ADAPTATION OF DISPOSITIONS TOWARDS LOVING PEDAGOGY SCALE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Yıl 2021, , 1586 - 1606, 01.07.2021

Mehmet Eroğlu , Vildan Donmuş Kaya

https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.853431

Cited By: 1

Öz

PEDAGOJİK SEVGİ EĞİLİMLERİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı Yin ve arkadaşları (2019) tarafından geliştirilen pedagojik sevgi eğilimleri ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanmasıdır. Orijinal formu 6 boyut ve 29 madde olan ölçeğin uyarlama çalışmalarının ilk aşamasında dilsel eşdeğerlik çalışması yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın verilerini toplamak için Fırat Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu’ndan etik uygunluk raporu (Tarih: 29/12/2020, Sayı: 432967) alınmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları için 291 sınıf öğretmeninden veri toplanmıştır. Yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizinde, 7 madde elenerek toplam varyansın %67,71’ ini açıklayan 6 boyutlu ölçek elde edilmiştir. Yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde iyi ve mükemmel uyumu gösteren (ꭓ 2 /sd = 1.77, CFI= .95, TLI= .95, RMSEA= .050, RMR= .017, SRMR= .049 uyum indeksi değerleri elde edilmiştir. Oluşan faktörler ölçeğin orijinal hali dikkate alınarak bağ ve adanmışlık, çeşitliliğin kabulü, samimiyet, empati, sınıf topluluğunun kabulü ve nezaket, bağışlama olarak adlandırılmıştır. Bu sonuçlar ölçme aracının yapısal geçerliğinin olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ölçeğin güvenirlik analizleri için Cronbach Alpha iç tutarlılık katsayısı hesaplanmıştır. Cronbach Alpha iç tutarlılık katsayıları, bağ ve adanmışlık boyutu için .85, çeşitliliğin kabulü boyutu için .73, samimiyet boyutu için .85, empati boyutu için .92, sınıf topluluğunun kabulü ve nezaket boyutu için .83, bağışlama için .75, ölçeğin geneli için ise . 92 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları uyarlanan pedagojik sevgi eğilimleri ölçeğinin öğretmenlerin pedagojik sevgi düzeylerini ölçebilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sevgi, pedagojik sevgi, öğretmen eğitimi, ölçek uyarlama

Kaynakça

• Abd Majid, R., Ali, M. M., Salleh, N. M., Alias, A., Kanapathy, R., & Hashim, K. S. (2018). The Dynamic Holistic Development of Human Potentials and Wellbeing: Implication on Educational Policies. Journal of ICSAR, 2(1), 88-93.
• Arghode, V., Yalvac, B., & Liew, J. (2013). Teacher empathy and science education: A collective case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 89-99.
• Aytan, T. (2014). An investigation of metaphors on the concept of teacher among preservice Turkish teachers. Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială, (46), 65-84.
• Binfet, J. T. (2015). Not-so Random Acts of Kindness: A Guide to Intentional Kindness in the Classroom. International Journal of Emotional Education, 7(2), 49-62.
• Binfet, J. T., & Gaertner, A. (2015). Children’s conceptualizations of kindness at school. Canadian Children, 40(3), 27-40.
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press
• Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (p. 99–136). American Psychological Association.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(4), 470-483.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (14.baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi (3. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Carpentier, J., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2012). Ruminations and flow: Why do people with a more harmonious passion experience higher well-being? Journal of Happiness studies, 13(3), 501-518.
• Cho, D. (2005). Lessons of love: Psychoanalysis and teacher‐student love. Educational Theory, 55(1), 79-96.
• Cortazzi, M., Jin, L., Kaivanpanah, S., & Nemati, M. (2015). Candles lighting up the journey of learning: teachers of English in Iran (Ed. Chris Kennedy).English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (123-138). British Council.
• Coster, W. J., & Mancini, M. C. (2015). Recommendations for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of instruments for occupational therapy research and practice. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, 26(1), 50-57.
• Cousins, S. B. (2017). Practitioners' constructions of love in early childhood education and care. International Journal of Early Years Education, 25(1), 16-29.
• Çapık, C., Gözüm, S., & Aksayan, S. (2018). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlama aşamaları, dil ve kültür uyarlaması: Güncellenmiş rehber. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi, 26(3), 199-210.
• Çelikkaya, H. (1996). Eğitim ve yönetimde sevgi faktörü.Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8, 67-72.
• Çokluk, Ö., Sekercioglu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok degiskenli istatistik. Ankara, Pegem Akademi.
• Day, C. (2004). Change agendas: The roles of teacher educators. Teaching education, 15(2), 145-158.
• De Laet, S., Colpin, H., Vervoort, E., Doumen, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2015). Developmental trajectories of children’s behavioral engagement in late elementary school: Both teachers and peers matter. Developmental psychology, 51(9), 1292.
• Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. he Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146–1163. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.221
• Demirkol, M. (2015). Barışın inşasında sevgi ve adaletin gücü. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 3(Special Issue 4), 416-424.
• Deniz, Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 1-16.
• Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher‐student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211-223.
• Dowling, M. (2014). Young children's personal, social and emotional development (4th ed.). London: Sage.
• Durlak, J. A.,Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A metaanalysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.
• Fernet, C., Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Austin, S. (2014). Fired up with passion: Investigating how job autonomy and passion predict burnout at career start in teachers. Work & Stress, 28(3), 270-288.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS statistics (Third Edition). Sage.
• Fincham, F. D. (2015). Facilitating forgiveness using group and community interventions. (Ed. Stephen Joseph) Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life (pp. 659-680). Wiley.
• Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury publishing USA.
• Girgin, M. (2012). Pedagojik değerler. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
• Gözüm, S. & Aksayan S. (2003). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: Psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 5(1), 3-14.
• Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first‐grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?. Child development, 76(5), 949-967.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Hughes, J. N. (2011). Longitudinal effects of teacher and student perceptions of teacher-student relationship qualities on academic adjustment. The Elementary school journal, 112(1), 38-60.
• Hutcheson, G. D., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Sage.
• Jasinski, I., & Lewis, T. E. (2016). Another kind of love in education: Whatever love. Interchange, 47(4), 429-441.
• Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of educational research, 79(1), 491-525.
• Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M., & Crowley, M. (2015). Early social-emotion functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2283-2290.
• Karpouza, E., & Emvalotis, A. (2019). Exploring the teacher-student relationship in graduate education: a constructivist grounded theory. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 121-140.
• Kayadibi, F. (2002). Sevgi faktörünün eğitim verimliliği üzerine etkisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5.
• Keller, M. M., Hoy, A. W., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 743-769.
• Kerr, S. L., O’Donovan, A., & Pepping, C. A. (2015). Can gratitude and kindness interventions enhance well-being in a clinical sample? Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 17-36.
• Kiuru, N., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., Pakarinen, E., Poskiparta, E., Ahonen, T., ... & Nurmi, J. E. (2015). Positive teacher and peer relations combine to predict primary school students’ academic skill development. Developmental psychology, 51(4), 434.
• Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (3rd edition). New York: Guilford Press.
• Lanas, M., & Zembylas, M. (2015). Towards a transformational political concept of love in critical education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(1), 31-44.
• Lavy, V. (2016). What makes an effective teacher? Quasi-experimental evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 62(1), 88-125.
• Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behaviour in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLoS One, 7(12), e51380.
• Lee, S. Y. (2017). A study of the passion for teaching profession and happiness among forest kindergarten teachers. International Journal of Child Warfare Promotion and Management, 1(1), 65-70.
• Loreman, T. (2011). Love as pedagogy. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2012). How to raise children to be good people? Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 33(1), 83-91.
• Maio, G. R., Thomas, G., Fincham, F. D., & Carnelley, K. B. (2008). Unraveling the role of forgiveness in family relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 307.
• Manning-Morton, J., & Thorp, M. (2015). Two-year-olds in early years settings: Journeys of discovery. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21-36.
• Maslow, A. H. (1981). Motivation and personality. Prabhat Prakashan.
• McAllister, G., & Irvine, J. J. (2002). The role of empathy in teaching culturally diverse students: A qualitative study of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 433-443.
• Moe, A. (2016). Harmonious passion and its relationship with teacher well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 431-437.
• Nasser, I., & Abu‐Nimer, M. (2016). Examining Views and Attitudes About Forgiveness Among Teachers in the A rab World: A Comparison Between Five Communities. Peace & Change, 41(2), 194-220.
• Özmen, F. (1999). Etkili Eğitimin Gerçekleştirilmesinde Duyuşsal Alanın Önemi. Sevgi Eğitimi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 193-198.
• Peterson Armour, M., & Umbreit, M. S. (2006). Victim forgiveness in restorative justice dialogue. Victims and offenders, 1(2), 123-140.
• Peterson, A. (2016). Compassion and education: Cultivating compassionate children, schools and communities. Springer.
• Pett, M., Lackey, N. & Sullivan, J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365-386). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. Handbook of psychology, 199-234.
• Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of educational research, 81(4), 493-529.
• Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment & human development, 14(3), 213-231.
• Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., Thijs, J. T., & Van der Leij, A. (2012). Supporting teachers’ relationships with disruptive children: The potential of relationship-focused reflection. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 305-318.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological review, 93(2), 119.
• Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Yapisal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazilari.
• Şahin, Ş., Ökmen, B., & Kılıç, A. (2018). Sevgi eğitimi dersi alan öğrencilerin sevgi ve sevgi eğitimi dersine dair görüşleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 176-197.
• Şimsek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giris: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ekinoks Basın Yayın Dağıtım Ltd Sti.
• Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. American Psychological Association.
• Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. The Journal of social psychology, 145(6), 673-685.
• Uitto, M., Lutovac, S., Jokikokko, K., & Kaasila, R. (2018). Recalling life-changing teachers: Positive memories of teacher-student relationships and the emotions involved. International Journal of Educational Research, 87, 47-56.
• Uusiautti, S., Määttä, K., & Määttä, M. (2013). Love-based Practice in Education. International Journal about Parents in Education, 7(2).
• Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(6), 1373.
• Warren, C. A. (2014). Towards a pedagogy for the application of empathy in culturally diverse classrooms. The Urban Review, 46(3), 395-419.
• Warren, C. A., & Hotchkins, B. K. (2015). Teacher education and the enduring significance of “false empathy”. The Urban Review, 47(2), 266-292.
• West, W. (2001). Issues relating to the use of forgiveness in counselling and psychotherapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 29(4), 415-423.
• Yalçın, S. (2013). Çocuk eğitiminde sevgi ve disiplin. İnkılâb Basım Yayım.
• Yin, L. C., & Majid, R. A. (2018). The Goodness of Character Strengths in Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(6), 1237-1251.
• Yin, L. C., Loreman, T., Abd Majid, R., & Alias, A. (2019). The Dispositions towards Loving Pedagogy (DTLP) scale: Instrument development and demographic analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102884.
• Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Vol. 30). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles.