Eğitimde Oyunlaştırma Uygulamaları” Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

eknolojik yeniliklerle geliştirilen oyunlaştırma, eğitim sistemlerini geliştirmek ve öğrencileri motive etmek için kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Öğrencileri motive etmek için önemli bir potansiyele sahip olan oyunlaştırma öğrenciler için çok cazip hale gelmiştir. Eğitsel oyunlaştırma uygulamalarının artması ile çalışmaların sayısı da artış göstermektedir. Oyun bağımlılığına bağlı olarak geliştirilen ölçeklerin olduğu bilinmesine rağmen, öğrencilerin oyunlaştırma yaklaşımı ve eğitimsel kullanımı hakkındaki bilgileri arttırmak için öğrencilerin bu yaklaşımla ilgili görüşlerini belirlemek gerekmektedir. Literatür incelendiğinde, oyunlaştırmanın öğrencilerin derslere yönelik motivasyon ve ilgi düzeylerini geliştirdiği söylense de, literatürde bu amaçla bir ölçek geliştirilmediği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğrencilerin oyunlaştırma uygulaması kullanarak öğrenim gördükleri bir eğitim süreci hakkındaki görüşlerini belirlemek için uygun bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Bu amaç kapsamında yapılan literatür taraması sonucunda eğitimde oyunlaştırma uygulamaları için olması gereken özellikler belirlenmiştir. Oyunlaştırma uygulamalarının eğitsel amaçlı kullanımına yönelik geliştirilmesi amaçlanan ölçek için 38 ifadelik madde havuzu oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören ve oyunlaştırma uygulamalarını eğitsel amaçlı kullanan öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik testleri için veriler 360 öğrenciden elde edilmiştir. Geri dönüş oranı % 97.2 olan uygulamadan sonra 350 kullanılabilir veri elde edilmiştir. Varimax analizi sonucunda, sadece bir faktörün olduğu belirlenmiştir.Ölçeğe eklenecek maddeler seçilirken madde toplam korelasyon katsayısının .30’dan yüksek olmasına dikkat edilmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık güvenilirliği .986 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu analize dayanarak, oyunlaştırma sürecinde öğrencilerin görüşlerini belirleme ölçeğinin güvenilir olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin eğitimde oyunlaştırma uygulamalarının kullanımına yönelik görüşlerini belirleme amaçlı ölçek kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Oyunlaştırma,uygulama,ölçek,geçerlik,güvenirlik

Validity and Reliability of the “Gamification Applications in Education” Scale

Öz

With the growth of suitable applications for the gamification approach, it has becoming increasingly used in education. Although it is known that there are scales that have been developed depending on game dependency, it is necessary to determine the opinions of students about this approach in order to increase the information about the students' approach to gamification and its educational use. When the literature is examined, it is found that, although it is mentioned that gamification improves the motivation and interest levels of the students towards lectures, no scale has been developed for this purpose. The aim of this research is to develop a scale to determine the opinions of the students on an educational process in which the learning is provided by using a gamification application. As a result of the literature review made within the scope of this overall aim, characteristics which should be suitable for the gamification applications in education were determined. Stratified random sampling is a process in which certain sub groups are selected for the sample in the same proportion as they exist in the population. Data for the tests of reliability and validity were obtained from a sample of 360 students. As a result of Varimax analysis, it has been determined that it is only has one factor. The internal consistency reliability of the scale is calculated as .986. Based on this analysis, it has been determined that the scale for determining the opinions of students during the gamification process is reliable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gamification,application,scale,validity,reliability

Kaynakça

1. 5mid, 2016. Retrived on 08 February 2017 from: http://5mid.com/lol/league-of-legends-100-milyon-oyuncusayisina-ulasti/ Akın, A., Usta, F., Başa, E., & Özçelik, B. (2016). Oyun bağımlılığı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (1), 223-232.
2. Alpar, R. (2010), Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik- Güvenirlik, Birinci Baskı, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
3. Aristolog, Retrived 4 May 2017 from: www.aristolog.com
4. Aytekin, B. A. (2016). Bilgisayar Destekli Eğitimde Teknolojik Kolaylaştırıcı Olarak Facebook Platformu ve Avantajları. International Multilingual Academic Journal, 1(1).
5. Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., Sommer, M., et al. (2014). Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 32(7), 694–697.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006), Veri Analizi El Kitabı, 6. Baskı, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
7. Christy, K. R., & Fox, J. (2014). Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women’s math performance. Computers & Education, 78, 66–77.
8. Dalpiaz, F., Snijders, R., Brinkkemper, S., Hosseini, M., Shahri, A., & Ali, R. (2017). Engaging the Crowd of Stakeholders in Requirements Engineering via Gamification. In Gamification (pp. 123-135). Springer International Publishing.

9. de-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., & Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education, 75, 82–91.
10. Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. In Proceedings of CHI 2013: Changing perspectives, Paris, France, April 27–May 2, 2013 (pp. 763–772).
11. Deterding, S., Bjork, S., Nacke, L. E., Dixon, D., & Lawley, E. (2013). Designing Gamification: Creating gameful and playful experiences. In CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts (pp. 3263e3266). New York: ACM Press
12. Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes, Computers & Education, 63, pp. 380--392.
13. Durualp, E., & Aral RAL, N . ( 2011). Oyun temelli sosyal beceri eğitimi. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık
14. Farzan et al., (2008a). R. Farzan, J.M. DiMicco, D.R. Millen, B. Brownholtz, W. Geyer, C. Dugan When the experiment is over: Deploying an incentive system to all the users Symposium on Persuasive Technology, Aberdeen, Scotland, April, 2008 (2008).
15. Farzan et al., (2008b). R. Farzan, J.M. DiMicco, D.R. Millen, B. Brownholtz, W. Geyer, C. Dugan Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008 (2008), pp. 563–572.
16. Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. (2011). Encouraging user participation in a course recommender system: An impact on user behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 276–284.
17. Filsecker, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the effects of external rewards on elementary students’ motivation, engagement and learning in an educational game. Computers & Education, 75, 136– 148.
18. Fraenkel, R. J. & Wallen, E. N. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGrawHill. Guler, C., & Guler, E. (2015). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamlarında Oyunlaştırma: Rozet Kullanımı. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching. 4(3). 125-130.
19. Gürbüztürk, O. & Şad, S. N. (2010). Turkish parental involvement scale: Validity and reliability studies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2: 487-491.
20. Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Empirical study on the effect of achievement badges in TRAKLA2 online learning environment. In Proceedings of learning and teaching in computing and engineering (LaTiCE) conference, Macau, March 21–24, 2013 (pp. 47–54).
21. Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming Homo economicus into Homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 236–245.
22. Hamari, J. (2015). Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers in Human Behavior.
23. Heilbrunn, B., Herzig, P., & Schill, A. (2017). Gamification Analytics—Methods and Tools for Monitoring and Adapting Gamification Designs. In Gamification (pp. 31-47). Springer International Publishing.
24. Johnson, B. & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the constructivist learning environment survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7: 65-80.
25. Kiryakova, G., Angelova, N., & Yordanova, L. (2014). Gamification in education. Proceedings of 9th International Balkan Education and Science Conference.
26. Kline, P. (1994), An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis, London: Routledge.
27. Küçük, S., & Şişman, B. (2017). Birebir Robotik Öğretiminde Öğreticilerin Deneyimleri. İlköğretim Online, 16(1). ISO 690
28. Lee, J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
29. Lee, J. J., Ceyhan, P., Jordan-Cooley, W., & Sung, W. (2013). GREENIFY: A real-world action game for climate change education. Simulation & Gaming, 1046878112470539.
30. Lounis, S., Pramatari, K., & Theotokis, A. (2014). Gamification is all about fun: The role of incentive type and community collaboration.
31. Lyons, S . (December 10, 2012). “League of Legends has 32 million monthly active players”. Retrieved February 28, 2017 from: http://www.destructoid.com/league-of-legends-has-32-millionmonthly-active-players236618.phtml Markets and Markets. (2016). Gamification market by solution (consumer driven and enterprise driven), applications (sales and marketing), deployment type (On-Premises and cloud), user type (large enterprise, SMBs), industry and region - global forecast to 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2016, from http://www. marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/gamification-market-991.html.
32. Meske, C., Brockmann, T., Wilms, K., & Stieglitz, S. (2017). Social Collaboration and Gamification. In Gamification (pp. 93-109). Springer International Publishing.
33. Mora, A., Riera, D., Gonzalez, C., & Arnedo-Moreno, J. (2015, September). A literature review of gamification design frameworks. In Games and virtual worlds for serious applications (VS-Games), 2015 7th international conference on (pp. 1e8). IEEE.
34. Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2016). Gamification in crowdsourcing: A review. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA, January 5-8, 2016.
35. Morschheuser, B., Werder, K., Hamari, J., & Abe, J. (2017). How to gamify? A method for designing gamification. In Proceedings of the 50th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (hicss), Hawaii, USA, January 4-7, 2017.
36. Nacke, L. E., & Deterding, S. (2017). The maturing of gamification research.
37. Ozdamli, F. (2009). A cultural adaptation study of multimedia course materials forum to Turkish. World Journal on Educational Technology, 1(1). Retrieved July 26, 2010, from http://www.world-educationcenter.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/123
38. See, L. J. (1951). Cronbach: Coefficient alhpa and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297-334.
39. Sharma S, (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques, John Wiley Sonc Inc, New York, 116.
40. Sheldon, L. (2011). The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game. Boston:Cengage Learning. Siemon, D., & Eckardt, L. (2017). Gamification of Teaching in Higher Education. In Gamification (pp. 153-164). Springer International Publishing.
41. Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353.
42. Thiel, S. K., & Fröhlich, P. (2017). Gamification as Motivation to Engage in Location-Based Public Participation?. In Progress in Location-Based Services 2016 (pp. 399-421). Springer International Publishing.
43. Thom, J., Millen, D., & DiMicco, J. (2012). Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1067-1070). ACM
44. Tsai, C. C. & Liu, S. Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science, International Journal of Science Education, 27(13): 1621-1638.
45. Tuan, H. L., Chang, H. P., Wang, K. H. & Treagust, D. F. (2000). The development of an Instrument for assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge, International Journal of Science Education, 22(4): 385- 398.
46. Tudof, 2016. www.tudof.org, 04.05.2016.
47. van Roy, R., & Zaman, B. (2017). Autonomously Motivating Gamification in Education: an Explorative Study. World Government Summit, 2016. Gamification and the Future of Education. Retrived 8 February 2017 from: https://worldgovernmentsummit.org/api/publications/document?id=2b0d6ac4-e97c-6578-b2f8- ff0000a7ddb6
48. Xu, F., Buhalis, D., & Weber, J. (2017). Serious games and the gamification of tourism. Tourism Management, 60, 244-256.
49. Yasar, S., & Anagün,S.S. (2009). Reliability and Validity Studies of the Science and Technology Course Scientific Attitude Scale. Turkish Science Education 6(2), 43-54.
50. Yıldırım, İ., & Demir, S. (2016). Students’ Views About Gamification Based Curriculum for the Lesson of “Teaching Principles and Methods”. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 6(11).