HASTANE BİLGİ VE YÖNETİM SİSTEMİNİN İMPLANT UYGULAMALARINA AİT VERİLERİNDEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ AMACIYLA İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Erciyes Üniversitesi DişHekimliği işlemlerini endikasyon, implant boy/çap, implant-üstürestorasyon tipi, implantasyon öncesi periodontaldeğerlendirme ve implant kaybı açısından Hastane Bilgive Yönetim isteminde (HBYS) yer alan verileri dikkatealarak değerlendirmek ve aynı zamanda mevcut sistemineksiklerini belirlemekti.Çalışmamızın materyalini Haziran 2007-Şubat 2012tarihleri arasında Erciyes Üniversitesi Diş HekimliğiFakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi (ADÇC) vePeriodontoloji Klinikleri’ne implant tedavisi içinbaşvurmuş 1634 hasta oluşturmuştur. Veriler HBYS’deyer alan bilgilerin değerlendirilmesi yoluyla eldeedilmiştir. İncelememizin sonuçları 865’i kadın ve 769’uerkek olmak üzere 1634 hastaya toplam 4555 implantınuygulandığını ortaya koymuştur. İmplant uygulananhastaların yaklaşık yarısının (% 49), bunların daçoğunluğunun dişsizlik durumu bilinmemekle birlikte,periodontal tedavi görmediği ve her iki klinik için debenzer oranlarda dağılım gösterdiği belirlenmiştir.Mevcut Periodontoloji gerekse de ADÇC Klinikleri’nde Haziran2007-Şubat implantasyon işlemlerinin giderek artan bir ivmekazandığı ve implant-üstü restorasyonların çoğunun dasabit protezler olduğu görülmüştür.Elde edilen verilerışığında, otomasyon sistemine hastanın dişsizlik durumu,peri-implantitis tedavisi, kaybedilen implant sayısı/lokalizasyonu ve benzeri eksik parametrelerin ilaveedilmesi, daha geniş popülasyonlarda ileride yapılmasıplanlanan retrospektif değerlendirmelerin sağlıklı birşekilde gerçekleştirilmesine olanak tanıyacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İmplant uygulaması, hastane bilgive yönetim sistemi, peri-implantitis, implant başarısı

The Investigation of the Hospital Information and Management System (HIMS) for the Evaluation of the Data of Implantation Procedure

Öz

The aim of this study was to evaluate theimplantation procedures performed at ErciyesUniversity, Faculty of Dentistry, with regard toimplant indication, implant length and diameter, typeof implantexamination prior to implant surgery, implant losstaking into consideration the current HospitalInformation Management System (HIMS) data andalso to determine the inadequacies of the currentautomation system.The material of our study consistedof a total of 1634 patients (865 females; 769 males)who presented to the clinic of Periodontology andOral Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) at ErciyesUniversity, Faculty of Dentistry for implant treatment.The data were obtained by the evaluation of theinformation in the HIMS.Results of our investigationshowed that 4555 implants were inserted in a total of1634 patients (865 females; 769 males). Almost half ofthe implant-treated patients (49 %), despite the lack ofknowledge in terms of edentulism, did not receive anyperiodontal treatment and the distribution of thesepatients in both clinics were similar. Current datarevealed that an increasing trend toward implantationprocedures occurred over a period from June 2007 toFebruary 2012 in both Periodontology and (OMFS)clinics and implant supported restorations were mostlyin the form of fixed prosthesis.In the light of the dataobtained, It is clear that, the inclusion of the missinginformation (state of edentulism, treatment of periimplant disease, number and localization of implantloss etc.) into the HIMS will enable the clinicians toperform a more reliable retrospective investigation inlarger populations in the future

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Implant procedures, Hospital informationand management system, Peri-implantitis, Implantsurvival

Kaynakça

1. Arvidson K, Bystedt H, Frykholm A, et al. A 3- year clinical study of Astra dental implants in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:321-329.
2. Spiekermann H, Jansen VK, Richter EJ. A 10- year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:231-243.
3. Mericski-Stern R, Schaffner TS, Marti P, et al. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures: A five-year longitudi- nal study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:9-18.
4. Tulstunov L. Implant zones of jaws: implant location related success rate. J.Oral Implanto- logy 2007;33:4
5. Edmunds DH, Crabb HS. Five-year review of tooth mortality in a selected population in Le- eds, U.K. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1975;3:64-68.
6. Herekar M,Patil V,Madhura M. Desing failures in implants:Critical analysis. Jida 2010;4:526- 529
7. Park KA , Jeong CW, Ryoo GH, et al. Survival Analysis of Wide-Diameter Implants in Maxil- lary & Mandibular Molar regions; A Retrospec- tive Study. J. korean academy of periodontology 2007;37: 825-838.
8. Anner R, Better H, Chaushu G. The effectivenes- sof 6mm Diameter Implants. J Periodontol 2005;76:1013-1015.

9. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, et al. Clinical assessment and surgical implications ofanatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:219-225.
10. Romanos GE, Greenstein G. The incisive ca- nal.Considerations during implant placement: case reportand literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009 Jul;24:740-745.
11. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Observa- tionof bifid mandibular canal using cone- beamcomputerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:155-159.
12. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Accessory mental beamcomputed tomography. Oral Surg Oral using cone- Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
13. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Huynh-Ba G. History of trea- ted periodontitis and smoking as risks for imp- lant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:39-68.
14. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, et al. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Den- tal Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:329-39.
15. van Assche N, van Essche M, Pauwels M, et al. Do periodontopathogens disappear after full- mouth tooth extraction? J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:1043-7.
16. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wik- sell; 1977. 132 pp
17. Misch CE, Wang HL, Misch CM, et al : Ratio- nale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: part 1 , Implant Dent 13 : 207 – 217
18. Ledermann P. Complete denture support in edentulous problem mandibles with help from 4 titanium plasma-coated PDL screw implants. SSO 1979;89:1137-1138. Zahnheilkd
19. Szmukler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, et al. Consi- deration preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental Imp- lantology. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11:12-25.
20. Barewal RM,Stanford C,Weesner TC., A rando- mized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of three loading protocols on dental imp- lant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:945-956.