SINIF V KAVİTELERDE AKIŞKAN LİNER UYGULANMASININ MİKROSIZINTI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada sınıf V kavitelerde kavite tabanına yerleştirilen akışkan kompozit rezin uygulamasının mikrosızıntı üzerine etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yeni çekilmiş ve çürüksüz 84 adet insan küçük azı dişine, yüzeydeki doku artıkları temizlendikten sonra standart sınıf V kaviteler hazırlandı. Daha sonra tabana bir akışkan kompozit uygulanıp uygulanmamasına göre iki ana gruba ve kullanılan adeziv materyale göre üç alt gruba ayrıldı. Kompozit restorasyonların yapılmasının ardından %2’lik metilen mavisi solüsyonu içinde 24 saat süreyle 37 °C’de etüvde bekletildi. Daha sonra dişlerden bukko-lingual yönde kesitler alındı ve oklüzal ve gingival duvarlardaki boya sızıntısı 30x büyütmede steriomikroskop altında değerlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Gingival kenarda gözlenen sızıntı miktarı, koronale göre daha fazla bulunurken (p<0,05), akışkan kompozit kullanılan ve kullanılmayan gruplar arasında mikrosızıntı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlenememiştir (p>0.05). Sonuç: Sınıf V kavitelerde, kavite tabanına ince bir tabaka akışkan kompozit rezin uygulanmasının mikrosızıntı üzerine herhangi bir faydası olmamıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akışkan kompozit, kompozit, liner,mikrosızıntı, Sınıf V restorasyon

The Effect of Flowable Composite Liner Application on Microleakage in Class V Cavities

Öz

Aim:To investigate the effects of flowable composite liner application on microleakage in class V cavities. Material and Method: Standard Class V cavities were prepared using extracted non-carious 84 human premolars after the surface was cleaned. Then the teeth were divided into two main groups according to whether to apply a flowable composite liner on the cavity bottom, and also they were divided into three subgroups according to adhesive materials used. After the composite restorations were completed, the teeth were stored at 37 °C and 100% humidified atmosphere for 24 hours. Then, bucco-lingual sections were received, dye penetration in occlusal and gingival walls were steriomicroscopy. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: It was found that the microleakage observed on gingival margins were statistically more than coronal margins (p<0,05), no significantly difference was observed in microleakage between groups with and without flowable composite liner ( p>0.05). Conclusion: Application of a thin layer flowable composite resin that was placed to the base of class V cavities was not useful on microleakage

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Class V restorations, composite, flowable composite, liner, microleakage

Kaynakça

1. Alonso RC, Sinhoreti MA, Correr Sobrinho L, Consani S, Goes MF. Effect of resin liners on the microleakage of class V dental composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12:56-61.
2. Bayındır YZ, Bayındır F, Zorba YO, Turgut H. Influence of different bonding systems and soft- start formation. Mater Res Innovat 2008; 12:166-171.
3. Simi B, Suprabha B. Evaluation of microleakage in posterior adhesive liners. J Conserv Dent 2011; 14:178-181. restorations with
4. Radhika M, Sajjan GS, Kumaraswamy BN, Mittal N. Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13:9-15.
5. Estafan D, Estafan A, Leinfelder KF. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites. Am J Dent 2000; 13:192-194.
6. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Jr Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:567-577.
7. Ballal V. Microleakage of Flowable Composite Restorations. Eur J Dent 2010; 4:358-362.
8. Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J 2008; 53:325-331.

9. Geerts S, Bolette A, Seidel L, Guéders A. An in vitro evaluation of leakage of two etch and rinse and two self-etch adhesives after thermocycling. Int J Dent 2012; 2012:852841.
10. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: A review. J Dent 2004; 32:173- 196.
11. Pavan S, dos Santos PH, Berger S, Bedran-Russo AK. The effect of dentin pretreatment on the microtensile bond strength of selfadhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104:258-264.
12. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Fer- rari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10:251-258.
13. Hosseini MH, Namvar F, Chalipa J, et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared by Er:YAG laser and conventional acid-etching. J Dent (Tehran) 2012; 9:20-26.
14. Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, et al. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self- etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J 2010; 2:220-226.
15. Bektas OO, Eren D, Akin EG, Akin H. Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite in terms of micro -shear bond strength and microleakage. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 271:541-546. Kavite 16. Totu Fİ.
16. Dezenfektanlarının ve Antibakteriyel Kompomer Restorasyonların Mikrosızıntı ve Bağlanma Kuvvetlerine Etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2006; ss 125- 139.
17. Sadeghi M. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20:159-163.
18. Hegde MN, Vyapaka P, Shetty S. A comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different newer direct composite resins using a self etching primer in class V cavities. J Conserv Dent 2009; 12:160-163.
19. Bausch JR, de Lange K, Davidson CL, Peters A, de Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48:59-67.
20. Alvarez-Gayosso C, Barceló-Santana F, Guerrero- Ibarra J, Sáez-Espínola G, Canseco-Martínez MA. Calculation of contraction rates due to shrinkage in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 2004; 20:228- 235.
21. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1240-1243.
22. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001; 26:302-307.
23. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69:516-521.
24. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangaç B. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities. Oper Dent 2003; 28:42-46.
25. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004; 29:301-308.
26. Neme AM, Maxson BB, Pink FE, Aksu MN. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: An in vitro study. Oper Dent 2002; 27:600-605.
27. Ziskind D, Adell I, Teperovich E, Peretz B. The effect of an intermediate layer of flowable composite resin on microleakage in packable composite restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005; 15:349-354.
28. Koliniotov-Koumpia E, Dionysopoulos P, Koumpia E. In vivo evaluation of microleakage of Class V flowable and packable composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 603-608.
29. Karadağ S. Mikrosızıntı araştırma teknikleri ve mikrosızıntıyı etkileyen faktörler. Atatürk Üniver- sitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2005; 15:80- 87.
30. Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clin Oral Investig 2002; 6:244-248.
31. Williams PT, Schramke D, Stockton L. Comparison of two methods of measuring dye penetration in restoration microleakage studies. Oper Dent 2002; 27:628-635.
32. Demirci M, Özer F, Küşdemir M, Sancakli HŞ, Karakaya Ş. Adeziv sistemlerin farklı uygulama şekillerinin V. sınıf kavitelerdeki mikrosızıntı üzeri- ne etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakül- tesi Dergisi 2007; 16:29-38.
33. Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: a review of materials and techniques. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3:33-44.
34. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self etching agents. Am J Dent 2004; 17:257-261.
35. Çelik Ç, Yazıcı AR, Dayangaç B, Özgünaltay G. Farklı iki ışık kaynağının akışkan restoratif materyallerin kenar sızıntıları üzerine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversi- tesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2007; 31:64-70.