Yıl 2011, Cilt 10 , Sayı 38, Sayfalar 44 - 60 2011-03-01

GOVERNANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
AVRUPA BİRLİĞİNDE YÖNETİŞİM

Yeşeren ELİÇİN [1]


Abstract European governance constitutes one of the key concepts in the integration process of the EU. European governance has been considered a remedy for the democratic legitimacy crisis as well as an efficient way of functioning for the enlargement of the Union. This article focuses firstly place on the definition of the European governance and then tries to understand its implications for the European administrative system. Key Words: European Union, governance, networks, open coordination method.
Avrupa Birliği'nin bütünleşme sürecinde yönetişim anahtar kavramlardan birini oluşturmaktadır. Avrupa yönetişimine hem Birliğin içinde olduğu meşruiyet krizini aşmak, hem de genişleyen Birliğe etkin bir işleyiş kazandırmak açılarından önemli işlevler yüklendiği izlenmektedir. Bu yazı çerçevesinde bir yandan Avrupa yönetişimi tanımlanmaya çalışılırken, bir yandan farklı yaklaşımların altı çizilerek kavram üzerindeki tartışmalar ve sorunlu alanlar ele alınmaktadır.
Avrupa Birliği, yönetişim, ağlar, Açık Koordinasyon Yöntemi
  • Bache I. ve Flinders M. (2004) Themes and issues in multi-level governance, Bache, I. ve Flinders, M. (der.) Multi-Level Governance içinde, Oxford University Press, New York, 1-11.
  • Bache I. ve George S. (2006) Politics in the European Union, 2nd ed., Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  • Best, E. (2003) Alternative Regulations or Complementary Methods? Evolving Options in European Governance, Eipascope, 2003/1, 2-11.
  • Borra´s, S. and Jacobsson, K. (2004) The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU, Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 185-208.
  • Börzel, T. (2010) European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy, JCMS, 48(2), 191-219.
  • Burns C. (2004) Codecision and the European Commission: A Study of Declining Influence? Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 1-18.
  • Calster, G.V. ve Deketelaere, K. (2001) The Use of Voluntary Agreements in the European Community’s Environmental Policy, Orts, E.W. ve Deketelaere, K. (der.) Environmental Contracts: Comparative Approaches to Regulatory Innovation in the United States and Europe içinde, Kluwer International, London/The Hague/Boston, 199-246.
  • Cini, M. (1996) The European Commission, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  • Coen, D. (2008) Lobbying in the European Union. Institutions, Actors and Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Eising, R. (2007) The Access of Business Interests to the EU Institutions: Towards Elite Pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 384-403.
  • European Commission (2003) Report from the Commission on European Governance, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
  • Farrell, M. (2005) EU External Relations: Exporting the EU Model of Governance?, European Foreign Affairs Review, 10, 451-462.
  • Gauthier, A. (2003), La construction européenne, Bréal, Rosny.
  • Greenwood, J. (2007) Interest Representation in the European Union, Palgrave Macmillian, Houndmills.
  • Greven, M.T. (2000) Can the European finally become a democracy?, Greven, M.T., Pauly L.W. (der.), Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order içinde, Lanham, MD, Rowman ve Littlefield, 35-61.
  • Héritier, A. ve Eckert, S. (2008) New Modes of Governance in the Shadow of Hierarchy: Self-Regulation by Industry in Europe, Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 113-38.
  • Héritier, A. (2003) New Modes of Governance in Europe: Increasing Political Capacity and Policy Effectiveness? Börzel, T.A. and Cichowski, R. (der.) The State of the European Union, 6 – Law, Politics, and Society içinde, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hodson, D. ve Maher, I. (2001) The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination, JCMS, 39(4), 719-46.
  • Kooiman, J. (der.) (1993) Modern Governance, Sage, London.
  • Mamadouh, V. ve van der Wusten, H. (2008) The European level in EU governance: territory, authority and trans-scalar networks, GeoJournal, 72, 19-31.
  • Peters, B. G. ve Wright, V. (2001) The national coordination of EU policy making, Richardson J. (der.) EU Power and Policy Making içinde, Routledge, London.
  • Pollack, Mark A. (2005) Theorizing The European Union: International Organization, Domestic Polity or Experiment in New Governance? Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 357-98.
  • Radaelli, C.M. (2003) The Open Method of Coordination: A new governance architecture for the European Union? Report for the Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
  • Risse, T. (2000) Let’s argue Communicative action and world politics, International Organization, 54, 1- 39.
  • Rhodes, M. (2005) Employment Policy, Wallace, H., Wallace, W. ve Pollack, M.A. (der.) Policy-Making in the European Union içinde, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 279-304.
  • Rhodes, R. (2000), Governance and Public Administration, Pierre, J. (der.) Debating Governance içinde, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Scharpf F.W. (1999) Governing in Europe: Democratic and Effective?, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  • Schout A., Jordan, A. (2005) Coordinated European Governance: Self-Organizing or Centrally Steered? Public Administration, 83(1), 201-220.
  • Williams S. (1991), Sovereignty and accountability in the European Community, Keohane, R. ve Hoffmann, S. (der.), The >ew European Community içinde, Westview Press, Boulder, 155-76.
Birincil Dil tr
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Yeşeren ELİÇİN

Tarihler

Başvuru Tarihi : 10 Eylül 2014
Kabul Tarihi : 7 Mayıs 2021
Yayımlanma Tarihi : 1 Mart 2011

APA Eliçin, Y . (2011). AVRUPA BİRLİĞİNDE YÖNETİŞİM . Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , 10 (38) , 44-60 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/esosder/issue/6152/82632