Using Blogs to Improve Elementary School Students’ Environmental Literacy in Science Class

Yıl 2017, , 347 - 355, 15.07.2017

Fatih Saltan , Omer Faruk Divarci

https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.347

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of blog activities on elementary students’ environmental literacy in science class. The relationships between students’ environmental literacy levels, their parents’ interest in environmental activities and the frequency of outdoor activities they do have also been also examined. Pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design has been utilized. The participants of the study are 80 seventh-grade elementary school students. The data have been gathered through “Environmental Literacy Scale”. After that, the instructor has created a blog to share some movies, animations and reflective questions for all the students. The students could follow and engage in all the sharing. The activities have lasted for eight weeks. Descriptive statistics, t-test and regression analysis have been tested via the data. The results have indicated that there is a significant difference between pre and post test scores regarding the students’ “environmental knowledge”, “attitude towards environment” and “being responsible for environment”. Furthermore; positive but weak relationship has been detected between students’ environmental literacy levels and parents’ interests in environmental activities. On the other hand, there is a moderate, positive correlation between students’ interest in environmental problems and involving in outdoor activities with parents(r=0.423, p=0.001). Overall, students’ involvements in blog activities and doing outdoor activities with parents have been found to be effective in acquiring environmental literacy

Anahtar Kelimeler

Blogs, social media, environmental literacy, elementary school students, science class

Kaynakça

• Blau, I., Mor, N., & Neuthal, T. (2009). Open the windows of communication: Promoting interpersonal and group interactions using blogs in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, 233–246.
• Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179-183.
• Clair, R. S., (2003). Words for the World: Creating Critical Environmental Literacy for Adults. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 99, 69-78.
• Dabbagh, N., &Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
• Daudi, S.S. and Heimlich, J.E., (1997). Environmental Literacy: What Does It Really Mean?. EETAP Resource Library, http://eelink.net/eetap/info23.pdf
• DeAndrea, D. C., Ellison, N. B., LaRose, R., Steinfield, C., & Fiore, A. (2012). Serious social media: On the use of social media for improving students' adjustment to college. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 15-23.
• Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441-451.
• Disinger, J.F. and Roth, C.E., (1992). Environmental Literacy. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/00000 19b/80/12/f4/a7.pdf, ErisimTarihi 03.04.2013
• Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2011).Tenure and promotion in the age of online social media. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801154.
• Hernandez, R.Y., (2005). An Assessment of The Environmental Literacy of Opinion Leaders in Eugena, Oregon. MS Thesis, University of Oregon.
• Istanbullu, R.A. (2008).Investigation of environmental literacy of sixth grades at a private school. Unpublished Master Thesis, ODTU, Ankara.
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
• Kisoglu, M. (2009).Ogrencimerkezliogretiminogretmenadaylarinincevreokuryazarligiduzeyineetkisininarastirilmasi. (Yayinlanmamis Doktora Tezi). Ataturk Universitesi, Erzurum.
• Minocha, S., &Kerawalla, L. (2011).University students' self-motivated blogging and development of study skills and research skills. In M. J. W. Lee, & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-Learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 149–179). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
• Morrone, M., Mancl, K. and Carr, K., (2001). Development of A Metric To Test Group Differences in Ecological Knowledge As One Component of Environmental Literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 33-42.
• Moseley, C., (2000). Teaching for Environmental Literacy. The Clearing House, 74(1), 23-24.
• MSU-WATER (2001-2006). Social Assessment: Stakeholder Attitudes, Beliefs, and Uses of Water Resources, co-PI M.Kaplowitz and S. Witter Vice President of Finance and Operations, Michigan State University.
• National Environmental Education Advisory Council (NEEAC), (1996).Report Assessing Environmental Education in the United States and the Implementation of the National Environmental Education Act of 1990. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?ac cno=ED403146, ErisimTarihi 23.03.2013
• Orr, D.W. (1990). Environmental Education and Ecological Literacy. The Education Digest, 55(9), 49-53.
• Okesli, T., F. (2008).Relationship Between Primary School Students’ Environmental Literacy and Selected Variables in Bodrum. (Unpublished Master Thesis), ODTU, Ankara
• Ravenscroft, A., Warburton, S., Hatzipanagos, S., & Conole, G. (2012). Designing and evaluating social media for learning: shaping social networking into social learning?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 177-182.
• Roth, C.E., (1968). Curriculum Overwiev for Developing Environmentally Literate Citizens. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/32/38/8c.pdf
• Roth, C.E., (1992). Environmental Literacy: Its Roots, Evolution and Directions in the 1990s. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/24/44/47.pdf
• Teksoz, G., Sahin, E. VeErtepinar, H., (2010), Cevre okur yazarligi, ogretmen adaylari ve surdurulebilir bir gelecek. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 39, 307-320, Ankara.
• Tikka, P. M., Kuitunen T. M., &Tynys M. S. (2000).Effects of educational background on students’ attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning environment.The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 12-9.
• Weiser, B.G., (2001).The Envirothon and Its Effects on Students’ Environmental Literacy. A Doctoral Dissertion, Faculty of The College of Education, University of Houston.
• Wright, J.M. (2006). The comparative Effect of Constructivist Versus Traditional Teaching Methods on Environmental Literacy of Post-Secondary Non-Science Majors. A Doctoral Dissertion, Graduate School of University of Nevada