinıitris, Democracy in the European Union, I.B.Tauris, London 2000.
ÇAPOĞLU, Gökhan, Türkiye'de Siyasi Parti Yapılanması, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 13, 1997.
DAALDER, Hans, The Rise of Parties in Westem Democarcies, Political Parties and Democracy A Journal of Democracy Book Political Parties and Democracy, Eds. Larry Diamond and Richard Gunther, Jhons Hopkins University Press, Maryland 2001.
DAHL, Robert A., Pluralism Revisited, Comparative Politics, Vol. 10, No. 2, January 1978.
DAHL, Robert A., Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press, New Haven 1971. (Polyarchy)
DALTON Russell J., FARRELL David M., MCALLISTER lan, Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy: How Parties Organize Democracy Comparative Study Of Electoral Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
DALTON, Russell J., Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation, Political Studies, Vol. 56, lssue 1, 2008. (Political Participation)
DALTON, Russell J., Communists and Democrats: Democratic Attitudes in the Two Germanies, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 24, No. 4, October 1994. (Communists and Democrats)
DEP AUW, Govemment Party Discipline in Parliamentary Democracies: The Cases of Belgium, France and United Kingdom in the 1990s, Cohesion And Discipline in Legislatures, Ed. Reuven Y. Hazan, Routledge, Oxon 2006.
DIERMEIER Daiıel, VLAICU Razvan, Executive Control and Legislative Success, Review ofEcononıic Studies, Vol., 78, 2011.
DİNÇKOL, Bihterin, Yönetilenlerin "Öz" Yönetimi - Kamuoyu, İstanbul Ticaret Üni- versitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Y. 5, Sy. 10, Güz 2006/2.
DUVERGER, Maurice, Siyasi Partiler, Çev. Ergun Özbudun, Bilgi Yayınevi, Ankara 1993.
ERDOĞAN, Mustafa, Anayasal Demokrasi, Siyasal Kitabevi Yayınlan, Ankara 2004.
FAUCHER, Florence, Party organisation and democracy - A comparison of Les Verts and the British Green Party, GeoJournal. Vol. 47, lssue 3, 1999.
FELD Lars P., KİRCHG.ASSNER Gebhard, Direct Democracy, Political Culture, and the Outcome of Econonıic Policy: A Report on the Swiss Experience, European Jounıal of Political Economy, Vol. 16, 2000.
FINKEL, Steven E., Can Democracy Be Taught?, Jounıal of Democracy, Volume 14, Number 4, October 2003.
FOWLER James H., KAM Cindy D., Beyond the Self: Social ldentity, Altruism, and Political Participation, Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, lssue 3, 2007.
GAUJA, Anika, An Assessment of the Impact of Party Law on Intra-Party Democracy in Common Law Nations, 20th International Political Science Association World Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, 2006.
GIBSON, James L., The Contributions of Tmth to Reconciliation: Lessons From South Africa, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 50 No. 3, June 2006.
GÖZTEPE, Ece, Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi Anlayışına Karşı Çoğulcu Demokrasi Model- leri: Nomıatif Düzenleme Olanakları ve Bunun Sınırlılığı Üzerine Bazı Düşünceler, Çoğulcu Demokrasi Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi İkilemi ve İnsan Haklan Toplantısı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayını, Ankara 2010.
GUNTHER Richard, DIAMOND Larry, Species of Political Parties: A New Typology, Party Politics, vol. 9, no. 2, March 2003 ..
GÜLSOY, Tevfik, Demokrasilerde Siyasal Parti Teşkilatı ve Parti İçi Demokrasi, (Ya- yınılanınanuş Doktora Tezi), Konya 2000.
HABERMAS Jürgen, Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Nornıative Theory on Empirical Research, Communication Theory, Vol. 16, Issue 4, November 2006.
HAKYEMEZ, Yusuf Şevki, Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi Anlayışı, Rousseau ve Türk Ana- yasaları Üzerindeki Etkisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 52, Sy. 4, Y. 2003.
HAZAN, Reuven Y., Does Cohesion Equal Discipline? Towards a Conceptual Delineation, Cohesion And Discipline in Legislatures, Ed. Reuven Y. Hazan, Routledge, Oxon 2006.
HEWLETT, Nick, Democracy in modem France, Continuum International Publishing Group, New York 2005.
İNCEOĞLU, Sibel, İnsan Haklan Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Çoğulculuk, Çoğul cu Demokrasi Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi İkilemi ve İnsan Haklan Toplantısı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayını, Ankara 2010.
KABASAKAL, Mehmet, Factors Influencing Intra-party Democracy and Menıbership Rights: The Case ofTurkey, Party Politics, July 2012.
KAM, Christopher J., Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
KAP ANİ, Münci, Politika Bilimine Giriş, Bilgi Y ayınevi, Ankara 2001.
KAYE Philip, FLAYELLE Luncinda, Part Discipline and Legislative Voting, Canadian Parliamentry Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1986.
KENIG, Ofer, Democratization of Party Leadership Selection: Do Wider Selectorates Produce more Competitive Contests?, Electoral Studies, Vol. 28, 2008.
224 Yrd. Doç. Dr. A. Tarık GÜMÜŞ ERÜHFD, C. VII, S. 3-4, (2012)
KILIÇ, Haşim, Parti İçi Demokrasi, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 13, 1997.
KITSCHELT, Herbert, The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited, Political Studies, Vol. XXXVII, 1989.
KÖKER, Levent, Seçim Sistemleri ve Siyasi Çoğulculuk, Anayasa Yargısı, c. 23, Ana- yasa Mahkemesi Yayınlan, Ankara 2006.
LANE Jan-Erik, ERSSON Svante O., Democracy: a Comparative Approach, Routledge, NewYork2003.
LAP ALOMBARA, Joseph, Reflections on Political Parties and Political Development, Four Decades Later, Party Politics, Vol. 13 No. 2, March 2007.
LIN, Gang, Leadership Transition, Intra-Party Democracy, And Institution Buildıng Inchina, Asian Survey, Vol. 44, No. 2, March/April 2004.
LIPSET, Seymour Martin, Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Econonıic Development and Political Legitinıacy, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, March 1959.
LIPSON, Eslie, Demokratik Uygarlık, (Çev: Haldun Gülalp, Türker Alkan), Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınlan, Ankara, 1984.
LISI Marco, FREIRE Andre, Political Equality And The Process Of Candidate Selection: Mps' Views in Comparative Perspective, Representation, Vol. 48, Issue 4, 2012.
LOTSHW AO, Kebapetse, The Lack of Internal Party Democracy in the African National Congress: A Threat to the Consolidation of Democracy in South Africa*, Journal of Southem African Studies, Vol. 35, No 4, December 2009.
MAINW ARING Scott, SHUGART Matthew S., Concluision: Presidentialism and The Party System, Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997.
McCARTY Nolan, POOLE Keıth T., ROSENTHAL Howard, The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress, American Political Science Review, Vol. 95, No. 3 September 2001.
MIMPEN, Jeroen, Intra-Party Democracy and ıts Discontents Democratization in a Volatile Political Landscape, http://www.nimd.org/documents/I/intra- party_democracy_and_its_discontents_nıimpen.pdf, 27.11.2012.
MOELLENDORF, Darrel, Reconciliation as a Political Value, Journal of Social Philosophy, Volume 38, Issue 2, May 2007.
MOLTCHANOV A, Amıa, Nationhood and Political Culture, Journal of Social Philosophy, Volume 38, Issue 2, May 2007.
MOONEY Annabelle, EV ANS Betsy, Globalization The Key Concepts, Taylor & Francis, Oxon 2007.
OWENS, Jhon E., Explaining Party Cohesion and Discipline in democratic Legislatures: Purposiveness and Contexts, Cohesion And Discipline in Legislatures, Ed. Reuven Y. Hazan, Routledge, Oxon 2006.
ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, Batı Demokrasilerinde ve Türkiye'de Parti Disiplini, Ankara Üni- versitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınlan, Ankara 1968.
ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, Siyasal Partiler, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara 1979.
ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, Siyasi Partilerin Hukukça Düzenlenmesi İhtiyacı ve Örgütlenme Sorunları, Siyasi Partiler ve Demokrasi, TESAV yayınlan, 1999,
http://www.ekitapyayin.com/id/070/siyasil- lsunus.htm 22.11.2012.
PETAUX, Jean, Democracy and Human Rights for Europe: tlıe Council of Europe's Contribution, Council ofEurope Publishing, Strasbourg, 2009.
PETTITT, Robin T., Electoral Reform, 'New Polıtıcs' And Intra-Party Democracy in Post-Devolutıon Scotland, Representation, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2008.
PLATTNER, Marc, Democracy Witlıout Borders?: Global Challenges to Liberal Democracy, Rownıan & Littlefield, Maryland 2008.
RAHAT Gideon, HAZAN Reuven, Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York2010.
ROKKAN, Stein, Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches To The Comparative Study OfThe Processes OfDevelopment, McKay, Oslo 1970.
SARTORI, Giovanni, Demokrasi Teorisine Geri Dönüş, Çev. Tuncer Karamustafaoğlu Mehmet Turan, Yetkin Yayınlan, Ankara 1993.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Routledge, London New York, 2012.
SELÇUK, Sami, Zorba Devletten Hukukun Ü stülüğüne, Yeni Türkiye Yayınlan, Anka- ra 1999.
SHUGART, Mattlıew S0berg, Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Pattenıs, French Politics, Vol. 3, 2005.
SUNAY, Reyhan, İfade Hürriyetinin Muhtevası ve Sınırlan, Liberal Düşünce Toplulu- ğu, Ankara 2001.
TEORELL Jan, HADENIUS Axel, Democracy without Democratic Values: A Rejoinder to Welzel and Inglehart, Studies in Comparative Intenıational Development, Vol. 41, Issue 3, Fall 2006.
TEORELL, Jan, Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 45, Issue 5, 2006.
TEZİÇ, Erdoğan, Anayasa Hukuku, Beta Yayınlan, İstanbul 2003.
TUNCAY, Suavi, Parti İçi Demokrasi ve Türkiye, Gündoğan Yayınlan, Ankara 1996. (Parti İçi Demokrasi) TUNCAY, Suavi, Parti İçi Demokrasi ve Türkiye, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 17, 1997.
UYGUN, Oktay, Demokrasinin Çoğunlukçu ve Çoğulcu Modelleri İki Bin Beşyüz Yıllık Bir Tartışmanın Analizi, Çoğulcu Demokrasi Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi İkilemi ve İnsan Haklan Toplantısı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayını, Ankara 2010.
WAUTERS, Bram, Explaining Participation in Intra-Party Elections: Evidence from Belgian Political Parties, Party Politics, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2010.
YANIK, Murat, Parti İçi Demokrasi Açısından Aday Belirleme Yöntemleri, Erzincan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. XI, Sy. 3-4, 2007.
YANIK, Murat, Parti İçi Demokrasi, Beta Yayınlan, İstanbul 2002.
YAYLA, Atilla, Parti İçi Demokrasi" ve Demokrasi, http://www.liberal- dt.org.tr/guncel/Y ayla/ay_demokrasil.htm, 13.10.2004.
YAYLA, Atilla, Siyaset Teorisine Giriş, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara 2004

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Anayasa Hukuku

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

A. Tarık Gümüş Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2012

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Eylül 2012

Kabul Tarihi

7 Kasım 2012

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2012 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3-4

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gümüş, A. T. (2012). ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3-4), 199-226. https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN

AMA

1.Gümüş AT. ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ. ERÜHFD. 2012;7(3-4):199-226. https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN

Chicago

Gümüş, A. Tarık. 2012. “ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (3-4): 199-226. https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN.

EndNote

Gümüş AT (01 Aralık 2012) ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 7 3-4 199–226.

IEEE

[1]A. T. Gümüş, “ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ”, ERÜHFD, c. 7, sy 3-4, ss. 199–226, Ara. 2012, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN

ISNAD

Gümüş, A. Tarık. “ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 7/3-4 (01 Aralık 2012): 199-226. https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN.

JAMA

1.Gümüş AT. ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ. ERÜHFD. 2012;7:199–226.

MLA

Gümüş, A. Tarık. “ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 7, sy 3-4, Aralık 2012, ss. 199-26, https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN.

Vancouver

1.A. Tarık Gümüş. ÇOĞULCU DEMOKRASİLERDE PARTİ İÇİ DEMOKRASİ. ERÜHFD [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2012;7(3-4):199-226. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA76JK85ZN