Türkiye’de Yolsuzluk ve Hükümet Büyüklüğü Arasındaki İlişkinin Tespiti: Küreselleşme Önemli mi?

Öz

Ekonomik krizler, salgın hastalıklar, çevresel bozulma ve jeopolitik çatışmalar, yıllar içinde kamu maliyesi politikalarında önemli dönüşümlere yol açmıştır. Özellikle refah devletiyle ilişkilendirilen kamu müdahaleciliği anlayışı, birçok ülkede kamu politikalarını belirleyen temel bir unsur haline gelmiştir. Ancak kamu harcamalarındaki sürekli artış, bütçe sürdürülebilirliğini zorlamaktadır. Politik, kurumsal ve küresel faktörlerin kamu harcama düzeyleri üzerindeki belirgin etkisi, etkinlik ile müdahale arasında bir ödünleşimin varlığını ortaya çıkarmıştır. Politik yolsuzluğun varlığında ise bu tür müdahaleler bir gereklilikten ziyade rant arayışına dönüşmekte ve hükümet büyüklüğü verimsiz biçimde artmaktadır. Öte yandan, küreselleşme hem kamu sektörünün büyüklüğü hem de kurumsal yapısı üzerinde önemli etkiler yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de yolsuzluk, küreselleşme ve hükümet büyüklüğü arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanmaktadır. Çalışma, küreselleşmenin yalnızca hükümet büyüklüğünü etkilemediğini, yolsuzluk ile hükümet büyüklüğü arasındaki ilişki üzerinde de etkili olabileceği fikrine dayanmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, 1970–2019 dönemine ait veriler kullanılarak Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) yaklaşımıyla değişkenler arasındaki dinamikler incelenmiştir. Bulgular, yolsuzluğun hükümet büyüklüğünü artırırken küreselleşmenin azalttığını göstermektedir. Dahası, küreselleşme moderatör etki yaratarak yolsuzluk ile hükümet büyüklüğü arasındaki istatistiksel ilişkiyi anlamlı biçimde zayıflatmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hükümet Büyüklüğü
• Yolsuzluk
• Küreselleşme
• ARDL

Exploring the Relationship between Corruption and Government Size in Türkiye: Does Globalization Matter?

Abstract

Economic crises, pandemics, environmental degradation, and geopolitical conflicts have led to major transformations in public finance policies over the years. In particular, government interventionism associated with the welfare state has become a defining element of public policies in many countries. However, the continuous increase in government expenditures has challenged budget sustainability. The significant influence of political, institutional, and global factors on expenditure levels has revealed a trade-off between efficiency and intervention. In the presence of political corruption, such interventions often shift from being a necessity to becoming rent-seeking activities, leading to an inefficient expansion of government size. On the other hand, globalization exerts a substantial impact on both the size and the institutional structure of the public sector. This study focuses on the relationship among corruption, globalization, and government size in Türkiye. It is based on the idea that globalization may affect not only government size directly but also the relationship between corruption and government size. Within this framework, the dynamics among the variables have been examined for the period 1970–2019 using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach. The findings indicate that while corruption increases government size, globalization reduces it significantly. Moreover, globalization has a moderating effect that significantly weakens the statistical relationship between corruption and government size.

Keywords

• Government Size
• Corruption
• Globalization
• ARDL

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 90(1), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.194
2. Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 123(3–4), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-7165-2
3. Akel, V., & Gazel, S. (2014). Döviz kurları ile BIST sanayi endeksi arasındaki eşbütünleşme ilişkisi: Bir ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 23–41.
4. Aktaş, E. E. (2021). Dynamic effects of corruption on general government final consumption expenditure: Evidence from OECD countries. Public Finance Quarterly, 66(4), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_4_6
5. Alam, M. S. (1989). Anatomy of corruption: An approach to the political economy of underdevelopment. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(4), 441–456.
6. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1997). The welfare state and competitiveness. American Economic Review, 87(5), 921–939.
7. Alesina, A., & Wacziarg, R. (1998). Openness, country size, and government. Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00010-3
8. Ali, H. E., & Solarin, S. A. (2020). Military spending, corruption, and the welfare consequences. Defence and Peace Economics, 31(6), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1567181

9. Azpitarte, F. (2011). Can corruption constrain the size of governments? European Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-010-9205-8
10. Balachandrudu, K. (2006). Understanding political corruption. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 67(4), 809–816.
11. Barreto, R. A., & Alm, J. (2003). Corruption, optimal taxation, and growth. Public Finance Review, 31(3), 207–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142103251589
12. Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726
13. Birch, A. H. (1964). Representative and responsible government. London: George Allen & Unwin.
14. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149–163.
15. Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York, NY: Academic Press.
16. Busemeyer, M. R. (2009). From myth to reality? Globalization and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 48(4), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00839.x
17. Çavuşoğlu, A. T., & Teoman, Ö. (2024). Government size and corruption in Turkey. Public Finance Quarterly, 52(6), 910–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421241257596
18. Cengiz, O., & Manga, M. (2021). Küreselleşme ve kamu sektörü istihdamı: Orta gelirli ülkeler üzerine bir inceleme. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 36(3), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.202136302
19. Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028452
20. D’Agostino, G., Dunne, J. P., & Pieroni, L. (2016). Government spending, corruption and economic growth. World Development, 84, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.06.008
21. Dzhumashev, R. (2014). The two-way relationship between government spending and corruption and its effects on economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(2), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12025
22. Enste, D. H., & Heldman, C. (2017). Causes and consequences of corruption: An overview of empirical results (IW-Report No. 2/2017). Cologne: Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW).
23. Epifani, P., & Gancia, G. (2007). On globalization and the growth of governments (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6065). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/publications/dp6065
24. Fairchild, A. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prevention Science, 10(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0109-6
25. Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2008). Foreign investment, international trade and the size and structure of public expenditures. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.06.004
26. Heimberger, P. (2021). Does economic globalization affect government spending? A meta-analysis. Public Choice, 187(3–4), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00784-8
27. Hessami, Z. (2014). Political corruption, public procurement, and budget composition: Theory and evidence from OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 34(C), 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.02.005
28. Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Kaufmann, D. (2010, April 19). Can corruption adversely affect public finances in industrialized countries?. Brookings Institution. Retrieved September 5, 2025 from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/can-corruption-adversely-affect-public-finances-in-industrialized-countries
30. Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00019-2
31. Kim, D.-H., Suen, Y.-B., Lin, S.-C., & Hsieh, J. (2018). Government size, government debt and globalization. Applied Economics, 50(25), 2792–2803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1409418
32. Kimakova, A. (2009). Government size and openness revisited: The case of financial globalization. Kyklos, 62(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00442.x
33. Klitgaard, R. (1998). International cooperation against corruption. Finance & Development, 35(1), 3–6.
34. Lal, D. (2002). The poverty of “development economics” (3rd ed.). London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
35. Liu, C., & Mikesell, J. L. (2014). The impact of public officials’ corruption on the size and allocation of U.S. state spending. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12212
36. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5
37. Niskanen, W. A. Jr. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton.
38. Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2012). Corruption in developing countries. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 450–482. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.450
39. Penn World Table. (2022). Share of government consumption in GDP at current purchasing power parities (PPPs). Groningen Growth and Development Centre. Retrieved August 15, 2025 from https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/
40. Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1995). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
41. Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium (371–413). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
43. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments?. Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/250038
44. Sevüktekin, M., Nargeleçekenler, M., & Giray, F. (2010). A cross-country comparison of corruption and public expenditures: A panel data approach. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(3), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690903304159
45. Swiss Economic Institute (KOF). (2022). KOF Globalisation Index. ETH Zurich. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html
46. Tanzi, V., & Davoodi, H. R. (1997). Corruption, public investment, and growth (IMF Working Paper No. 97/139). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451929515.001
47. The Economist. (2024, September 23). Governments are bigger than ever. They are also more useless: Why voters across the rich world are miserable. The Economist. Retrieved October 7, 2025 from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2024/09/23/governments-are-bigger-than-ever-they-are-also-more-useless
48. Trpeski, P., Merdzan, G., Kozeski, K., & Cvetanoska, M. (2023). Corruption, government spending and economic growth: The case of Central and Eastern Europe. European Business and Technology Conference Proceedings (EBTSF-23), 1–27. University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopje.
49. United Nations. (2023). World public sector report 2023: Transforming institutions to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals after the pandemic. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government. Retrieved September 12, 2025 from https://publicadministration.un.org/en/Research/World-Public-Sector-Reports
50. V-Dem Institute. (2022). Excor: Corruption index. University of Gothenburg. Retrieved October 10, 2025 from https://www.v-dem.net
51. World Bank. (2022a). Gross domestic product (GDP) at market prices (current US$). Retrieved October 10, 2025 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
52. World Bank. (2022b). Inflation, consumer prices (annual %). Retrieved October 10, 2025 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG
53. Xin, X., & Rudel, T. K. (2004). The context for political corruption: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502005.x