SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİNDE YAPAY ZEKÂ UYGULAMALARI: DİJİTAL SAĞLIK DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE YENİ YAKLAŞIMLAR

Öz

Sağlık sistemleri, yaşlanan nüfus, kronik hastalıkların artışı, yükselen sağlık maliyetleri ve artan hasta yükü gibi çok boyutlu sorunlarla karşı karşıyadır. Bu durum, sağlık hizmetlerinin daha verimli, sürdürülebilir ve hasta odaklı biçimde sunulabilmesi için dijital dönüşüm süreçlerini zorunlu hale getirmiştir. Yapay zekâ (YZ) teknolojileri, büyük veri analitiği, makine öğrenmesi ve derin öğrenme gibi yöntemler aracılığıyla sağlık hizmetlerinde önemli bir dönüşüm potansiyeli sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, sağlık bilimlerinde yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin gelişimini ve sağlık hizmetlerindeki temel uygulama alanlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada öncelikle sağlık hizmetlerinde dijital dönüşüm süreci ve akıllı hastane kavramı ele alınmış, ardından yapay zekânın kuramsal çerçevesi, tarihsel gelişimi ve sağlık alanındaki rolü değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında yapay zekânın özellikle tıbbi görüntüleme, klinik karar destek sistemleri, hastalık tahmini ve erken teşhis uygulamaları gibi alanlardaki kullanım örnekleri incelenmiştir. Koios DS, Caption Care, ExoAI, Sonio, Us2.ai, Qure.ai ve Infervision gibi yapay zekâ tabanlı sağlık teknolojileri, tanı doğruluğunu artırma, klinik iş akışlarını hızlandırma ve sağlık hizmetlerinin maliyet etkinliğini güçlendirme açısından önemli katkılar sunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte veri güvenliği, etik sorumluluk, algoritmik önyargı ve regülasyon eksikliği gibi sorunlar yapay zekâ uygulamalarının yaygınlaşmasında önemli tartışma alanları oluşturmaktadır. Sonuç olarak yapay zekâ, sağlık sistemlerinde tanı doğruluğunu artıran, klinik karar süreçlerini destekleyen ve dijital sağlık ekosisteminin gelişimine katkı sağlayan stratejik bir teknoloji olarak değerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay Zekâ
• Sağlık Teknolojileri
• Klinik Karar Destek Sistemleri
• Tıbbi Görüntüleme

ARTİFİCİAL INTELLİGENCE APPLİCATİONS İN HEALTH SCİENCES: NEW APPROACHES İN DİGİTAL HEALTH TRANSFORMATİON

Öz

Health systems face multifaceted challenges such as aging populations, the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, rising healthcare costs, and growing patient demand. These pressures have made digital transformation processes essential for delivering healthcare services in a more efficient, sustainable, and patient-centered manner. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, through methods such as big data analytics, machine learning, and deep learning, offer significant transformative potential for healthcare services. This study aims to examine the development of artificial intelligence technologies in health sciences and their primary application areas in healthcare services. Within the scope of the study, the digital transformation process in healthcare and the concept of smart hospitals are first discussed. Subsequently, the conceptual framework of artificial intelligence, its historical development, and its role in healthcare are evaluated. The study further explores the use of artificial intelligence in areas such as medical imaging, clinical decision support systems, disease prediction, and early diagnosis applications. AI-based healthcare technologies such as Koios DS, Caption Care, ExoAI, Sonio, Us2.ai, Qure.ai, and Infervision contribute significantly to improving diagnostic accuracy, accelerating clinical workflows, and enhancing the cost-effectiveness of healthcare services. However, issues such as data security, ethical responsibility, algorithmic bias, and regulatory gaps remain important challenges for the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence applications. Consequently, artificial intelligence is considered a strategic technology that enhances diagnostic accuracy in healthcare systems, supports clinical decision-making processes, and contributes to the development of the digital health ecosystem.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial Intelligence
• Health Technologies
• Clinical Decision Support Systems
• Medical Imaging
• Digital Health

Kaynakça

1. Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., & Jha, A. K. (2010). Research commentary—The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0327
2. Aidoc. (2026). AI-powered medical imaging solutions (EU). https://www.aidoc.com/eu/
3. Akkus, Z., Cai, J., Boonrod, A., Zeinoddini, A., Weston, A. D., Philbrick, K. A., ve Erickson, B. J. (2019). A survey of deep-learning applications in ultrasound: Artificial intelligence-powered ultrasound for improving clinical workflow. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 16, 1318–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.06.004
4. Alimiri Dehbaghi, H., ve Khoshgard, K. (2025). Revolutionizing emergency care: An overview of the transformative role of artificial intelligence in diagnosis, triage, and patient management. International Journal of Emergency Medicine (Online), 18(1), 242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-01049-1
5. American Medical Association. (2021, July 16). Clinical case study: Telehealth for hypertension. Retrieved December 29, 2025, from https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/prevention-wellness/clinical-case-study-telehealth-hypertension
6. Anisuzzaman, D. M., Malins, J. G., Jackson, J. I., Lee, E., Naser, J. A., Rostami, B., . . . Attia, Z. I. (2026). A view-flexible deep learning framework for automated analysis of 2D echocardiography. NPJ Cardiovascular Health, 3(1), 17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44325-025-00100-7
7. Arnett, A. (2025). FDA clears AI software for ultrasound-guided nerve blocks. Los Angeles: Anthem Media Group. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/other-sources/fda-clears-ai-software-ultrasound-guided-nerve/docview/3241001283/se-2
8. Aruleba, R. T., Adekiya, T. A., Ayawei, N., Obaido, G., Aruleba, K., Mienye, I. D., et al. (2022). COVID-19 diagnosis: A review of rapid antigen, RT-PCR and artificial intelligence methods. Bioengineering, 9(4), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9040153

9. Bahl, M. (2024). Combining AI and radiomics to improve the accuracy of breast US. Radiology, 312(3). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.241795
10. Behnam, F., Khajouei, R., Nabizadeh, A. H., Saedi, S., ve Ghaemi, M. M. (2023). Usability evaluation of emergency information systems in educational hospitals in Kerman, Iran. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23(1), 277. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02357-3Betancourt, M. (2020). Force magnifier: The cultural impacts of artificial intelligence. Wildside Press LLC.
11. Bizalwan, D. S., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., & Gong, Y. Y. (2025). Enhancing Healthcare with Artificial Intelligence: A Configurational Integration of Complementary Technologies and Stakeholder Needs. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 57, 384-417. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05715
12. Caption Health. (2024). AI-guided cardiac ultrasound solutions. https://www.caption-care.com/
13. Chen, M. C., Ball, R. L., Yang, L., Moradzadeh, N., Chapman, B. E., Larson, D. B., et al., & Lungren, M. P. (2017). Deep learning to classify radiology free-text reports. Radiology, 286(3), 845–852. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017171115
14. Chaturvedi, A. (2023). Defining legal responsibility in the age of AI: Addressing gaps in data privacy regulation. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law, 3(1).
15. Chibuzor, U., Voicu-Dorobanțu Roxana, Ogunyemi, A. A., Alex, N., Nata, S., & Craß Stefan. (2025). Leveraging blockchain for ethical AI: Mitigating digital threats and strengthening societal resilience. Future Internet, 17(7), 309. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17070309
16. Çelebi, F., Tuncer, O., Oral, M., Duymaz, T., Orhan, T., & Ertaş, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence in diagnostic breast ultrasound: A comparative analysis of decision support among radiologists with various levels of expertise. European Journal of Breast Health, 21(1), 33-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2024-9-7
17. Çilhoroz, Y., ve Işık, O. (2021). Yapay zekâ: Sağlık hizmetlerinden uygulamalar. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 573–588.
18. da Silva, L. M., & Athanazio, D. A. (2026). Real world experience on digital transformation and deployment of artificial intelligence tools across a network of pathology laboratories in brazil. Surgical and Experimental Pathology, 9(1), 17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42047-026-00229-4
19. Dhariwal, K., & Mehta, A. (2017). Architecture and plan of smart hospital based on Internet of Things (IoT). International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 1976–1980.
20. Dogan, Y., Az, A., Sogut, O., Akdemir, T., Ergenc, H., Umit, T. B., . . . Ozturk, M. F. (2026). Domain-specific and computer-vision-driven versus general-purpose AI models in PA-CXR analysis: A comparative study with emergency-medicine specialists. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01806-x
21. Epic. (2026). Epic Health System Community. 6 Şubat 2026 tarihinde https://www.epic.com/community/ adresinden erişildi.
22. Esmaeilzadeh P (2020) Use of AI-based tools for healthcare purposes: a survey study from consumers’ perspectives. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01191-1 European Commission. (2022). Legal framework of EU data protection. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/legal-framework-eu-data-protection_en adresinden erişildi.
23. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security. (2016). Smart hospitals: Security and resilience for smart health service and infrastructures. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/cyber-security-and-resilience-for-smart-hospitals adresinden erişildi.
24. Evans, J. (2018, Ağustos). How Apple’s AI imaging vision may save lives. Computerworld. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.computerworld.com/article/1699377/how-apple-s-ai-imaging-vision-may-save-lives.html adresinden erişildi.
25. Gallant, C., Bernard, L., Cherise, K., Stephanie, W., Noga, M., Kumaradevan, P., . . . Jaremko Jacob L. (2025). AI-augmented point of care ultrasound in intensive care unit patients: Can novices perform a “Basic echo” to estimate left ventricular ejection fraction in this acute-care setting? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(9), 2899. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14092899
26. Gandhi, S., Mosleh, W., Shen, J., & Chow, C. M. (2018). Automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence in echocardiography: A brave new world. Echocardiography, 35, 1402–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14086
27. Garg, T., John, S., Abdulkarim, S., Ahmed, A. D., Kirubi, B., Rahman, M. T., Ubochioma, E., & Creswell, J. (2025). Implementation costs and cost-effectiveness of ultraportable chest X-ray with artificial intelligence in active case finding for tuberculosis in Nigeria. PLOS Digital Health, 4(6), e0000894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000894
28. GE HealthCare. (2026). Imaging products | GE HealthCare. 6 Şubat 2026 tarihinde https://www.gehealthcare.com/products/imaging adresinden erişildi.
29. Geoghegan, L., Scarborough, A., Wormald, J. C. R., Harrison, C. J., Collins, D., Gardiner, M., Bruce, J., & Rodrigues, J. N. (2021). Automated conversational agents for post-intervention follow-up: A systematic review. BJS Open, 5(4), zrab070. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab070
30. Goldenberg, S., Nir, G., & Salcudean, S. E. (2019). A new era: Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer. Nature Reviews Urology, 16, 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0193-3
31. Gopal, G., Suter‐Crazzolara, C., Toldo, L., & Eberhardt, W. (2019). Digital transformation in healthcare: Architectures of present and future information technologies. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 57(3), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0658
32. Hirata, Y., Nomura, Y., Saijo, Y., Sata, M., & Kusunose, K. (2024). Reducing echocardiographic examination time through routine use of fully automated software: A comparative study of measurement and report creation time. Journal of Echocardiography, 22(3), 162-170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00636-6
33. Hu, H., Su, J., & Ma, J. (2022). Editorial: Smart hospital innovation: Technology, service, and policy. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 845577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.845577
34. Hussain, A., Umair, M., Khan, S., Alonazi, W. B., Almutairi, S. S., & Malik, A. (2024). Exploring sustainable healthcare: innovations in health economics, social policy, and management. Heliyon, 10(13). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33186.
35. IBM Institute for Business Value. (2023). Healthcare in the AI era: Leading through trust, value and transformation. IBM. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.ibm.com/downloads/documents/us-en/1379d330685ae497 adresinden erişildi.
36. Infervision. (2025). AI medical imaging, empowering the patient journey. Ocak 2026 tarihinde https://global.infervision.com/ adresinden erişildi.
37. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
38. Jensen, J. L., Peterson, S. K., Sambade, M. J., Alley, J. R., Yu, S., Kinjo, T., et al. (2026). Shared PRAME epitopes are T-cell targets in NUT carcinoma. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 14, e013539. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-013539
39. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., et al. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2, e000101. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101
40. Johnson, D. B., Binyam, Y., Stamatini, F., Metamia, C., O’Grady Tina, Park, B. H., & Balko, J. M. (2025). 136 Ultrahigh tumor mutational burden (TMB) is associated with improved survival outcomes in patients (pts) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, 13, A151-A152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-SITC2025.0136
41. Kaldoudi, E. (2023). Smart hospital: The future of healthcare. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 24, 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.011
42. Kalis, B., Collier, M., & Fu, R. (2018). 10 promising AI applications in health care. Harvard Business Review, 2–5.
43. Kenny, P. A. (2026). Pathogenicity assessment of a TSC2 c.2966+1G>A splice site variant in vaginal adenocarcinoma [Preprint]. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.31.25343109
44. Khanna, S., Sattar, A., & Hansen, D. (2013). Artificial intelligence in health: The three big challenges. The Australasian Medical Journal, 6(5), 315–317. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2013.1758
45. Kim, S. J., Roh, J. W., Kim, S., Park, J. Y., & Choi, D. (2020). Current State and Strategy for Establishing a Digitally Innovative Hospital: Memorial Review Article for Opening of Yongin Severance Hospital. Yonsei medical journal, 61(8), 647–651. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.647
46. Klinker, K., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital transformation in health care: Augmented reality for hands‐free service innovation. Information Systems Frontiers, 22, 1419–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09937-7
47. Ko, E. Y. (2014). S-Detect™ in breast ultrasound: Initial experience. Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://images.samsung.com/is/content/samsung/assets/pl/business/ultrasonograf/wiedza/White_Paper_S-Detect_Breast_1_RS80A_2014.pdf adresinden erişildi.
48. Koios Medical. (2024). Koios DS: AI-powered ultrasound decision support. 5 Mart 2026 tarihinde https://koiosmedical.com/ adresinden erişildi.
49. Kononenko, I. (2001). Machine learning for medical diagnosis: History, state of the art and perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 23(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0933-3657(01)00077-X
50. König, M., Sander, A., Demuth, I., Diekmann, D., & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (2019). Knowledge-based best of breed approach for automated detection of clinical events based on German free text digital hospital discharge letters. PloS one, 14(11), e0224916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224916
51. Krasuska, M., Williams, R., Sheikh, A., et al. (2020). Technological capabilities to assess digital excellence in hospitals in high performing health care systems: International eDelphi exercise. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e17022. https://doi.org/10.2196/17022
52. Krittanawong, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., et al. (2017). Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69(21), 2657–2664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.571
53. Kwon, H., An, S., Lee, H.-Y., et al. (2022). Review of smart hospital services in real healthcare environments. Healthcare Informatics Research, 28(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2022.28.1.3
54. Laux, J., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2024). Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI Act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk. Regulatory Governance, 18, 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12512
55. Li, Y., Li, Q., Fu, K., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2025). Progress in the application of artificial intelligence in ultrasound-assisted medical diagnosis. Bioengineering, 12(3), 288. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030288
56. Loppini, M., Gambaro, F. M., Chiappetta, K., Grappiolo, G., Bianchi, A. M., & Corino, V. D. A. (2022). Automatic identification of failure in hip replacement: An artificial intelligence approach. Bioengineering, 9(7), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070288
57. Marques, I. C. P., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2020). Digital transformation in the area of health: Systematic review of 45 years of evolution. Health and Technology, 10, 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-019-00402-8
58. Mateusz, D., Kacała Arkadiusz, Tołkacz Aleksandra, Aleksandra, K., Maja, G., & Guziński Maciej. (2026). Transforming stroke diagnosis with artificial intelligence: A scoping review of brainomix e-stroke, aidoc, RapidAI, and viz.ai. Medicina, 62(3), 582. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030582
59. McDougall, R. J. (2019). No we shouldn’t be afraid of medical AI; it involves risks and opportunities. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(8), 559. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105572
60. Milne-Ives, M., de Cock, C., Lim, E., Shehadeh, M. H., de Pennington, N., Mole, G., Normando, E., & Meinert, E. (2020). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence conversational agents in health care: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e20346. https://doi.org/10.2196/20346
61. Muda, N., & Sulaiman, M. H. (2026). Adapting quality function deployment to translate patient feedback into prioritized technical requirements for healthcare artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 5713. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36550-x
62. Narang, A., Bae, R., Hong, H., et al. (2021). Utility of a deep-learning algorithm to guide novices to acquire echocardiograms for limited diagnostic use. JAMA Cardiology, 6(6), 624–632. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0185
63. Nerveblox, the ultrasound AI for regional anaesthesia receives US FDA 510(k) clearance. (2025, 20 Ağustos). PharmaBiz. 6 Mart 2026 tarihinde https://www.proquest.com/magazines/nerveblox-ultrasound-ai-regional-anaesthesia/docview/3241208613/se-2 adresinden erişildi.
64. Neuwirth, R. J. (2023). Prohibited artificial intelligence practices in the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). Computer Law & Security Review, 51, 105798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105798
65. Paige. (2026). Request a trial – Paige AI. Retrieved February 6, 2026, from https://www.paige.ai/request-a-trial
66. OECD. (2022). OECD framework for the classification of AI systems. OECD Publishing. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-framework-for-the-classification-of-ai-systems_cb6d9eca-en.html adresinden erişildi.
67. Qure.ai. (2026). AI assistance for accelerated healthcare. 7 Mart 2026 tarihinde https://www.qure.ai/ adresinden erişildi.
68. Rabiei, R., Dehghan, S., Hsu, W.-C., Bastani, P., Almasi, S., & Mortezaei, S. (2025). Transition toward smart hospitals: A scoping review of features, technologies, and challenges. Health Science Reports, 8, e71601. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.7160
69. Ramesh, A. N., Kambhampati, C., Monson, J. R. ve Drew, P. J. (2004). Artificial intelligence in medicine. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 86(5), 334-338.
70. Rashid, Z., Ahmed, H., Nadeem, N., Zafar, S. B., & Yousaf, M. Z. (2025). The paradigm of digital health: AI applications and transformative trends. Neural Computing & Applications, 37(17), 11039-11070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-025-11081-0
71. Reddy, S., Fox, J., & Purohit, M. P. (2018). Artificial intelligence-enabled healthcare delivery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 112(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818815510
72. Rigla, M., García-Sáez, G., Pons, B., & Hernando, M. E. (2017). Artificial intelligence methodologies and their application to diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817710475
73. Roubal, O., & Narusevych, K. (2025). The panorama of artificial intelligence – development or advancement? Communication Today, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.34135/communicationtoday.2025.Vol.16.No.1.4
74. Sahu CK, Young C, Rai R (2021) Artificial intelligence (AI) in augmented reality (ar)-assisted manufac turing applications: a review. Int J Prod Res 59(16):4903–4959. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543. 2020.1859636
75. Samek, W., & Müller, K. R. (2019). Towards explainable artificial intelligence. In W. Samek, G. Montavon, A. Vedaldi, L. K. Hansen, & K. R. Müller (Eds.), Explainable AI: Interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning (pp. 5–22). Springer.
76. Sanjeevi, G., Gopalakrishnan, U., Parthinarupothi, R. K., & Madathil, T. (2024). Deep learning supported echocardiogram analysis: A comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 151, 102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102866
77. Shah, W. S., Elkhwesky, Z., Jasim, K. M., Elkhwesky, E. F. Y., & Elkhwesky, F. F. Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in healthcare services: Past, present and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 18(3), 941-963. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00699-w
78. Shan, R., Pei, C., Fan, Q., Liu, J., Wang, D., Yang, S., & Wang, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted platform performs high detection ability of hepatocellular carcinoma in CT images: An external clinical validation study. BMC Cancer, 25, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13529-x
79. Stahl, B. C., & Leach, T. (2023). Assessing the ethical and social concerns of artificial intelligence in neuroinformatics research: An empirical test of the European Union Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (ALTAI). AI and Ethics, 3, 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00201-4
80. Steerling, E., Siira, E., Nilsen, P., Svedberg, P., & Nygren, J. (2023). Implementing AI in healthcare—The relevance of trust: A scoping review. Frontiers in Health Services, 3, 1211150. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1211150
81. Stephanie, L., & Sharma, R. S. (2020). Digital health eco‐systems: An epochal review of practice‐oriented research. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.017
82. Stephens, K. (2024). GE HealthCare debuts Caption AI for rapid cardiac assessment. AXIS Imaging News. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ge-healthcare-debuts-caption-ai-rapid-cardiac/docview/3037168498/se-2 adresinden erişildi.
83. Tagliaferri SD, Angelova M, Zhao X, Owen PJ, Miller CT, Wilkin T, Belavy DL (2020) Artificial intelli gence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews. npj Digit Med 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0303-x
84. Tajik, A. (2016). Machine learning for echocardiographic imaging: Embarking on another incredible journey. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68(21), 2296–2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.915
85. Thrall, J. H., Li, X., Li, Q., Cruz, C., Do, S., Dreyer, K., & Brink, J. (2018). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in radiology: Opportunities, challenges, pitfalls, and criteria for success. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(3, Pt B), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.026
86. Tierney, A. A., Gayre, G., Hoberman, B., Mattern, B., Ballesca, M., Kipnis, P., Liu, V., & Lee, K. (2024). Ambient artificial intelligence scribes to alleviate the burden of clinical documentation. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.23.0404
87. Uslu, B. Ç., Okay, E., & Dursun, E. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting IoT‐based smart hospital design. Journal of Cloud Computing, 9(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-020-00215-5
88. Van Maanen, G. (2022). AI ethics, ethics washing, and the need to politicize data ethics. Digital Society, 1(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00013-3
89. Vega, R., Kwok, C., Rakkunedeth Hareendranathan, A., Nagdev, A., & Jaremko, J. L. (2024). Assessment of an artificial intelligence tool for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction in echocardiograms from apical and parasternal long-axis views. Diagnostics, 14, 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161719
90. Vesnic-Alujevic, L., Nascimento, S., & Polvora, A. (2020). Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks. Telecommunications Policy, 44, 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101961
91. Viz.ai. (2026). Transforming healthcare with AI-powered care coordination | Viz.ai. 7 Mart 2026 tarihinde https://www.viz.ai/ adresinden erişildi.
92. Wang, B., Zheng, H., Qian, K., Zhan, X., & Wang, J. (2024). Edge computing and AI-driven intelligent traffic monitoring and optimization. Applied and Computational Engineering, 77, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/67/2024MA0062
93. Xu, W., Jia, X., Mei, Z., Gu, X., Lu, Y., Fu, C.-C., et al. (2023). Generalizability and diagnostic performance of AI models for thyroid US. Radiology, 307(5). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221157
94. Yang, F., & Graetz, I. (2026). Ambient AI tool adoption in US hospitals and associated factors. The American Journal of Managed Care, 32(1), e25-e30. doi:https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2026.89876
95. Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is about more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30, 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00194-3
96. Yao, W., Chu, C. H., & Li, Z. (2011). Leveraging complex event processing for smart hospitals using RFID. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(3), 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2010.04.020
97. Zegarra, R. R., & Ghi, T. (2023). Use of artificial intelligence and deep learning in fetal ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 62, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26130
98. Zhang, L., Wu, J., Yang, J., Chen, S. S., Liu, J. P., Zhang, P., Chu, J., & Luo, C. L. (2023). Development and application evaluation of a nursing simulation teaching information system based on hospital information systems. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2023, 6334967. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6334967
99. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York, NY: PublicAffairs. 18 Nisan 2026 tarihinde https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=56791 adresinden erişildi.