Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 387 - 395, 15.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Akarsu, B., Coskun, H., & Kariper, A. I. (2011). An investigation on college students’ conceptual understanding of quantum physics topics. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences, 8(15), 349–362.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2003). Why the seven E's. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from: http://www.miamisci.org/ph/lpintro7e.html.
  • Bethge, T., & Niedderer, H. (1995). Students' conceptions in quantum physics. Submitted to American Journal of Physics (AJP).
  • Caliskan, S. (2002). Quantum physics lesson teaching programme proposal: Oscillator example (Unpublished Master's Thesis). 9 Eylul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Cepni, S. (2010). Introduction to research and project studies (Revised copy). Trabzon: Celepler Pressing.
  • Cohen, L. and Manian, L. (1994). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Cushing, T. J. (2003). Philosophical concepts in physics-1. Istanbul: Sabanci University Publications.
  • Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expandingthe 5E model. Science Teacher, 70(6), 56-59.
  • Ejigu, M. A. (2014). An investigation into physics students’ depictions of the basic concepts of quantum mechanics, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Africa, South Africa.
  • Eryilmaz, O. (2014). Comparison of the learning status of high school modern physics subjects taught in line with two different teaching programs (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Eryilmaz, O., & Sen, A. I. (2010). Determination of concepts of 12th grade students of secondary education by concept maps relating modern physics. IX. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Book of Abstracts, 36, Izmir.
  • Fletcher, J. (1997). How students learn quantum mechanics (Unpublished Master Thesis). University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Fletcher, P., & Johnson, I. (1999). Quantum mechanics: Exploring conceptual change. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved March 22, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
  • Hewitt-Taylor J. (2001). Use of the constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Art & Science Research Methods, 15, 39–42.
  • Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodogy methods and techniques (Second Edition). New Delhi: New age International Publishers.
  • Mashadi, A., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Insights into students' understanding of quantum physics: visualizing quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 20(6), 511-516.
  • Mcevoy, P. J., &  Zarate, O. (2010). Quantum theory (N. Catli, Trans.). Istanbul: NTV Publications.
  • Ireson, G. (1999). A multivariate analysis of undergraduate physics students’ conceptions of quantum phenomena. Europen Journal of Physics, 20(3), 193-199.
  • Muller, R., & Wiesner, H. (1999). Students’ conceptions of quantum physics. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
  • Olsen, R. V. (2001). Introduction quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 565-574.
  • Patton M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Butun, S.B. Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Sackes, M. (2010).  The role of cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational variables in conceptual change: preservice early childhood teachers’ conceptual understanding of the cause of lunar phases (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).  Graduate Program in Education, The Ohio State University, The Ohio State, USA.
  • Steinberg, R. Wittman, M. C., Bao, L., & Redisch, E.F. (1999). The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
  • Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–655.
  • Trundle K., Atwood R., & Christopher J. (2006). Fourth grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards based lunar concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 595-616.
  • Ucar, S. (2007). Using inquiry-based instruction with web-based data archives to facilitate conceptual change about tides among preservice teachers (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Ohio State University, The Ohio State, USA.
  •  Yalcin, O., & Emrahoglu, N. (2017). Examining the high school students’ transfer levels of modern physics topics to daily life. Pegem Education and Training Journal, 7(1), 115-158.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on "de Broglie Matter Waves" Subject

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 387 - 395, 15.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387

Öz

The object of this study is to determine the
conceptual understanding that prospective Science teachers have relating
"de Broglie: Matter waves" and to investigate the effect of the
instruction performed, on the conceptual understanding. This study was
performed at a state university located in the western part of Turkey, with the
Faculty of Education-Science Teaching students (2nd year / 48 individual) in
the academic year of 2010-2011. The study was planned as a single group
pretest-posttest design. A two-step question was used in the study, prior to
and after the instruction. Lessons were conducted using the 7E learning model
in the instruction process. When all these results are evaluated, it can be
said that the conceptual understanding of the prospective teachers regarding
"de Broglie; matter waves" has been taken place. In general, when all
the sections are examined, it has been observed that the prospective teachers
have more alternative concepts prior to the instruction and more scientific
concepts after the instruction.  In this
process, besides instruction, the prospective teachers have not taken any place
in a different application regarding the basic concepts of quantum physics.
Therefore, it has been determined that the 7E learning model used in the
research and the activities included in the 7E learning model are effective in
conceptual understanding.

Kaynakça

  • Akarsu, B., Coskun, H., & Kariper, A. I. (2011). An investigation on college students’ conceptual understanding of quantum physics topics. Journal of Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences, 8(15), 349–362.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2003). Why the seven E's. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from: http://www.miamisci.org/ph/lpintro7e.html.
  • Bethge, T., & Niedderer, H. (1995). Students' conceptions in quantum physics. Submitted to American Journal of Physics (AJP).
  • Caliskan, S. (2002). Quantum physics lesson teaching programme proposal: Oscillator example (Unpublished Master's Thesis). 9 Eylul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Cepni, S. (2010). Introduction to research and project studies (Revised copy). Trabzon: Celepler Pressing.
  • Cohen, L. and Manian, L. (1994). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Cushing, T. J. (2003). Philosophical concepts in physics-1. Istanbul: Sabanci University Publications.
  • Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expandingthe 5E model. Science Teacher, 70(6), 56-59.
  • Ejigu, M. A. (2014). An investigation into physics students’ depictions of the basic concepts of quantum mechanics, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Africa, South Africa.
  • Eryilmaz, O. (2014). Comparison of the learning status of high school modern physics subjects taught in line with two different teaching programs (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Eryilmaz, O., & Sen, A. I. (2010). Determination of concepts of 12th grade students of secondary education by concept maps relating modern physics. IX. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Book of Abstracts, 36, Izmir.
  • Fletcher, J. (1997). How students learn quantum mechanics (Unpublished Master Thesis). University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Fletcher, P., & Johnson, I. (1999). Quantum mechanics: Exploring conceptual change. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved March 22, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
  • Hewitt-Taylor J. (2001). Use of the constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Art & Science Research Methods, 15, 39–42.
  • Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodogy methods and techniques (Second Edition). New Delhi: New age International Publishers.
  • Mashadi, A., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Insights into students' understanding of quantum physics: visualizing quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 20(6), 511-516.
  • Mcevoy, P. J., &  Zarate, O. (2010). Quantum theory (N. Catli, Trans.). Istanbul: NTV Publications.
  • Ireson, G. (1999). A multivariate analysis of undergraduate physics students’ conceptions of quantum phenomena. Europen Journal of Physics, 20(3), 193-199.
  • Muller, R., & Wiesner, H. (1999). Students’ conceptions of quantum physics. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
  • Olsen, R. V. (2001). Introduction quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 565-574.
  • Patton M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Butun, S.B. Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Sackes, M. (2010).  The role of cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational variables in conceptual change: preservice early childhood teachers’ conceptual understanding of the cause of lunar phases (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).  Graduate Program in Education, The Ohio State University, The Ohio State, USA.
  • Steinberg, R. Wittman, M. C., Bao, L., & Redisch, E.F. (1999). The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics. Paper present at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from: https://jrm.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf#page=22.
  • Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–655.
  • Trundle K., Atwood R., & Christopher J. (2006). Fourth grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards based lunar concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 595-616.
  • Ucar, S. (2007). Using inquiry-based instruction with web-based data archives to facilitate conceptual change about tides among preservice teachers (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Ohio State University, The Ohio State, USA.
  •  Yalcin, O., & Emrahoglu, N. (2017). Examining the high school students’ transfer levels of modern physics topics to daily life. Pegem Education and Training Journal, 7(1), 115-158.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Meryem Gorecek Baybars

Huseyin Kucukozer

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Nisan 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Gorecek Baybars, M., & Kucukozer, H. (2018). The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on "de Broglie Matter Waves" Subject. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387
AMA Gorecek Baybars M, Kucukozer H. The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on "de Broglie Matter Waves" Subject. eujer. Nisan 2018;7(2):387-395. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387
Chicago Gorecek Baybars, Meryem, ve Huseyin Kucukozer. “The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on ‘de Broglie Matter Waves’ Subject”. European Journal of Educational Research 7, sy. 2 (Nisan 2018): 387-95. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387.
EndNote Gorecek Baybars M, Kucukozer H (01 Nisan 2018) The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on "de Broglie Matter Waves" Subject. European Journal of Educational Research 7 2 387–395.
IEEE M. Gorecek Baybars ve H. Kucukozer, “The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on ‘de Broglie Matter Waves’ Subject”, eujer, c. 7, sy. 2, ss. 387–395, 2018, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387.
ISNAD Gorecek Baybars, Meryem - Kucukozer, Huseyin. “The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on ‘de Broglie Matter Waves’ Subject”. European Journal of Educational Research 7/2 (Nisan 2018), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387.
JAMA Gorecek Baybars M, Kucukozer H. The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on "de Broglie Matter Waves" Subject. eujer. 2018;7:387–395.
MLA Gorecek Baybars, Meryem ve Huseyin Kucukozer. “The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on ‘de Broglie Matter Waves’ Subject”. European Journal of Educational Research, c. 7, sy. 2, 2018, ss. 387-95, doi:10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.387.
Vancouver Gorecek Baybars M, Kucukozer H. The Effect of 7E Learning Model on Conceptual Understandings of Prospective Science Teachers on "de Broglie Matter Waves" Subject. eujer. 2018;7(2):387-95.