From the Critique of the Enlightenment to the New Politics: Some Thoughts on Alasdair MacIntyre and Richard Rorty

Öz

This article deals with two authentic and different thinkers, Alasdair MacIntyre and Richard Rorty who have significant contribution to the field of political philosophy. Essentially these two thinkers have brought about different political and moral arguments. MacIntyre centralizes “virtue” by firmly criticizing liberal politics. Rorty on the other hand centralizes “irony” by inviting us to the recognition of our radical contingency. Within the imagination of Rorty there is no place for a substantive virtue, while he celebrates liberal politics. What makes two thinkers close is their critics against the Enlightenment philosophy. Here in this article together with their political and moral arguments as well as drawing upon their anti-Enlightenment perspectives, the possibilities of a new understanding of politics will be elaborated

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Alasdair MacIntyre,Richard Rorty,Virtue,Irony,Politics,Enlightenment

AYDINLANMA ELEŞTİRİSİNDEN YENİ BİR SİYASETE DOĞRU: ALASDAIR MACINTYRE VE RICHARD RORTY’Yİ BİRLİKTE DÜŞÜNMEK

Öz

Bu makalede siyaset felsefesi alanında önemli katkıları bulunan iki özgün ve farklı düşünür, Alasdair MacIntyre ve Richard Rorty ele alınmaktadır. Bu iki düşünür esasen birbirine benzemez siyasi ve ahlaki argümanlar ortaya koymaktadırlar. MacIntyre “erdem” kavramını merkezileştirerek liberal siyasete eleştirel bir mesafe koymaktadır. Rorty ise “ironi” kavramını merkezileştirerek her birimizin radikal olumsallığımızı idrak etmemizi istemektedir. Rorty’nin tahayyülünde özcü bir erdem arayışına yer yoktur, liberal siyaset ise kutlanmaktadır. Ama iki düşünürü birleştiren Aydınlanma felsefesine yönelttikleri güçlü eleştirilerdir. Bu makalede bu eleştirilerden hareketle ve ortaya koydukları siyasi ve ahlaki argümanlarla birlikte yeni bir siyaset anlayışının imkanları ele alınacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Alasdair MacIntyre,Richard Rorty,Erdem,İroni,Siyaset,Aydınlanma

Kaynakça

1. ANDERSON, Charles W. “Pragmatism and Liberalism, Rationalism and Irrationalism: A Response to Richard Rorty”, Polity, 23(3): 357-37, 1991.
2. BERNSTEIN, Richard J. “Nietzsche or Aristotle?: Reflections on Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue”, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 67(1): 6-29, 1984.
3. BREEN, Keith. “Alasdair MacIntyre and the Hope for a Virtuous Acknowledged Dependence”, Contemporary Political Theory, 1(2): 181-201, 2002.
4. BREEN, Keith. “The State, Compartmentalization and the Turn to Local Community: A Critique of the Political Thought of Alasdair MacIntyre”, The European Legacy, 10(5):485-501, 2005.
5. BUSCEMI, William I. “The Ironic Politics of Richard Rorty”, The Review of Politics, 55(1):141-157, 1993.
6. D’ANDREA, Thomas D. Tradition, Rationality, and Virtue: The Thought of Alasdair MacIntyre, Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2006.
7. HIBBS, Thomas S. “MacIntyre, Aquinas, and Politics”, The Review of Politics, 66 (3):357-383, 2004.
8. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Marxism and Christianity, Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.

9. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. “Why is the Search for the Foundations of Ethics so Frustrating?”, The Hastings Center Report, 9(4):16-22, 1979.
10. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. “Moral Dilemmas”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50 (Supplement): 367-382, 1990a.
11. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. “The Privatization of Good: An Inaugural Lecture”, The Review of Politics, 52(3): 344-377, 1990b.
12. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues?, Chicago: Open Court Publishing, 1999.
13. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Erdem Peşinde: Ahlak Teorisi Üzerine Bir Çalışma, çev.: Muttalip Özcan, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2001.
14. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. “Richard Rorty (1931-2007)”, Common Knowledge, 14(2): 183-192, 2008a.
15. MACINTYRE, Alasdair. “What More Needs to Be Said? A Beginning, Although only a Beginning, at Saying It”, Analyze and Kritik, 30: 261-276, 2008b.
16. MARA, Gerald M. “After Virtue, Autonomy: Jurgen Habermas and Greek Political Theory”, The Journal of Politics, 47(4):1036-1061, 1985.
17. PINKARD, Terry. “MacIntyre’s Critique of Modernity”, Alasdair MacIntyre: Contemporary Philosophy in Focus içinde, der.: Mark C. Murphy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
18. RORTY, Richard. Olumsallık, İroni ve Dayanışma, çev.: Alev Türker, Mehmet Küçük, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 1995.
19. RORTY, Richard. “Justice as a Larger Loyalty”, Ethical Perspectives, 4(2): 139- 151, 1997.
20. RORTY, Richard. “Is ‘Cultural Recognition’ a Useful Concept for Leftist Politics?”, Critical Horizons, 1(1):7-20, 2000.
21. ROTH, Paul A. “Politics and Epistemology: Rorty, MacIntyre, and the end of philosophy”, History of the Human Sciences, 2(2):171-191,1989.
22. SEDGWICK, Peter. “The Ethical Dance: A Review of Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue” Socialist Register, 19(9): 259-267, 1982.
23. TOPPER, Keith. “Richard Rorty, Liberalism and the Politics of Redescription”, American Political Science Review, 89(4): 954-965, 1995.
24. VOLPI, Frederic. “Pragmatism and ‘Compassionate’ Political Change: Some Implications of Richard Rorty’s Anti-Foundationalist Liberalism”, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 28(5): 537-557, 2002.
25. WAIN, Kenneth. “Strong Poets and Utopia: Rorty’s Liberalism, Dewey and Democracy”, Political Studies, XLI: 394-407, 1993.
26. WARTOFSKY, Marx W. “Virtue Lost or Understanding MacIntyre”, Inquiry:An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 27(1-4):235-250, 1984.
27. WILLIAMS, Joan C. “Rorty, Radicalism, Romanticism: The Politics of the Gaze”, Wisconsin Law Review, 131:131-155, 1992.