Dönüşümcü Liderlik Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Web of Science veri tabanında dönüşümcü liderlik ile ilgili yayımlanan makalelerin, bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada Türkiye ve dünya üzerinde yayımlanan makaleler atıf, yazar, kurum ve ülke olarak incelenmiştir. Web of Sicience veri tabanına göre Türkiye’de dönüşümcü liderlik ile alakalı makaleler 2007 yılında, dünyada ise 1989 yılında yayımlanmaya başlamıştır. Türkiye’de 58 Dünyada ise 1139 makale incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme sonucunda en fazla makalenin hem ulusal hem de uluslararası düzeyde 2024 yılında yayımlandığı tespit edilmiştir. Ulusal düzeyde en çok atıf alan makalenin Karacabey, Bellibaş, ve Adams (2022) tarafından yazıldığı, uluslararası düzeyde ise Robinson, Lloyd ve Rowe (2008) tarafından yazıldığı belirlenmiştir. En etkili yazar analizinde ise ulusal düzeyde Mahmut Polatcan, uluslararası düzeyde de Geert Devos tespit edilmiştir. En etkili kurum analizinde ise ulusal düzeyde Karabük Üniversitesi, uluslararası düzeyde Jeruselam Hebrew Üniversitesi en etkili kurumlar olarak belirlenmiştir. Dünya üzerinde en çok çalışma yapılan ülke olarak Amerika Birleşik Devletleri belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Liderlik
• Dönüşümcü Liderlik
• Bibliyometrik Analiz

Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Transformational Leadership

Öz

This study aimed to examine the articles published on transformational leadership in the Web of Science database using the bibliometric analysis method. The research focused on publications from both Turkey and around the world, analyzing them in terms of citations, authors, institutions, and countries. According to the Web of Science database, articles related to transformational leadership began to be published in Turkey in 2007, while globally, the first publications appeared in 1989. A total of 58 articles from Turkey and 1,139 articles from around the world were analyzed. As a result of this analysis, it was found that the highest number of publications at both national and international levels occurred in 2024. The most cited national article was written by Karacabey, Bellibaş, and Adams (2022), while the most cited international article was authored by Robinson, Lloyd, and Rowe (2008). In terms of the most influential authors, Mahmut Polatcan was identified at the national level, whereas Geert Devos was the most prominent internationally. Regarding institutional impact, Karabük University was the leading institution in Turkey, while the Hebrew University of Jerusalem stood out at the global level. The United States was identified as the country with the highest number of studies on transformational leadership worldwide.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Leadership
• Transformational Leadersşhp
• Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, A., Ambad, S-N., & Mohd, S.J. (2020). The trend of research on transformational leadership literature: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 11(1), 1-23.
2. Ateşci, Ö., & Dirik, D. (2024). Dönüşümcü liderlik ile yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisi üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(4), 2218-2236.
3. Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.
4. Aydın, A., Sarıer, Y. & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals' leadership styles on teachers' organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(2), 806-811.
5. Bannon, K. (2000). Principals and teachers perseptions o f the estentto with principals exercise transform ational leadership in schools and the relationship o f the leadership perceptions to teachers perceptions o f the extent o f shared school goals. St. Johns University Journal of Educational Administration, 34(4), 138-157.
6. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transformational to transformational leadership: Leaning to share the vision, Organizational Dynamics, 19, 3-23.
7. Bass. B. M. (1985). Leadersihp and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free.
8. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Kılınç, A. Ç. & Polatcan, M. (2021). The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An Integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776-814.

9. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(6), 662-683.
10. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17(l1), 5–18.
11. Börner, K., Chen, C. & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255
12. Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 270–283.
13. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Cansoy, R., Parlar, H. & Polatcan, M. (2022). Collective teacher efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher commitment. Internatıonal Journal of Leadershıp in Educatıon, 25(6), 900-918.
15. Cemaloğlu, N. (2011). Primary principals' leadership styles, school organizational health and workplace bullying. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 495-512.
16. Charbonneau, D., Barling, J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Transformational leadership and sports performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(7), 1521–1534.
17. Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrarative theory of leadership. New Jersey: Cawrence Erkbaum Associates.
18. Çankaya, M. (2024). WoS Veri Tabanında Yer Alan Dönüştürücü Liderlik Konulu Akademik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi. Erzurum Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 79-91.
19. Day, C., Gu, Q. & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.
20. Deinert, A., Homan, A. C., Boer, D., Voelpel, S. C., & Gutermann, D. (2015). Transformational leadership sub-dimensions and their link to leaders personality and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1095–1120.
21. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
22. Dublin, A. J. (2001). Leadership research finding, practice and skills. New York: Hougton Mifflin Company.
23. Eisenbach, R., Watson, K. & Pillai, R. (1999). Transformational leadership in the contex of organizational cgange. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 80-89.
24. Eraslan, L. (2006). Liderlikte post-modern bir paradigma: Dönüşümcü liderlik. International Journal of Human Sciences, (14), 449-462.
25. Erkutlu, H. (2013). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 27(7), 708–726.
26. Esen, M., Bellibaş, M. Ş. & Gümüş, S. (2020). The evolution of leadership research in higher education for two decades (1995-2014): A Bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Educatioan, 23(3), 259-273.
27. Feldman, C. D. & Arnold, J. H. (1993). Managing individual and group behaviour in organizations. McGraw Hill Comp.
28. Gelmez, S. (2018). İlkokul ve ortaokul yöneticilerinin dönüşümcü liderlik özellikleri. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi sayfasından erişilmiştir.
29. Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
30. House, R. J., &Dessler, G. (1974). The path-goal theory of leadership: Some post hoc and a priori tests. In. J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Contingency Approaches to Leadership. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
31. Karacabey, M. F., Bellibaş, M. Ş. & Adams, D. (2022). Principal leadership (instructional leadership and transformational leadership) and teacher professional learning in Turkish schools: examining the mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy and teacher trust. Educational Studies, 48(2), 252-272.
32. Karadağ, E. (2020). The effect of educational leadership on students' achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 49-64.
33. Karadağ, E., Bektaş, F. & Yalçın, M. (2015). The effect of educational leadership on students' achievement: a meta-analysis study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(1), 79-93.
34. Kilinç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M. & Er, E. (2024). How transformational leadership influences teachers' commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educatıonal Management Admınıstratıon & Leadershıp, 52(2), 455-474.
35. Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
36. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
37. Leithwood, K. A. (1994). The move toward transformational leadership, educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(49), 679-706.
38. Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-199.
39. Marks, H. M. & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
40. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group, T. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
41. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C. & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251-262.
42. Nguni, S., Sleegers, P. & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177.
43. O’Toole, J. (1999). Leadership A to Z: A guide fort he appropriately ambitious. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
44. Pring, R. (2013). Eğitim araştırmaları felsefesi (D. Köksal, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel.
45. Razi, S. (2003). İlköğretim yöneticilerinin çağdaş liderlik eğilimleri. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi sayfasından erişilmiştir.
46. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A. & Rowe, K. J. (2008). the impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
47. Schooley, M. L. (2005). An analysis of the realitionship between transformational leadership and school culture. (Master's Thesis), University of Missouri-Columbia, New York.
48. Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C. & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496-536.
49. Türköz, T. (2023). Dönüşümcü liderlik konulu makaleler üzerine bibliyometrik bir analiz. XIX. IBANESS İktisat İşletme ve Yönetim Bilimleri 2023 Kongresinde sunulmuş bildiri. Plovdiv, Bulgaristan.
50. Üsdiken, B. & Pasadeos, Y. (1993). Türkiye’de örgütler ve yönetim yazını. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 26(2), 73-93.
51. Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.
52. Weiß, E., & Süß, S. (2016). The relationship between transformational leadership and effort-reward imbalance. Leadership Organization Development Journal, 37(4), 450–466.
53. Zeren, D. & Kaya, N. (2020). Dijital pazarlama: Ulusal yazının bibliyometrik analizi. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1), 35-52.
54. Zupic, I. & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.