Views of Mathematics Teacher Candidates about the Technological Tools That Can Be Used in Mathematics Lessons

Abstract

In this research, it was aimed to determine the views of mathematics teacher candidates about the technological tools that can be used in mathematics lessons. The research was conducted through qualitative research methodology. 120 teacher candidates who were educated in the mathematics teacher education program in Dicle University Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty took part to the research. The data of the study were collected through semi-structured interviews. The data collection tool used in the study is an interview form developed by the researcher, and it consists of open-ended questions. In the analysis of the data, descriptive analyses were used. As a result of the data analysis obtained from the research, it was determined that teacher candidates responded as “computer/computer software” at most for the questions about what technological tools could be used in mathematics lessons, what technological tools they would use when they were teachers, and which technological tools would be beneficial. In addition, teacher candidates stated that there were computers at most as technological tools in their faculties and the technological tools in their faculties were mostly used for visualization/concretization the subject

Keywords

• Mathematics, technology, technological tools, mathematics teacher candidates

Kaynakça

1. Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Ogretmenlerin internet kullanimi ve bu konudaki ogretmen gorusleri [Use of internet by teachers and their opinions on the issue]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 22, 1-8.
2. Alakoc, Z. (2003). Matematik ogretiminde teknolojik modern ogretim yaklasimlari [Technological modern teaching approaches in mathematics teaching]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2 (1), 43-49.
3. Brown, J. P. (2017). Teachers’ perspectives of changes in their practice during a technology in mathematics education research project. Teaching and Teacher Education 64, 52-65.
4. Buyukbaykal, C.I. (2015). Communication technologies and education in the information age. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 636-640.
5. Cagıltay, K., Cakiroglu, J., Cagıltay, N., & Cakiroglu, E. (2001). Ogretimde bilgisayar kullanimina iliskin ogretmen gorusleri [Teachers’ perspectives about the use of computers in education]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21, 19-28.
6. Catlioglu, H. & Kutluca, T. (2008). Matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin ogrenme ortamlarinda internet kullanimina yonelik gorusleri [Prospective mathematics teachers’ views toward internet usage in learning environments]. In proceedings of VIII. International Educational Technology Conference, 454-457. Eskisehir.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (Third edition). New York: Sage.
8. Dogan, A., & Akbarov, A. (2016). Teachers’ attitudes toward the usage of mobile devices in efl classroom. European Journal of Educational Research, 5 (1), 11-17.

9. Durukan, U. G., Hacıoglu, Y. & Donmez-Usta, N. (2016). Bilgisayar ve ogretim teknolojileri ogretmeni adaylarinin “teknoloji” algilari [Computer education and instructional technology prospective teachers’ perceptions of technology]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 4 (7), 24-46.
10. Erdemir, N., Bakirci, H., & Eyduran, E. (2009). Ogretmen adaylarinin egitimde teknolojiyi kullanabilme ozguvenlerinin tespiti [Determining of student teachers’ self-confidence using technology in instruction]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6 (3), 99-108.
11. Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teacher. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351-365.
12. Isik, A. D. (2015). Features of mobile devices and its implications into education: a literature review. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 3(6), 188-198.
13. Kayak, S. & Kir, E. (2015). Evaluation of candidate language teachers’ level of knowledge and ideas towards the use of interactive whiteboard. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 3 (5), 33-60.
14. Kocak, O. (2013). Fatih projesi kapsamindaki lcd panel etkilesimli tahta uygulamalarina yonelik ogretmen tutumlari (Erzincan ili ornegi). [Attitudes of teachers about interactive whiteboards with lcd panel of fatih Project (Erzincan province sample)] Unpublished master thesis, Ataturk University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Erzurum.
15. Kuslu, F. (2015). Bilgisayar destekli matematik öğretiminin 8. sinif ogrencilerinin “prizmalar” konusundaki basarilarina etkisi [The effect of computer assisted mathematics teaching on the success of the 8thgrade students in the topic of “prisms”]. Unpublished master thesis, Sakarya University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Sakarya.
16. Lai, H. J. (2010). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of interactive whiteboard training workshops: A case study from Taiwan. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 511-522.
17. Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T.W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 371-382.
18. Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2015). Information and communications technology in developing, emerging and transition economies: An assessment of research. Information Technology for Development, 21 (3), 330-364.
19. Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Fidalgo-Blanco, A., & Alves, G. (2017). Technology behaviors in education innovation, Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 596-598.
20. Sonmez, M. (2014). The role of technology faculties in engineering education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 35-44.
21. Volk, M., Cotic, M., Zajc, M. & Starcic, A.I. (2017). Tablet-based cross-curricular maths vs. traditional maths classroom practice for higher-order learning outcomes, Computers & Education, 114, 1-23.
22. Yavuz, S. & Coskun, A. S. (2008). Sınıf ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin egitimde teknoloji kullanimina iliskin tutum ve dusunceleri [Attitudes and perceptions of elemantary teaching through the use of technology in education]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 274-286.
23. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences], Ankara: Seckin Publication.