Nepotizmin Kurum Kültürüne Etkisinde Örgütsel Adaletin Aracı Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışma, nepotizmin kurum kültürü üzerindeki etkilerini incelemekte ve örgütsel adaletin bu süreçteki aracılık rolünü araştırmaktadır. Günümüzde adalet ve eşitlik ilkelerinin ihlali, organizasyonlar içerisinde ciddi çatışmalara ve iş verimliliğinde azalmaya yol açmaktadır. Özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkelerde sıklıkla karşılaşılan nepotizm, çalışan motivasyonunu olumsuz etkileyen bir uygulama olarak ön plana çıkmaktadır. Çalışanlar arasında aile veya yakınlık bağlarına dayalı işe alım ve terfi süreçleri, adalet algısını zedelerken, bunun sonucunda da örgütsel bağlılık ve performans düşüşü gözlemlenmektedir. Araştırmanın amacı, nepotizmin kurumsal kültür üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini anlamak ve örgütsel adaletin bu etkileri nasıl hafifletebileceğini belirlemektir. Bu bağlamda, yüksek eğitim seviyeleri ve genç çalışan profili gibi demografik veriler, çalışma kapsamındaki önemli bulgular arasında yer almaktadır. Araştırma evreni Düzce ilinde bulunan bir kurumda çalışanlar olup, toplam 146 katılımcının verileri üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcılar arasında erkek (yaklaşık %52) ve kadın (yaklaşık %48) oranlarının dengeli olduğu, çoğunluğun (yaklaşık %72,6) lisans mezunu olduğu ve yüksek lisans yapanların oranının (%17,8) da dikkat çekici olduğu ortaya koyulmuştur. Araştırmada kullanılan ölçekler, Likert tipi 5’li ölçek ile hazırlanmış ve geçerlilik ile güvenilirlik testleri yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, kullanılan ölçeklerin güvenilirliklerinin yüksek olduğunu ve ölçümlerin geçerli kabul edildiğini göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, nepotizmin örgütsel adalet üzerinde anlamlı ve negatif bir etki yarattığını göstermiştir. Örgütsel adaletin, nepotizmin olumsuz etkilerini dengeleyebileceği gerçeği, adil yönetim uygulamalarının geliştirilmesi gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır. Bu çalışma, nepotizm üzerine daha fazla araştırma yapılması çağrısına cevap vererek literatüre katkıda bulunmayı hedeflemekte ve örgütlerin adalet algısını artırmaya yönelik somut öneriler sunarak, daha adil bir iş ortamı yaratma yolunda adımlar atmalarına yardımcı olmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nepotizm
• Kurum Kültürü
• Örgütsel Adalet
• Örgütsel Davranış
• Eşitlik

The Mediating Role of Organizational Justice in the Effect of Nepotism on Corporate Culture

Öz

This study examines the effects of nepotism on corporate culture and investigates the mediating role of organizational justice in this process. Today, violations of the principles of justice and equality lead to serious conflicts within organizations and a decrease in work productivity. Nepotism, which is frequently encountered especially in developing countries, stands out as a practice that negatively affects employee motivation. While recruitment and promotion processes based on family or affinity ties among employees damage the perception of fairness, organizational commitment and performance decline as a result. The purpose of this study is to understand the negative effects of nepotism on corporate culture and to determine how organizational justice can mitigate these effects. In this context, demographic data such as high education levels and young employee profile are among the important findings of the study. The population of the study was employees working in an organization in Düzce province and the data of 146 participants were collected. It was revealed that the proportion of men (approximately 52%) and women (approximately 48%) among the participants was balanced, the majority (approximately 72.6%) were bachelor's degree holders and the proportion of master's degree holders (17.8%) was also remarkable. The scales used in the study were prepared with Likert-type 5-point scale and validity and reliability tests were conducted. The results show that the reliability of the scales used are high and the measurements are accepted as valid. The results show that nepotism has a significant and negative effect on organizational justice. The fact that organizational justice can offset the negative effects of nepotism emphasizes the need to develop fair management practices. This study aims to contribute to the literature by responding to the call for more research on nepotism and aims to help organizations take steps towards creating a fairer work environment by providing concrete suggestions to increase the perception of justice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nepotism
• Corporate Culture
• Organizational Justice
• Organizational Behavior
• Equality

Kaynakça

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A. & Rosati, F. (2014). Aynı üniversite fakültesindeki akrabalar: Kayırmacılık mı yoksa liyakat mı? Scientometrics, 101, 737-749.
2. Adamovic, M. (2023). Organizational justice research: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. European Management Review. doi: 10.1111/emre.12564
3. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
4. Adedoyin, O. (2010). Using IRT approach to detect gender biased items in public examinations: A case study from the Botswana junior certificate examination in mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(7), 385.
5. Akar, S. (2020). Örgüt kültüründe bir iş ahlakı problemi olarak nepotizm. Management Journal, 22(4), 25-39. doi: 10.33712/mana.697413
6. Akgül, A. & Çevik, O. (2003). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri, SPSS’te işletme yönetimi uygulamaları. Ankara: Emek Ofset Ltd. Şti.
7. Aktan, E. & Aydıntan, B. (2021). Cameron-Freeman Örgüt kültürü türleri ekseninde örgüt kültürü ve bilgi güvenliği algısı ilişkisi: Devlet üniversitelerinde bir uygulama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 324–344. Alhamad, A.M., Aljanabi, B.R.H. & Almaali, A.A.H. (2022). The relationship between organizational justice, organizational trust, and organizational citizenship behavior: A case study of the employees of the Karabuk University. Sumerianz Journal of Business Management and Marketing, 5(1), 8-15. doi: 10.47752/sjbmm.51.1.7
8. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, Engin. (2007). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri SPSS uygulamalı (5. bs.). Sakarya: Sakarya Kitapevi.

9. Araslı, H., Bavik, A. & Ekiz, E. H. (2006). The effects of nepotism on human resource management: The case of three, four and five star hotels in Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(7/8), 295-308. doi: 10.1108/01443330610680399
10. Araslı, H. & Arıcı, N. C. (2020). The effect of nepotism on tolerance to workplace incivility: Mediating role of psychological contract violation and moderating role of authentic leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 597-613.
11. Arasli, H. & Tumer, M. (2008). Nepotism, favoritism and cronyism: A study of their effects on job stress and job satisfaction in the banking industry of North Cyprus. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36(9), 1237-1250.
12. Asunakutlu, T. & Avcı, U. (2010). Nepotizm-iş tatmini ilişkisi: Aile işletmelerinde bir inceleme. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15(2), 93–109.
13. Balthazard, P. A., Cooke, R. A. & Potter, R. E. (2006). Dysfunctional culture, dysfunctional organization. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 709–732.
14. Barney, J. B. (1986). Örgüt kültürü: Sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajının kaynağı olabilir mi? Yönetim İncelemesi Akademisi, 11(3), 656-665.
15. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
16. Bellows, T. J. (2009). Meritocracy and the Singapore political system. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 24–44. doi: 10.1080/02185370902767581
17. Bertrand, M. & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73-96.
18. Beugre, C. D. & Baron, R. A. (2001). Perceptions of systemic justice: The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 324-339.
19. Boadi, I., He, Z., Bosompem, J., Darko, A. D. & Gavedzi, S. (2020). Employees’ perception of nepotism and cronyism in the Ghanaian banking industry: Impact on job satisfaction, job stress and employee motivation. International Journal of Manpower, 41(6), 1-17. doi: 10.1108/IJM-12-2018-0414
20. Burhan, O. K., van Leeuwen, E. & Scheepers, D. (2020). On the hiring of kin in organizations: Perceived nepotism and its implications for fairness perceptions and the willingness to join an organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 34-48.
21. Cameron, K. S. & Freeman, S. J. (1991). Cultural congruence, strength, and type: Relationships to effectiveness. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 23-58.
22. Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Addison-Wesley.
23. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2019). 4 reasons talented employees don’t reach their potential. Erişim adresi: https://hbr.org/2019/03/4-reasons-talented-employees-dont-reach-their-potential.
24. Chegini, M. G. (2009). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 1(2), 173.
25. Chen, Z. X. & Wang, H. (2011). Nepotism and its influence on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in China. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(3), 206-219.
26. Christie, P. M. J., Kwon, I. W. G., Stoeberl, P. A. & Baumhart, R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 263-287.
27. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.
28. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H. & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
29. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R. & Rupp, D. E. (2007). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2), 164-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.10.004
30. Çetin, A. & Topaloğlu, C. (2018). Otel işletmelerinde Cameron-Quinn örgüt kültürü tiplerinin yenilikçiliğe etkisi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 6(2), 457-473.
31. Darioly, A. & Riggio, R. E. (2014). Nepotism in the hiring of leaders. Swiss Journal of Psychology.
32. De Clercq, D. & Rius, I. B. (2007). Organizational commitment in Mexican small and medium-sized firms: The role of work status, organizational practices, and organizational justice. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(4), 467-490.
33. Deal, T. E. & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
34. Demirel, Y. & Seçkin, Z. (2011). Örgütsel adaletin bilgi paylaşımı üzerine etkisi: İlaç sektörü çalışanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. Bilig, 56, 99-119.
35. Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Wiley.
36. Denison, D. R. & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204-223. doi: 10.1287/orsc.6.2.204
37. Eisenberg, E. & Riley, P. (2001). Organizational culture. F. M. Jablin ve L. Putnam (Ed.), The new handbook of organizational communication (s. 291–322) içinde. Sage Publications.
38. Erkuş, A. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma sarmalı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
39. Ferris, G. R. Berkson, H. M. Kaplan, D. M., Gilmore, D. C., Buckley, M. R. & Hochwarter, W. A. (2009). Politics in human resources decisions: A walk on the dark side. Organizational Dynamics, 38(3), 219-230. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.04.001
40. George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson
41. Gilliland, S. (2008). The tails of justice: A critical examination of the dimensionality of organizational justice constructs. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.08.001
42. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9-22. doi: 10.5465/amr.1987.4306437
43. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.
44. Güney, S. & Gümüş, A. (2019). Çalışanların işten ayrılma niyetleri üzerindeki ulusal kültürün etkisinde yöneticilerin örgütsel adalet anlayışlarının aracılık rolü. Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies, 4(2), 45-61. doi: 10.20491/isarder.2019.724
45. Gürbüz, S. (2019). Aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
46. Gürbüz, S. & Mert, İ. S. (2009). Örgütsel adalet ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik uygulaması: Kamuda görgül bir çalışma. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 42(3), 117-139.
47. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2. bs.). New York: Guilford Publications.
48. Hennessey, J. T. (1998). ‘Reinventing’ government: Does leadership make the difference? Public Administration Review, 58(6), 522-532. doi: 10.2307/977579
49. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2. bs.). Sage Publications.
50. Ignatowski, G., Sułkowski, Ł. & Stopczyński, B. (2021). Risk of increased acceptance for organizational nepotism and cronyism during the Covid-19 pandemic. Risks, 9(4), 59. doi: 10.3390/risks9040059
51. Iqbal, Q. & Ahmad, N. H. (2020). Workplace spirituality and nepotism-favouritism in selected ASEAN countries: The role of gender as moderator. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(1), 31-49. doi: 10.1108/JABS-01-2018-0019
52. İçerli, L. (2010). Örgütsel adalet: Kuramsal bir yaklaşım. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(1), 67-92.
53. Jain, A. K., Srivastava, S. & Sullivan, S. E. (2023). Does fear-based silence mediate the nepotism–employee outcomes relationship? Personnel Review, 52(3), 835-855. doi: 10.1108/PR-06-2021-0394
54. Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D. B. & Reay, T. (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26(2), 121-139.
55. Jaworski, B. J. & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
56. Jones, R. G. & Stout, T. (2015). Policing nepotism and cronyism without losing the value of social connection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 2-12.
57. Kang, M. & Kim, S. Y. (2020). Organizational justice and market performance: A multilevel analysis of the moderating role of market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 115, 288-296.
58. Karakılıç, N. Y. (2019). Cameron ve Quinn örgüt kültürü ölçeğinin güvenirlik ve geçerliğinin test edilmesi. Kocatepe İİBF Dergisi, 21(1), 19-30.
59. Karakose, T. (2014). The effects of nepotism, cronyism and political favoritism on the doctors working in public hospitals. Studies on Ethno-Medicine, 8(3), 245-250.
60. Kim, W. C. & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 65-75.
61. Ko, J. (2017). The effect of organizational culture on empowerment in the public enterprise: Focused on the moderating effects of organizational justice. Korean Journal of Labor Policy and Economics, 13(1), 81-95. doi: 10.24020/KJLPE.2017.13.1.81
62. Kotter, J. P. & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Free Press.
63. Kwon, K. (2014). Nepotism in family businesses and its impact on organizational innovation. Family Business Review, 27(4), 332-347.
64. Loi, R., Hang‐Yue, N. & Foley, S. (2006). Çalışanların adalet algılarını örgütsel bağlılığa ve ayrılma niyetine bağlamak: Algılanan örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolü. Mesleki ve Örgütsel Psikoloji Dergisi, 79(1), 101-120.
65. Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood,C. M. & Williams, J. (2004) Confidence limits fort he indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
66. Marjani, A. & Ardahaey, F. T. (2012). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational justice. Asian Social Science, 8(4), 124-133. doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n4p124
67. Martínez-Tur, V., Moliner, C. & Maniezki, A. (2020). Organizational justice. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429325755-5
68. Merriam-Webster (2020). Nepotism. Erişim adresi: www.merriam-webster.com
69. Mhatre, K. H., Riggio, R. E. & Riggio, H. R. (2013). Kayırmacılık ve liderlik. Kuruluşlarda kayırmacılık (s. 171-198) içinde. Routledge.
70. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
71. Mulder, B. K. (2013). A model of organizational nepotism. Nepotism in organizations (s. 219-251) içinde. Routledge.
72. Nachmias, C. F. & Nachmias, D. (1996). Research methods in the social sciences (5. bs.). London: St. Martin’s Press Inc.
73. Niemietz, H., Kinderen, S. & Constantinidis, C. (2013). Understanding the role of subcultures in the corporate architecture process. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2013) (s. 1–12) içinde. Utrecht.
74. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
75. Olan, F., Liu, S., Neaga, I., Chen, H. & Nakpodia, F. (2019). Bilgi paylaşımı üzerindeki kültürel etkinin kurumsal performansa nasıl katkıda bulunduğu: fsQCA yaklaşımının kullanımı. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 94, 313-319, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.027
76. Özdemir, A. (2013). Okul yöneticilerindeki adalet ve liyakat ile öğretmenlerdeki sadakat ve gayret arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 19(1), 99-117.
77. Özdevecioğlu, M. & Akın, M. (2013). Yöneticilerin örgüt kültürü ve örgütler arası vatandaşlık davranışları algılamaları. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 112-131.
78. Padgett, M. Y. & Morris, K. A. (2005). Keeping it “all in the family:” Does nepotism in the hiring process really benefit the beneficiary? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(2), 34-45. doi: 10.1177/107179190501100205
79. Pearce, J. L. (2015). Cronyism and nepotism are bad for everyone: The research evidence. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 41-44.
80. Pearce, J. L., Xin, K. M., Xu, Q. J. & Rao, A. N. (2011). “Managers' context: How government capability affects managers. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 500-516.
81. Pinsker, J. (2015). Like father, like Son: how much nepotism is too much? The Atlantic. Erişim adresi: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/06/nepotism-mobility-same-jobs-fathers/395567/
82. Przęczek, C., Rosiński, J. & Manko, B. A. (2021). Research review in organizational justice. Journal of Politics, Economics and Society, 21(1), 45-60. doi: 10.18290/pepsi-2020-0003
83. Putri, A. & Dudija, N. (2020). Organizational justice: A literature review and managerial implications for future research. Advances in social science, education and humanities research (s. 193-202) içinde. doi: 10.1201/9781003010814-27
84. Rainey, H. G. & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Dörtnala koşan filler: Etkili hükümet örgütleri teorisinin unsurlarını geliştirmek. Kamu Yönetimi Araştırma ve Teorisi Dergisi, 9(1), 1-32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401
85. Redding, S. G. & Hsiao, M. (1990). An empirical study of overseas Chinese managerial ideology. International Journal of Psychology, 25(3/6), 629-641.
86. Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture and leadership: The art of influencing without formal authority. MIT Sloan Management Review.
87. Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9–20.
88. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4. bs.). Jossey-Bass.
89. Scherer, R. F., Wiebe, F. A., Luther, D. C. & Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 763-770.
90. Shortell, S. M., Jones, R. H., Rademaker, A. W., Gillies, R. R., Dranove, D. S., Hughes, E. F. X., Budetti, P. P., Reynolds, K. S. E. ve Huang, C. F. (2000). Assessing the impact of total quality management and organizational culture on multiple outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Medical Care, 38(2), 207–217.
91. Spranger, J. L., Colarelli, S. M., Dimotakis, N., Jacob, A. C. & Arvey, R. D. (2012). Aile işletmelerinde akraba yoğunluğunun etkileri. Örgütsel Davranış ve İnsan Karar Süreçleri, 119(2), 151-162.
92. Tan, Ö. & Çetin, C. (2012). Performans değerlendirme sistemine ilişkin örgütsel adalet algısının sistemden duyulan memnuniyet üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Öneri Dergisi, 9(35), 1-13.
93. Tran, B. (2019). Organizational justice: The injustice in the foundation of organizational citizenship behavior within higher education institutions. Human resource management in higher education (s. 1-28) içinde. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9850-5.CH001
94. Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349-361.
95. Usal, A. & Kuşluvan, Z. (2006). Davranış bilimleri sosyal psikoloji (5. bs.). İzmir: Barış Yayınları.,
96. Uslu, A. & Baydaş, A. (2021). Algılanan örgütsel adaletin örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel sinizm ve iş tatmini üzerine etkisi. Eskişehir Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 57-74. doi: 10.17755/ESOSDER.861027
97. Vveinhardt, J. & Sroka, W. (2020). Nepotism and favouritism in Polish and Lithuanian organizations: The context of organisational microclimate. Sustainability, 12(4). Erişim adresi: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1425#cite
98. Vveinhardt, J. & Petrauskaitė, M. (2013). Nepotism and favoritism in the recruitment process and their impact on employees’ work motivation, job satisfaction and work productivity: Interdisciplinary study of Lithuanian and Latvian trade sector. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Modern Approaches to the Analysis of Current Economic Problems, Kaunas, Lithuania.
99. Ybema, J. F. & Van den Bos, K. (2010). Effects of organizational justice on depressive symptoms and sickness absence: A longitudinal perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 70(10), 1609-1617.
100. Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7. bs.). Pearson.