THE EFFECT OF CONGENITAL MAXILLARY LATERAL TEETH DEFICIENCY AND INCISOR POSITION ON FACE SOFT TISSUE THICKNESS

Öz

Aim:The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare patients with congenital maxillary lateral incisor teeth deficiency with normal patients in terms of lower and upper incisor teeth positions and facial soft tissue thickness.

Material&Method: This retrospective study consisted of lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs of 108 subjects (29 males, mean age 15.85 ± 2.32 years; mean age: 15.42 ± 3.15 years) without orthodontic treatment. The determination of hard and soft tissue points and measurements were performed using the radiographic image analysis program on the computer. Individuals were divided into 4 groups (skeletal class I, II and III individuals with maxillary lateral incisor deficiency and skeletal class I normal group with no deficiency) with 26 patients in each group according to the ANB angle. Fourteen linear and twelve angular measurements were used to assess the hard tissue and soft tissue profile. The independent samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation coeffient were used for the statistical analysis of the obtained data.

Results: When the intergroup evaluation was performed, there was a significant difference between the thickness of the upper lip and the thickness of chin between the groups with congenital maxillary lateral incisor deficiency group and the normal group (p <0.05). It was determined that the vertical dimensions of the face were smaller in the individuals with maxillary lateral incisor deficiency.

Conclusion: The deficiency of maxillary lateral incisor affects the soft tissue thicknesses by influenced the incisor positions and the vertical dimensions of the patient.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• maxillary lateral incisor teeth deficiency,cephalometric analysis,incisor teeth positions

KONJENİTAL MAKSİLLER LATERAL DİŞ EKSİKLİĞİ VE KESİCİ DİŞ KONUMLARININ YÜZ YUMUŞAK DOKU KALINLIKLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

Amaç: Diş eksikliği olmayan normal hastalar ile konjenital diş eksikliğine sahip hastaları alt ve üst çene kesici diş konumları ve yüz yumuşak doku kalınlıkları açısından değerlendirmek ve karşılaştırmaktır.

Materyal & Metot:Bu retrospektif çalışma, ortodontik tedavi görmemiş 108 bireyin (29 erkek, yaş ortalaması 15,85±2,32 yıl; 75 kız, yaş ortalaması 15,42±3,15 yıl) lateral sefalometrik ve panoramik radyografilerinden oluşturuldu. Sert ve yumuşak doku noktalarının belirlenmesi ve ölçümler bilgisayar üzerinde radyografik görüntü analiz programı kullanılarak yapıldı.  Bireyler, ANB açısının değerine göre her grupta 26 hasta olacak şekilde 4 gruba (maksiller lateral kesici diş eksikliği olan iskeletsel sınıf I, II ve III bireyler ve diş eksikliği olmayan iskeletsel sınıf I normal hasta grubu) ayrılmıştır. On dört doğrusal ve on iki açısal ölçüm, sert doku ve yumuşak doku profilinin değerlendirilmesinde kullanıldı. Elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizi için bağımsız örneklem t testi, Mann-Whitney U testi ve Spearman korelasyon katsayısı kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular: Gruplar arası değerlendirme yapıldığında konjenital üst çene lateral kesici diş eksikliği olan gruplar ile olmayan normal grup arasında özellikle üst dudak kalınlıkları ile çene ucu kalınlığı arasında anlamlı farklılık belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Lateral kesici eksikliği olan bireylerde yüzün dik yön boyutlarının daha küçük olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Sonuç: Maksiller lateral kesici diş eksikliği olması, kesici diş konumlarını ve hastanın dik yön yüz boyutunu etkileyerek yumuşak doku kalınlıkları üzerinde etkili olmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• maksiller lateral kesici diş eksikliği,sefalometrik analiz,kesici diş konumları

Kaynakça

1. 1. Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Yildirim H, Ceylan I. Investigation of the maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and associated dental anomalies in an orthodontic patient population. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2012;17(6):e1068.
2. 2. Fekonja A. Hypodontia in orthodontically treated children. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2005;27(5):457-60.
3. 3. Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Ceylan I, Kamak H. Frequency and distribution of developmental anomalies in the permanent teeth of a Turkish orthodontic patient population. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2011;6(2):82-9.
4. 4. MCNEILL RW, JOONDEPH DR. Congenitally absent maxillary lateral incisors: treatment planning considerations. The Angle Orthodontist. 1973;43(1):24-9.
5. 5. Muller T, Hill I, Petersen A, Blayney J. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1970;81(1):101-7.
6. 6. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;131(4):510-4.
7. 7. Güngör AY. Konjenital diş eksikliğine sahip hastaların kraniyofasiyal özelliklerinin incelenmesi: SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2009.
8. 8. Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O, Oztek O, Kamak H, Ceylan I. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(5):e797-801.

9. 9. Nunn J, Carter N, Gillgrass T, Hobson R, Jepson N, Meechan J, et al. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: background and role of paediatric dentistry. British dental journal. 2003;194(5):245.
10. 10. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics-e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
11. 11. Arte S, Nieminen P, Apajalahti S, Haavikko K, Thesleff I, Pirinen S. Characteristics of incisor-premolar hypodontia in families. Journal of Dental Research. 2001;80(5):1445-50.
12. 12. Cobourne M. Familial human hypodontia–is it all in the genes? British dental journal. 2007;203(4):203.
13. 13. Burcal RG, Laskin DM, Sperry TP. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1987;45(8):666-70.
14. 14. Hodges A, Rossouw PE, Campbell PM, Boley JC, Alexander RA, Buschang PH. Prediction of lip response to four first premolar extractions in white female adolescents and adults. The Angle Orthodontist. 2009;79(3):413-21.
15. 15. Göyenç Y. Farklı sayıda kongenital diş eksikliğine sahip bireylerin dişsel ve iskeletsel olarak değerlendirilmesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi. 1993;6(2):134-40.
16. 16. Roald KL, Wisth PJ, Bøe OE. Changes in craniofacial morphology of individuals with hypodontia between the ages of 9 and 16. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1982;40(2):65-74.
17. 17. Yüksel S, Üçem T. The effect of tooth agenesis on dentofacial structures. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1997;19(1):71-8.
18. 18. Øgaard B, Krogstad O. Craniofacial structure and soft tissue profile in patients with severe hypodontia. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995;108(5):472-7.
19. 19. Bondarets N, McDonald F. Analysis of the vertical facial form in patients with severe hypodontia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. 2000;111(2):177-84.
20. 20. Diels RM, Kalra V, DeLoach Jr N, Powers M, Nelson SS. Changes in soft tissue profile of African-Americans following extraction treatment. The Angle Orthodontist. 1995;65(4):285-92.
21. 21. Kusnoto J, Kusnoto H. The effect of anterior tooth retraction on lip position of orthodontically treated adult Indonesians. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001;120(3):304-7.
22. 22. Ramos AL, Tatsuei Sakima M, dos Santos Pinto A, Bowman SJ. Upper lip changes correlated to maxillary incisor retraction—a metallic implant study. The Angle Orthodontist. 2005;75(4):499-505.
23. 23. Ricketts R. Cephalometric Synthesis-An Exercise. Am J orthod. 1960;46:647-73.
24. 24. Kamak H, Celikoglu M. Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions: is there a difference? The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2012;42(1):23-31.
25. 25. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 1993;103(4):299-312.
26. 26. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning—part II. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 1993;103(5):395-411.
27. 27. Miyajima K, Mcnamara Jr JA, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1996;110(4):431-8.
28. 28. Alcalde RE, Jinno T, Pogrel MA, Matsumura T. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1998;56(2):129-34.
29. 29. Paek I-C, Bowman D, Klapper L. A cephalometric study of of Korean adults. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989;96(1):54-9.
30. 30. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2004;125(3):366-72.
31. 31. Bacon W, Girardin P, Turlot JC. A comparison of cephalometric norms for the African Bantu and a Caucasoid population. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1983;5(3):233-40.
32. 32. Nanda R, Nanda RS. Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. The Angle Orthodontist. 1969;39(1):22-8.
33. 33. Endo T, Ozoe R, Yoshino S, Shimooka S. Hypodontia patterns and variations in craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients. The Angle Orthodontist. 2006;76(6):996-1003.
34. 34. Cha K-S. Soft-tissue thickness of South Korean adults with normal facial profiles. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2013;43(4):178-85.
35. 35. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. The Angle Orthodontist. 1959;29(1):8-29.
36. 36. Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth: Angle's system: White Dental Manufacturing Company; 1907.
37. 37. Lundström F, Lundström A. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1992;101(3):244-7.
38. 38. Uysal T, Yagci A, Basciftci FA, Sisman Y. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31(4):449-56.
39. 39. Malkoç S, Demir A, Uysal T, Canbuldu N. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;31(2):174-9.
40. 40. Ghaleb N, Bouserhal J, Bassil-Nassif N. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;33(3):228-35.
41. 41. McKeown H, Robinson D, Elcock C, Al‐Sharood M, Brook A. Tooth dimensions in hypodontia patients, their unaffected relatives and a control group measured by a new image analysis system. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2002;24(2):131-41.
42. 42. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kojima K, Shimooka S. Congenitally missing mandibular incisors and mandibular symphysis morphology. The Angle Orthodontist. 2007;77(6):1079-84.
43. 43. Woodworth DA, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. Bilateral congenital absence of maxillary lateral incisors: a craniofacial and dental cast analysis. American journal of orthodontics. 1985;87(4):280-93.