Yeni Nesil Öğrencilerin Öz Eğitiminde Özgürlük ve Öz Liderlik İşbirliği: Özgürleştiren Liderlik

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 32 - 41, 31.12.2020

Mustafa Fidan

Öz

Bu literatür taramasında bireyin özüne odaklanılmıştır. Özgürlük ve öz liderlik alan yazınları öz eğitim, özgüven, öz yeterlik, kendini gerçekleştirme ve değişim kavramlarıyla birlikte derinlemesine incelenmiştir. Özgürlük ve öz liderlik kavramlarının bireylerin öz süreçlerini destekleme bağlamında kesişmekte olduğu görülmüştür. Bu kesişen bağlamda, öz liderliğin özgürleştiren yönü vurgulanmıştır. Çalışmanın temeli, bireyin özüne yapılan yatırımların bireye çok yönlü kazanımlar sağladığı gerçeğidir. Dolayısıyla öz liderliği desteklemenin özgürlüğü desteklemek anlamına geldiği ortaya konulmaktadır. Çalışma sonucunda, öz liderliğin bireysel özgürlük bağlamında çözümler sunabileceği ve öz liderliğe yatırım yapılması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

özgürlük, öz liderlik, özgüven, öz eğitim, kendini gerçekleştirme, özgürleştiren liderlik

Kaynakça

• Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilties. In Distance Learners in Higher Education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes. Madison, Wi.: Atwood.
• Arısoy, Ö. (2009). İnternet bağımlılığı ve tedavisi. Psikiyatride güncel yaklaşımlar, 1(1), 55-67.
• Balcı, A. (2011). The Changing Context of Educational Administration and its Effects on Educational Administration Postgraduate Programmes. Education and Science, 36(162). 196-219.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
• Bandura, A. (2010). Self‐efficacy. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1(3), 1-65.
• Beck, U. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences (Vol. 13). Sage.
• Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. The quarterly journal of economics, 117(3), 871-915.
• Bowen, H. R. (1977). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. Transaction Publishers. Bryman, A. E. (1992). Charisma and Leadership in Organizations. London: Sage.
• Burnette, D. M. (2015). NEGOTIATING THE MINE FIELD: Strategies for Effective Online Education Administrative Leadership in Higher Education Institutions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(3).
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
• Croy, M. J. (1998). Distance education, individualization, and the demise of the university. Technology in society, 20(3), 317-326.
• Dickinson, G., & Clark, K. M. (1975). Learning orientations and participation in self-education and continuing education. Adult Education, 26(1), 3-15.
• Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., Kim, D. H. ve Yammarino, F. J. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 6–35.
• Earley, P. (2020). Surviving, thriving and reviving in leadership: The personal and professional development needs of educational leaders. Management in Education,
• Feltz, D. L. (2007). Self-confidence and sports performance. studies, 33(41), 50-66.
• Fidan, M. Lider takipçi ilişkisi bağlamında liderliğin tarihsel evrimi ve kadın liderliği. İstanbul Üniversitesi Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, (19), 53-70.
• Flood, R. L. (1990). Liberating systems theory. In Liberating Systems Theory (pp. 11-32). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Francis, R. (2012). The decentring of the traditional university: The future of (self) education in virtually figured worlds. Routledge.
• Furtner, M. R., Baldegger, U., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2013). Leading yourself and leading others: Linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 436-449.
• Gadamer, H. G. (2001). Education is self‐education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(4), 529-538.
• Gutmann, A., & Ben‐Porath, S. (2014). Democratic education. The encyclopedia of political thought, 863-875.
• Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and higher education, 3(1-2), 41-61.
• Honneth, A. (2004). Organized self-realization: Some paradoxes of individualization. European journal of social theory, 7(4), 463-478.
• Horney, K. (1991). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. WW Norton & Company.
• Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: when should self-leadership be encouraged?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.
• Houtman, D., Aupers, S., & De Koster, W. (2011). Paradoxes of individualization: Social control and social conflict in contemporary modernity. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..
• Janfada, M., & Beckett, D. G. (2019). Leading the self, cultivating wisdom: a neo-Aristotelian perspective on experiential learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(3), 334-345.
• Kelan, E. K., & Wratil, P. (2018). Post‐heroic leadership, tempered radicalism and senior leaders as change agents for gender equality. European Management Review, 15(1), 5-18.
• Lambert, L., Zimmerman, D. P., & Gardner, M. E. (2016). Liberating leadership capacity: Pathways to educational wisdom. Teachers College Press.
• Lears, T. J. (2000). From salvation to self-realization: Advertising and the therapeutic roots of the consumer culture, 1880-1930. Advertising & Society Review, 1(1).
• Levine, M. (2012). A mind at a time: How every child can succeed. Simon and Schuster.
• Lussier, R. N. & Achua, C. F. (2010) Leadership: theory, application ve skill development, Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P. (1991). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 18-35.
• Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585-600.
• Manz, C. C. (2015). Taking the self-leadership high road: Smooth surface or potholes ahead?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 132-151.
• Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5, 361-367.
• Maslow, A. (1965). Self-actualization and beyond. 06.06.2020 tarihinde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED012056.pdf adresinden erişildi. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
• Meade, C. P. (2019). Leadership alive: Changing leadership practices in the emerging 21st century culture. Leadership Alive, Inc..
• Mill, J. S. (1966). On liberty. In A selection of his works (pp. 1-147). Palgrave, London.
• Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
• Morrison, A. (2008). ‘I can’t do any more education’: class, individualisation and educational decision‐making. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 60(4), 349-362.
• Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 270-295.
• Neck, C. P., Manz, C. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2019). Self-leadership: The definitive guide to personal excellence. Sage Publications.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2009). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.
• Pautler, S. E., Tan, J. K., Dugas, G. R., Pus, N., Ferri, M., Hardie, W. R., & Chin, J. L. (2001). Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology, 57(2), 230-233.
• Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Clarendon Press.
• Picard, H., & Islam, G. (2020). ‘Free to Do What I Want’? Exploring the ambivalent effects of liberating leadership. Organization Studies, 41(3), 393-414.
• Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.
• Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Corwin Press.
• Shuklina, E. A. (2001). Technologies of self-education: The sociological aspect. Russian Education & Society, 43(4), 57-78.
• Sung, Y., Nam, T. H., & Hwang, M. H. (2020). Attachment style, stressful events, and Internet gaming addiction in Korean university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 154.
• Torbert, W. R. (1978). Educating toward shared purpose, self-direction and quality work: The theory and practice of liberating structure. The Journal of Higher Education, 49(2), 109-135.
• Whinston, A. B. (2020). Reengineering education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 6(3), 1.
• Williams, S. (1997). Personality and self-leadership. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 139-155.
• Xia, X. (2020). Thoughts on the Mixed Learning Model of College Mathematics SPOC Based on the Concept of “Internet Plus Education”. In 5th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2019) (pp. 1175-1177). Atlantis Press.
• Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (Seventh Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education
• Zborovskii, G. E., & Shuklina, E. A. (1998). Self-education as a sociological problem. Russian Education & Society, 40(10), 65-81.