SANAL GERÇEKLİK TEMELLİ ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARINDA BULUNUŞLUK HİSSİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BULUNUŞLUK ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLANMASI

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 169 - 188, 31.01.2019

Seyfullah Gökoğlu , Ünal Çakıroğlu

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.441497

Cited By: 9

Öz

Sanal gerçeklik, birçok avantajlar sunmakta ve çeşitli
alanlardaki kullanımı son yıllarda giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Kullanıcılar
hazırlanan senaryolar sanal bir ortam içerisinde ile bulunma hissini
deneyimleyebilmektedir. Genel olarak senaryoların içindeymiş gibi olma,
oradaymış gibi hissetme olarak nitelendirilen bu deneyim bulunuşluk hissi
olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Subjektif bir kavram olan bulunuşluk hissinin
yapısal özellikleri ile ilgili kesin tanımlamalar yapılamamaktadır. Bu noktada,
araştırmacılar tarafından bulunuşluk hissinin kişisel raporlamalara dayalı
olarak ölçülmesine yönelik araştırmalar devam etmektedir. Bu araştırmada
Witmer, Jerome ve Singer (2005) tarafından geliştirilen Bulunuşluk Ölçeğinin
(Presence Questionnaire, PQ) Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması yapılmış ve faktör
yapısı incelenmiştir. Türkçe’ye uyarlanan ölçek 484 katılımcıya uygulanmıştır.
Elde edilen veriler üzerinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) ve doğrulayıcı
faktör analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda orijinal ölçekten farklı
olarak 5 faktörlü bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Ortaya çıkan yeni faktör yapısı,
faktörler arasındaki ilişkiler ve maddelerin faktörlere göre dağılımları
tartışılmıştır. Uyarlanan ölçeğin Türkiye’de son yıllarda artan bir araştırma
eğilime sahip olan sanal dünyalar ve sanal gerçeklik araştırmaları için
geliştirilecek sanal ortamların gerek tasarım süreci gerekse etkililiğinin
değerlendirilmesi bakımından yol gösterici olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bulunuşluk hissi, bulunuşluk ölçeği, ölçek uyarlama, sanal gerçeklik, sanal öğrenme ortamları

Kaynakça

• Adams, E. (2004). Postmodernism and the three types of immersion. [Available online at http://designersnotebook.com/Columns/063_Postmodernism/063_postmodernism.htm], adresinden 15 Ağustos 2016 tarihinde erişildi.
• Akbaş, G. ve Korkmaz, L. (2007). Ölçek uyarlaması (Adaptasyon). Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 13(40), 15-16.
• Ausburn, L. J. & Ausburn, F. B. (2004). Desktop virtual reality: A powerful new technology for teaching and research in industrial teacher education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 41(4), 33-58.
• Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, M. J. (2001). Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence, 10(6), 583-598.
• Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lunblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008). The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 104-141.
• Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Garcia-Palacios, A., Villa, H., Perpiña, C., & Alcañiz, M. (2000). Presence and reality judgment in virtual environments: A unitary construct? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(3), 327-335.
• Basdogan, C., Ho, C.-H., Srinivasan, M. A., & Slater, M. (2000). An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(4), 443-460.
• Blascovich, J. & Bailenson, J. (2006). Immersive virtual environments and education simulations. In S. Cohen, K. E. Portney, D. Rehberger, C. Thorsen (Eds.), Virtual decisions: Digital stimulations for teaching reasoning in the social sciences and humanities (pp. 229-253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
• Brasil, I. S., Neto, F. M. M., Chagas, J. F. S., de Lima, R. M., Souza, D. F. L., Bonates, M. F. … Dantas, A. (2011, May). An inteligent agent-based virtual game for oil drilling operators training. Paper presented at the XIII. Symposium on Virtual Reality, Uberlandia, Brazil.
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis: For applied research. NY: Guilford Press.
• Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154–161.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (8. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Chen, C. J., Toh, S. C., & Wan, M. F. (2004). The theoretical framework for designing desktop virtual reality-based learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15(2), 147-167.
• Chittaro, L. & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49, 3-18.
• Chuah, K. M., Chen, C. J. & Teh, C. S. (2008). Incorporating Kansei engineering in instructional design: Designing virtual reality based learning environments from a novel perspective. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 37-48.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Dalgarno, B. (2002). The potential of 3D virtual learning environments: A constructivist analysis. Electronic Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 5(2), 1-19.
• Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61-77.
• Dillon, C., Keogh, E., Freeman, J., & Davidoff, J. (2001, May). Presence: Is your heart in it? Paper presented at the 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Philadelphia, USA.
• Dubovi, I., Levy, S. T., & Dagan, E. (2017). Now I know how! The learning process of medication administration among nursing students with non-immersive desktop virtual reality simulation. Computers & Education, 113, 16-27.
• Erkuş, A. (2007). Ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama çalışmalarında karşılaşılan sorunlar. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 13(43), 17-25.
• Feldstein, I., Dietrich, A., Milinkovic, S., & Bengler, K. (2016). A pedestrian simulator for urban crossing scenarios. Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control, 239-244.
• Field, A. P. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced techniques for the beginner. London: Sage Publications.Fontaine, G. (1992). The experience of a sense of presence in intercultural and international encounters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(4), 482-490.
• Freina, L. & Ott, M. (2015, April). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. Paper presented at the eLearning and Software for Education Conference, Bucharest, Romania.
• Giovancarli, C., Malbos, E., Baumstarck, K., Parola, N., Pélissier, M.-F. Lançon, C. … Boyer, L. (2016). Virtual reality cue exposure for the relapse prevention of tobacco consumption: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 17(96), 1-9.
• Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182.
• Ijsselsteijn, W. A., de Ridder, H., Freemanc, J., & Avonsd, S. E. (2000). Presence: Concept, determinants and measurement. Proceedings of the Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V, 520-529.
• Jerome, C. J. & Witmer, B. G. (2002). Immersive tendency, feeling of presence, and simulator sickness: Formulation of a causal model. Proceedings of the Forty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2197-2201.
• Johnson, L. F. & Levine, A. H. (2008). Virtual worlds: Inherently immersive, highly social learning spaces. Theory Into Practice, 47, 161-170.
• Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International Inc.
• Juan, M. & Pérez, D. (2009). Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety in an acrophobic environment viewed via HMD or CAVE. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 18(3), 232-248.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (Ed.). (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (5. baskı). Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.
• Karaman, M. K. & Ozen, S. (2016). A survey of students’ experiences on collaborative virtual learning activities based on five-stage model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 247-259.
• Kim, A., Darakjian, N., & Finley, J. M. (2017). Walking in fully immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of potential adverse effects in older adults and individuals with parkinson’s disease. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14(16), 1-12.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3nd ed.). New York: The GuilfordPress.
• Krijn, M., Emmelkamp, P. M., Olafsson, R. P., & Biemond, R. (2004). Virtual reality exposure therapy of anxiety disorders: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(3), 259-281.
• Lau, K. W. & Lee, P. Y. (2015). The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(1), 3-18.
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27-50.
• Lee, C., Chou, C., & Sun, T. (2015). Evaluating presence for customer experience in a virtual environment: Using a nuclear power plant as an example. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(2), 484-499.
• Lee, E. A. L. & Wong, K. W. (2014). Learning with desktop virtual reality: Low spatial ability learners are more positively affected. Computers & Education, 79, 49-58.
• Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. (2010). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323-339.
• Limniou, M., Roberts, D., & Papadopoulos, N. (2008). Full immersive virtual environment CAVETM in Chemistry education. Computers & Education, 51, 584-593.
• Maransky, G., Lilleholt, L., & Aaby, A. (2017). Development and validation of the multimodal presence scale for virtual reality environments: A confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 276-285.
• Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M., & Boorks, F. P. (2002). Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environment. ACM Transaction on Graphics, 21(3), 645-652.
• Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education, 50, 1339-1353.
• Negut, A., Matu, S. A., Sava, F. A., & David, D. (2016). Task difficulty of virtual reality-based assessment tools compared to classical paper-and-pencil or computerized measures: A meta-analytic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 414-424.
• North, M. S. (2002). A study of the sense of presence in virtual environment experiment. Proceedings of the CISST’02 International Conference, 623-626.
• North, M. M. & North, S. (2016). A comparative study of sense of presence of traditional virtual reality and immersive environments. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 20, 1-15.
• Nunez, D. & Blake, E. (2001). Cognitive presence as a anified concept of virtual reality effectiveness. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality and Visualization, 115-118.
• Ott, M. & Tavella, M. (2009). A contribution to the understanding of what makes young students genuinely engaged in computer-based learning tasks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 184-188.
• Passing, D., David, T., & Eshel-Kedmi, G. (2016). Improving children’s cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D immersive virtual reality environments. Computers & Education, 95, 296-308.
• Ratan, R. A. & Hasler, B. (2009). Self-presence standardized: Introducing the self-presence questionnaire (SPQ). Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence, 1-8.
• Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D. … Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: The link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45-56.
• Rybarczyk, Y., Coelho, T., Cardoso, T., & de Oliviera, R. (2014). Effect of avatars and viewpoints on performance in virtual world: Efficiency vs. telepresence. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Creative Technologies, 1(1), 1-12.
• Sanchez-Vives, M. V. & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332-339.
• Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence, 10(3), 266-281.
• Serrano, B., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2016). Virtual reality and stimulation of touch and smell for inducing relaxation: A randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behaviour, 55, 1-8.
• Silva, G. R., Donat, J. C., Rigoli, M. M., de Oliveira, F. R., & Kristensen, C. H. (2016). A questionnaire for measuring presence in virtual environments: Factor analysis of the presence questionnaire and adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese. Virtual Reality, 20, 237-242.
• Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 364(1535), 3549-3557.
• Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis.
• Stoerger, S. (2008). Virtual worlds, virtual literacy: An educational exploration. Knowledge Quest, 36, 50-56.
• Stull, A. T. (2009). Anatomy learning in VR: A cognitive investigation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, USA.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Takatalo, J., Nyman, G., & Laaksonen, L. (2008). Components of human experience in virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 1-15.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M., Bastos, R., Steed, A., Brooks, F. … Slater, M. (1999, April). The visual cliff revisited: A virtual presence study on locomotion. Paper presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Presence, University of Essex, Colchester.
• Witmer, B. G. & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240.
• Witmer, B. G., Jerome, C., & Singer, M. J. (2005). The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence, 14(3), 298-312.
• Yu, I., Mortensen, J., Khanna, P., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2012). Visual realism enhances realistic response in an immersive virtual environment. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 32(6), 36-45.
• Zeltzer, D. (1992). Autonomy, interaction and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 109-112.