An Idealist Immaterialist: George Berkeley

Öz

George Berkeley is one of the most important thinkers of British empiricist tradition and the Enlightenment. He who was a philosopher and cleric sought a life after his ideals; he placed immaterialism, which has been subject to fierce criticism not only during his lifetime but also after him, in the center of his system of thought and spent efforts to make it understood. In this article, we will try to state how this view of Berkeley who is a unique and passionate idealist has shaped the immaterialist thought. We will also examine how his view of the abstract concepts of religion, morality and God that are the main elements of his immaterialism have influenced his thought. We will also try to discover whether he is an idealist or immaterialist, or he anticipated an immaterialism that includes idealism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Locke
• Berkeley
• İmmaterialism
• İdealism
• Occasionalism
• God
• Religion and Morals

İDEALİST BİR MATERYALİST: GEORGE BERKELEY

Öz

George Berkeley, İngiliz deneyci geleneğinin ve aydınlanma düşüncesinin en önemli düşünürlerinden birisidir. İdealleri uğruna yaşamış bir filozof ve din adamı olarak Berkeley, immateryalizm gibi, gerek kendi zamanında gerekse sonrasında oldukça ciddi eleştirilere maruz kalmış bir kavramı, düşünce dünyasının merkezine yerleştirmiş ve ömrü boyunca da onun anlaşılması için çaba sarfetmiştir. Biz bu makalemizde, düşünce tarihinin en önemli idealistlerinden biri olan kabul edilen Berkeley’in, bu kendine has ve tutkulu bakış açısının immateryalist düşünceyi nasıl şekillendirdiğini ortaya koyacağız. Bu arada onun immateryalizminin ana unsurları olan din, ahlak, Tanrı ve soyut kavramlara dair görüşlerinin, düşüncesindeki etkilerinin görülmesini sağlayacağız. En önemlisi ise onun, sadece bir idealist mi yoksa bir immateryalist mi olduğu, ya da idealizmi içinde barındıran bir immateryalizmi öngörüp öngörmediğini irdelemeye çalışacağız.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Locke
• Berkeley
• İmmateryalizm
• idealizm
• Okazyonalizm
• Tanrı
• Din ve Ahlak

Kaynakça

1. • A.C. Grayling, “Berkeley’s argument for immaterialism”, The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, ed. Kenneth P.Winkler, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-2005.
2. • Acton, H.B., “George Berkeley”, Maxmillian Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2. Edition, c. I, 2006.
3. • Açıköz, H.Mustafa, Berkeley ve İmmateryalist Metafiziği, Elis Yayınları, Ankara-2003.
4. • Avramide, Anita, Other Minds, Routledge, Oxon-2000.
5. • Bennett, Jonathan, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Central Themes, Oxford University Press, 7.baskı, Oxford-1991
6. • Berkeley, George, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, (içinde), J.B.Lippincott&Co, Philadelphia-1881.
7. • ………………….., “An Essay Towards Preventing the Ruin of Great Britain”, The Works of George Berkeley (içinde), vol.III, Londra-1820
8. • ………………….., Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher, ed. David Berman, Routledge, London and Newyork-1993.

9. • ………………….., Hylas ile Philonous Arasında Üç Konuşma, ter. K.Sahir Sel, Sosyal Yayınlar, 1996.
10. • …………………..., “Siris: A Chain of Philosophical Reflection and Inquiries Concerning The Virtues of Tar Water”, The Works of George Berkeley (içinde) vol. III, London-1820.
11. • …………………..., İnsan Bilgisinin İlkeleri Üzerine, çev: Halil Turan, Bilim ve Sanat, Ankara-1996.
12. • Broadie, Alexander, “Roger Bacon”, The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, ed. Ted Honderich, Oxford, Oxford Universitiy Press, Oxford-1995.
13. • Brown, Stuart, “The Critical Reception of Malebranche” The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche, ed. Steven Nadler, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-2006
14. • Burnyeat, M.F., “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed” The Philosophical Review, , XCI, No:1, 1982.
15. • Caffentzis, G.C., “Locke, Berkeley and Hume as Phisophers of Money”, George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment, ed: Silvia Parigi, Springer, 2010
16. • Cevizci, Ahmet, Felsefe Tarihi, Say Yayınları, 5.baskı, İstanbul-2014
17. • Cummins, Philips D., “Berkeley on minds and agency”, The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, ed. Kenneth P.Winkler, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-2005.
18. • David Berman, “Introduction”, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher, (içinde) ed. David Berman, Routledge, London and Newyork-1993.
19. • Fogelin, Robert J., Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge, Routledge, New York, 2005.
20. • …………………., Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge, Routledge-2003
21. • Franck, Richard, Modern Philosophy the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, Routledge, London,-2004.
22. • Fraser, Alexander Campbell, “George Berkeley”, The Works of George Berkeley, ed. A.C.Fraser, Oxford-1901.
23. • Garrett, Aaron, Berkeley’s Three Dialogues, Continuum International Publishing, London-2008
24. • h t t p : / / o n l i n e b o o k s . l i b r a r y . u p e n n . e d u / w e b b i n / b o o k / lookupname?key=Berkeley%2C%20George%2C%201685-1753, 30.10.2014.
25. • http://tigger.uic.edu/~hilbert/Images%20of%20Berkeley/Berk_life.htm 30.10.2014
26. • Jolley, Nicholas, “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition, Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, ed. J.A Cover; Mark Kulstad, Hackett Publishing Company, 1990
27. • Krauth, Charles P., “Prolegomena”, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, (içinde), J.B.Lippincott&Co, Philadelphia-1881.
28. • Locke, J. Locke, İnsan Anlığı Üzerine Bir Deneme çev. Vehbi Hacıkadiroğlu, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul-1996.
29. • Muehlmann, Robert, Berkeley’s Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive and Critical Essays, Penn State Press, Pennsylvania-2010
30. • Robert, John Russell, A Metaphysics for Mob, The Philosophy of George Berkeley, Oxford University Press, Oxford-2007.
31. • The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy and Philosophers, ed. J.O. Urmson, Hawthorn Books Inc, New York-1990
32. • Timuçin, Afşar, Düşünce Tarihi, BDS Yayınları, İstanbul-1992.
33. • Winkler, Kenneth. P., “Introduction”, The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, ed. Kenneth P.Winkler, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-2005.
34. • ………………, “The New Hume”, The Philosophical Review, vol.100, no:4, 1991.