Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

HİSSE SENEDİ PRİMİ BULMACASININ ÇÖZÜMÜ

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 612 - 631, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1124492

Öz

Bu çalışma, hisse senedi primi bulmacasının çözümünü sunmaktadır. Yeni model, daha önce yapılan çalışmalarda yatırımcıların finansal piyasalarda riske yönelik davranışlarına yer verilerek geliştirilmiştir. Yeni test edilen bu modele dair hesaplamalar, sübjektif zaman iskonto değerinin 0.99 olduğu varsayıldığında, göreceli riskten kaçınma katsayısının değerinin 1.033526 olduğunu göstermektedir Ayrıca, risksiz varlıklara yatırım yapan yatırımcılar belirsiz bir servet değeri için negatif fayda tahsis ederken, hisse senetlerine yatırım yapanlar, yatırımcıların riske yönelik davranışlarının belirlendiği yıl olarak otomatik olarak seçilen 1977'de belirsiz bir servet değeri için pozitif fayda tahsis etmektedirler. Sözü edilen yukarıdaki değerler, mevcut ampirik çalışmalarla uyumlu olduğundan; hisse senedi primi bulmacasına çözüm sağlayan yeni geliştirilmiş modelin geçerliliğini doğrulamaktadırlar.

Kaynakça

  • ABEL, A. B. (1990). Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses (No.w3279). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w3279
  • AIYAGARI, S. R., & GERTLER, M. (1991). Asset returns with transactions costs and uninsured individual risk. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27(3), 311-331.
  • ALVAREZ, F., & JERMANN, U. J. (2000). Efficiency, equilibrium, and asset pricing with risk of default. Econometrica, 68(4), 775-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00137
  • ATTANASIO, O. P., BANKS, J., & TANNER, S. (2002). Asset holding and consumption volatility. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 771-792. https://doi.org/10.1086/340774.
  • BANSAL, R., & COLEMAN, W. J. (1996). A monetary explanation of the equity premium, term premium, and risk-free rate puzzles. Journal of Political Economy, 104(6), 1135–1171. https://doi.org/10.1086/262056.
  • BENARTZI, S., & THALER, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118511.
  • BRAV, A., CONSTANTINIDES, G. M., & GECZY, C. C. (2002). Asset pricing with heterogeneous consumers and limited participation: Empirical evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1086/340776.
  • BROWN, S. J., GOETZMANN, W. N., & ROSS, S. A. (1995). Survival. The Journal of Finance, 50(3), 853-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04039.x
  • CAMPBELL, J. Y., & COCHRANE, J. H. (1999). By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), 205–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/250059
  • COCHRANE, J. H. (2009). Asset pricing: Revised edition. Princeton university press.
  • CONSTANTINIDES, G. M. (1990). Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle. Journal of Political Economy, 98(3), 519-543. https://doi.org/10.1086/261693 CONSTANTINIDES, G. M., & DUFFIE, D. (1996). Asset pricing with heterogeneous consumers. Journal of Political economy, 104(2), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1086/262023
  • CONSTANTINIDES, G. M., DONALDSON, J. B., & MEHRA, R. (2002). Junior can't borrow: A new perspective on the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399508
  • DANTHINE, J. P., & DONALDSON, J. B. (2014). Intermediate Financial Theory (3rd ed.). Academic press.
  • EPSTEIN, L. G., & ZIN, S. E. (1991). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1086/261750
  • GABAIX, X., & LAIBSON, D. (2001). The 6D bias and the equity-premium puzzle. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 16, 257–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/654447
  • HEATON, J. (1995). An empirical investigation of asset pricing with temporally dependent preference specifications. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 681–717. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171913
  • HEATON, J., & LUCAS, D. J. (1996). Evaluating the effects of incomplete markets on risk sharing and asset pricing. Journal of Political Economy, 104(3), 443–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/262030
  • HEATON, J., & LUCAS, D. (1997). Market frictions, savings behavior, and portfolio choice. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1(1), 76–101.
  • LYNCH, A. W. (1996). Decision frequency and synchronization across agents: Implications for aggregate consumption and equity return. The Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1479–1497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04076.x
  • MANKIW, N. G. (1986). The equity premium and the concentration of aggregate shocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(1), 211–219.
  • MCGRATTAN, E. R., & PRESCOTT, E. C. (2001). Taxes, regulations, and asset prices (No. w8623). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w8623
  • MEHRA, R., & PRESCOTT, E. C. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2), 145-161.
  • MEHRA, R. (2003). The equity premium: Why is it a puzzle? (No. w9512). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w9512
  • MEHRA, R. (2008). Handbook of the equity risk premium. Elsevier.
  • MUNK, C. (2013). Financial asset pricing theory. OUP Oxford.
  • RIETZ, T. A. (1988). The equity risk premium: a solution. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 117–131.

SOLUTION TO THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 612 - 631, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1124492

Öz

This study provides the solution to the equity premium puzzle. The new model was developed by including the behavior of investors toward risk in financial markets in prior studies. The calculations of this newly tested model show that the value of the coefficient of relative risk aversion is 1.033526 by assuming the value of the subjective time discount factor to be 0.99. Furthermore, investors investing in risk-free asset allocate negative utility for an uncertain wealth value, while those investing in equity allocate positive utility for an uncertain wealth value in 1977 that is automatically selected as the year for the determination of the behavior of investors toward risk. Since the above mentioned values are compatible with the existing empirical studies, they confirm the validity of the newly derived model that provides the solution to the equity premium puzzle.

Kaynakça

  • ABEL, A. B. (1990). Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses (No.w3279). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w3279
  • AIYAGARI, S. R., & GERTLER, M. (1991). Asset returns with transactions costs and uninsured individual risk. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27(3), 311-331.
  • ALVAREZ, F., & JERMANN, U. J. (2000). Efficiency, equilibrium, and asset pricing with risk of default. Econometrica, 68(4), 775-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00137
  • ATTANASIO, O. P., BANKS, J., & TANNER, S. (2002). Asset holding and consumption volatility. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 771-792. https://doi.org/10.1086/340774.
  • BANSAL, R., & COLEMAN, W. J. (1996). A monetary explanation of the equity premium, term premium, and risk-free rate puzzles. Journal of Political Economy, 104(6), 1135–1171. https://doi.org/10.1086/262056.
  • BENARTZI, S., & THALER, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118511.
  • BRAV, A., CONSTANTINIDES, G. M., & GECZY, C. C. (2002). Asset pricing with heterogeneous consumers and limited participation: Empirical evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1086/340776.
  • BROWN, S. J., GOETZMANN, W. N., & ROSS, S. A. (1995). Survival. The Journal of Finance, 50(3), 853-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04039.x
  • CAMPBELL, J. Y., & COCHRANE, J. H. (1999). By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), 205–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/250059
  • COCHRANE, J. H. (2009). Asset pricing: Revised edition. Princeton university press.
  • CONSTANTINIDES, G. M. (1990). Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle. Journal of Political Economy, 98(3), 519-543. https://doi.org/10.1086/261693 CONSTANTINIDES, G. M., & DUFFIE, D. (1996). Asset pricing with heterogeneous consumers. Journal of Political economy, 104(2), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1086/262023
  • CONSTANTINIDES, G. M., DONALDSON, J. B., & MEHRA, R. (2002). Junior can't borrow: A new perspective on the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399508
  • DANTHINE, J. P., & DONALDSON, J. B. (2014). Intermediate Financial Theory (3rd ed.). Academic press.
  • EPSTEIN, L. G., & ZIN, S. E. (1991). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1086/261750
  • GABAIX, X., & LAIBSON, D. (2001). The 6D bias and the equity-premium puzzle. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 16, 257–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/654447
  • HEATON, J. (1995). An empirical investigation of asset pricing with temporally dependent preference specifications. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 681–717. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171913
  • HEATON, J., & LUCAS, D. J. (1996). Evaluating the effects of incomplete markets on risk sharing and asset pricing. Journal of Political Economy, 104(3), 443–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/262030
  • HEATON, J., & LUCAS, D. (1997). Market frictions, savings behavior, and portfolio choice. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1(1), 76–101.
  • LYNCH, A. W. (1996). Decision frequency and synchronization across agents: Implications for aggregate consumption and equity return. The Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1479–1497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04076.x
  • MANKIW, N. G. (1986). The equity premium and the concentration of aggregate shocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(1), 211–219.
  • MCGRATTAN, E. R., & PRESCOTT, E. C. (2001). Taxes, regulations, and asset prices (No. w8623). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w8623
  • MEHRA, R., & PRESCOTT, E. C. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2), 145-161.
  • MEHRA, R. (2003). The equity premium: Why is it a puzzle? (No. w9512). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w9512
  • MEHRA, R. (2008). Handbook of the equity risk premium. Elsevier.
  • MUNK, C. (2013). Financial asset pricing theory. OUP Oxford.
  • RIETZ, T. A. (1988). The equity risk premium: a solution. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 117–131.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Finans
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Atilla Aras 0000-0002-7727-9797

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 31 Aralık 2022
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 11 Haziran 2022
Kabul Tarihi 7 Ekim 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Aras, A. (2022). SOLUTION TO THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE. Finans Ekonomi Ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(4), 612-631. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1124492