Çalışanların Yeşil Memnuniyeti (Employees’ Green Satisfaction) Ölçeği Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2026, Sayı: 24, 41 - 57, 18.01.2026

Bilgen Gaye Yalpa

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Çalışanların Yeşil Memnuniyeti (ÇYM) Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlilik ve güvenirlik analizlerinin yapılmasıdır. Araştırma, nicel araştırma desenlerinden tarama modeli çerçevesinde tasarlanmıştır. Ölçek uyarlama sürecinde Brislin’in (1970) ileri–geri çeviri yöntemi izlenmiş, uzman görüşleri aracılığıyla dilsel ve kavramsal uygunluk sağlanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) ile test edilmiştir. Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlilik için ise iş tatmini ve işten ayrılma niyeti değişkenleriyle korelasyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Güvenirlik incelemelerinde Cronbach’s Alpha katsayısı ve Spearman-Brown iki yarı güvenilirlik katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, Adana ilinde özel sektörde görev yapan 395 çalışandan elde edilen veriler oluşturmaktadır. AFA sonuçları ölçeğin tek faktörlü yapısının toplam varyansın %52,74’ünü açıkladığını, DFA sonuçları ise modelin uyum indekslerinin kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğunu göstermiştir (χ²/sd=1,824; CFI=0,992; RMSEA=0,046). Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı yüksek bulunmuştur (α=0,869). Ayrıca, ÇYM ölçeği ile iş tatmini arasında anlamlı ve pozitif (r=0,305), işten ayrılma niyeti arasında ise anlamlı ve negatif (r=-0,296) ilişki saptanmıştır. Sonuçlar, ÇYM ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu ve çalışanların çevreci girişimlerden duydukları memnuniyeti değerlendirmede kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, yalnızca ölçeğin Türkçe’ye kazandırılmasına katkı sağlamamakta; aynı zamanda örgütsel bağlılık, sürdürülebilirlik odaklı insan kaynakları yönetimi ve yeşil davranış literatürüne de yeni bir boyut eklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çalışanların Yeşil Memnuniyeti , Ölçek Uyarlama , Geçerlilik , Güvenirlik.

Turkish Adaptation of the Employees’ Green Satisfaction Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

The aim of this study is to adapt the Employees’ Green Satisfaction (EGS) Scale into Turkish and to conduct its validity and reliability analyses. The research was designed within the framework of a quantitative survey model. During the adaptation process, Brislin’s (1970) forward–backward translation method was applied, and linguistic as well as conceptual validity was ensured through expert evaluations. The construct validity of the scale was examined through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Criterion-related validity was tested by analyzing correlations with job satisfaction and turnover intention. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha and the Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient. The study sample consisted of 395 employees working in the private sector in Adana, Türkiye. The results of the EFA indicated that the single-factor structure of the scale explained 52.74% of the total variance, while CFA results demonstrated acceptable model fit indices (χ²/df=1.824; CFI=0.992; RMSEA=0.046). The internal consistency of the scale was found to be high (α=0.869). Furthermore, the EGS scale showed a significant positive correlation with job satisfaction (r=0.305) and a significant negative correlation with turnover intention (r=-0.296). The findings confirm that the Turkish version of the EGS scale is a valid and reliable measurement instrument and can be effectively used to assess employees’ satisfaction with organizational environmental initiatives. Beyond introducing the scale into Turkish literature, this study also provides a foundation for future research in organizational commitment, sustainability-oriented human resource management, and pro-environmental behavior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Employees’ Green Satisfaction , Scale Adaptation , Validity , Reliability

Kaynakça

• Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and proenvironmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1777
• Afsar, B., Maqsoom, A., Shahjehan, A., Afridi, S.A., Nawaz, A., & Fazliani, H. (2019). Responsible leadership and employee’s proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1815
• Ahakwa, I., Yang, J., Agba Tackie, E., & Asamany, M. (2021). Green human resource management practices and environmental performance in ghana: The role of green innovation. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 4(4), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v4i4.704
• Ahmad, I., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). The impact of ethical leadership style on job satisfaction: Mediating role of perception of green HRM and psychological safety. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 40(5), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2018-0461
• Al-Swidi, A. K., Gelaidan, H. M., & Saleh, R. M. (2021). The joint impact of green human resource management, leadership and organizational culture on employees' green behaviour and organisational environmental commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128112
• Amrutha, V.N., & Geetha, S.N. (2021). Linking organizational green training and voluntary workplace green behavior: mediating role of green supporting climate and employees’ green satisfaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125876
• Ansari, N. Y., Farrukh, M., & Raza, A. (2021). Green human resource management and employees pro‐environmental behaviours: Examining the underlying mechanism. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2044
• Anthony Jnr, B. (2020). Green campus paradigms for sustainability attainment in higher education institutions – a comparative study. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(1), 117–148.: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2019-0060
• Anwar, N., Mahmood, N. H. N., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J. N., & Khalid, W. (2020). Green human resource management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401
• Barakat, S.R., Isabella, G., Boaventura, J.M.G., & Mazzon, J.A. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility on employee satisfaction. Managament Decision, 54 (9), 2325e2339. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2016-0308.
• Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298.
• Başol, O., & Çömlekçi, M. F. (2020). İş tatmini ölçeğinin uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 1(2), 17-31.
• Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., & Guillemin, F. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186-3191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
• Brayfield, A., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311.
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (1. baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Cai, H.H., Abbass, K., Lu, Q., & Shi, V. (2024). Probing the CSR-pro-environmental behavior linkage: insights into green reputation and chief sustainability officer influence. Journal of Environmental Management, 369, 122300.
• Carmeli, A., Brammer, S., Gomes, E., & Tarba, S.Y. (2017). An organizational ethic of care and employee involvement in sustainability-related behaviors: A social identity perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(9), 1380-1395.
• Chang, T.W. (2020). Corporate sustainable development strategy: Effect of green shared vision on organization members’ behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072446
• Cheema, S., Afsar, B., & Javed, F. (2020). Employees' corporate social responsibility perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment: The mediating roles of organizational identification and environmental orientation fit. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1769
• Chen, Y.S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business. Ethics, 93, 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0223-9
• Chen, Y.S., & Chang, C.H. (2013). Towards green trust: the influences of green perceived quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction. Management Decisions 51 (1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311291319
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (1. baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2016). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm
• Erdirençelebi, M., & Ertürk, E. (2018). Çalışanların örgütsel yalnızlık algısının iş tatmini ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerine etkileri. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(2), 603-618.
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
• Freire, C., & Pieta, P. (2022). The impact of green human resource management on organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of organizational identification and job satisfaction. Sustainability, 14(13), 7557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137557
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
• Günel, Y. (2025). İş yükü algısının işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde tükenmişliğin aracı rolü: Zincir market çalışanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 101, 273-298.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., & Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (2), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.268.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
• Huang, L., Guo, Z., Deng, B., & Wang, B. (2023). Unlocking the relationship between environmentally specific transformational leadership and employees' green behaviour: A cultural self-representation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 134857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134857
• Huertas-Valdivia, I., Llorens-Montes, F.J., & Ruiz-Moreno, A. (2018). Achieving engagement among hospitality employees: a serial mediation model. International Journal of Contemporary Hospital Managament, 30 (1), 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2016-0538.
• Iqbal, Q., Hassan, S. H., Akhtar, S., & Khan, S. (2018). Employee's green behavior for environmental sustainability: A case of banking sector in Pakistan. World Journal of Technology and Sustainable Development, 15(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-08-2017-0025
• Islam, M.N., Furuoka, F., & Idris, A. (2021), Mapping the relationship between transformational leadership, trust in leadership, and employee championing behavior during organizational change. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(2), 95-102, doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2020.09.002.
• Jabbour, C.J.C., Sarkis, J., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Renwick, D.W.S., Singh, S.K., & Grebinevych, O. (2019). Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the ’human side’of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.038.
• Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional Effects on Job and Life satisfaction: The Role of Core Evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17-34.
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
• Kalmaz, M., & Tozkoparan, G. (2020). Psikolojik sahiplenmenin çalışanların ekstra rol davranışı üzerine etkisi: Özel sektörde bir araştırma. İzmir İktisat Dergisi. 35(2), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.202035204
• Khan, K.I., Babar, Z., Sharif, S., Iqbal, S., & Khan, M.I. (2021), Going green? Investigating the role of GSCM practices on firm financial and environmental performance through green innovation. International Journal of Procurement Management, 14(6), 681-701.
• Kim, A., Kim, Y., & Han, K. (2019). A cross level investigation on the linkage between job satisfaction and voluntary workplace green behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3776-7
• Kim, T.T., Kim, W.G., Majeed, S., & Haldorai, K. (2023). Does green human resource management lead to a green competitive advantage? A sequential mediation model with three mediators. International Journal of Hospitality Manaeament, 111, 103486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103486
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
• Kuzucu, Y. (2008). Duygusal farkındalık düzeyi ölçeği’nin uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(29), 51–64.
• Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & Williams, E. G. (2013). Read this article, but don't print it: Organizational citizenship behavior toward the environment. Group & Organization Management, 38(2), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112475210
• Latif, B., Gunarathne, N., Gaskin, J., Ong, T.Z., & Ali, M. (2022). Environmental corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior: the effect of green shared vision and personal ties. Resources, Conversation and Recycle. 106, 106572.
• Li,W., Bhutto, T.A., Xuhui,W., Maitlo, Q., Zafar, A.U., & Ahmed Bhutto, N. (2020). Unlocking employees’ green creativity: the effects of green transformational leadership, green intrinsic, and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120229, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120229.
• Long, C. S., Xuan, S. S., Ismail, W. K. W., Rasid, S. Z. A., & Kowang, T. O. (2014). An analysis on academicians job satisfaction in the perspective of HRD practices. International Education Studies, 7(7), 85–95.
• Lukman, R., Lozano, R., Vamberger, T., & Krajnc, M. (2013). Addressing the attitudinal gap towards improving the environment: A case study from a primary school in Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.005
• Markey, R., Mcivor, J., Brien, M. O., & Wright, C. F. (2019). Reducing carbon emissions through employee participation: Evidence from Australia. Industrial Relations Journal, 50(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12238
• Martín-de Castro, G., Amores-Salvadó, J., & Navas-López, J. E. (2016). Environmental management systems and firm performance: Improving firm environmental policy through stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1377
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Nurhayati, M., Saputra, A. R. P., Santosa, A., Rahmani, S., & Ariyanto, E. (2022). Impact of work-school conflict to employee performance: Moderation of perception organizational support and work characteristics. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2022.v12i2.005
• Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Employee green behaviors. In S. E. Jackson, D. S. Ones, & S. Dilchert (Eds.), Managing human resources for environmental sustainability, 85-116. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
• Peet, J., & Bossel,H. (2000), An ethics-based systems approach to indicators of sustainable development, International Journal of SustainableDevelopment, 3(3), 221-238.
• Pham, N.T., Thanh, T.V., Tuckova, Z., & Thuy, V.T.N. (2020). The role of green human resource management in driving hotel’s environmental performance: interaction and mediation analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102392 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102392.
• Pintoe, A. (2017). Employee green behavior : A case in manufacturing & service sector in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7, 2222–6990. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3740
• Puspitasari, K. A., Saputra, A. R. P., & Casmi, E. (2024). Nostalgic marketing and its antecedents on Gen X. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(1), e04251. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i1.4251
• Rendtorff, J.D. (2019), Sustainable development goals and progressive business models for economic transformation Local Economy. The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 34(6), 510-524, doi: 10.1177/0269094219882270.
• Renwick, D.W., Jabbour, C.J., Muller-Camen, M., Redman, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Contemporary developments in Green (environmental) HRM scholarship. International Journal of Human Resources Management 27 (2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1105844.
• Rounaghi, M.M. (2019), Economic analysis of using green accounting and environmental accounting to identify environmental costs and sustainability indicators. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(4), 504-512.
• Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599–627. https://doi.org/10.2307/256461
• Shafaei, A., Nejati, M., & Yusoff, Y. M. (2020). Green human resource management: A two-study investigation of antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Manpower, 41(7), 1041–1060. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0406
• Singh, S.K., & El-Kassar, A.N. (2019). Role of big data analytics in developing sustainable capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 1264-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.199.
• Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274.
• Tahir, A.H., Umer, M., Nauman, S., Abbass, K., & Song, H. (2024). Sustainable development goals and green human resource management: a comprehensive review of environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Managament, 370, 122495.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (4. bs.). Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Tortumlu, M., ve Uzunbacak, H. H. (2022). İş arkadaşları arasındaki etkileşim: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 143–157.
• Tosun, C., Parvez, M.O., Bilim, Y., & Yu, L. (2022). Effects of green transformational leadership on green performance of employees via the mediating role of corporate social responsibility: reflection from North Cyprus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 103(4), 103218, doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103218.
• Umrani, W. A., & Afsar, B.(2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402–428.
• Unsworth, K.L., Dmitrieva, A., & Adriasola, E. (2013). Changing behaviour: increasing the effectiveness of workplace interventions in creating pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Organizational Behavior 34 (2), 211–229.
• Vu, H.T., Tran, D., Goto, D., & Kawata, K. (2020). Does experience sharing affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? A randomized controlled trial in Vietnam. World Development., 136, 105062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105062
• Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/257021
• West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
• Yang, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Green, green, it's green: A triad model of technology, culture, and innovation for corporate sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8), 1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081369
• Yusliza, M. Y., Muhammad, Z., Farooq, K., Kassim, W. Z. W., & Omar, M. K. (2021a). A qualitative study of factors influencing employee ecological behavior of academics in higher education. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, and G. Karabulut (Eds.), Eurasian business and economics perspectives. (Eurasian studies in business and economics), 20, 3-18. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85304-4_1
• Yusliza, M. Y., Tanveer, M. I., Ramayah, T., Kumar, S. C., Saputra, J., & Noor Faezah, J. (2021b). Perceived green human resource management among employees in manufacturing firms. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.29
• Zhang, Y. X., Wei, Y., & Zhou, G. (2018). Promoting firms' energy-saving behavior: The role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy, 115, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.003