"İnanç Hikâyeleri": Unutulmuş Tür

Öz

Gillian Bennett, (1989). “Belief Stories”: The Forgotten Genre, Western Folklore, c. 48, no. 4. s. 289-311 kaynağından tercüme edilmiştir ve kaynak makalede özet bulunmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• efsane,halk inancı,inanç efsanesi,memorat,inanç hikayesi,inanç hikayeleri,efsaneler

"Belief Stories": The Forgotten Genre

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Alver, Brynjulf. 1967. Category and Function. Fabula 9:63-69.
2. Atkinson J. Maxwell and John Heritage (eds.). 1984. Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
3. Bascom, William. 1965. The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives. Journal of American Folklore 78:3-30.
4. Beck, Ervin. 1984. Occ upational Ident it y and Legend Decline: The Meat That Never Spoils. In Perspectives on Contemporary Legend: Proceedings of the Conference on Contemporary Legend, Sheffield, July 1982, ed. Paul Smith, pp. 18-44. Sheffield: CECTAL.
5. Ben Amos, Dan. 1971. Toward a Definition of Folklore in Context. Journal of American Folklore 84:3-15.
6. Bennett, Gillian. 1987. Traditions of Belief- Women and the Supernatural. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
7. Blehr, Otto. 1967. The Analysis of Folk Belief Stories and its Implications for Research on Folk Belief and Folk Prose. Fabula 9:259-263.
8. Brazil, David. 1975. Intonation in Discourse. Birmingham: Birmingham University, English Language Research, Monograph 1.

9. Brunvand, Jan Harold. 1978. The Study of American Folklore: An Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
10. Brunvand, Jan Harold. 1981. The Vanishing Hitchhiker: American Urban Legends and Their Meanings. New York: Norton.
11. Christiansen, Reidar Th. 1958. The Migratory Legends: A Proposed List of Types with a Systematic Catalogue of the Norwegian Variants. Helsinki. FF Communications 175.
12. Dégh, Linda. 1971. The 'Belief Legend' in Modern Society: Form, Function and Relationship to Other Genres. In American Folk Legend: A Symposium, ed. Wayland D. Hand, pp. 55-68. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
13. Dégh, Linda and Andrew Vázsonyi. 1971. Legend and Belief. Genre 4:281-304.
14. Dégh, Linda. 1974. The Memorate and the Proto-Memorate. Journal of American Folklore 87: 225-239.
15. Dömötör, Tekla. 1981. Some Questions Concerning Belief-Legends as a Genre. In Adaptation, Decline and Change in Oral Literature, ed. Lauri Honko and Wilmos Voigt, pp. 11-17. Helsinki: Studia Fennica 26.
16. Dorson, Richard M. 1964. Buying the Wind: Regional Folklore in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Garfinkel, Harold. 1972. Studies in the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. David Sudnow, pp. 1-30. New York: Free Press.
18. Glanvil, Joseph. 1681. Sadducismus Triumphatus. London: Thomas Newcomb.
19. Halpert, Herbert. 1971. Definition and Variation in Folk Legend. In American Folk Legend: A Symposium, ed. Wayland D. Hand, pp. 47-54. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
20. Hand, Wayland D. 1965. Status of European and American Legend Study. Current Anthropology 6(4) :439-46.
21. Honko, Lauri. 1964. Memorates and the Study of Folk Beliefs. Journal of the Folklore Institute 1:15-19.
22. Hufford, David J. 1976. Ambiguity and the Rhetoric of Belief. Keystone Folklore 21: 11-24.
23. Klintberg, Bengtaf. 1989. Do the Legends of Today and Yesterday Belong to the same Genre? Unpublished paper presented at the 9th Congress of the International Society for Folk Narrative Research, Budapest, June 1989.
24. Nicolaisen, W. F. H. 1987. The Linguistic Structure of Legend in Perspectives on Contemporary Legend II, ed. Gillian Bennett, Paul Smith and J. D. A. Widdowson, pp. 61-76. Sheffield: CECTAL/Sheffield Academic Press.
25. Pentikäinen, Juha. 1968. Grenzprobleme zwischen Memorat und Sage. Temenos 3:136-167.
26. Peuckert, Will-Erich. 1961. Handwörterbuch der Sagen. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
27. Ranke, Friedrich. 1925. Grundfragen der Volks-sagenforschung. Niederdeutsche Zeitschrift fur Volkskunde 3: 12-23.
28. Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. 1978. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation. In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. J. N. Schenkein, pp. 7-55. New York: Academic Press.
29. Slotkin, Edgar M. 1988. Legend Genre as a Function of Audience. In Monsters with Iron Teeth: Perspectives on Contemporary Legend III, ed. Gillian Bennett and Paul Smith, pp. 89-111. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
30. Smith, Paul. 1983. The Book of Nasty Legends. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
31. Smith, Paul. 1984. On the Receiving End: When Legend Becomes Rumour. In Perspectives on Contemporary Legend: Proceedings of the Conference on Contemporary Legend, Sheffield. July 1982, ed. Paul Smith, pp. 197-215. Sheffield: CECTAL.
32. Smith, Paul. 1989. Contemporary Legend: A Legendary Genre? In The Questing Beast: Perspectives on Contemporary Legend IV, ed. Gillian Bennett and Paul Smith, pp. 91-102. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
33. Stahl, Sandra K. D. 1977a. The Personal Narrative as Foklore. Journal of the Folklore Institute (14(1-2): 9-30
34. Stahl, Sandra K. D. 1977b. The Oral Personal Narrative in its Generic Context. Fabula 18: 18-39.
35. Sydow, Carl von. 1948. Selected Papers on Folklore. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger.
36. Thoms, William. 1965. Folklore. In The Study of Folklore, ed. Alan Dunden, pp. 4-6. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37. Tillhagen, C. H. 1964. Was ist eine Sage? Eine Definition und ein Vorschlag für ein europaische Sagensystem. In Tagung der Sagenkommission der International Society for Folk-Narrative Research. Budapest 14-16 Oktober 1963. (Budapest: Acta Ethnographica 13), ed. G. Ortutay, pp. 9-17.
38. Toelken, Barre. 1971. Ma'i Joldoshi: Legendary Styles and Navaho Myth. In American Folk Legend: A Symposium, ed. Wayland D. Hand, 203-212. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
39. Tucker, Elizabeth. 1981. Danger and Control in Children's Storytelling. ARV 37: 141-146.
40. Ward, Donald (ed. & trans). 1981. The German Legends of the Brothers Grimm. 2 vols. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.