Belirsizliğin Uluslararası Ticaret Üzerindeki Asimetrik Etkileri: NARDL Modeline Dayalı Ampirik Bir İnceleme

Öz

Belirsizlik, yatırımların ertelenmesine, tasarrufların artmasına, tüketimin azalmasına ve sonuç olarak da uluslararası ticaret hacmini azalmasına ve ekonomik yavaşlamaya yol açmaktadır. Küresel belirsizlik ve uluslararası ticaret arasında asimetrik bir ilişki olduğu kabul edilmektedir. Başka bir ifadeyle, belirsizliklerin artmasının küresel ticaret hacmini azaltması, belirsizliklerin azalmasının ise küresel ticaret hacmini artırması beklenmektedir. Bu durum, pozitif ve negatif şoklara karşı küresel ticaret hacminde oluşacak etkilerin ayrıştırılması gereğini ortaya koyması bakımından önem arz etmektedir. Bu kapsamda çalışmada, 1990:Q1-2022:Q2 döneminde küresel belirsizlik ve uluslararası ticaret arasındaki ilişkinin sırasıyla Dünya Belirsizlik Endeksi (World Uncertanity Index-WUI) ve Baltık Kuru Yük Endeksi (Baltic Dry Index-BDI) serileri üzerinden araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışmada söz konusu seriler arasındaki uzun ve kısa dönemli asimetrik ilişkiler, doğrusal olmayan gecikmesi dağılmış otoregresif model (Non-Linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag-NARDL) yaklaşımıyla incelenmektedir. Çalışmada ulaşılan sonuçlar, inceleme döneminde analize konu olan iki değişken arasında asimetrik bir ilişkinin var olduğunu ve Dünya Belirsizlik Endeksi’nde meydana gelen azalışların Baltık Kuru Yük Endeksi’ni artırıcı etki yarattığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dünya Belirsizlik Endeksi
• Uluslararası Ticaret
• NARDL.

Asymmetric Effects of Uncertanity on International Trade: An Empirical Investigation Based on The NARDL Model

Öz

Uncertainty leads to postponement of investments, increased savings, reduced consumption and, consequently, reduced international trade volume and economic slowdown. It is accepted that there is an asymmetric relationship between global uncertainty and international trade. In other words, an increase in uncertainty is expected to decrease the volume of global trade, while a decrease in uncertainty is expected to increase the volume of global trade. This situation is important in terms of the need to decompose the effects of positive and negative shocks on the volume of global trade. In this context, this study aims to investigate the relationship between global uncertainty and international trade over the period 1990:Q1-2022:Q2 using the World Uncertanity Index (WUI) and Baltic Dry Index (BDI) series, respectively. In the study, the long and short-run asymmetric relationships between these series are analyzed with the Non-Linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) approach. The results of the study show that there is an asymmetric relationship between the two variables analyzed in the analysis period and that decreases in the World Uncertainty Index have an increasing effect on the Baltic Dry Index.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• World Uncertanity Index
• International Trade
• NARDL

Kaynakça

1. Abel, A. B. (1983). Optimal Investment under Uncertainty. American Economic Review, 73(1), 228-233.
2. Abaidoo, R. (2019). Policy Uncertainty and Dynamics of International Trade. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 11(1), 101-120.
3. Açık, A. (2020). The Impact of Uncertainty on International Trade: An Evidence from Container Traffic in Turkish Ports. Journal of Politics Economy and Management, 3(2), 1-10.
4. Açık, A. (2021). The Impact of Global Uncertanity on International Trade: A Research on Maritime Transport. Ş. Karabulut (Ed.), İktisadi, Mali ve Finansal Uygulamaların Ampirik Sonuçları (399-416). Gazi Kitabevi.
5. Ahir, H., Bloom, N. & Furceri, D. (2022). The World Uncertainty Index. NBER Working Paper 29763. NBER: Cambridge, MA, USA.
6. Armelius, H., Belfrage, C. J. & Stenbacka, H. (2014). The Mystery of the Missing World Trade Growth after the Global Financial Crisis. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review, 3, 7-22.
7. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. & Mestre, R. (1998). Error‐Correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single‐Equation Framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
8. Bar-Ilan, A. & Strange, W. C. (1996). Investment Lags. American Economic Review, 86(3), 610-622.

9. BDI. (2022). Baltic Dry Index. https://tr.investing.com/indices/baltic-dry-historical-data. (Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2022).
10. Beckmann, J. & Czudaj, R. (2017). Exchange Rate Expectations and Economic Policy Uncertainty. European Journal of Political Economy, 47, 148-162.
11. Bernanke, B. (1983). Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Cyclical Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 85-106.
12. Bloom, N., Floetotto, M., Jaimovich, N., Saporta-Eksten, I. & Terry, S. J. (2018). Really Uncertain Business Cycles. Econometrica, 86(3), 1031-1065.
13. Brach, M. A. (2003). Real Options in Practice. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14. Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A. & Ruta. M. (2017). Trade Developments in 2016: Policy Uncertainty Weighs on World Trade. Washington, DC: World Bank.
15. Daştan, M. & Karabulut, K. (2022). Effects of Global Economic Policy Uncertainty on Macroeconomic Activity: The Case of Turkey. Trends in Business and Economics, 36(1), 133-142.
16. Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica. Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(4), 1057-1072.
17. Dixit, A. (1989). Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty. The Journal of Political Economy, 97, 620-638.
18. Dixit, A. K. & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
19. Dogah, K. E. (2021). Effect of Trade and Economic Policy Uncertainties on Regional Systemic Risk: Evidence from ASEAN. Economic Modelling, 104, 105625.
20. Engel, C., Mark, N. & West. K. (2007). Exchange Rate Models are Not as Bad as You Think [With Comments and Discussion]. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 22, 381-473.
21. Evenett, S. J. & Fritz, J. (2015). Peak Trade in the Stell Sector. The Global Trade Slowdown: A New Normal?. VoxEU eBook, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
22. Gao, R., Zhao, Y. & Zhang, B. (2023). Baltic Dry Index and Global Economic Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from the Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality Tests. Applied Economics Letters, 30(3), 360-366.
23. Grier, K. B. & Smallwood, A. D. (2013). Exchange Rate Shocks and Trade: A Multivariate GARCH-M Approach. Journal of International Money and Finance, 37, 282-305.
24. Handley, K. (2014). Exporting Under Trade Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Evidence. Journal of International Economics, 94(1), 50-66.
25. Handley, K. & Limao, N. (2015). Trade and Investment Under Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Firm Evidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 189–222.
26. Handley, K. & Limao, N. (2017). Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2731-2783.
27. Hartman, R. (1972). The Effects of Price and Cost Uncertainty on Investment. Journal of Economic Theory, 5(2), 258-266.
28. Hlatshwayo, S. & Saxegaard, M. (2016). The Consequences of Policy Uncertainty: Disconnects and Dilutions in the South African Real Effective Exchange Rate-Export Relationship. IMF Working Paper No. WP/16/13. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
29. Hoekman, B. (2015). The Global Trade Slowdown: A New Normal?. VoxEU eBook, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
30. Imbruno, M. (2019). Importing Under Trade Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(4), 806-826.
31. Jung, J. (2023). Multinational Firms and Economic Integration: The Role of Global Uncertanity. Sustainability, 15(3), 2801.
32. Koru, A. T. (2020). Küresel Ticarette Değişimler ve Devlet. M. Tiryakioğlu (Der.), Devletle Kalkınma Fikret Şenses’e Armağan (55-72). İletişim.
33. Kido, Y. (2016). On the Link between the US Economic Policy Uncertainty and Exchange Rates. Economics Letters, 144, 49-52.
34. Krol, R. (2014). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Exchange Rate Volatility. International Finance, 17, 241-256.
35. Lin, F. & Sim, N. C. S. (2013). Trade, Income and the Baltic Dry Index. European Economic Review, 59, 1-18.
36. Lin, F. & Sim. N. (2014). Baltic Dry Index and the Democratic Window of Opportunity. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42, 143-159.
37. Limao, N. & Maggi, G. (2015). Uncertainty and Trade Agreements. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7(4), 1-42.
38. Matzner, A., Birgit Meyer, B. & Oberhofer, H. (2023). Trade in Times of Uncertainty. CESifo Working Paper, No. 10284.
39. Mayes, D. G. & Viren, M. (2002). Asymmetry and the Problem of Aggregation in the Euro Area. Empirica, 29, 47-73.
40. Novy, D. & Taylor, A. M. (2014). Trade and Uncertainty. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(4), 1-50.
41. Pepur, P., Peronja, I. & Laća, S. (2022). Global Market Factors that Impact Baltic Dry Index. Pomorstvo, 36(2), 242-248.
42. Pesaran, M. H. & Shin, Y. (1998). An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371-413.
43. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
44. Romer, C. D. (1990). The Great Crash and the Onset of the Great Depression. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 597-624.
45. Ruixiang, X., Xiangyun, X. & Yu, S. (2018). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Low Growth of International Trade: An Analysis Based on The Gravity Model. Journal of Finance and Economics, 44(7), 60-72.
46. Sağlam, B. B., Tepe, & Açık, A. (2021). The Impact of Uncertainty on National Port Throughput: Evidence from European Countries. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 9(2), 66-73.
47. Shin, Y., Yu, B. & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in A Nonlinear ARDL Framework. R. C. Sickles & W. C. Horrace (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (281-314). New York, NY: Springer.
48. Sidek, N. Z. M., Kiranantawat, B. & Khaengkhan, M. (2022). The Impact of Uncertainty on Trade: The Case for a Small Port. Economies, 10, 193.
49. Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics (3rd Edition). Routledge.
50. Taglioni, D. & Zavacka, V. (2012). Innocent Bystanders: How Foreign Uncertainty Shocks Harm Exporters. Policy Research Working Paper, 6226. Washington, DC: World Bank.
51. Tam, P. S. (2018). Global Trade Flows and Economic Policy Uncertainty. Applied Economics, 50, 34-35, 3718-3734.
52. UNCTAD. (2022). Review of Maritime Transport. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) Publishing, Geneva. (Erişim Tarihi: 17.10.2022).
53. Wei, Y. (2019). Oil Price Shocks, Economic Policy Uncertainty and China’s Trade: A Quantitative Structural Analysis. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 20-31.
54. WUI. (2022). World Uncertainty Index. https://worlduncertaintyindex.com (Erişim Tarihi: 17.10.2022).
55. Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further Evidence on The Great Crash, The Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(1), 25-44.