A Qualitative Evaluation of Confession Pages as a Means of Communication and Interaction in Generation Z
Öz
This study examines the usage practices of confession pages among Generation Z university students to understand the dynamics of anonymous communication in digital environments. The research explores how these platforms provide anonymity, trust-building, and social interaction for users.
A mixed-methods approach, including content analysis and in-depth interviews, was adopted. Content analysis involved examining posts on university confession pages over a specific period, categorizing themes such as anonymity, trust, and self-confidence. In-depth interviews were conducted with seven university students who actively use confession pages to explore their communication experiences on these platforms.
Findings indicate that confession pages serve as a source of entertainment, social information, and anonymous sharing for individuals. Participants emphasized that expressing thoughts anonymously is liberating while also reinforcing their sense of social belonging. However, anonymity can sometimes challenge ethical boundaries and lead to negative outcomes such as cyberbullying. In conclusion, the conscious use of digital platforms is crucial for fostering healthy online interactions.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Generation Z, Confession Pages, University Confession Pages, New Forms of Communication, Content Analysis
Destekleyen Kurum
TÜBİTAK
Proje Numarası
1919B012332790
Etik Beyan
The IUC Social and Humanities Research Ethics Committee unanimously decided that the study is ethically appropriate in its meeting dated 05.11.2024.
Kaynakça
- Bayram, P. (2016). Kentteki yabancıların sosyal medya aracılığıyla bir araya gelişi: “Muğla itiraf” adlı Facebook sayfası üzerine bir örnek olay analizi. İnsan& İnsan, 5(23), 6-22. Bayram, S. (2016). Dijital platformlarda kimlik inşası: Sosyal medya etkileşimlerinin sosyolojik analizi. Beta Yayınları.
- Boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
- Christopherson, K. M. (2007). The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog.” Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 3038-3056.
- Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
- Fatima, Z. (2016). Negotiating Masculinity through Language: The Case of Pakistani Facebook Confession Pages. Journal of Gender & Social Issues, 15(2), 69–91.
- Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
- Geonzon, C., Gerasmio, A., Lanos, K., Salvan, F., & Tagaytay, M. M. (2016). Portals of Institutional Culture: University Confession Pages in Focus. UIC Research Journal, 20(2).
- Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192.
- Kadakal, A. Alver, B. 2017. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin İletişim Becerilerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 2(2), 1-20.
- Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Sage.
