Uyarlanabilir Yeniden İşlevlendirme ve Miras Algısı: Bursa'daki İki Tarihi Yapının Kullanıcı Temelli Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Öz

Günümüzde dijital platformlarda paylaşılan kullanıcı yorumları, kültürel miras alanlarının algılanmasına ilişkin nitel veriler sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, Bursa'da yeniden işlevlendirilmiş iki bina olan Kitapevi Otel ve Balibey Han'ı örnek alarak, farklı yönetim modellerinin kullanıcı algıları üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Metin madenciliği ve AHP yöntemleriyle desteklenen analiz, mimari süreklilik, kültürel sürdürülebilirlik ve kullanıcı deneyimi başlıkları altında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, kullanıcı odaklı değerlendirme modellerinin kültürel mirasın korunmasındaki rolünü ortaya koymayı ve bu konudaki literatüre katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yeniden işlevlendirme
• Kitapevi Otel
• Balibey Han
• kullanıcı algısı

Adaptive Reuse and Heritage Perception: A User-Based Comparative Analysis of Two Historic Structures in Bursa

Öz

Abstract. User reviews shared on digital platforms today provide qualitative data on the perception of cultural heritage sites. This study examines the impact of different management models on user perceptions through the use of two refunctioned buildings in Bursa, the Kitapevi Hotel and the Balibey Han. The analysis, supported by text mining and AHP methods, was conducted under the headings of architectural continuity, cultural sustainability, and user experience. The study aims to reveal the role of user-centered evaluation models in preserving cultural heritage and contribute to the literature in this regard.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• repurposing
• Kitapevi Hotel
• Balibey Han
• user perception

Kaynakça

1. Australia ICOMOS. (2013). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood, VIC: Australia ICOMOS.
2. Baykal, K. (1950). Bursa ve Anıtları. Bursa: Aysan Printing House.
3. Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2000). Public Involvement and Planning: Looking Beyond the One to the Many. International Planning Studies, 5(3), 321–344.
4. Eyice, S. (1992). Balî Bey Hanı. in TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/bali-bey-hani [accessed on: 21.07.2025].
5. Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
6. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. ICOMOS. (1964). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter). Paris: ICOMOS.
8. ICOMOS ISC20C. (2017). Madrid–New Delhi Document: Approaches for the Conservation of Twentieth-Century Architectural Heritage. Paris: ICOMOS. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Secretariat/2017/GA_Documents_2017/GA2017_6-3-2_Madrid-NewDelhi_Document_EN_final_20170730.pdf

9. Kaplanoğlu, R. (2003). Doğal ve sanat eserleriyle Bursa. Osmangazi Municipality Publications.
10. Kazmaoğlu, A. (2000). Kitapevi: Burçüstünde Bir Kültür Merkezi. Tasarım, (100), 103–115.
11. Kee, Tris. (2015). Knowledge Exchange and Participatory Practice in Architecture. The International Journal of Design in Society. 9. 17-25. 10.18848/2325-1328/CGP/v09i03/38563.
12. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, Mit Press.
13. Özbek Eren, İ. (2022). Korumanın anlamı üzerine yeniden düşünmek. Mimarlık, (427), 38–42.
14. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
15. Shahi, S., Esnaashary Esfahani, M., Bachmann, C. and Haas, C. (2020), “A definition framework for building adaptation projects”, Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 63, 102345, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102345.
16. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. New York: Routledge.
17. Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the Scientific Discourse on Cultural Sustainability. Sustainability, 6(3), 159–176.
18. Sunay, S. (2007). Bursa Balibey Hanı. Ankara University Journal of Language, History, and Geography, 47(1), 115–130.
19. Tweed, C., & Sutherland, M. (2007). Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.008
20. Tzonis, A., & Lefaivre, L. (1981). The Grid and the Pathway: An Introduction to the Work of Dimitris and Susana Antonakakis. Architecture in Greece (Vol. 15, Pp. 164–178). Athens: Ekistics.
21. Uzzell, D. (2006). Interpreting Our Heritage: A Theoretical Interpretation. in L. Smith (Ed.), Cultural Heritage: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies (Vol. 1, pp. 1–11). London: Routledge.
22. Yung, E. H. K., & Chan, E. H. W. (2012). Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat International, 36(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001