RADİKÜLER KİST BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİNDE KONİK IŞINLI BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ VE ULTRASONOGRAFİ’NİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Radiküler kist, çenelerde en sık görülen odontojenik kaynaklı inflamatuar kisttir. Son yıllarda maksilloofasiyal bölgede bulunan kistlerin incelemesinde sıklıkla konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) kullanılmaktadır. Ancak vestibül kemiğin inceldiği veya destrükte olduğu durumlarda ultrasonografi (USG) de yardımcı tanı aracı olarak kullanılabilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı radiküler kistlerin USG boyutlarının KIBT boyutlarıyla karşılaştırılmasıdır. Bu çalışmaya, fakültemizde rutin dental muayeneler sırasında fark edilen ve teşhisi patolojik olarak doğrulanan 20 radiküler kist vakası dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan KIBT görüntülerinin tamamı Newtom 5G cihazıyla (FP, Quantitative Radiology, Verona, İtalya) alındı ve USG incelemeleri Aplio™ 500 (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan) B-Mod ve yüksek frekanslı lineer tarama probları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmişti. Normal dağılım gösteren değerler için Pearson korelasyon katsayısı, normal dağılım göstermeyen değerler için Spearman korelasyon katsayısı hesaplandı. Lezyonların bukkolingual, meziodistal ve superoinferior boyutları için KIBT ve USG ölçümleri arasında pozitif ve anlamlı korelasyon izlendi. (p<0.01/r:0.912, p<0.01/r:0.857 ve p=0.01/r:0.688). Hem KIBT hem de USG için vestibül kemik kalınlığı ve lezyonların bukkolingual boyutu arasında anlamlı bir ilişki gözlenmedi (p>0.05). İntraosseöz lezyonların incelenmesinde KIBT diş hekimliği alanında sıklıkla kullanılsa da USG, lezyonun boyutlarını güvenilir bir tanı aracı olan KIBT ile korele bir şekilde verebildiğinden intraosseöz lezyonların tanısında yardımcı araç olarak kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi
• korelasyon
• radiküler kist
• ultrasonografi

COMPARISON OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN EXAMINATION OF RADICULAR CYSTS DIMENSIONS

Öz

Radicular cyst is the most common odontogenic inflammatory cyst in the jaws. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been increasingly popular in recent years for the assessment of cysts in the maxillofacial region. However, ultrasonography (USG) can also be performed as a secondary diagnostic method in cases with thinned or destructed vestibuler bone. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radicular cysts' USG and CBCT dimensions. This study included 20 cases of radicular cysts that were found during routine dental examinations at our faculty and whose diagnosis was verified pathologically. AplioTM 500 (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan) using B-Mode and high frequency linear scanning probes was utilized for the USG tests, and all of the CBCT images used in the study were obtained using a Newtom 5G device (FP, Quantitative Radiology, Verona, Italy). Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for normally distributed values, and Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated for non-normally distributed values. Positive and significant correlation was found between CBCT and USG measurements for the buccolingual, mesiodistal and superoinferior dimensions of the lesions. (p<0.01/r:0.912, p<0.01/r:0.857 and p=0.01/r:0.688). For both CBCT and USG, there was no significant correlation between vestibular bone thickness and the size of lesions in the buccolingual region (p>0.05). CBCT is a widely utilized diagnostic imaging modality in dentistry for the evaluation of lesions in the jaws. However, ultrasonography (USG) can serve as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of intraosseous lesions, given its ability to accurately measure lesion size and its correlation with CBCT findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• cone beam computed tomography
• correlation
• radicular cyst
• ultrasonography

Kaynakça

1. Shear M, Seward GR. Cysts of the oral regions. Blackwell Munksgaard, Iowa 1992; pp 125.
2. Keinan D, Cohen RE. The significance of epithelial rests of Malassez in the periodontal ligament. J Endod. 2013;39(5):582-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.004. PMID: 23611372.
3. Elango I, Baweja DK, Noorani H, Shivaprakash P. Radicular cyst associated with deciduous molar following pulp therapy: A case report. Dent Res J 2008; 5(2):95-98.
4. Lustig JP, Schwartz-Arad D, Shapira A. Odontogenic cysts related to pulpotomized deciduous molarsClinical features and treatment outcome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(4):499-503. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70251-9. PMID: 10225634.
5. Mass E, Kaplan I, Hirshberg A. A clinical and histopathological study of radicular cysts associated with primary molars. J Oral Pathol Med. 1995;24(10):458-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1995.tb01134.x. PMID: 8600282.
6. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(6):609-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028. PMID: 19464146.
7. Mahesh B, Shastry SP, Murthy PS, Jyotsna T. Role of cone beam computed tomography in evaluation of radicular cyst mimicking dentigerous cyst in a 7-year-old child: a case report and literature review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(2):213-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1438. PMID: 28890627; PMCID: PMC5571396.
8. Adibi S, Shakibafard A, Karimi Sarvestani Z, Saadat N, Khojastepour L. Effect of cortical bone thickness on detection of intraosseous lesions by ultrasonography. Radiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:797593. doi: 10.1155/2015/797593. PMID: 26366296; PMCID: PMC4561116.

9. Caglayan F, Bayrakdar IS. The intraoral ultrasonography in dentistry. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(2):125-133. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.197016. PMID: 29465043.
10. Raghav N, Reddy SS, Giridhar A, Murthy S, Yashodha Devi BK, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography, and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110(3):379-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.039. PMID: 20727498
11. Gundappa M, Ng S, Whaites E. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35(5):326-33. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/60326577. PMID: 16940480.
12. Kamburoğlu K, Çakmak EE, Eratam N, Sönmez G, Karahan S. In vitro assessment of periapical lesions created in sheep mandibles by using high resolution ultrasonography and cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(8):20210048. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210048. PMID: 34111365; PMCID: PMC8611275.
13. Goel S, Nagendrareddy SG, Raju MS, Krishnojirao DR, Rastogi R, et al. Ultrasonography with color Doppler and power Doppler in the diagnosis of periapical lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21(04):279-83. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.90688. PMID: 22223940; PMCID: PMC3249943
14. Bayrakdar IS, Yilmaz AB, Caglayan F, Ertas U, Gundogdu C, et al. Cone beam computed tomography and ultrasonography imaging of benign intraosseous jaw lesion: a prospective radiopathological study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1531-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2257-1. PMID: 29046963.
15. Dedeoğlu N, Duman ŞB, Altun O, Arıkan B. In vitro Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography Imaging Methods in the Evaluation of Artificial Mandible Intraosseous Lesions. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021;22(3):198-205. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.87481.1264. PMID: 34514068; PMCID: PMC8417550.
16. Rama Mohan K, Koteswara Rao N, Leela Krishna G, Santosh Kumar V, Ranganath N, et al. Role of ultrasonography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg.. 2015;14(2):162-70. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0616-x. PMID: 26028830; PMCID: PMC4444684.