SİYASİ TAHAYYÜLLER, AHLAKİ NORMLAR VE EDEBİ ANLATILAR: RICHARD RORTY VE MARTHA NUSSBAUM’IN KATKILARI

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 20, 161 - 179, 01.12.2015

Koray Tütüncü , Fatma Tütüncü

Öz

Bu makalenin iki amacı vardır. İlki siyaset ve ahlak felsefesinin edebi anlatılarla buluşma biçimini göstermek. İkincisi böylesi bir buluşmanın liberal demokratik bireylerin siyasi tahayyüllerini geliştirip demokratik siyasi pratiğin canlandırılmasına ilişkin katkılarını göstermek. Bu iki amaç iki önemli liberal filozofun Richard Rorty ve Martha Nussbaum’ın eserleri üzerinden ele alınacaktır. Sonuç itibariyle bu iki filozofun çok farklı felsefi ve siyasi fikirlere sahip olsalar da edebi metinlerin siyasi ve ahlaki önemi konusunda birleştikleri, siyasi ahlaki alanda siyasi kayıtsızlık ve ahlaki soyutluk engelini aşarak adalet ve dayanışma duygularının güçleneceğini vurguladıklarını ortaya koyar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

edebiyat, siyaset, etik, Nussbaum, Rorty, dayanışma, siyasi tahayyül

Political Imaginations, Moral Norms and Literary Narrations: Richard Rorty and Martha Nussbaum’s Contributions

Öz

This article has two aims. First it indicates the way political moral philosophy
meets literary forms. Second, it indicates the way this meeting contributes
to the democratic political practice through cultivating the political imagination
of liberal democratic individuals. These two aims are mediated through
the works of two significant liberal philosophers Richard Rorty and Martha
Nussbaum. Although these philosophers have very different political arguments,
when it comes to the importance of the literary texts, they believe their progressive
role in politico-moral sphere should not be ignored.

Anahtar Kelimeler

literature, politics, ethics, Nussbaum, Rorty, political imagination

Kaynakça

• Brodsky, Garry. "Rorty's interpretation of pragmatism." Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society (1982): 311-337.
• Burns, Anthony (2013), “Nussbaum, Cosmopolitanism and Contemporary Political Problem”, International Journal of Social Economics, 40 (7):648-662.
• Claassen, Rutger ve Marcus Düwell (2013), “The Foundations of Capability Theory: Comparing Nussbaum and Gewirth”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16: 493-510.
• Eskin, Michael (2004), “Introduction: The Double ‘Turn’ to Ethics and Literature?”, Poetics Today, 25 (4):557-572.
• Falomi, Matteo (2014), “Perfectionism and Perceptive Equilibrium: Cavell and Nussbaum on Style and Ethical Method” Journal of Philosophical Research, 39:1-17.
• Feher, Istvan (2013), “Aspects of Rorty’s Legacy: Pragmatism, Hermeneutis, Politics”, Philobiblon, 18 (1):58-67.
• Fesmire, Steven (1999), “Morality as Art: Dewey, Metaphor, and Moral Imagination”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35 (3): 527-550.
• Gasper, Des (2006), “Cosmopolitan Presumptions? On Martha Nussbaum and her Commentators”, Development and Change, 37 (6):1227-1246.
• Goodin, Robert E. ve David Parker (2000), “Symposium on Martha Nussbaum’s Political Philosophy”, Ethics, 1: 5-7.
• Gross, Neil, (2003), “Richard Rorty’s Pragmatism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Ideas”, Theory and Society, 32(1):93-148.
• Grossman, Kathryn M. (1994), Figuring Transcendence in Les Miserables: Hugo’s Romantic Sublime, ARS, New York.
• Harpham, Geoffrey G. (2002), “The Hunger of Martha Nussbaum”, Representations, 77: 52-81.
• Kalin, Jesse (1992), “Knowing Novels: Nussbaum on Fiction and Moral Theory”, Ethics, 103 (1): 135-151.
• Kearney, Richard and James Williams (1996), “Narrative and Ethics”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 70: 29-61.
• Kerr, Eric T. ve J. Adam Carter (2015), “Richard Rorty and Epistemic Normativity”, online baskı, 1-22.
• Kwiek, Marek (1998), “After Philosophy: The Novelist as Cultural Hero of Modernity? On Richard Rorty’s New Pragmatism”, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 92:77-96.
• Landy, Joshua (2004), Philosophy as Fiction: Self, Deception and Knowledge in Proust, Oxford University Press, Oxford ve New York.
• Llanera, Tracy “Morality by Words: Murdoch, Nussbaum, Rorty”, Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture , 2014, 18.1: 1-17
• Leypoldt, Günter (2008), “Richard Rorty’s Literary Criticism and the Poetics of World-making”, New Literary History, 39(1):145-163.
• Machan, Tibor (1996), “Indefatigable Alchemist: Richard Rorty’s Radical Pragmatism”, The American Scholar, 65 (3):417-424.
• Mahon, Aine (2014), “Style and Philosophy in Martha Nussbaum and Henry James”, Journal of Philosophical Research, 39: 409-420.
• May, Brian (1993), “Neoliberalism in Rorty and Forster”, Twentieth-Century Literature, 39 (2): 185-207.
• Mulhall, Stephen (2008), The Wounded Animal: JM Coetzee and the Difficulty of Reality in Literature and Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Mulhall, Stephen (1994), Stanley Cavell: Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Nussbaum, Martha (2013), The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Nussbaum, Martha (2012), The New Religious Intolerance: Overcoming the Politics of Fear in an Anxious Age, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Nussbaum, Martha (2010), “Perceptive Equilibrium: Literary Theory and Ethical Theory”, Hagberg, Garry L. and Walter Jost (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature, Blackwell Publishing.
• Nussbaum, Martha (2009), Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Nussbaum, Martha (2003), Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Nussbaum, Martha (2001), The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1999), Sex and Social Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford ve New York.
• Nussbaum, C. Martha (1995a), Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life, Beacon, Boston.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1995b), “Poets as Judges: Judicial Rhetoric and the Literary Imagination”, The University of Chicago Law Review, 62(4): 1477-1519.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1995c), “The Window: Knowledge of Other Minds in Virginia Woolf’s “To the Lighthouse”, New Literary History, 26 (4): 731-753.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1992), “Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defence of Aristotelian Essentialism”, Political Theory, 20(2): 202-246.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1991), “The Literary Imagination in Public Life”, New Literary History, 22:877-910.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1990) Love's knowledge: essays on philosophy and literature, New York: Oxford University Press
• Nussbaum, Martha (1989), “Reading for Life”,Yale Journal of Law and Humanities, 1 (1):165-180.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1988), “Narrative Emotions: Beckett’s Genealogy of Love”, Ethics, 98 (2): 225-254.
• Nussbaum, Martha (1983), “Flawed Crystals: James’s The Golden Bowl and Literature as Moral Philosophy”, New Literary History, 15 (1):25-50.
• Outka, Gene ve Reeder, John P. (ed.) (1992), Prospects for a Common Morality, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Raeber, Michael I. (2013), “The Art of Democracy—Art as a Tool for Developing Democratic Citizenship and Stimulating Public Debate: A Rortyan-Deweyan Account”, Humanities, 2: 176-192.
• Rigsbee, David (2008), “Rorty from a Poet’s View”, New Literary History, 39 (1):141-143.
• Robbins, Bruce (2011), “Is Literature a Secular Concept? Three Earthquakes”, Modern Language Quarterly, 72 (3):293-317.
• Rorty, Richard (2008), “Texts and Lumps”, New Literary History, 39 (1):53-68.
• Rorty, Richard (2001), “Redemption from Egotism: James and Proust as Spiritual Exercises”, Telos, 3(3): 243-263.
• Rorty, Richard (1995), Olumsallık, İroni ve Dayanışma, Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
• Rorty, Richard (1992), “The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy”, Outka, Gene ve Reeder, John P. (ed.) (1992), Prospects for a Common Morality içinde, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Tartaglia, James (2010), “Did Rorty’s Pragmatism Have Foundations?”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 18 (5): 607-627.
• Tütüncü, Koray (2013), “Zalimliği Hoşgörmemek: Judith Shklar’ın Siyasi Liberalizmini Yeniden Düşünmek”, Doğu Batı, 66:103-119.
• Worth, Sarah E. (2008), “Storytelling and Narrative Knowing: An Examination of the Epistemic Benefits of Well-Told Stories”, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 42 (3): 42-56.