Reflections of Argumentation-Based Learning on Achievement and Attitudes of 6th Grade Middle School Students Towards Density in Science Course

Öz

This study aims to examine the effect of argumentation-based activities on 6th grade students' academic achievement and attitudes towards science course on “Density”. The study was designed with a quasi-experimental design and included 23 experimental (EG) and 27 control (CG) group students from a middle school in Elazığ. While activities based on the Toulmin Argumentation Model (prediction-observation-explanation, peer assessment) were applied in the EGR, traditional methods were used in the CGR. Data were collected using an academic achievement test and a valid and reliable attitude scale developed by the researcher. Independent samples t-test results showed that there was an increase in the posttest scores of both groups; however, the increase in the CSR group was not statistically significant, while the increase in the DGR group was significant; there was a difference between the test scores of the groups in favor of DGR, but the difference between the pre-test scores was not statistically significant, while the difference between the post-test scores was significant. It was observed that there was an increase in the posttest scores of CSR students' attitudes towards science course methods and techniques, associating the course with daily life, attitudes towards course content and general attitudes towards science course, but this increase was not statistically significant; whereas there was an increase in the posttest scores of DGR students as in CSR students and this increase was statistically significant. The results of the study reveal that argumentation-based learning supports academic achievement and attitude positively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Argumentation
• Science Education
• Intensity
• Academic Achievement

Ortaokul 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Yoğunluk Konusuna Yönelik Argümantasyon Tabanlı Öğrenmenin Fen Dersindeki Başarı ve Tutumlara Yansımaları

Öz

Bu çalışma, argümantasyon temelli etkinliklerin 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin "Yoğunluk" konusundaki akademik başarıları ve fen bilimleri dersine yönelik tutumları üzerindeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yarı deneysel desenle tasarlanan araştırmada, Elazığ’da bir ortaokulda öğrenim gören 23 deney (DGR) ve 27 kontrol (KGR) grubu öğrencisi yer almıştır. DGR’de Toulmin Argümantasyon Modeli’ne dayalı etkinlikler (tahmin-gözlem-açıklama, akran değerlendirmesi) uygulanırken, KGR’de geleneksel yöntemler kullanılmıştır. Veriler, araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen akademik başarı testi ve geçerli-güvenilir tutum ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Bağımsız örneklemler t-testi sonuçları her iki grubun sontest puanlarında bir artışın olduğunu; ancak KGR grubundaki artışın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde değilken, DGR grubundaki artışın anlamlı düzeyde olduğunu; grupların test puanları arasında DGR lehine bir farklılığın olduğunu ancak öntest puanları arasındaki farklılığın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde değilken sontest puanları arasındaki farklılığın anlamlı düzeyde olduğunu göstermektedir. KGR öğrencilerinin fen bilimleri dersi yöntem ve tekniklerine, dersi günlük yaşamla ilişkilendirme ve ders içeriğine yönelik tutumları ile fen bilimleri dersine yönelik genel tutumları son test puanlarında bir artış olduğu ve bu artışın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde olmadığı; DGR öğrencilerinin ise son test puanlarında KGR öğrencilerinde olduğu gibi bir artışın olduğu ve bu artışın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırma sonuçları, argümantasyon temelli öğrenmenin akademik başarıyı ve tutumu olumlu yönde desteklediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Argümantasyon
• Fen Eğitimi
• Yoğunluk
• akademik başarı
• tutum

Kaynakça

1. Acar, O. N. (2016, 20–23 Nisan). Dijital çağda yeni medya okuryazarlığının gerekliliği [The necessity of new media literacy in the digital age] [Tam metin bildiri]. 2. Uluslararası Medya Çalışmaları Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı (ss. 841–853), Sakarya, Türkiye. https://www.academia.edu/37335817/D%C4%B0J%C4%B0TAL_%C3%87A%C4%9EDA_YEN%C4%B0_MEDYA_OKUYAZARLI%C4%9EININ_GEREKL%C4%B0L%C4%B0%C4%9E%C4%B0
2. Akçay, A. ve Altun, A. (2020). Hata ayıklama performansı testi geliştirme: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Test development for debugging performance: validity and reliability study]. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3), 667-685. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.815922
3. Allchin, D. ve Zemplén, G. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: epistemics and whole science. Science Education, 104, 907-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589
4. Alpar, R. (2014). Spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik güvenirlik [Applied statistics and validity and reliability with examples from sports, health and education sciences] (3. baskı). Detay Yayıncılık.
5. Aydın, Ö. ve Kaptan, F. (2014). Fen-teknoloji öğretmen adaylarının eğitiminde argümantasyon biliş üstü ve mantıksal düşünme becerilerine etkisi ve argümantasyona ilişkin görüşleri [The effect of argumentation on metacognitive and logical thinking skills of pre-service science-technology teachers and their views on argumentation]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 4(2), 164-188. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ebader/issue/44715/555659
6. Başol, G. (2015). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
7. Batari, N. ve Rusmini, R. (2023). The effectiveness of student worksheet based on scientific literacy to train argumentation skills on factors that affecting reaction rate. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 11(4), 513-522. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i4.8596
8. Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M. ve Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958

9. Berland, L. K. ve Reisier, B. J. (2011). Clasroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20420
10. Böttcher, F. ve Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in science education: a model-based framework. Science & Education, 20, 103-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9304-5
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, E. Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (26. baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
12. Chakraborty, P. (2024). Computer, computer science, and computational thinking: relationship between the three concepts. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5044787
13. Chen, W., Han, Y., Tan, J., Chai, A., Lyu, Q. ve L. (2024). Exploring students' computer‐supported collaborative argumentation with socio‐scientific issues. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 40(6), 3324-3337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13073
14. Chowning, J. (2022). Science teachers in research labs: expanding conceptions of social dialogic dimensions of scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59, 1388-1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21760
15. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. ve Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis (twelfth). Pearson Education Limited.
16. Cin, M. (2013). Argümantasyon yöntemine dayali kavram karikatürü etkilerinin öğrencilerin kavramsal anlama düzeylerine ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi [Effects of concept cartoon activities based-argumentation method on students' conceptual understanding levels and scientific process skills] (342327) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
17. Demirel, R. (2021). Işık konusunun argümantasyon destekli tasarım temelli fen ve mühendislik uygulamaları ile öğretiminin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin 21. yüzyıl yaşam becerileri ve öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi [The effect of teaching the subject of light with argumentation-supported design based science and engineering practices on the learning outcomes and twenty-first century skills of seventh grade students] (696568) [Doktora tezi, Aksaray Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
18. Demirtaşlı, R. N. (2017). Ölçmede güvenirlik [Reliability in measurement]. In R. N. Demirtaşlı (Ed.), Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education] (4. baskı, ss. 77–100). Anı Yayıncılık. Glassner, A. (2017). Evaluating arguments in instruction: theoretical and practical directions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.013
19. Gouvea, J., Appleby, L., Fu, L. ve Wagh, A. (2022). Motivating and shaping scientific argumentation in lab reports. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-11-0316
20. Gömleksiz, M. N. ve Bulut, İ. (2007). Yeni fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programının uygulamadaki etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the effectiveness of the new science and technology curriculum in practice]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 76-88. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hunefd/issue/7804/102313
21. Gülhan, F. ve Şahin, F. (2018). The effects of STEAM (STEM+ art) activities 7th grade students’ academic achievement, STEAM attitude and scientific creativities. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(3), 1675-1699. https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/5430
22. Gür, E. (2019). Argümantasyon modelinin maddenin değişimi ünitesinin öğretiminde öğrencilerin başarı, tartışmacı tutum ve problem çözme algısına etkisi [The effect of argumentation modal implemented in the unit "change of matter" on students' achievements, argumentative attitude, perceptions of problem solving] (597242) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
23. Hasançebi, B., Terzi, Y. ve Küçük, Z. (2020). Madde güçlük indeksi ve madde ayırt edicilik indeksine dayalı çeldirici analizi [Distractor analysis based on item difficulty index and item discrimination index]. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.615465
24. Hendratmoko, A., Madlazim, M., Widodo, W., Suyono, S. ve Arifin, Z. (2023). Inquiry and debate in science learning: potential strategy for improving students’ scientific argumentation skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 12(1), 114-138. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3152
25. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. ve Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer.
26. Kabatas Memis, E. ve Ergun, Z. (2023). The effect of argumentation-based ınquiry approach on students’ academic achievement and analytical thinking skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(2), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2023.10.2.375
27. Kan, A. (2014). Ölçme aracı geliştirme [Measurement tool development]. In S. Tekindal (Ed.), Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education] (4. baskı, ss. 259–296). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
28. Kapici, H., Akçay, H. ve Koca, E. (2021). Comparison of the quality of written scientific arguments in different laboratory environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-020-10147-W
29. Karahan, E., Bilici, S. C. ve Ünal, A. (2015). Integration of media design processes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.15
30. Karakuş, D. M. ve Yalçın, O. (2016). Fen eğitiminde argümantasyon temelli öğrenmenin akademik başarıya ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi: bir meta-analiz çalışması [The effect of argumentation-based learning on academic achievement and science process skills in science education: a meta-analysis]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.415534
31. Karaman, Z. (2020). DNA ve genetik kod ünitesinin öğretiminde argümantasyon temelli kavram karikatürlerinin akademik başarıya etkisi [The effect of argumentation modal implemented in the unit "change of matter" on students' achievements, argumentative attitude, perceptions of problem solving] (659544) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
32. Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Yayıncılık.
33. Kırbağ Zengin, F., Keçeci, G. ve Kırılmazkaya, G. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin nükleer enerji sosyo-bilimsel konusunu online argümantasyon yöntemi ile öğrenmesi [Primary school students' learning the socio-scientific topic of nuclear energy with online argumentation method]. Education Sciences, 7(2), 647-654. https://doi.org/10.12739/10.12739
34. Kızkapan, O. ve Bektaş, O. (2021). Enhancing seventh-grade students’ academic achievement through epistemologically enriched argumentation instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 43, 1600-1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1923082
35. Kilmen, S. (2017). Madde analizi, madde seçimi ve yorumlanması [Item analysis, item selection and interpretation]. In R. N. Demirtaşlı (Ed.), Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education] (4. baskı, ss. 327–348). Anı Yayıncılık.
36. Kim, B., Kim, H., Cho, J. ve Bae, S. (2015). The effect of the argumentation lessons according to interaction on high school students' academic achievement. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 8(3), 309-317.
37. Kingir, S., Geban, Ö. ve Günel, M. (2013). Using the science writing heuristic approach to enhance student understanding in chemical change and mixture. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1645–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9326-x
38. Konstantinidou, A. ve Macagno, F. (2013). Understanding students’ reasoning: argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education. Sci & Educ, 22, 1069-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9564-3
39. Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A. ve Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
40. Kutluer, M. (2020). Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımının 8. sınıf öğrencilerinde madde döngüleri ve çevre sorunları konusundaki başarılarına ve argümantasyon seviyelerine etkisi [The effect of argumentation based science learning approaches on 8th grade students' success at the subjects of cycles of matter and environmental problems and on their argumentation levels] (620351) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.
41. Lazarou, D., Erduran, S. ve Sutherland, R. (2017). Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: following the object of activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.05.003
42. Lestari, D., Paidi, P. ve Suwarjo, S. (2024). Effect of the inquiry-based nature of science argumentation instructional model in scientific literacy skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(3), 734-744. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21024
43. Li, X., Wang, W. ve Li, Y. (2022). Systematically reviewing the potential of scientific argumentation to promote multidimensional conceptual change in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 44, 1165-1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2070787
44. Lin, Y. (2022). The influence of students’ position on argumentation learning through online and face-to-face environments. International Journal of Science Education, 44, 2632-2657. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2141082
45. Lin, S.S., Mintzes, J.J. (2010). Learning argumentation skills through instruction in socioscientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 993-1017.
46. Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Diez, C. R. ve Tseng, K. H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: an exploratory study among female taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8
47. Martini, M., Widodo, W., Qosyim, A., Mahdiannur, M. ve Jatmiko, B. (2021). Improving undergraduate science education students’ argumentation skills through debates on socioscientific issues. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 10(3), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30050
48. McDonald, C. V. ve Heck, D. (2012). How do we teach argumentation in the new Australian curriculum? secondary science teachers’ experiences in an argumentation-based professional development program. teachingscience, 58(3), 22-28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275276617_How_do_we_teach_argumentation_in_the_new_Australian_Curriculum_Secondary_science_teachers'_experiences_in_an_argumentation-based_professional_development_program/link/554fd85108ae12808b37a8c0/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6Il9kaXJlY3QiLCJwYWdlIjoicHVibGljYXRpb24ifX0
49. Melta, D., Azhar, M., Yohandri, Y., Arsih, F. ve Razak, A. (2024). Argument-driven inquiry learning model to improve students' argumentation skills in science learning: systematic literature review. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 12(1), 5843. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v12i1.5843
50. Memiş, E. ve Karakus, E. (2021). An evaluation of academic achievements through the use of argument and concept maps embedded in argumentation based inquiry. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09679-9
51. Menke, J., Drimalla, J., Welji, S., Alibek, A., Tembe, N., Foutz, T. ve Conner, A. (2024). Support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM: A study of elementary teachers' practice. School Science and Mathematics. 1, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18312
52. Meral, E., Akbaş, Y. ve Şahin Şahin, İ. F. (2019). Implementing argumentation-based science learning approach in social studies: Academic achievement and students’ views. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9(1), 209–245. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.529139.
53. Meral, E., Şahin, İ. F. ve Akbaş, Y. (2021). The effects of argumentation-based teaching approach on students’ critical thinking disposition and argumentation skills: “population in our country unit”. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2021.8.1.195
54. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2013). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. Ankara. https://tegm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_06/09163104_Fen_Bilimleri_Dersi_YYretim_ProgramY_KarYYlaYtYrmalarY.pdf
55. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2024). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Science curriculum]. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/ogretim-programlari/fen-bilimleri-dersi
56. Munyati, L., Rudhumbu, N. ve Sunzuma, G. (2024). Effect of the dialogue and argumentation strategy on the academic achievement of ordinary level students in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(3).19
57. Musripoh, N., Shofiyah, S., Nada, S. ve Kusmawan, U. (2024). Enhancing students' scientific argumentation skills through STEM-based problem based learning. International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 6(1), 1691. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v6i1.1691
58. Neuman, W. L. (2016). Toplumsal araştırma yöntemleri [Social research methods] (Çev. Sedef Özge). Yayın Odası Yay.
59. Newell, G. ve Misar, K. (2022). Argumentative writing as an epistemic practice in middle school science. Journal of Literacy Research, 54, 272–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X221116860
60. Noviyanti, N.I., Mukti, W.R., Yuliskurniawati, I.D., Mahanal, S. ve Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students' scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034
61. Nussbaum, E., Van Winkle, M., Tian, L., Putney, L., Huerta, M., Perera, H., Dove, I., Herrera, A. ve Carroll, K. (2024). Extending science instruction beyond the CER: use of critical questions in the argumentation of middle school science students. Science Education. 108(5), 1420-1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21877
62. Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell‐Richardson, C. ve Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315-347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073
63. Öksüzer, B. ve Pınarbaşı, T. (2024). Investigation of the effect of teaching the unit "Chemistry is everywhere" by argumentation on academic achievement and some variables. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 32(2), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1473672
64. Petritis, S., Kelley, C. ve Talanquer, V. (2021). Exploring the impact of the framing of a laboratory experiment on the nature of student argumentation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22, 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00268B
65. Ping, I., Halim, L. ve Osman, K. (2020). Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach in developing argumentation skills, science process skills and biology understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 19(2), 276-288. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276
66. Sampson, V. ve Clark, D. (2011). A comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 63–97. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ908376
67. Serttaş, F. A. ve Demirkaya, H. (2021). Sosyal bilgilerde argümantasyon tabanlı öğrenme sürecinin öğrenci başarı ve tutumlarına etkisi. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15, 40–54. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1791100
68. Şentürk, Ö. ve Selvi, M. (2023). Argumentation-supported educational comics as a teaching tool for environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 30, 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2227357
69. Taufik, A. N., Rahman, T. ve Solihin, H. (2019). The use of argument based science inquiry learning model by using science writing heuristic approach to build students argument ability in environmental pollution theme. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE), 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022048
70. Tekindal, S. (2022). Nicel, nitel, karma yöntem araştırma desenleri ve istatistik tasarımı ve yürütülmesi - eğitim, psikoloji ve sosyoloji alanları için (2. baskı). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
71. Topçu, M.S. (2008). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning [Doctoral Dissertation, Ortaodoğu Teknik Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
72. Trend, R. (2009). Commentary: fostering students’ argumentation skills in Geoscience Education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 4(57), 224-232. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164787.pdf
73. Ural, E. ve Gençoğlan, D. M. (2020). The effect of argumentation-based science teaching approach on 8th graders’ learning in the subject of acids-bases, their attitudes towards science class and scientific process skills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
74. Uysal, İ. ve Kılıç, A. (2022). Normal dağılım ikilemi. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12(1), 220-248. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.962653
75. Wan, Z., Zhan, Y. ve Zhang, Y. (2023). Positive or negative? the effects of scientific inquiry on science achievement via attitudes toward science. Science Education. 108(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21825
76. Weiss, K. A., McDermott, M. A. ve Hand, B. (2022). Characterising immersive argument-based inquiry learning environments in school-based education: a systematic literature review. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897931
77. Yılmaz Özcan, N. ve Tabak, S. (2019). The effect of argumentation-based social studies teaching on academic achievement, attitude and critical thinking tendencies of students. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12, 213-222. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019257669
78. Yildirim, N. (2022). Argumentation-based teaching in science education: meta-analysis. Education Quarterly Reviews. 5(2), 226-237. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.02.483