ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF GASTRONOMY EDUCATION: TURKEY CASE
Öz
Gastronomy education in Turkey is given under the names of “food and beverage management” and “gastronomy and culinary arts” in degree programs and “culinary” in associate degree programs. In these sections where students are active in a significant part of the educational process, the physical facilities, curriculum, lecturer, student and database dimensions are important in determining the quality of education. In this research, it is aimed to evaluate the quality of gastronomy education at the higher education level in Turkey. In this direction, the questionnaire method was used for data collection. These questionnaires were sent all gastronomy lecturers and the students including private universities in Turkey. 400 students and 102 academics a total of 502 questionnaires have returned and taken into consideration. The obtained data were analyzed with SPSS packet program. Analised results present very interesting findings about the quality of gastronomy education at higher education level in Turkey. It is seen that the physical facilities, databases and curriculum offered during the education in these sections do not satisfy both the academicians and the students and are not sufficient. In addition, quality of gastronomy education scores show meaningful and significant differences according to the type of university trained and the degree of education.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 6(30), 569–581 . doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
- ACF. (2018, Temmuz 20). American Culinary Federation: https://www.acfchefs.org/ACF/Education/Accreditation/ACF/Education/Accreditation/
- Brown, J. N. (2013). A Brief History of Culinary Arts Education in America. Journal of Hospitality and#x26; Tourism Education. doi:DOI: 10.1080/10963758.2005.10696841
- Brown, J. N. (2014). Integrating Eisner's Arts Education Philosophy into Culinary Arts Education. Journal of Culinary Science and Technology, 4(1), s. 89-99. doi:DOI: 10.1300/J385v04n01_10
- Brown, J. N., Mao, Z. “., and Chesser, J. W. (2013). A Comparison of Learning Outcomes in Culinary Education: Recorded Video vs. Live Demonstration. Journal of Hospitality and#x26; Tourism Education 25:3, s. 103-109. doi:DOI: 10.1080/10963758.2013.826940
- ESG. (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. http://www.enqa.eu: http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf
- GACHEF. (2018, Temmuz 20). The Culinary Arts Industry Accreditation. www.gadoe.org: https://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/CTAE/Documents/GACHEF-Culinary-Arts-Industry-Accreditation-Manual.pdf
- Görkem, O., and Sevim, B. (2016). Gastronomi Eğitiminde Geç mi Kalındı, Acele mi Ediliyor? Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(58), 977-988. doi:10.17755/esosder.06573
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Duran Cankül
*
0000-0001-5067-6904
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Nisan 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Aralık 2018
Kabul Tarihi
20 Mart 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 70
Cited By
ASSESSMENT OF CULINARY CLASS DEMONSTRATION METHODS ON STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE: VIDEO VERSUS LIVE STREAMING
Journal of Event, Tourism and Hospitality Studies (JETH)
https://doi.org/10.32890/jeth2021.1.4Gastronomi ve mutfak sanatları eğitim programlarının incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma
Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1397978What Motivates Students to Study Gastronomy? The Case of Türkiye
Journal of Culinary Science & Technology
https://doi.org/10.1080/15428052.2024.2427961